On 1/1/07, Costello, Roger L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Folks,
I have filled in the hCalendar profile page:
http://microformats.org/wiki/hcalendar-profile
Hopefully I have done it correctly. Please check it for accuracy.
--- that is a good start, have a look at the hCard profile[1] it
On 1/1/07, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 'wiki' page on xFolk:
http://microformats.org/wiki/xFolk
says:
If you need to define tags as part of a more specialised
format, rel=tag is the recommended way to do so, and xFolk,
hReview, hCard and hCalendar
On 1/1/07, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Eran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Suppose Sue publishes a family tree as a series of web pages, one for
each person.
On her own page, she has:
http://example.com/sue.html
Title: Sue Smith
On 1/3/07, Dmitry Baranovskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Link: http://dmitry.baranovskiy.com/work/csc/
--- very cool! i´ll play around with this and see if i can break it,
at first pass everything works great!
two quick suggestions:
1) put all 24 hours in the time drop-down, right now it only
Hi Folks,
In his book, The Wisdom of Crowds, James Suroweicki says that to
effectively harness the collective intelligence of a crowd - such as
the Web - there needs to be the right balance between:
- making individual knowledge globally and collectively useful
- allowing individual
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Brian
Suda [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On 1/1/07, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 'wiki' page on xFolk:
http://microformats.org/wiki/xFolk
says:
If you need to define tags as part of a more specialised
format, rel=tag is the
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Brian
Suda [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Suppose Sue publishes a family tree as a series of web pages, one for
each person.
On her own page, she has:
http://example.com/sue.html
Title: Sue Smith
JaneFred
The FAQ http://microformats.org/wiki/faq is getting long. I propose
splitting it into two or more parts.
Would that be OK with everyone? How should it be done?
It might break some links :-(
--
Andy Mabbett
* Say NO! to compulsory ID Cards: http://www.no2id.net/
*
I don't see any reason for splitting this. What is the problem and
why does it need to be split? How would splitting solve that problem?
It looks great to me as-is.
Ben
On 1/3/07, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The FAQ http://microformats.org/wiki/faq is getting long. I propose
Folks might like to know that dissenting opinion is still being censored
from the 'wiki':
http://microformats.org/wiki?title=rel-tag-issuescurid=1025action=history
--
Andy Mabbett
* Say NO! to compulsory ID Cards: http://www.no2id.net/
* Free Our Data:
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Benjamin
West [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I don't see any reason for splitting this. What is the problem and
why does it need to be split? How would splitting solve that problem?
It looks great to me as-is.
1) please don't top post, per
On 03/01/07, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) The answer to your first two, tautological, questions (and by
implication your last) is contained in my post, Please (re)read it.
I read your email. I don't see your concerns outlined.
I have no problems with how the FAQ currently is.
On 1/3/07 2:53 PM, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Benjamin
West [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I don't see any reason for splitting this. What is the problem and
why does it need to be split? How would splitting solve that problem?
It looks great to me
Do as I say:
http://microformats.org/wiki?title=hcarddiff=0oldid=12098
do not undo editor edits, especially twice or more times, as
that is grounds for being banned
not as I do:
1. http://microformats.org/wiki?title=hcarddiff=12098oldid=12097
2.
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Benjamin
West [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Please don't top post, per
http://microformats.org/mailinglists-policies/
Off topic rants don't belong on the wiki. It's not helpful.
I agree, but since my comments were neither off-topic nor ranting,
that's a straw man
Seeing the tag implementation on Operator has made me question the
existing tagging standard. With wordpress you may get something like
?cat=13 for a tag or something that may not even be the intended tag
at all. After doing some research on the wiki I see that the
rel=tag microformat is based
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Frances Berriman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On 03/01/07, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) The answer to your first two, tautological, questions (and by
implication your last) is contained in my post, Please (re)read it.
I read your email. I don't see your
On 1/3/07 3:08 PM, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do as I say:
http://microformats.org/wiki?title=hcarddiff=0oldid=12098
do not undo editor edits, especially twice or more times, as
Andy, RTFC: ^^
that is grounds for being banned
not as I do:
On 03/01/07, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Frances Berriman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On 03/01/07, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) The answer to your first two, tautological, questions (and by
implication your last) is contained in my post,
On 1/3/07 3:20 PM, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some time ago, I added two informative references:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E.123
http://www.imc.org/pdi/
to the hCard main page:
http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard#Informative_References
Tantek has
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andy Mabbett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
two informative references:
[...]
so I have now removed them:
Apologies; the correct edit was:
http://microformats.org/wiki?title=hcarddiff=12103oldid=121022
Though, bizarrely, Tantek has reverted that.
So, it seems that
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tantek Çelik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
do not undo editor edits, especially twice or more times, as
Andy, RTFC: ^^
I have no idea what RTFC, though if the first three letters mean the
same as in RTFM, kindly moderate your language,
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Nick
Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
When I see a tag
and click on it, I expect the visible content, not what's appended to
the end of a URL. Anyone care to shed some light on this for me?
