Steven Manos wrote:
something like...
kill `ps aux | grep mplayer | head -n 1 | awk {'print $2'}`
see pkill(1)
Thanks David,
I just tried that line but it seems to be the same or if anything it
seems even slower.
Gary
David Gwynne wrote:
I would suggest looking at the socket options parameter in /etc/samba/
smb.conf. I have the following in my smb.conf and transfer speeds seem
to perform a lot
Hello
I have installed and used sound successfully in the past. I reread the
man and faq pages
about sound but still no good.
This is an amd64 setup so I dont know if that is the reason for my
trouble. On motherboard
is nForce4 AC97 and USB is Creative Technology SB Live! 24-bit
This is really puzzling me, please someone help me out.
I've tried a couple of things. Firstly I swapped out the NIC for a
different brand, no change. Writes god-awful slow, reads nice and zippy.
I did some googling and tried some things. Here are the results of
ifconfig -a
netstat -in
Hi,
that is an interesting (off-)topic :-) May I ask the very last question?
If % is not good enough for getting random values in a range, then what is?
I see a lot of arc4random() % ... when grepping the /usr/src on OpenBSD.
And my (probably too naive) approach to shuffling 32 cards has been:
* sean conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-19 01:33]:
G'Day,
Is there a way to reduce the interval NTPD polls for time updates?
I have installed 3.7 and have determined NTPD is contacting the time
server approx. 30sec.
ntpd scales the quey interval down itself based on the
So that's what the kernel panic really means: Out of memory ?
GTG
Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] 19/07/2005 03:36
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Gordon Ross wrote:
I've got an OpneBSD 3.7 machine (no patches - just the standard 3.7 CD
install) running under VMWare GSX Server V3.1 Today, the machine
Alexander Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED] asks:
...
If % is not good enough for getting random values in a range, then what is?
...
Actually, % 32 is fine (or any reasonably small power of 2). Modulo
any odd number is guaranteed to have at least a small problem, and
module a large enough number is
On 7/18/05, Bryan Irvine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a mail server located in a DMZ and I just changed my gateway to
run with carp. I was wondering if there's a way to sync the spamd db
so that in the event of failover new messages won't take twice as long
to arrive. I don't expect any
Hi,
I asked this question a week ago but there was no reply,
so I am asking it again somewhat differently. I would
really greatly appreciate any comments on this!
Is it possible to change a cloned link-level host route
(generated by arp requests) into a static gateway host
route?
The
Thanks for your reply Tim. If anything it makes me feel worse. I was
hoping it was something easily fixed.
I just tried transferring a 50 Mb file to the OBSD samba box from win
using SCP. Again very slow writes but much faster reads. The 50 Mb file
took about 7 mins to transfer to the OBSD
Hi,
I are using the pc engine wrap-boxes for network measurement. Iperf tops
out at 25 Mbit/s send and 37 Mbit/s receive. If I look at top at the
same time I get 0% idle and the rest is evenly distributed between
interrupt, system and user.
Obviously I have no option here to replace
On 7/19/05, Rickard Dahlstrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I are using the pc engine wrap-boxes for network measurement. Iperf tops
out at 25 Mbit/s send and 37 Mbit/s receive. If I look at top at the
same time I get 0% idle and the rest is evenly distributed between
interrupt, system and user.
Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
Thanks for your reply Tim. If anything it makes me feel worse. I was
hoping it was something easily fixed.
I just tried transferring a 50 Mb file to the OBSD samba box from win
using SCP. Again very slow writes but much faster reads. The 50 Mb
file took about 7
This *may* help.
man mount
softdep
(FFS only.) Mount the file system using soft dependen-
cies. Instead of metadata being written immediately,
it
is written in an ordered fashion to keep the on-disk
--On 19 July 2005 10:50 +0200, Rickard Dahlstrand wrote:
I are using the pc engine wrap-boxes for network measurement. Iperf
tops out at 25 Mbit/s send and 37 Mbit/s receive. If I look at top at
the same time I get 0% idle and the rest is evenly distributed
between interrupt, system and user.
...on Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 10:29:34AM +0200, Michael Adam wrote:
The scenario is the following: On an OpenBSD firewall and
router, I have an interface if0 with address 192.168.1.1/24.
Now, there is a host 192.168.1.2 which sits behind a third host
192.168.1.3 from the network segment of
Stuart Henderson wrote:
--On 19 July 2005 10:50 +0200, Rickard Dahlstrand wrote:
I are using the pc engine wrap-boxes for network measurement. Iperf
tops out at 25 Mbit/s send and 37 Mbit/s receive. If I look at top at
the same time I get 0% idle and the rest is evenly distributed
between
Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
Hi All,
I just built a OpenBSD 3.7 samba file server for my home lan. It's a P3
500, 128mb RAM, with a 2 gig IDE HDD for the OS and two x Maxtor 200 GB
IDE drives for data.
whoa.
no where near enough RAM.
