On Sun, 27 Nov 2005, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-26 08:57]:
Looking at the code of bgpd/ospfs, I don't see it design as using multiple
treads ( doesn't mean I understand it fully either) so it wouldn't benefit
from a dual
Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 09:13:36AM +0100, Bo Rising Rasmussen wrote:
Hi all,
I have searched a bit now, and have not seen anything on this subject.
I have 2 different internet connections, which I would like to use for
my CARP setup. I was thinking that they would
hmm, on Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 11:03:19PM -0500, Nick Holland said that
You can do what you want, but your work will be ignored.
a beautiful attitude. i hope the project won't acquire it also.
because even though we are the lowest life form, the users of
this system, we also contribute back as
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:01:21AM +0100, Bo Rising Rasmussen wrote:
Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 09:13:36AM +0100, Bo Rising Rasmussen wrote:
Hi all,
I have searched a bit now, and have not seen anything on this subject.
I have 2 different internet connections,
Heya, list!
C'mon ppl, stop argue and yell at each other
Just do whatever you feel it's necessary and propose your work
- Original Message -
From: frantisek holop [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: misc misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: openbsd web site design
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:21:58AM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 04:31:31PM +0100, Said Outgajjouft said that
Line 92
@pwd_mkdb = (pwd_mkdb, -p);# program for building passwd database
and line 133
@pwd_mkdb = (pwd_mkdb, -p, -d, .);
Isn't it more
... damn keyboard...
where was I...
Aaa.. Propose your work, no matter alfa/beta...
for everybody's viewing pleasure
Then and only then it would be decided by project's leader if it's worth to
change something or not
Does anybody drive on the right in Australia just because he feel it would
be
Joachim Schipper wrote:
SNIP
... is there something special I have to
set up on the gateways, for this to work? Or should I just follow the
manual, and set it up as if I had two gateways?
Thanks for the help already!
Regards,
Bo
You'll want to make sure that when the outer
hmm, on Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 11:52:27AM +0200, John G. Gavrilitsa said that
Aaa.. Propose your work, no matter alfa/beta...
for everybody's viewing pleasure
i will, i will. hopefully others as well.
we all know the mantra here. shut up and so on.
just need some time, i did not except this
On Monday 28 November 2005 05:34, Marc Espie wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 04:58:08AM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
How do I unlink a previously linked directory name?
==
/usr}sudo ln -f ports #I tried this since I couldn't find an unlink command
ln: ports: is a directory
Thanks All!
rm did the trick.
Dave
On Monday 28 November 2005 05:44, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
Hello!
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 04:58:08AM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
How do I unlink a previously linked directory name?
==
/usr}sudo ln -f ports #I tried this since I couldn't find
El lun, 28-11-2005 a las 04:58 -0500, Dave Feustel escribis:
How do I unlink a previously linked directory name?
With rm (a linked directory is not a directory but a link to a
directory, that's a linked file directory entry).
From rm(1):
The rm utility attempts to remove the non-directory type
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 05:18:40PM +0100, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
I know, it's personal site (well, just splash at this moment), and I
decided for 1024x768.
Deciding for *any* resolution is *bad* design.
Agree with that.
Craig.
Dave Feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's called rm
I finally figured that out. I thought there used to be
an unlink command (on ATT Unix).
Yes.
Deleting a file actually just means to remove a hard link. The
corresponding syscall is unlink(2). When no references are left,
the file
Since a couple of days a lot of the following line are logged in
/var/log/messages:
Nov 28 12:30:23 arwen login: 9 LOGIN FAILURES ON ttyC0
What this means?
Isn't ttyC0 the console? I'm sure that nobody is trying to log from
the console...
Thanks.
--
If someone care the layout of book instead the content, he shouldn't read it.
If someone care the layout of OpenBSD website more than content, he
should change OS, use some other, that got nice website.
At 12:20 2005-11-28, you wrote:
hmm, on Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:15:30PM +0100, Marcin
On Monday 28 November 2005 10.30, you wrote:
Hi.
Just in case anybody's interested in building an amd64 machine for using
with OpenBSD: I wouldn't recommend the asus pundit ae3 barebone.
It is based on what seems to be a KS-8-MV motherboard which has an sis
chip providing SATA, Network and
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:33:49AM -0600, J Moore wrote:
Why don't you cut the guy some slack - or at least shut your yap on this
(puh-l-e-e-e-ze)? I don't see *any* of what you're claiming to be
OpenBSD policy stated on the website. In fact I see a statement
(somewhat) to the contrary:
On Sunday 27 November 2005 19.39, Chris wrote:
Hello everyone.
I wanted to build an email server OBSD style. I have never done this,
and it has been a while since I set one up (few years). I wanted to
take advantage of many of the newer developments in the *nix email world.
I am using
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 08:24:03AM -0500, the unit calling itself Kenneth R
Westerback wrote:
And if it's the one-man show you claim, why don't you let the man
speak for himself? Or if you've been hired as the official OpenBSD
bitch, please - let us know.
