On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:24 AM, Manu Sporny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, you are correct. Usually, each Microformat states how this should
be handled. So far, the general parsing rule has been use whatever
value you hit first if the Microformat can only have one value for the
given
On Fri, February 15, 2008 12:59, Tim White quoted:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:24 AM, Manu Sporny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes, you are correct. Usually, each Microformat states how this should
be handled. So far, the general parsing rule has been use whatever value
you hit first if the
Chuck Allen wrote:
Sarven Capadisli wrote:
AUDIO-TITLE would be the next logical option.
A completely peanut gallery comment from someone has been following
this thread -- One would think that as Microformats flourish across
other domain areas, you'll run into this again. So thinking about
Sarven Capadisli wrote:
AUDIO-TITLE would be the next logical option.
A completely peanut gallery comment from someone has been following this thread -- One would think that as Microformats flourish across other domain
areas, you'll run into this again. So thinking about a rationale/approach
OK, this is getting a bit wild. Can everyone please take a little
stock. I shall try to lay out what I see are the ‘facts’ of this
situation, which are being debated at length, but can't actually be
altered.
So:
• ‘title’ is specified as something else.
• ‘fn’ is perceived as too generic