Trip over the power cord, you will end up swapping during
--On 19 July 2005 12:50 +0200, Rickard Dahlstrand wrote:
Stuart Henderson wrote:
--On 19 July 2005 10:50 +0200, Rickard Dahlstrand wrote:
I are using the pc engine wrap-boxes for network measurement. Iperf
tops out at 25 Mbit/s send and 37 Mbit/s receive. If I look at top
at the same time I
From: Gary Clemans-Gibbon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for your reply Tim. If anything it makes me feel worse. I was
hoping it was something easily fixed.
I just tried transferring a 50 Mb file to the OBSD samba box from win
using SCP. Again very slow writes but much faster reads. The 50 Mb file
Stuart Henderson wrote:
--On 19 July 2005 12:50 +0200, Rickard Dahlstrand wrote:
Stuart Henderson wrote:
--On 19 July 2005 10:50 +0200, Rickard Dahlstrand wrote:
I are using the pc engine wrap-boxes for network measurement. Iperf
tops out at 25 Mbit/s send and 37 Mbit/s receive. If I look
[IMAGE]
Dear LaSalle Bank customer,
We recently noticed one or more attempts to log in your LaSalle Bank
online banking account from a foreign IP address and we have reasons to
believe that your account was hijacked by a third party without your
authorization.
If you recently accessed your
Rickard Dahlstrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I are using the pc engine wrap-boxes for network measurement. Iperf
tops out at 25 Mbit/s send and 37 Mbit/s receive. If I look at top at
the same time I get 0% idle and the rest is evenly distributed between
interrupt, system and user.
Or you could disable apm0 and see if that helps.
-Original Message-
From: David Gwynne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 July 2005 01:57 PM
To: Gary Clemans-Gibbon
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Writes to samba server very, very slow
From: Gary Clemans-Gibbon [EMAIL
Nick Holland wrote:
Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
Hi All,
I just built a OpenBSD 3.7 samba file server for my home lan. It's a P3
500, 128mb RAM, with a 2 gig IDE HDD for the OS and two x Maxtor 200 GB
IDE drives for data.
whoa.
no where near enough RAM.
Trip over the power cord, you will end
Hi,
I'm having trouble with our firewalls. They are both Dell 2850 with
identical hardware inside (dmesg below). I have five carp interfaces
connected to five different em interfaces. carp0,2,3,4 works fine
(master stays master and backup stays backup). For carp5 however both
interfaces stays as
Hi list,
I've seen a lot of people using ftp-proxy in their pf.conf's thought their
servers are only ftp servers (not clients) and are self-defending (there are
no any firewalls in front of them to defend them). But I've been reading PF
FAQ and got a little bit confusing... From PF FAQ:
Please
Hi,
On 7/19/05, Alexander Bochmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That setup is broken by design.
Well yes, but sometimes you don't have all aspects of the
network setup under your control.
The only real way to make this work is
to have 192.168.1.2 do proxy-arp for
192.168.1.3, which will solve
Hello!
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 11:02:54AM -0700, Jack Bates wrote:
[...]
4) Do not use the % (modulo) operator to select a card. The residues from
% introduce small amounts of bias, and this is a disqualifying factor for
regulated gaming.
Does that point still hold, assuming I use a modulus
Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu wrote:
Or you could disable apm0 and see if that helps.
-Original Message-
From: David Gwynne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 July 2005 01:57 PM
To: Gary Clemans-Gibbon
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Writes to samba server very, very slow
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 02:34:04PM +0200, Michael Hamerski wrote:
the FAQ which you refer to mentions 1M per 1G of storage, so that's not
really 1G of RAM for this system, is it? or is there a reason I'm missing?
no...256M would in theory do it (assuming nothing bigger than around
200G in one
So here I am again talking about using a USB2 drive to do backups. So I
have all the new hardware for this including two 250GB Hitachi drives,
and this USB2-EIDE enclosure:
http://www.kingwin.com/pdut_detail.asp?LineID=CateID=27ID=248
First thing I tried was hooking up an old 3GB HD I had
On 7/19/05, Roy Morris wrote:
sorry, I must be reading this wrong or not understanding. Why
would you not just put in a static arp entry? Is there ever a
time when you don't want traffic to take this route?
No, I want all traffic to take this route. There are several
imaginable solutions:
Hi
I need to sniff a network segment and I need to sniff both headers and
data. Because tcpdump captures only headers its unsuitable for the task.
I saw that ports has ettercap and sniffit but I didn' get around to
testing them to see if they will do the job I need. Can anyone recommend
other
Hello!
