On Jul 13, 2007, at 8:30 AM, Rob Manson wrote:
Hi all,
I had a chat with Tantek on irc about the current limitations when
using
forms with hCard etc.
I'd appreciate any help anyone can provide in this area as this has a
reasonable impact on some development I'm currently working on.
On Jul 25, 2007, at 4:52 PM, Paul Wilkins wrote:
I think you've just invented that statistic. Care to prove me wrong?
In the interest of public spirit, I use ctrl-s to save.
As do I, since I discovered on the page in question that it was an
option. But it seems we're just debating for
On Jul 25, 2007, at 5:21 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
There are no editors, with additional rights over other users, on
Wikipedia.
I'm having trouble reconciling that statement with what appears to be
your Wikipedia page claiming the exact opposite:
On Jul 31, 2007, at 6:11 PM, Karl Dubost wrote:
Actually... AFAIK... your birthday and your date of birth are the
same
thing. (And they both have a year.)
Not in Korea at least.
I was writing this in the commuting train without internet access.
East Asian age reckoning is a concept
Sincerely,
Scott Reynen
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
On Aug 5, 2007, at 1:39 PM, Joe Andrieu wrote:
Scott,
Could you to provide the evidence that was used to conclude that
Andy failed to adhere to the be nice guideline /after/ the
private warning?
I know nothing more about what Andy did than you do. I won't speak
for the admins in
On Aug 7, 2007, at 2:45 AM, Peter Bremer wrote:
The site is dynamic and on the intranet, so difficult to show
something, but the basic layout of the table is thus:
| Event 1 | 01-01-2007 | example.org/event1 | Organiser 1 |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Event 2 | 02-02-2007 | example.org/event2 |
On Aug 7, 2007, at 9:19 AM, Paul Kinlan wrote:
I am thinking of using META description for now (but I am not sure
of the quality of data in the tag), however, I have been looking at
micro-summary (http://microformats.org/wiki/microsummary-
brainstorming).
Is this topic still alive? Has
On Aug 7, 2007, at 2:22 PM, Paul Kinlan wrote:
On a side note, does any one have any information quantites of
useage of things like hAtom.
The default theme on Blogger uses hAtom, so whatever the number is,
it's growing by tens (if not hundreds) of thousands of blogs every day.
Peace,
On Aug 11, 2007, at 5:24 AM, James O'Donnell wrote:
Hello,
Apologies if this is not the correct forum to ask this question.
We've set up a Movable Type blog at
http://www.nmm.ac.uk/rog and I'm experimenting with tagging blog
entries like so:
a rel=tag
On Aug 11, 2007, at 10:23 AM, James O'Donnell wrote:
The link needs to go to the MT search script, and pass the tag name
and blog ID, since we run multiple blogs. But I think that can be
done with mod-rewrite.
Would http://www.nmm.ac.uk/rog/tag/meteors/; cause any problems to
a parser?
On Aug 17, 2007, at 6:41 AM, Toby A Inkster wrote:
Really, microformats.org needs to bless one of the many
replacements for the abbr-design-pattern. I'm sure I'm not the
only one who's waiting for a clear direction before proceeding.
In the microformats process, solutions as blessed by
On Aug 22, 2007, at 1:00 PM, Michael MD wrote:
I think he might have meant something more like a way to describe
widgets or
small applications.
Indeed, if you look at the Upcoming page Chris pointed to, he left a
comment there pointing to the pre-iPhone widget microformat work:
On Aug 28, 2007, at 6:33 AM, Alex Faaborg wrote:
Yes, while previous Firefox designs have focused on the browser
injecting UI into the page, this discussion is about how the
content creator should provide links and buttons for acting on
microformatted content.
It seems you'll still need
On Aug 29, 2007, at 10:26 AM, Brian Suda wrote:
If an imaginary value of present were invented, then parsers would
probably do the same thing can take the current date() and save that
out to the file, otherwise DTEND:present wouldn't be a valid .ics
file.
this will take some thought. At the
On Aug 31, 2007, at 8:18 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
I'd like to do some advocacy work with the Internet Movie Database,
but
they don't advertise any useful contacts on their website. Does anyone
have one?
I find IMDB one of the most frustrating sites on the web. They have
so much great data
On Sep 4, 2007, at 12:26 PM, Charles Iliya Krempeaux wrote:
tr class=vcard geo
or is that naughty? :-)
I actually do stuff like that all the time... for things like
signatures... it makes it very compact... for example...
