venue
for public information sharing, so it could really be either.
michael
On 02/05/2015 16:12, Jon Johnsen wrote:
Depending on the kinds of data involved, some of this discussion might
better confined to the ucb-security list, as Michael Sinatra suggested.
Or even off-line.
*Jon Johnsen
Correct, it's the ucb-security list, which I had restricted to UCB and
LBL people. I don't know what the policy of SNS^H^H^HISP is, as they
now own the list. Also note that LBL staff (including myself) have the
ability to be UCB affiliates, which gives us a UCB email address. So it
probably