Yes, it's a potential minefield:
a rel=tag
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tantek Çelik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On 1/3/07 3:02 PM, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Benjamin
West [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Off topic rants don't belong on the wiki. It's not helpful.
I agree, but since my comments
Hi Andy,
On Jan 3, 2007, at 3:38 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
I recommend you voluntarily refrain from emailing microformats
lists for 24
hours at this point. One more meta-discussion email from you
after you have
been asked to stop will be grounds for banning from the lists.
Voluntary
On 1/3/07 3:38 PM, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tantek Çelik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Will Tantek now be banning himself?
No, because Tantek is an editor of the spec (hCard) as noted, Andy is not.
Editor: one ho edits (and, ona Wiki, one who
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Frances
Berriman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I read your email. I don't see your concerns outlined.
Then I suggest that you did not read it well.
Try reading the first sentence again.
getting too long?
Yes.
--
Andy Mabbett
* Say NO! to compulsory
On 1/3/07 3:35 PM, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andy Mabbett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
two informative references:
[...]
so I have now removed them:
Apologies; the correct edit was:
http://microformats.org/wiki?title=hcarddiff=12103oldid=121022
I don't recommend splitting it. I'm not sure what too long means.
My guess is that if you do make such a change, it'll be reverted.
Ben
On 1/3/07, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Frances
Berriman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I read your email. I don't see
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tantek Çelik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On 1/3/07 3:38 PM, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tantek Çelik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Tantek is an editor of the spec (hCard) as noted, Andy is not.
Editor: one ho edits (and, ona
Thanks Brian and Stephanie for your feedback.
I've fixed two issues Brian was pointing to. Initially I added a
little restriction to time range, because if you put two events
(9:00–10:00) and (9:30–9:55) I don't really know which one should go
first. But you are right, I will left it to user to
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bob Jonkman
quoted PJ Doland:
If people have to categorize HOW something might be considered NSFW
(nudity, language, violence, nudity language, etc.) it's going to
make them less likely to use the standard in practice.
That's supposition, presented as fact.
As
On Jan 3, 2007, at 3:10 PM, Nick Peters wrote:
Seeing the tag implementation on Operator has made me question the
existing tagging standard. With wordpress you may get something like
?cat=13 for a tag or something that may not even be the intended tag
at all.
Yes, Wordpress abuses the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tantek Çelik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Though, bizarrely, Tantek has reverted that.
^
Please refrain from making ad-hominem attacks on the mailing list.
You appear not to know what ad hominem means.
I made an editor judgment call
[...]
That is
On 1/3/07 3:45 PM, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tosh. You have only just revered my edit of 19 November:
http://microformats.org/wiki?title=xfolk-faqdiff=10378oldid=10377
and no-one in the community has raised any issue with that in the
intervening period.
Apologies - an
On Jan 3, 2007, at 2:08 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
On:
http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-tag#Abstract
By adding rel=tag to a hyperlink, a page indicates that the
destination of that hyperlink is an author-designated tag (or
keyword/subject) for the current page.
On 1/3/07 5:07 PM, Joe Andrieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tantek Ç elik wrote:
Finally, note that this is yet another meta-discussion email
that you have sent, and thus as promised, absent any
objections from anyone else on the list (or IRC), you will
shortly be banned from the mailing-list
On 1/3/07, Tantek Çelik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/3/07 5:07 PM, Joe Andrieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the record, I do object.
Joe, thanks very much for your input. You are the only person (in email or
IRC) who has objected to banning Andy.
I'm a little late, but for the record,
On 1/3/07 7:11 PM, Christopher St John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/3/07, Tantek Çelik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/3/07 5:07 PM, Joe Andrieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the record, I do object.
Joe, thanks very much for your input. You are the only person (in email or
IRC) who has
On Dec 29, 2006, at 11:54 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Breton
Slivka [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
There's a few rather obvious problems with this idea that I can see.
However, before I point them out, I will note that if the benefits of
such a plan outweigh the
On Jan 3, 2007, at 5:11 PM, Christopher St John wrote:
On 1/3/07, Tantek Çelik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/3/07 5:07 PM, Joe Andrieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the record, I do object.
Joe, thanks very much for your input. You are the only person (in
email or
IRC) who has objected
A small group of like-minded individuals with a common background
who know each other personally is easy to organize. This was that,
but it ain't no more.
I'm not sure how much this applies... the group of administrators is a
world wide group of volunteers. Although this hasn't always been
On Jan 3, 2007, at 8:26 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote:
The big difference here (in contrast to Usenet, other lists etc.)
is that
this community has retained a remarkably positive and inviting tone of
discussion for quite a long time, much much more so than those
other forums,
and those involved
43 matches
Mail list logo