-- a class=vcard fn n url href=http://changelog.ca/;Charles Iliya
On Sep 5, 2007, at 2:34 PM, Ben Ward wrote:
Syntactically the URI would still work, however, semantically it
would have
been broken, that is, it is bad to not only change URIs so that
they 404 and
just plain don't work, but it is also bad to change the *meaning*
of that
URI.
As long as
On Sep 10, 2007, at 10:39 AM, David Janes wrote:
The first suggests a must and the second a should. It's just a bit
confusing, so any help to iron that out would be fabulous. :)
See the last line of that section [1]; I think this will resolve the
issue for you.
As at least two people
On Sep 10, 2007, at 2:17 PM, Matt Warnock wrote:
I's it possible to have 2 hCards on one page?
Yes, by default they'll all be exported to a single .vcf file, as
they are here:
http://feeds.technorati.com/contacts/http://
exhale.daisyinteractive.com/locations/
But you can also specify
On Sep 12, 2007, at 10:43 PM, Matt Warnock wrote:
I am giving the first element (cell) of the row time th an id, then
referencing that id in the following td classes through the headers
attribute.
I'm using the clues in the Allsopp book of naming the axis
attribute the same as the th
On Sep 14, 2007, at 2:02 AM, Jens Meiert wrote:
The microformats community could happily go on with creating yet
more names if these were at least neutralized with a prefix or
suffix or whatever, while about everyone might change or extend
sites just as he or she wants, not being forced to
On Sep 17, 2007, at 3:54 PM, Ben Ward wrote:
I don't know the answer to this particular problem, but:
On 17 Sep 2007, at 22:23, Scott Reynen wrote:
abbr class=type title=PGPpublic key/abbr
‘PGP’ is not an abbreviation of ‘public key’.
abbr works the other way; the above suggests
On Sep 21, 2007, at 5:38 PM, Guillaume Lebleu wrote:
Duncan Cragg wrote:
- I would like to drop in a field for the ticker code:
NASDAQ:MSFT, etc; also the SEDOL and ISIN codes.
I would think that stock tickers / security identifiers deserve a
microformat of their own before we can think of
On Sep 22, 2007, at 12:32 PM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
address class=vcard
span class=fnJohn Doe/spanbr
E-mail: a class=email href=mailto:John%20Doe%
[EMAIL PROTECTED]span
class=value[EMAIL PROTECTED]/span/a
/address
Shouldn't just the value be used as an e-mail address value this
On Sep 27, 2007, at 1:15 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
How is a parser to deal with a child-less adr?
I've handled child-less adr by reading the textual content of the
element as a full unstructured address. This isn't useful for
conversion to vCard, but it's still useful semantics in other
On Oct 10, 2007, at 4:03 AM, Duncan Cragg wrote:
The microformats community works on the basis of having the data
embedded into the HTML. The RDF/SemWeb approach looks to have a
consistent data model, and then having as many representations as
you
like of that data model. The data model for
On Oct 10, 2007, at 9:43 AM, Duncan Cragg wrote:
Now, you made a point of stating that it's only for developers and
being merely syntax and not semantics.
Why is that? If you define hCard in JSON and I get one, I'll know it's
an hCard, surely?
You will, but only because you already know what
On Oct 13, 2007, at 3:36 AM, Tom Morris wrote:
Publishing microformats as
RDFa seems like a terrific way to ensure that only RDFa tools can
read them.
There is no technical reason RDF couldn't be converted into
microformats just as easily as microformats are converted into RDF.
Let's
On Oct 17, 2007, at 11:53 AM, LucaP wrote:
I cannot find any previous discussion about such a fundamental
data structure
That would make it new, so please take it to the -new list instead of
this -discuss list:
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
Peace,
Scott
On Nov 26, 2007, at 3:57 PM, ken wrote:
The idea of a semantic web is absolutely cool and I'm really looking
forward to the day when we have some standards agreed upon and we can
all start implementing them.
I think we're long past that day, not just with microformats but also
with RDF
On Dec 3, 2007, at 11:18 AM, Ben Ward wrote:
abbr class=geo point-20
title=+22.31119;+89.86145
Rayenda, Bangladesh
/abbr
There's no way that ‘+22.31119;+89.86145’ is an abbreviation of
‘Rayenda, Bangladesh’.