As far as I can recall
On 11/27/05, David Ulevitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 27, 2005, at 7:52 PM, Jeremy David wrote:
Right now, OpenBSD.org's layout and design relies on a lot of old
hacks,
which break down for many users. I find that unacceptable, just as
I find
the general attitude that something
On Nov 28, 2005, at 9:37 AM, J Moore wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 08:24:03AM -0500, the unit calling itself
Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
And if it's the one-man show you claim, why don't you let the man
speak for himself? Or if you've been hired as the official OpenBSD
bitch, please - let
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 01:57:57AM -0500, the unit calling itself STeve Andre'
wrote:
Why don't you cut the guy some slack - or at least shut your yap on this
(puh-l-e-e-e-ze)? I don't see *any* of what you're claiming to be
OpenBSD policy stated on the website. In fact I see a statement
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 09:54:34AM -0500, the unit calling itself Jason Dixon
wrote:
I don't speak for Nick, but I imagine he probably feels a bit
unappreciated when folks feel like nitpicking his design, when that
is probably not his job (certainly not his focus) in the first
place.
Here's an example of what I'm talking about.
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fopenbsd.org%2Fcharset=%28dete
ct+automatically%29doctype=Inli
Openbsd.org is built on invalid, broken code.
If you would like to know why web standards are important, you could read
these
steven mestdagh wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:21:58AM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 04:31:31PM +0100, Said Outgajjouft said that
Line 92
@pwd_mkdb = (pwd_mkdb, -p);# program for building passwd database
and line 133
@pwd_mkdb = (pwd_mkdb, -p, -d, .);
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 08:37:56 -0600, J Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 08:24:03AM -0500, the unit calling itself Kenneth R
Westerback wrote:
And if it's the one-man show you claim, why don't you let the man
speak for himself? Or if you've been hired as the official
On 11/28/05, Jason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I assume it's because Nick is a VOLUNTEER that spends an unlimited
amount of time keeping the site updated with CONTENT. He knows that
no matter what design changes he wishes to make will undoubtedly be
shot down by Theo since the site is
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 04:30:25PM +0100, Said Outgajjouft wrote:
$ENV{'PATH'} = /sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin;
and that is where pwd_mkdb will be found.
Hmm that doesn't answer my question.
The answer I am looking for could be one of the following.
1. The PATH environment is local to
On Nov 28, 2005, at 10:06 AM, J Moore wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 09:54:34AM -0500, the unit calling itself
Jason Dixon wrote:
I don't speak for Nick, but I imagine he probably feels a bit
unappreciated when folks feel like nitpicking his design, when that
is probably not his job
Playing with a layout that works already is senseless, but I see value
in cleaning up the HTML of the existing pages.
On 11/28/05, frantisek holop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:29:43 -0500, Jeremy David
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are 5 errors on the main page alone. That means that no matter how
useful the content on the website is, the code breaks down for a lot of
people. Standards are
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:50:13PM +, Julian Smith wrote:
on filesystem redundancy
I'm not sure I fully understand exactly what AFS offers in this area,
but it comes with a lot of extra stuff that I don't need, and also seems
very complicated.
I think I'll persevere with
hey guys
is there anyone here ever tried to put up a openbsd fail-over fw using 2
obsd boxes connected to 2 different ISP's ?
something like:
ISP1 (66.77.204.10) ISP2 (207.110.9.10)
| fxp0 | fxp0
fwall0(firewall1-master) fwall1
On 11/28/05, Eric Faurot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/28/05, Jeremy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The website is hacky, invalid, and broken.
broken? which page? which browser?
Hi. Thanks for joining the conversation, Eric.
I appreciate your question, but I believe to cite a particular
On 11/28/05, J.C. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:29:43 -0500, Jeremy David
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are 5 errors on the main page alone. That means that no matter how
useful the content on the website is, the code breaks down for a lot of
people. Standards are
Greetings,
At the recent PacSec conference in Tokyo, I demonstrated how we can
easily secure wireless networks with OpenBSD. This solution uses IPsec
to protect the traffic between the wireless clients and the Access
Points. Users authenticate using OpenSSH (authpf) before they are
allowed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
all or nothing.
make the pages match the quality of the code and
the cd's.
even if you don't care, other people do.
I PAID for my CDs. I am happy with artwork, particularly the
smirk on that puffer fish.
I did not pay for the website. If I can stumble into the FAQ
Quoting steven mestdagh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 04:30:25PM +0100, Said Outgajjouft wrote:
$ENV{'PATH'} = /sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin;
and that is where pwd_mkdb will be found.
Hmm that doesn't answer my question.
The answer I am looking for could be one of
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 07:18:53AM -0800, the unit calling itself J.C. Roberts
wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 08:37:56 -0600, J Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 08:24:03AM -0500, the unit calling itself Kenneth R
Westerback wrote:
And if it's the one-man show you
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:29:43AM -0500, Jeremy David wrote:
On 11/28/05, Jason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I assume it's because Nick is a VOLUNTEER that spends an unlimited
amount of time keeping the site updated with CONTENT. He knows that
no matter what design changes he wishes
hmm, on Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 05:32:54PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek said that
It's even a FAQ: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq8.html#wwwnotstd
doesn't mean it's right, does it?
