Joe Andrieu wrote:
There seemed to be partial agreement that hAudio
means the individual audio recording, that being
the simplest case to solve, although I agree with
the contradiction in the above problem statements.
The answer for multiple audio recordings on a page is to
have multiple
Manu Sporny wrote:
Brian Suda wrote:
--- now we are spiraling back to ideas of what people WANT rather
than model what is being published.
I agree - we should keep our focus on solving demonstrated
needs as outlined by the audio-info-examples exploratory
discussion. Right now, we are
Joe Andrieu wrote:
Manu Sporny wrote:
Brian Suda wrote:
--- now we are spiraling back to ideas of what people WANT rather
than model what is being published.
I agree - we should keep our focus on solving demonstrated
needs as outlined by the audio-info-examples exploratory
discussion.
On Jun 5, 2007, at 6:46 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
Scott Reynen wrote:
On Jun 5, 2007, at 4:00 PM, Colin Barrett wrote:
A classical recording is a good example -- unlike popular music, the
tracks on the album are often merely segments of a larger whole,
f.e.
Beethoven's Fifth is comprised of
Scott Reynen wrote:
halbum is the grouping Microformat for audio albums specifically - it
can aggregate a number of haudio recordings together.
halbum is the grouping of albums? I'm guessing this is a
miscommunication, as I've seen no previous discussion of groups of
albums. Please
Scott Reynen wrote:
Nobody seems to have raised any
issues related to existing elements in the haudio draft in several weeks.
I don't know how you can possibly think that. Multiple people have
suggested changing the wiki entry in just the last few days, and you've
said you don't think it
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 20:42 -0600, Scott Reynen wrote:
On Jun 4, 2007, at 6:33 PM, Joe Andrieu wrote:
The alternative to the above that I thought you were going for was
something like this:
halbum
playlist/XOXO
haudio
haudio
haudio
Scott Reynen wrote:
The alternative to the above that I thought you were going for was
something like this:
halbum
playlist/XOXO
haudio
haudio
haudio
haudio
That makes sense to me.
Ah crap... I seem to have caused confusion with my ramblings.
Joe Andrieu wrote:
It seems that halbum means we no longer requires this
grouping abstraction.
That is correct - but this has only come about in the last couple of
days. I usually wait for some sort of concensus before updating the wiki.
What is your definition for a playlist? I think we
Martin McEvoy wrote:
hmm problem here, what if our album has multiple content types not all
albums are just playable music yes?
I think what both Scott and Joe are referring to are audio albums. We
aren't talking about video albums or multimedia albums. We should
concentrate on solving the
On Jun 5, 2007, at 4:50 AM, Martin McEvoy wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 20:42 -0600, Scott Reynen wrote:
On Jun 4, 2007, at 6:33 PM, Joe Andrieu wrote:
The alternative to the above that I thought you were going for was
something like this:
halbum
playlist/XOXO
haudio
Colin Barrett wrote:
On Jun 5, 2007, at 2:20 PM, Scott Reynen wrote:
The label haudio appears to be describing two distinct concepts here
(1: album information, 2: individual track information), which I find
confusing. That these two concepts share some properties, but that
doesn't make
On Jun 5, 2007, at 4:00 PM, Colin Barrett wrote:
On Jun 5, 2007, at 2:20 PM, Scott Reynen wrote:
The label haudio appears to be describing two distinct concepts
here (1: album information, 2: individual track information),
which I find confusing. That these two concepts share some
On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 00:03 +, Brian Suda wrote:
On 6/5/07, Martin McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Colin you have a good point here
haudio would not be extended far enough to suit the classical
communities needs when you take into account that Beethoven has nine
symphonies with a
Scott Reynen wrote:
On Jun 5, 2007, at 4:00 PM, Colin Barrett wrote:
A classical recording is a good example -- unlike popular music, the
tracks on the album are often merely segments of a larger whole, f.e.
Beethoven's Fifth is comprised of four movements. All of the same
information that
Brian Suda wrote:
--- now we are spiraling back to ideas of what people WANT rather
than model what is being published.
I agree - we should keep our focus on solving demonstrated needs as
outlined by the audio-info-examples exploratory discussion. Right now,
we are talking about audio albums.
Manu Sporny wrote:
However, I do believe it is the simplest, most atomic
problem we could start with. And therefore, probably our
best chance for getting traction. The current hAudio
proposal says Defining parts of an hAudio will not be
complete without a complete grouping
On 5/31/07, Manu Sporny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What ever happened to working on the media-format?
The media-format was far too broad of a problem - that's why it hasn't
moved forward in two years even though there are a great number of
examples of marking up media on the web. It is far
Manu Sporny wrote:
Joe Andrieu wrote:
From reviewing the examples [2],
Thank you for that very thorough and well thought out
argument, Joe. I agree with most of what you had to say,
here's my $0.02 on the rest:
I think there are five distinct semantic items here, at a minimum:
Brian Suda wrote:
I just think there was either, no interest in
developing the format, or too many what if we add this happened and
it never moved forward.
It tends to be more of the latter when it comes to this list :) - lots
of good ideas... in fact, too many to see clearly, sometimes. That
Joe Andrieu wrote:
We need examples of playlists to support your playlist
argument... which we don't have.
Sure we do. There are a bunch on the examples page,
including the FIQL service I mentioned in my email.
Are we looking at the same examples page?
Manu Sporny wrote:
Joe Andrieu wrote:
We need examples of playlists to support your playlist
argument... which we don't have.
Sure we do. There are a bunch on the examples page,
including the FIQL service I mentioned in my email.
Are we looking at the same examples page?
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 12:56 +, Brian Suda wrote:
On 5/31/07, Manu Sporny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are only two things that are strongly supported by the
audio-info-examples right now. Audio albums and audio podcasts
(collections of audio). Here are the options:
Option #1:
Brian Suda wrote:
--- firstly, microformats are not a how should we do this it is more
of a how are things already being done?
Option #2 is how it is already being done. The options were more about
if we wanted to generalize the scope of the hAudio Microformat. It was
to see if anybody had a
Martin McEvoy wrote:
Your use of audio-album could cause problems later in the semantic
meaning, iTunes has many celebrity playlists, which are not actually
ALBUMS, but are a collection of related songs. The term podcast seems
very 2005, in 4 years will we still use 'podcats' maybe, maybe not?
25 matches
Mail list logo