Without commenting
On Dec 6, 2007, at 11:26 AM, Paul Wilkins wrote:
HTML 5 says the following
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-cite
HTML 5 isn't necessarily a definitive source on semantics in HTML 4
and XHTML, but in this case, I think it's the reasonable elaboration
on what little
On Dec 14, 2007, at 12:21 PM, Ben Ward wrote:
I am going to ask that we better define the problem. That we follow
up the demand for a better pattern (regardless of whether your
personal motivation is following the spec or assistive technology).
I'd like to ask that people stop jumping
On Dec 15, 2007, at 3:08 AM, Ciaran McNulty wrote:
It seems to me 3:23 is already
machine-readable
Does 3:23 mean 3 mins 23 seconds, or 3 hours 23 mins, or 23 minutes
past three o'clock? ;-)
My point is it's not productive to ask such questions outside the
context of the actual problem,
On Jan 7, 2008, at 1:31 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
@class wasn't used because they didn't want to stomp on the
Microformats
community's implementation, among other reasons. In certain RDFa
implementations, bad things happened when you mixed RDFa and
Microformats on the same page.
Can you maybe
On Feb 7, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Manu Sporny wrote:
It invalidates the need for mfo in hcard, doesn't it?
If it were applied to the rest of Microformats, it would invalidate
the
need for mfo entirely.
Not exactly. As hober said in IRC:
# [02:17:12] hober just to quickly clarify, the
On Feb 7, 2008, at 4:59 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
If it's just a generic contact that you know nothing about, I'd say
just
use fn, as adding org is potentially incorrect information. But if
you
know it's a music act, I think it makes sense to consider even an
individual performer's name to be
On Feb 7, 2008, at 3:03 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
On the topic of whether this should have had wider discussion, I
thought it was well established long ago that the properties of an
AGENT hCard are not inherited by the container hCard, so I don't
see anything really changing here.
The
On Feb 7, 2008, at 1:47 PM, Brandon Richards wrote:
For portability sake, how do
the other pages of content get linked or associated without having to
actually include all of the content within one page?
rel=next and rel=prev [1] can be used to describe these kind of
relationships between
On Feb 7, 2008, at 5:11 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
added:
Similarly, parsers should treat nested [[hCalendar]],
[[hReview]], [[hResume]] [[xFolk]] in the same way, properties
inside them {{must}} only apply to the nested microformat, not
to the containing microformat.
On Feb 11, 2008, at 7:33 AM, Rickards, Julian (NDM) wrote:
I fixed the page and now it is valid. However, that doesn't change the
result. Having done a bit of testing, it appears that in the URI link
where I use a fragment identifier (which would normally use the # as
in
On Feb 19, 2008, at 12:22 PM, gareth rushgrove wrote:
Their seems to be a little interest in the idea anyhow.
On 2/19/08, John Panzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thom Shannon wrote:
Standardisation might be interesting here as well. For instance
back
to blog comments. Comments from within
On Feb 25, 2008, at 10:03 AM, Toby A Inkster wrote:
So as not to be perceived as one of those people who complains about
things rather than doing something to correct them, I've started
mapping
out VTODO, VALARM, VFREEBUSY and the remaining parts of VEVENT on a
sub-
page of my user page
On Feb 25, 2008, at 2:54 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
We're intentionally trying to minimize use of User: pages to
emphasize community rather than personal projects.
We are? That's the first time I've seen that suggested, in over two
years here.
Yeah, I probably didn't state that very well.
On Mar 5, 2008, at 4:57 AM, Toby A Inkster wrote:
For example, the following:
span title=Monday 3 March 2008 (data:2008-03-03)
class=dtstartstarted two days ago/span
Is perfectly accessible in all tested screen readers (the read the
human-
readable started two days ago) and
On Mar 7, 2008, at 9:16 AM, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
Hi Folks,
What social networking sites use XFN to express relationship
information?
In particular, I am seeking sites that let me see and scrape the XFN
data. That is, I want to be able to do View Page Source and see the
rel=... on the
On Mar 8, 2008, at 2:11 AM, Lorenzo De Tomasi wrote:
But now the question is which is the correct ISO 8601 timestamp?
2008-01-29T11:42:00+01:00 or 2008-01-29T11:42:00+0100?
