Hello Tim,
On 17/08/2010 08:52, Tim's Trees wrote:
Martin,
Thank you for your detailed reply.
I had hoped my site would be a comprehensive list of events within a
certain category.
Let us say Craft Fairs and because of the searching I would provide, a
user could select all Craft Fairs in
I came across the following script, but I can not get it to be
recognised as a microformat, by my browsers Chrome and Firefox, with
the normal microformat extensions.
Other microformats I have tried were recognised.
The offending code is
div class=”vevent” style=”display:none;”
a class=”url”
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Tim's Trees timstr...@googlemail.com wrote:
I came across the following script, but I can not get it to be
recognised as a microformat, by my browsers Chrome and Firefox, with
the normal microformat extensions.
do you have a URL so that others can test it as
Tim,
most user-agent tools ignore hidden elements... So remove the display:
none; and try again. :)
Cheers,
André Luís
On 16 August 2010 14:46, Brian Suda brian.s...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Tim's Trees timstr...@googlemail.com
wrote:
I came across the following
Tim's Trees wrote:
I came across the following script, but I can not get it to be
recognised as a microformat, by my browsers Chrome and Firefox, with
the normal microformat extensions. Other microformats I have tried
were recognised. The offending code is
I was able to get Operator to
Hello Tim,
On 16/08/2010 13:59, Tim's Trees wrote:
I came across the following script, but I can not get it to be
recognised as a microformat, by my browsers Chrome and Firefox, with
the normal microformat extensions.
Other microformats I have tried were recognised.
The offending code is
Thank you all for your full and quick replies. You were right, the
original was a complete mismatch of quotes and once I had fixed those
it displayed in Chrome and Operator:Firefox. I apologise for not
spotting that.
I have noted the urls you have recommended and will investigate those
first in
On 16/08/2010 19:24, Tim's Trees wrote:
Thank you all for your full and quick replies.
You are welcome
You were right, the
original was a complete mismatch of quotes and once I had fixed those
it displayed in Chrome and Operator:Firefox. I apologise for not
spotting that.
:)
I have