In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Scott
Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I appreciate your attempts to offer constructive feedback. I hope
this community will prove more receptive to such feedback in the
future, even - perhaps especially - when it is disagreeable.
David's feedback has been
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Shorthouse, David
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Andy et al.,
I temporarily subscribed to this listserv once again to:
And have apparently unsubscribed, again. Nonetheless, I'll reply, for
the benefit of other readers.
1) apologize for allowing my emotions get in the
On Dec 8, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
I appreciate your attempts to offer constructive feedback. I hope
this community will prove more receptive to such feedback in the
future, even - perhaps especially - when it is disagreeable.
David's feedback has been constructively received,
Andy et al.,
I temporarily subscribed to this listserv once again to:
1) apologize for allowing my emotions get in the way of what can be a
fantastic solution to a very difficult problem and,
2) offer advice to take your proposed species microformats to the next level
of resilience in the face
On Dec 7, 2006, at 9:08 PM, Shorthouse, David wrote:
In the face of the mess taxonomy can be at times, it would be worth
thinking
about GUIDs like LSIDs for use in microformats for species. uBio is
but one
provider of LSIDs. There are at least a half dozen other providers
and many
more