Both are valid per ISO 8601. Here's the full spec:
On Mar 11, 2008, at 8:10 AM, Christopher St John wrote:
Sarcastic answers may be appropriate for individuals (or not) but
they certainly are not appropriate for people acting in an official
capacity on the list.
Drew can clarify whether he was being sarcastic, but I'd like to
clarify
On Mar 8, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
I just got back from vacation, otherwise this would have gone out
sooner.
I'm likewise back from vacation now, so just now responding to this.
It has come to my attention that Andy Mabbett has been banned by
the admins for 18 months[1].
This
On Mar 11, 2008, at 9:14 AM, David Meade wrote:
If those of us who are concerned about this being implemented
incorrectly are wrong, please let me know and I'll forward that
education on to the mailing lists that have been discussing this ...
but if we're correct in our belief that WordPress
On Mar 17, 2008, at 1:14 PM, Igor Wawrzyniak wrote:
Best to have Tantek, Eric or one of the other Technorati alumni
answer that, since they were here in the very beginning.
Technorati was involved from the beginning? I noticed they use
microformats.
Technorati's developer wiki is
On Mar 17, 2008, at 4:27 PM, John Allsopp wrote:
Even in the past 10 days, only a small minority of people have
shown an inclination to engage in this meta-discussion.
But I'd suggest that lack of piping up on this form is not entirely
evidence that people don't care.
It's important (for
On Mar 19, 2008, at 6:36 AM, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
1. If XFN is used on a web page then that web page MUST contain an
hCard of the person that represents the source of the relationship.
2. There MUST be a mechanism that connects the XFN to the hCard that
represents the source individual.
On Mar 19, 2008, at 10:02 AM, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
1. All people in an XFNetwork MUST be identified via
hCard somewhere within the network.
How about allowing the parties involved in an XFN-relationship be
identified by either hCard or a FOAF document or an OpenID? (I must
confess
On Mar 20, 2008, at 9:27 AM, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
The purpose of a representative hCard is to identify itself as Hey,
look at me, I am the author of this page.
I think it's more Hey, look at me, I am the *subject* of this page.
The author is identified by address.
A PLEA TO
On Apr 4, 2008, at 12:34 PM, Sarven Capadisli wrote:
all grab the @alt value for entry-title. Is this documented anywhere
for hAtom parsing?
It's documented here:
http://microformats.org/wiki/parsing
I just added a link to that from here:
http://microformats.org/wiki/hatom-parsing
It may
Sorry for not noticing this earlier, but this thread really belongs on
the -dev list (to keep the -discuss list relevant for those not doing
development). Please direct future replies to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(and join first if you're doing development and not already on the
list).
On Apr 30, 2008, at 4:08 PM, Suzy Loew wrote:
I've been tasked with converting some of our content with
microformats. I've already successfully worked with hCard to my
satisfaction, but now I'm attempting a hAtom entry. I'm still new to
this, but I would like your opinion of the following
On May 6, 2008, at 2:24 PM, Gordon Oheim wrote:
Hi all,
I was just reading a blog about bad use of Photoshop that linked to
not-safe-for-work sites every now and then. Made me wonder if we
could use a microformat that indicates non-suitable for work links
and the likes? I could imagine a
On May 7, 2008, at 5:35 PM, Dylan Wilbanks wrote:
Hi --
I'm new to the list, so if the following issue has been already been
addressed, my apologies.
I'm converting our homegrown events calendar display UI from its
2001-era HTML to microformatted XHTML. The problem I've run into is
On [May 22], at [ May 22] 7:46 , Martin McEvoy wrote:
Hmm It seems to me that the microformats community seems to find it
difficult to resolve the abbr design issue[1], its been over a year
now?
This is difficult to solve because we lack the resources to do testing
with screen reader
On [Jun 16], at [ Jun 16] 11:01 , Paul Shen wrote:
Hey all,
I'm new to this community but I'd like to contribute to the
advancements of a semantic web. Please don't bash on any of my noob
mistakes :)
I was browsing the to do list and stumbled across the microformat
playground idea
On [Jun 20], at [ Jun 20] 7:17 , rob smith wrote:
Hello,
If I am right, one of the primary objectives of using microformats
is to be able to retrieve the desired information from web pages
around the world easily and reliably.
