Andy,
At 12:44 05/10/2007, you wrote:
On Fri, October 5, 2007 11:20, Chris Newell wrote:
a new measurement microformat straw-man on the wiki:
http://microformats.org/wiki/measure-brainstorming#Straw_man
I guess you may have been through this but my first thought is why not
separate unit-code
Andy,
At 15:03 05/10/2007, you wrote:
On Fri, October 5, 2007 14:57, Chris Newell wrote:
Microformats put the burden, where possible, on parsers, not
publishers, in order to make life as easy as possible for publishers.
Agreed, but this is a balance. If it's hard to parse you'll get buggy
On Fri, October 5, 2007 15:31, Chris Newell wrote:
That would be:
abbr class=hmeasure title=2m22msup2/sup/abbr
using m2, or whatever is that standard for representing
square-metres.
Given that parsers must accept the formats includes [unit-code][number]
would:
span
Andy,
At 15:49 05/10/2007, you wrote:
On Fri, October 5, 2007 15:31, Chris Newell wrote:
That would be:
abbr class=hmeasure title=2m22msup2/sup/abbr
using m2, or whatever is that standard for representing
square-metres.
Given that parsers must accept the formats includes
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andy Mabbett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Taylor Cowan's eelgant sugegstion in the Currency discussion:
http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-new/2007-September
/000915.html
talkes the form:
abbr class=currency title=USD100one hundred bucks/abbr
