Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS-64 team

2010-09-23 Thread Earnie
Andy Koppe wrote: On 22 September 2010 12:54, Earnie wrote: Andy Koppe wrote: MSYS on the other hand has no paying customers and the changes there only need to be approved by the FOSS users who code and maintain it. So are you saying that MSYS might become less integrated with Windows than

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS-64 team

2010-09-23 Thread NightStrike
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Andy Koppe andy.ko...@gmail.com wrote: On 21 September 2010 12:51, Earnie wrote: Andy Koppe wrote: Cygwin isn't strictly obliged to provide an interface to Windows. No, but then it wouldn't really be Cyg*win* anymore. It would effectively be Interix with a

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS-64 team

2010-09-23 Thread JonY
On 9/23/2010 21:38, NightStrike wrote: On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Andy Koppeandy.ko...@gmail.com wrote: On 21 September 2010 12:51, Earnie wrote: Andy Koppe wrote: Cygwin isn't strictly obliged to provide an interface to Windows. No, but then it wouldn't really be Cyg*win* anymore. It

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS-64 team

2010-09-23 Thread Andy Koppe
On 23 September 2010 14:38, NightStrike wrote: On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Andy Koppe wrote: Cygwin isn't strictly obliged to provide an interface to Windows. No, but then it wouldn't really be Cyg*win* anymore. It would effectively be Interix with a particularly slow fork(). That's

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS-64 team

2010-09-22 Thread Andy Koppe
On 21 September 2010 22:13, Andy Koppe wrote: On 21 September 2010 12:51, Earnie wrote: Andy Koppe wrote: Cygwin isn't strictly obliged to provide an interface to Windows. No, but then it wouldn't really be Cyg*win* anymore. It would effectively be Interix with a particularly slow fork().

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS-64 team

2010-09-21 Thread Earnie
Andy Koppe wrote: Cygwin isn't strictly obliged to provide an interface to Windows. No, but then it wouldn't really be Cyg*win* anymore. It would effectively be Interix with a particularly slow fork(). That's unless it moved into its own subsystem, which of course would mean a major

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS-64 team

2010-09-20 Thread Earnie
Cesar Strauss wrote: Since MSYS is derived from Cygwin, one way to get 64-bit support for MSYS would be to add it first to Cygwin and port it to MSYS later. However, as this thread indicates, there is currently some interest on bringing 64-bit support to MSYS, while I do not have evidence

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS-64 team

2010-09-20 Thread Kai Tietz
2010/9/20 Earnie ear...@users.sourceforge.net: Cesar Strauss wrote: Since MSYS is derived from Cygwin, one way to get 64-bit support for  MSYS would be to add it first to Cygwin and port it to MSYS later. However, as this thread indicates, there is currently some interest on bringing 64-bit

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS-64 team

2010-09-20 Thread Earnie
Kai Tietz wrote: 2010/9/20 Earnie ear...@users.sourceforge.net: Cesar Strauss wrote: Since MSYS is derived from Cygwin, one way to get 64-bit support for MSYS would be to add it first to Cygwin and port it to MSYS later. However, as this thread indicates, there is currently some interest on

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS-64 team

2010-09-20 Thread JonY
On 9/20/2010 22:36, Earnie wrote: Kai Tietz wrote: 2010/9/20 Earnieear...@users.sourceforge.net: Cesar Strauss wrote: Since MSYS is derived from Cygwin, one way to get 64-bit support for MSYS would be to add it first to Cygwin and port it to MSYS later. However, as this thread indicates,

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS-64 team

2010-09-20 Thread NightStrike
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:39 AM, JonY jo...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: On 9/20/2010 22:53, NightStrike wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:28 AM, JonYjo...@users.sourceforge.net  wrote: On 9/20/2010 22:36, Earnie wrote: Kai Tietz wrote: 2010/9/20 Earnieear...@users.sourceforge.net:

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS-64 team

2010-09-19 Thread Cesar Strauss
On 17/9/2010 12:58, ArbolOne wrote: Ok, folks. Apparently no one else is jumping on the Build MSYS under 64bit MSWin waggon. So, let us start with the project. You are welcome to join the MSYS team on mingw.org. You may use the MSYS mailing list, if you wish, to help coordinate this effort.

[Mingw-w64-public] MSYS-64 team

2010-09-17 Thread ArbolOne
Ok, folks. Apparently no one else is jumping on the Build MSYS under 64bit MSWin waggon. So, let us start with the project. Does any of you know where to get the latest source code? MSYS-64 Development Team ~~ Teemu stink...@yahoo.com mailto:stink...@yahoo.com Bidski

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS-64 team

2010-09-17 Thread JonY
On 9/17/2010 23:58, ArbolOne wrote: Ok, folks. Apparently no one else is jumping on the Build MSYS under 64bit MSWin waggon. So, let us start with the project. Does any of you know where to get the latest source code? MSYS-64 Development Team ~~ Teemu stink...@yahoo.com

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS-64 team

2010-09-17 Thread NightStrike
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:58 AM, ArbolOne arbol...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, folks. Apparently no one else is jumping on the Build MSYS under 64bit MSWin waggon. So, let us start with the project. Does any of you know where to get the latest source code? MSYS-64 Development Team