In connection with this, I'd like to know which all search
On the abbr-design-pattern page, markup rejections section [1] is the
following text:
OBJECT with param value. (requires significant extra markup and CSS
in order to *behave* correctly)
Can anyone provide more detail about this parenthetical rejection
explanation? I vaguely recall
On [Jun 28], at [ Jun 28] 11:09 , Ben Ward wrote:
On 28 Jun 2008, at 17:03, Ed Lucas wrote:
George Brocklehurst wrote:
Is it worth revisiting Tantek's original suggestion of using the
object element to represent dates? [1]
The idea was to do something like this:
object
On [Jun 30], at [ Jun 30] 11:11 , Jeremy Keith wrote:
I disagree. I think that writing:
abbr title=14:005 minutes ago/abbr
...clarifies the abbreviated form.
I think the problem may be clarified by actually writing those out in
a sentence:
I arrived at work 5 minutes ago.
I arrived at
On [Jun 30], at [ Jun 30] 4:29 , Jeremy Keith wrote:
There are a few cases where we are specifying content syntax for
publishers, e.g. phone type in hCard. And these are all similarly
problematic. I think we might get closer to solving these problems
by considering them not in terms of
On [Jun 30], at [ Jun 30] 11:12 , Breton Slivka wrote:
I think you'll find that metadata of any kind is a comprimise of the
microformats core principles
What I mean by metadata is information about content, which already
makes up the bulk of microformats, e.g. class names, rel values, tag
On [Jul 2], at [ Jul 2] 4:37 , Bob Jonkman wrote:
The difference with ISO dates is we've previously defined them as
content; I'm suggesting that's a mistaken definition, as these dates
don't function as content in our reference standard iCalendar.
I disagree. In an appointment, the date IS
On [Jul 14], at [ Jul 14] 6:39 , Breton Slivka wrote:
To someone with a different calendar, ISO8601 may make just
as much sense as July 1st, 2007. that is: very little.
I'm assuming by different calendar, you mean non-Gregorian? If so,
what are the use cases for non-Gregorian dates in
On [Jul 14], at [ Jul 14] 5:57 , John Allsopp wrote:
I recently learnt that in Japan there are two year numbering
systems. The western style one is more common, but it far from
uncommon to use the traditional Japanese year numbering system as
well.
Do you have any examples of the
On [Jul 15], at [ Jul 15] 5:51 , Ciaran McNulty wrote:
Another example of non-Gregorian calendaring is Saudi Arabia, where
the arabic calendar is in common usage:
http://www.sama.gov.sa/
Thanks Karl and Ciaran. I've added these examples to the wiki here:
On [Aug 22], at [ Aug 22] 7:01 , Martin McEvoy wrote:
I am having problems with the actual definition of license
I am English I spell it licence
For better or worse, we're using American English spelling.
I would write,
a rel=licence href=http://somewhere.com/licence;Read My
Licence/a
On [Aug 25], at [ Aug 25] 8:47 , Manu Sporny wrote:
There have been several threads discussing Microformats, RDFa and
HTML5
that are occurring on the WHATWG mailing list. The discussion
relates to
whether or not HTML5 should depend on the Microformats community to
solve HTML5's semantic
On [Aug 28], at [ Aug 28] 4:23 , Tantek Celik wrote:
I would be very concerned that the microformats principles would be
compromised by any such efforts as Manu suggests, and efficiency of
parsing/parsers and other points listed are not worth compromising
the principles.
That, or we'd
On [Sep 2], at [ Sep 2] 6:45 , Martin McEvoy wrote:
I think relative urls on the whole are bad form because many
authors forget to set the base url for their relative paths...
There's nothing wrong with that. See:
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1808.html
3.3. Base URL from the Retrieval
On [Sep 27], at [ Sep 27] 4:27 , Toby A Inkster wrote:
If any style sheet language can be used, why don't microformats
create
their own style language eg:
span class=bday style=bday.1968-01-044th Jan, 1968/span
By definition, the contents of the style attribute must be in the
default
On [Nov 7], at [ Nov 7] 8:09 , Rob Crowther wrote:
Thus, this will parse:
span class=dtstartspan class=value title=2008-11-04/
span4th
November/span
But this will fail:
span class=dtstartOn 4th November 2008 Barack Obama was elected
the
first African American president of the United
On [Nov 7], at [ Nov 7] 12:40 , Rob Crowther wrote:
2008/11/7 Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Not as a valid dtstart value, no. The title attribute is only
parsed when
the value element is empty, so that would parse with an invalid
dtstart
value containing the entire sentence. See
On [Nov 18], at [ Nov 18] 6:21 , Jason Karns wrote:
I agree with Martin that it's sad we are unable to take advantage of
this attribute where possible.
