On Feb 20, 2007, at 1:24 PM, Thom Shannon wrote:
I was thinking there should be a way to have your OpenID
on other profiles that can easily be consumed, allowing someone to see
you on social network A and add you on their social network B based on
you using the same OpenID.
that's where UID
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:24:00 +0100, Thom Shannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forgive me if this is going over old ground, I just joined this list and
couldn't find what I was looking for on the wiki. Are there any
particular conventions emerging for embedding an OpenID into a hCard?
The
I was picturing something more along the lines of a list of your friends
on your social network, each one with an openID, you'd then want to copy
and paste that to search for the same friend on the other social
network. No one needs to know it's actually a url, not least the user.
Both social
I disagree, it being a URL is a good thing. I have http:/
kevinmarks.com as an openid URL with microformats attached to it
(based on Chris Messina's here):
http://factoryjoe.com/hcard.html
Should I be asserting his urls as a uid?
On Feb 21, 2007, at 2:19 AM, Thom Shannon wrote:
I was
A preliminary go at a bidirectional XOXO to JSON service:
http://kevinmarks.com/cgi-bin/xoxotojson.py?url=http://kevinmarks.com
and back again:
http://kevinmarks.com/cgi-bin/jsontoxoxo.py?url=http%3A//
kevinmarks.com/cgi-bin/xoxotojson.py%3Furl%3Dhttp%3A//kevinmarks.com
change the url
I'm not saying you shouldn't have the option, my openid is my website,
so I want people to link to it too. But if my mum has an openID of
openid.aol.com/mum, then she just needs to remember that, use it, and
know that's her unique identity across the net, she never needs to see
what's actually
Arve Bersvendsen wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:24:00 +0100, Thom Shannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forgive me if this is going over old ground, I just joined this list and
couldn't find what I was looking for on the wiki. Are there any
particular conventions emerging for embedding an OpenID
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:18:41 +0100, John Panzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would think that using a rel value would make more sense, since rel
exists to signify the relationship between the current document (or
context therein); a href=http://example.com/;
rel=openid.identifierMy
Hi,
I've been dabbling with RSS feeds and microformats, embedding a microformat
in the item description of an RSS2.0 feed. When the RSS feed is viewed in
Bloglines, it displays ok in a web browser but, on close examination of the
html, it turns out that all the span elements have been renamed
On Feb 21, 2007, at 10:34 AM, Arve Bersvendsen wrote:
The UID seems to be limited to the hcard itself, while the rel's
context is larger; is there a way to tell what context is meant?
No, but then again, the context of a random class attribute is not
necessarily limited to the hcard
I believe it's using a tool that attempts to disable any tags it doesn't
recognise, possibly something like Anomy Sanitizer. Try using different
tags, as long as you have the class names you can use any tag, doesnt
have to be span. See if there are more suitable semantic elements you
can use,
On Feb 20, 2007, at 8:44 PM, Tim White wrote:
I vote for leaving it date-published. It really doesn't matter when
consumers get their hands on a published piece,
all that matters is when it is (claimed to be) published.
I also vote for leaving it date-published. Though not really arguing
Identifier is, Per the straw man[1]:
An (not necessarily globally unique) identifier, such as a
cite-key, pubmed ID number, or simply the reference number
or string within a publication ([1] or [CLRS2001])
I wrote an hCite export template for BibDesk*, and used the
identifier (cite-key)
as
On 2/21/07, Ryan Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Identifier is, Per the straw man[1]:
An (not necessarily globally unique) identifier, such as a
cite-key, pubmed ID number, or simply the reference number
or string within a publication ([1] or [CLRS2001])
--- i'm not sure exactly
Jeremy said:
Though not really arguing
against Tim's reasons, there are cases in which citations can have a
date published and a date visited or accessed.
Most definitely. I did not mean to discount the value of date-accessed.
That said, should there also be a date-accessed or
15 matches
Mail list logo
