Re: [uf-new] The Process (was: hAudio case study)

2007-09-13 Thread Andy Mabbett
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tantek Çelik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes Document the implicit schemas that the content examples imply. Every word in that sentence matters. On the contrary: implicit is redundant. The alternative: Document the schemas implied by the content examples. reads

Re: [uf-new] hAudio ISSUE #8: hAlbum is redundant

2007-09-13 Thread Chris Newell
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 23:11:38 +0100 From: Martin McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [uf-new] hAudio ISSUE #8: hAlbum is redundant To: For discussion of new microformats. microformats-new@microformats.org Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain If we bloat haudio in

Subject: Re: [uf-new] hAudio ISSUE #8: hAlbum is redundant

2007-09-13 Thread Chris Newell
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:58:36 -0400 From: Manu Sporny [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [uf-new] hAudio ISSUE #8: hAlbum is redundant To: For discussion of new microformats. microformats-new@microformats.org Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Martin

Re: [uf-new] hAudio ISSUE #8: hAlbum is redundant

2007-09-13 Thread Manu Sporny
Scott Reynen wrote: If we do that, we will lose the ability to differentiate between an album, podcast, toplist, download, and chart. Can you explain a bit more what exactly we gain with that ability, in terms of practical capabilities? Here is the premise: It is important to be able to

Re: [uf-new] hAudio ISSUE #8: hAlbum is redundant

2007-09-13 Thread Martin McEvoy
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 10:46 -0400, Manu Sporny wrote: Martin McEvoy wrote: I am not trying to be too simplistic here but I hope you can see what I am trying to say, I don't think I see everything that you're trying to say, Martin... but I'll try to summarize what I think you are saying: