On Feb 13, 2007, at 2:38 PM, Scott Reynen wrote:
On Feb 13, 2007, at 12:32 PM, Ryan King wrote:
And if the uid is not an url, then authors can't assert
authority, correct?
I'm not even considering authority for now. We need to just deal
with related hCards first.
I'm no longer clear on
On Feb 10, 2007, at 3:09 AM, Joe Andrieu wrote:
Ryan King wrote:
First off, I'm not saying we should constrain UID to be a
URL, but in
the case that it *is* a URL, we can apply these semantics.
And if the uid is not an url, then authors can't assert authority,
correct?
I'm not even
On Feb 12, 2007, at 6:36 AM, Ryan Cannon wrote:
On Feb 12, 2007, at 8:16 AM, David Janes wrote:
a globally unique identifier corresponding to the individual or
resource associated with the vCard.
(from http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2426.txt)
Is RK's UID
On Feb 11, 2007, at 6:16 PM, Ryan Cannon wrote:
On Feb 10, 2007, at 2:56 PM, Joe Andrieu wrote:
Forcing the religion of uids
should be urls on the rest of the world is not why we are here.
Making it easy for authors to connect their web content and web
apps with the semantic web is. If
On Feb 13, 2007, at 12:32 PM, Ryan King wrote:
And if the uid is not an url, then authors can't assert authority,
correct?
I'm not even considering authority for now. We need to just deal
with related hCards first.
I'm no longer clear on what you're proposing, Ryan. I thought you
were
On 2/11/07, Ryan Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
UID+URL *is* more constraining. Like rel-tag, you're forcing a lot of
assumptions about the documents *surrounding* these URLs--links have
to point somewhere after all.
My UID, if you will, is http://ryancannon.com/. I've established it
across
On Feb 12, 2007, at 8:16 AM, David Janes wrote:
On 2/11/07, Ryan Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
UID+URL *is* more constraining. Like rel-tag, you're forcing a lot of
assumptions about the documents *surrounding* these URLs--links have
to point somewhere after all.
My UID, if you will, is
On 2/12/07, Ryan Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 12, 2007, at 8:16 AM, David Janes wrote:
On 2/11/07, Ryan Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
UID+URL *is* more constraining. Like rel-tag, you're forcing a lot of
assumptions about the documents *surrounding* these URLs--links have
to
On Feb 10, 2007, at 2:56 PM, Joe Andrieu wrote:
Forcing the religion of uids
should be urls on the rest of the world is not why we are here.
Making it easy for authors to connect their web content and web
apps with the semantic web is. If someone else likes uids that
aren't urls, and the
Ryan King wrote:
First off, I'm not saying we should constrain UID to be a
URL, but in
the case that it *is* a URL, we can apply these semantics.
And if the uid is not an url, then authors can't assert authority, correct?
Secondly, UID is supposed to be a globally unique identifier, so
10 matches
Mail list logo