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 05:20:43PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to sniff a network segment and I need to sniff both headers and
data. Because tcpdump captures only headers its unsuitable for the task.
No. Read the manpage, look for the option -s.
[...]
Kind regards,
Hannah.
tcpdump -s 1500 will get you your data as well.
Now for dissection tethereal(1) might be better suited.
Capture using tcpdump(1), then read with tethereal(1) as a non uid 0 user.
The latest ethereal-10.11 compiles fine.
If you have any issues let me know.
I am not your puppet. Since when? Now
On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 17:20:43 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] proclaimed...
I need to sniff a network segment and I need to sniff both headers and
data. Because tcpdump captures only headers its unsuitable for the task.
I saw that ports has ettercap and sniffit but I didn' get around to
testing
Hi Chris
Nop. tcpshow decodes pcap files and if the creating sniffer doesn't
write the packet payload it won't show it :( I need a sniffer that will
write into a file (preferably in pcap format) everything coming on the
wire. Ethereal does that, but it doesn't compile on OpenBSD :(
Paolo
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 05:20:43PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I need to sniff a network segment and I need to sniff both headers and
data. Because tcpdump captures only headers its unsuitable for the task.
I saw that ports has ettercap and sniffit but I didn' get around to
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I need to sniff a network segment and I need to sniff both
headers and
data. Because tcpdump captures only headers its unsuitable
for the task.
I saw that ports has ettercap and sniffit but I didn' get around to
testing them to see if
Hello,
I'm trying to profile a milter.
I compile and link it with -pg option and all seems OK, but when I run
the binary I get the message:
# ./milter
cannot find atexit, destructors will not be run!
The milter itself interfaces bogofilter, so it needs to spawn a process
to scan the messages
Hannah Schroeter wrote:
Hello!
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 05:20:43PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to sniff a network segment and I need to sniff both headers and
data. Because tcpdump captures only headers its unsuitable for the task.
No. Read the manpage, look for the option
On 7/19/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I need to sniff a network segment and I need to sniff both headers and
data. Because tcpdump captures only headers its unsuitable for the task.
I saw that ports has ettercap and sniffit but I didn' get around to
testing them to see
Making, drinking tea and reading an opus magnum from Alexander Bochmann:
...on Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 12:56:03AM -0700, Tim Hammerquist wrote:
I've seen this same phenomenon when copying to from my OSX Powerbook and
my fileserver (running both FreeBSD 5 and Gentoo Linux), with the OSX
WARNING, this is likely going to sound offensive to some people...
Johan M:son Lindman wrote:
On Tuesday 19 July 2005 17:02, you wrote:
Since OpenBSD is not very helpful in this case I can only enclose the
dmesg without the enclosure plugged in. But first here's the info for
the enclosure as
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
At 11:15 PM -0700 7/18/05, Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
Thanks David,
I just tried that line but it seems to be the same or if
anything it seems even slower.
I missed the start of this thread, but make sure that you do not
have a duplex-mismatch with your ethernet
On 7/19/05, Stephen Marley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 01:28:17PM -0700, Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
A little bit more info,
i ran the following...
snip
dont forget to use netstat -i (-e on windows) to look
for errors on the line, which would be indicative of
lan
Stephen Marley wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 01:28:17PM -0700, Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
A little bit more info,
i ran the following...
.
$ ifconfig -m dc0
dc0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
address: 00:50:bf:9c:62:e4
media: Ethernet
Hello.
I have the following problem with suexec:
I've chmod'ed /usr/sbin/suexec:
[1:09:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ l /usr/sbin/suexec
-r-sr-xr-x 1 root bin - 12052 Feb 2 07:58 /usr/sbin/suexec*
I've added
User foo
on a VirtualHost apache directive,
but when I try to exec the cgi script I
I've had this problem before. Other protocols work OK (not great, but
OK), but Samba is gets modem speeds on a fast ethernet connection. I've
had some success in the past by manually specifying the network speed
and duplexing. See man hostname.if for info on how to do that (pay
particular
Rogier Krieger wrote:
On 7/19/05, Rene Rivera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] I just can't follow current on a production server (as other users
will also tell you).
At the risk of sounding discourteous, you should get yourself a proper
test environment. That way you can leave your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Niclas Sodergard wrote:
| Hi,
|
| I'm having trouble with our firewalls. They are both Dell 2850 with
| identical hardware inside (dmesg below). I have five carp interfaces
| connected to five different em interfaces. carp0,2,3,4 works fine
| (master
...I guess I just need to replace hardware. Now-like...
viq
--
Startuj z INTERIA.PL! http://link.interia.pl/f186c
--On 19 July 2005 10:46 -0500, Daniel Ramaley wrote:
I've had this problem before. Other protocols work OK (not great, but
OK), but Samba is gets modem speeds on a fast ethernet connection.
