On Aug 16, 2007, at 9:01 PM, Clay Newton wrote:
There is significant overlap in the data elements for each of these
records. It would seem to me that one microformat could support the
sum of these phases.
Thoughts?
If the receipt microformat proposal ends up supporting your needs,
that's
Scott Reynen wrote:
On Aug 16, 2007, at 9:01 PM, Clay Newton wrote:
There is significant overlap in the data elements for each of these
records. It would seem to me that one microformat could support the
sum of these phases.
Thoughts?
Start simple.
I agree... we shouldn't try to merge
