On 01/02/2008, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in an hAudio; whereas an hReview would have:
class=dtreviewed dc-date-created
fyi, there's an existing (community) convention to be found in
Embedded RDF (eRDF):
[[
For example:
divaddress class=dc-creatorIan Davis/address wrote
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Janes
Sent: 04 February 2008 17:30
To: For discussion of new microformats.
Subject: Re: RE: [uf-new] Dublin Core (was: hAudio FN or Title)
There's been information collected about how an item microformat would
work
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 10:47 +, Ottevanger, Jeremy wrote:
Hi.
Coming out of lurk mode, I must say that I'm in complete agreement
with Andy. Thanks to Jim,
Is GRDDL not a solution to this whole dc question?
W3C Completes Bridge Between HTML/Microformats and Semantic Web
2008/2/4, Ottevanger, Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi.
Coming out of lurk mode,
--- welcome to the list, and thanks for your thoughts.
I recognise that The Process wisely advocates that formats should where
possible build upon those that exist already, and that a DC microformat might
tread
On Mon, February 4, 2008 11:59, Brian Suda wrote:
the process also states: There must be a problem to be solved (i.e. a
real world use case). No problem, no microformat.
The problem has already been stated.
Jumping straight to making a generic OBJECT DC
format is not the best approach.
It
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 16:29 +, Ottevanger, Jeremy wrote:
why on earth should there NOT be a generic microformat out there to
capture outline information about all sorts of things that fall
through the cracks left by other
I think there is a thing microformat item
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 12:58 +, Andy Mabbett wrote:
On Mon, February 4, 2008 11:53, Martin McEvoy wrote:
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 10:47 +, Ottevanger, Jeremy wrote:
Hi.
Coming out of lurk mode, I must say that I'm in complete agreement
with Andy. Thanks to Jim,
Is GRDDL not
There's been information collected about how an item microformat
would work, though by no means consider this official, blessed, voted
upon, or even official proposed. If anyone is really serious about
going down this road, I suggest going back though the mailing list
archives, especially around
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tantek Çelik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
The main disagreement seemed to be in DC's choice of class names...
That's only one problem with DC.
You fail to explain why you think DC's class (sic) names are a problem.
The other problem is that DC itself is more
