Ryan Cannon wrote:
... I till prefer ?, + and *, as I have to continually move my
eye between the two charts in order to remember which is which. I would
remember ?, + and *.
--- while i agree, i am trying to strike a happy balance between those
of use who KNOW the REGEX syntax and those who
With all the movement around the cheatsheets on the wiki, i have taken
the opportunity to correct a few errors on my PDF. I have also worked
in a few suggestions from folks, such as a new labeling scheme for the
Matrix of what properties are available for which formats and to try
and better
Hi Brian,
On Dec 5, 2006, at 5:07 AM, Brian Suda wrote:
All comments, suggestions, etc. are welcome.
http://suda.co.uk/projects/microformats/cheatsheet/
Beautiful work; I love the table on the right!
One question: why not use ? for single occurence optional, and +
for one or more, like
On 12/5/06, Dr. Ernie Prabhakar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Beautiful work; I love the table on the right!
--- cheers, i hope you find it helpful.
One question: why not use ? for single occurence optional, and +
for one or more, like Perl (and I) do. I actually can't figure out
what character
Hi Brian,
On Dec 5, 2006, at 1:40 PM, Brian Suda wrote:
--- i think there was an reason why i didn't use ?, +, * (but i can't
remember at the moment). The One or More is the UTF currency sign,
for me it is sort of emtpy circle with a cross through it - if they
are too similar, i can look into
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Brian Suda [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
a new labeling scheme for the
Matrix of what properties are available for which formats
Thanks for including that.
--
Andy Mabbett
Say NO! to compulsory ID Cards: http://www.no2id.net/
Free Our