I've had poor speeds samba-windows before and sometimes been able to
fix it by just disabling and
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 01:56:41PM -0400, I'd written, in part:
...I'm not sure whether this is an Xorg issue, a KDE issue, or -- because I'm
running firefox, an X application issue. Any advice you might have to help
me narrow down the problem further would be appreciated
I have managed
On 7/20/05, Thanos Tsouanas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've added
User foo
on a VirtualHost apache directive,
but when I try to exec the cgi script I want, these appear in the error
logs:
(9)Bad file descriptor: getpwuid: invalid userid 2050
2050 being the correct userid for the
Hello,
I'm fairly new to OpenBSD. I need to create a simple IPSec setup,
which is (as I learned) called bump-in-the-wire. Basically, I have
OpenBSD box with two ethernet interfaces bridged together. I want to
protect communication with one particular server in _transport_ mode
with IPSec. That
Stephen Marley wrote:
Have you tried a crossover cable, bypassing the switch?
Words of wisdom right there. I would definitely try a crossover cable
between the OpenBSD server and your client machine. That will show you
whether the problem lies with Samba or elsewhere. I remember
Avtar Gill wrote:
Stephen Marley wrote:
Have you tried a crossover cable, bypassing the switch?
Words of wisdom right there. I would definitely try a crossover cable
between the OpenBSD server and your client machine. That will show you
whether the problem lies with Samba or elsewhere.
Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
Yes, I've tried different cables and different ports on the switch.
This hardware has all been used before together. I cycled the power to
the switch (can't find a reset button) and no change. Via samba or SCP
it takes 7 minutes to write a file to the server and 12
I'm building several new 3.7 machines. These machines will be Amanda
clients (only, not servers)/ Looks like the amanda port depends on gnuplot,
which depends on X11.
Now, I really don;t want X on these machines. Is there a way to tell the
port build provess to make the client side only? Or just
Tim Hammerquist wrote:
Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
Yes, I've tried different cables and different ports on the switch.
This hardware has all been used before together. I cycled the power to
the switch (can't find a reset button) and no change. Via samba or SCP
it takes 7 minutes to write a file
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I heeded your words of wisdom and after some rummaging I found a crossover
cable. Hooked it up the same winXP box direct and the exact same result.
Sounds like a bad nic. If you have a spare, you might try swapping with it.
Also, what's the other machine and what is
Don Koch wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I heeded your words of wisdom and after some rummaging I found a crossover
cable. Hooked it up the same winXP box direct and the exact same result.
Sounds like a bad nic. If you have a spare, you might try swapping with it.
Also, what's the other
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Gordon Ross wrote:
So that's what the kernel panic really means: Out of memory ?
yes and no. it means what it says, but the root cause is being out of
memory.
--
And that's why we're leaving California.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 09:50:03PM -0400, Don Koch wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I heeded your words of wisdom and after some rummaging I found a crossover
cable. Hooked it up the same winXP box direct and the exact same result.
Sounds like a bad nic. If you have a spare, you might
Sounds like a bad nic. If you have a spare, you might try
swapping with it.
Also, what's the other machine and what is it running?
The NIC is fine, and yes I swapped it out early on as well as the cable
and the port on the switch. I've also tried a crossover cable. I've also
How about a nic from a different mfr? Using another good 'dc' nic
doesn't
rule out a basic hardware incompatibility related directly to that brand
of nic card coupled with your other hardware.
JB
.
Even though it worked fine with RH7.3 a three + year old OS ?
I've seen specific
John Brooks wrote:
How about a nic from a different mfr? Using another good 'dc' nic
doesn't
rule out a basic hardware incompatibility related directly to that brand
of nic card coupled with your other hardware.
JB
.
Even though it worked fine with RH7.3 a three + year old OS ?
I've
i was under the impression that the only way to install the 3.7 release
of OpenBSD/mips was via tftp / netboot. this is the only installation
method mentioned in the install doc. it worked fine for me.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 05:22:54PM -0700, Roger Neth Jr wrote:
Hello List,
I could not find a
I need to add another ethernet card to the box, but have run out of
PCI slots. Currently there is an Intel dual port (fxp) in there and
I'm considering one of the above as a replacement. Could anyone with
experience with one of these cards comment as to the pro's/con's of
either card?
Steve
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Steven Bowers wrote:
I need to add another ethernet card to the box, but have run out of
PCI slots. Currently there is an Intel dual port (fxp) in there and
I'm considering one of the above as a replacement. Could anyone with
experience with one of these cards comment as
Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
Also I have just grabbed the stable branch from cvs and am running
stable GENERIC and still doesn't fix it. Just a recap - the problem is
not just samba writes to either of the data disks from the network via
samba or scp are painfully slow. Reads from the box to the
74 matches
Mail list logo
