Re: [uf-new] hAudio ISSUE #3: published-date is redundant

2007-08-17 Thread Ian McKellar
I'm concerned that it won't be possible to mix hAtom and hAudio as flexibly as I'd like with this but it might be for the best. The main problem I see is that it would be hard to share elements between hAudio and hAtom (such as entry-title and audio-title) because to prevent the audio's published

Re: [uf-new] hAudio ISSUE #3: published-date is redundant

2007-08-17 Thread David Janes
On 8/17/07, Ian McKellar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm concerned that it won't be possible to mix hAtom and hAudio as flexibly as I'd like with this but it might be for the best. The main problem I see is that it would be hard to share elements between hAudio and hAtom (such as entry-title and

Re: [uf-new] hAudio ISSUE #3: published-date is redundant

2007-08-17 Thread Martin McEvoy
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 23:11 -0700, Ian McKellar wrote: I'm concerned that it won't be possible to mix hAtom and hAudio as flexibly as I'd like with this but it might be for the best. The main problem I see is that it would be hard to share elements between hAudio and hAtom (such as entry-title

Re: [uf-new] hAudio ISSUE #3: published-date is redundant

2007-08-17 Thread Andy Mabbett
On Fri, August 17, 2007 13:41, Martin McEvoy wrote: Consider this pseudo-xhtml: div class=hentry haudio div class=entry-contentThis song is great/div Shouldn't that be an hReview? -- Andy Mabbett ** via webmail ** ___ microformats-new mailing

Re: [uf-new] hAudio ISSUE #3: published-date is redundant

2007-08-17 Thread Ian McKellar
On 8/17/07, Martin McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 23:11 -0700, Ian McKellar wrote: I'm concerned that it won't be possible to mix hAtom and hAudio as flexibly as I'd like with this but it might be for the best. The main problem I see is that it would be hard to share

Re: [uf-new] hAudio ISSUE #3: published-date is redundant

2007-08-14 Thread Manu Sporny
Tantek Çelik wrote: I agree it should use the ISO date-time pattern every other date format is using. So, we've got 3 votes for PUBLISHED using date-time pattern, none opposed. I'd like some others to weigh in before we resolve this. A simple AGREE/+1 would suffice, or DISAGREE with logical

Re: [uf-new] hAudio ISSUE #3: published-date is redundant

2007-08-08 Thread Manu Sporny
Brian Suda wrote: If you look at the wiki page which lists our classes, http://microformats.org/wiki/classes you will see that we have several ways of specifying a date hCard uses REV, which is the REVISION date hCalendar uses LAST-MODIFIED, the time the calendar was last changes hAtom uses

Re: [uf-new] hAudio ISSUE #3: published-date is redundant

2007-08-08 Thread Tantek Çelik
On 8/8/07 8:14 AM, Manu Sporny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Brian Suda wrote: If you look at the wiki page which lists our classes, http://microformats.org/wiki/classes you will see that we have several ways of specifying a date hCard uses REV, which is the REVISION date hCalendar uses