Fortunately, this isn't really a problem in practice. One of the
notable characteristics of rev is that it carries the same meaning as
On [Nov 22], at [ Nov 22] 7:09 , Samuel Richter wrote:
It seems to me that both hAtom and hDOAP present limitations of a sort
when it comes to providing feeds for software updates. On the one
hand with hAtom, you have a generic microformat with no way of
identifying any content beyond it
On [Dec 15], at [ Dec 15] 12:54 , Martin McEvoy wrote:
To back up my argument, I'll cite the vCard spec (RFC 2426) which
defines the purpose of UID as:
To specify a value that represents a globally unique
identifier corresponding to the individual or resource
associated with the vCard.
On [Dec 17], at [ Dec 17] 4:09 , adrian skardhamar wrote:
img src=http://someurl/photo_of_cow.jpg; rel=http://someurl/meta_data_about_photo_of_cow
what is actually held at http://someurl/meta_data_about_photo_of_cow
is still up for debate.
If you want to keep this link hidden from
On [Dec 17], at [ Dec 17] 4:13 , Martin McEvoy wrote:
The above does not make any sense (to me), UID in microformats 99%
of the time is hooked on the URL value, URL's are *not* globally
unique to people just unique to the domain
That may be true in some cases, but it's certainly not
On [Dec 17], at [ Dec 17] 12:52 , Martin McEvoy wrote:
Here's a URL that is unique to me:
http://microformats.org/wiki/User:ScottReynen
Those URLs are not OpenIDs, but are usable as UIDs. It's not
really difficult to find such URLs; almost every site you use with
an account creates a URL
On May 25, 2009, at 11:47 AM, Chris Cressman wrote:
I'd like to mark up the example below with a dtstart and dtend. I've
done this in the past using the abbr design pattern. I'd like to use
the value class pattern instead. However, I haven't been able to find
any examples of the value class
On Aug 3, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Bradley Ramos wrote:
I am having a little trouble semantically setting up some hCard
data. I am writing contact information for the official website of
the Department of Transportation Services, which is part of the City
County of Honolulu. Therefore, ideally I
On Aug 12, 2009, at 12:47 PM, Aaron wrote:
We
have a page that has all of the event information scattered
throughout the
page and was wondering if we used a single span or div ID to enclose
each
individual section would this information still be read as a single
event?
As Chris said,
On Sep 22, 2009, at 5:56 PM, Karsten Januszewski wrote:
I was just on MySpace and noticed that /some/ profile pages are now
formatted using hCard - for example: http://www.myspace.com/
irhetoric. It appears that newly created MySpace profile pages are
using Microformats now. However, lots
On Jul 13, 2010, at 8:14 PM, Oli Studholme wrote:
Suggested edit on
http://microformats.org/wiki/microdata#microdata_vCard_vocabulary
Avoid the microdata vCard vocabulary as in many ways it is an
out-of-date fork/snapshot of hCard, even though portions of it appear
to based directly on the
On Jul 14, 2010, at 8:30 PM, Angelo Gladding wrote:
I am currently writing a universal parser [1].
Hi Angelo,
Sounds like an ambitious project and I'd like to have more to contribute, but
all I have now is a suggestion to move this discussion to the microformats-dev
list, which is focused on
On Jul 18, 2010, at 6:38 AM, Oli Studholme wrote:
I'd suggest removing the entire vocabulary-specific section altogether. As
mentioned in the same page, microdata is aiming to solve a different problem
than microformats, so it's misleading to suggest specific vocabularies are
actually
On Jul 19, 2010, at 2:31 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
Out of curiosity what do you perceive are the different problems that
microformats and microdata are trying to solve?
Microformats aim to solve a specific problem. Microdata aims to be
compatible with RDF, which demands more generic
On Jul 22, 2010, at 1:51 PM, Angelo Gladding wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 7:20 AM, Oli Studholme
microformats@boblet.net wrote:
宮野衆 is the Japanese name Miyano (宮野) Shu (衆) (well, probably — there
may be other readings for 衆). As Philip correctly guesses, Miyano is
the family name, so
301 - 395 of 395 matches
Mail list logo