-f
--
bigamy: too many wives. monogamy: see bigamy.
hmm, on Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 05:32:54PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek said that
It's even a FAQ: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq8.html#wwwnotstd
at least remove
We welcome new contributors,
because that is clearly not true.
-f
--
the purpose of life is life with a purpose.
On 11/28/05, Jonathan Glaschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 08:15:00AM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:29:43 -0500, Jeremy David
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And that's exactly the problem.
Creating good html code means to me to look at the stardards
From: frantisek holop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hmm, on Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 05:32:54PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek said that
It's even a FAQ: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq8.html#wwwnotstd
at least remove
We welcome new contributors,
because that is clearly not true.
Sure, should be something
eric wrote:
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 12:59:18 +0100, Federico Giannici proclaimed...
Isn't ttyC0 the console? I'm sure that nobody is trying to log from
the console...
It is the first virtual terminal on x86 architectures. Logs don't lie, so
you might want to track it down, or see if you're
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hmm, on Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 05:32:54PM +0100, Otto
Moerbeek said that
It's even a FAQ:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq8.html#wwwnotstd
doesn't mean it's right, does it?
Certainlly doesn't mean it's wrong.
Almost certainly means it's OpenBSD
What system were you
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 19:03:08 +0100
frantisek holop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hmm, on Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 05:32:54PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek said that
It's even a FAQ: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq8.html#wwwnotstd
at least remove
We welcome new contributors,
because that is clearly not true.
On 11/28/05, Eric Faurot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/28/05, Jeremy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/28/05, Eric Faurot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/28/05, Jeremy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The website is hacky, invalid, and broken.
broken? which page? which browser?
hmm, on Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:35:57PM -0501, Nick Holland said that
NAME ONE.
Name one person.
Name one browser.
Name one problem.
OR SHUT UP.
so small problems or quirks are not problems anymore?
honestly Nick, go compare the code to the pages and you
should blush.
Validation is NOT
Hi,
This is getting real old. _CONTENT_IS_KING_ nothing else
matters here. As Nick said it is about functionality. This
.org is not about winning any website design awards..
It is about the OS goals set by Theo of OpenBSD.
Browsers do whatever it is their developers/corps decide
always
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 11:27:56 -0600, J Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did think - I actually thought pretty carefully about what I said. I
tried to avoid actually *calling* Nick the OpenBSD bitch; instead I
asked him if he was. Yeah - it's kind of a fine line...
Have you given up molesting
On 11/28/05, Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NAME ONE.
Name one person.
Name one browser.
Name one problem.
OR SHUT UP.
I believe I've mentioned several problems in this thread which occur
with several browsers. I suppose that I had hoped that the OpenBSD
team would greet new ideas
On 29/11/2005, at 4:47 AM, frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 05:32:54PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek said that
It's even a FAQ: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq8.html#wwwnotstd
doesn't mean it's right, does it?
The OpenBSD project does not fix the broken browsers which visit the
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 01:07:02PM -0500, Jeremy David wrote:
On 11/28/05, Jonathan Glaschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 08:15:00AM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:29:43 -0500, Jeremy David
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And that's exactly the problem.
On 13:28 Mon 28 Nov, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They welcome contributers.
You are not a contributor.
And it won't become one because of all the people on this mailing lists
with such attitude.
--
http://coastaldisturbance.com/
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 07:03:08PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 05:32:54PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek said that
It's even a FAQ: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq8.html#wwwnotstd
at least remove
We welcome new contributors,
because that is clearly not true.
-f
--
Hi Nick,
On 29/11/2005, at 4:36 AM, Nick Holland wrote:
Unfortunately, I care about the work I do. I do read (or at least
skim)
every message (ok, almost every...I've started an ignore list of
people
who warrent not ever giving a response to) that goes through misc@,
looking for a tidbit
I think he did, too. That's why I don't understand Nick insulting the
guy, and bashing his ideas. Clearly Nick's opinions don't mesh, but why
would he pursue this cross-thread vendetta? The only result of this sort
of behavior is that a potential contributor is alienated.
You say contributor,
3) Write it for an older release
[...]
4) Publish it, let it rot.
amen to that.
This message is essentially amplifying what Nick says, so please feel
free to skip if documentation is not your thing.
I may be somewhat biased, but looking at what google serves up for the
keywords OpenBSD
On 11/28/05, Eric Faurot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/28/05, Jeremy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The idea has been mentioned in this thread that it's too difficult to
make websites work in multiple browsers and still be valid. That idea
is simply incorrect. Here's an example.
frantisek holop 28-Nov-05 18:03
hmm, on Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 05:32:54PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek said that
It's even a FAQ: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq8.html#wwwnotstd
at least remove
We welcome new contributors,
because that is clearly not true.
It is true. Off the top of my head I can
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-26 08:57]:
Isn't it that all the routing changes anyway, either from BGPd or OSPFd are
both ending in the PF table at the kernel level. That's what I understand
I've installed the November, 27 snapshot on an Averatec 3250HX-01
with an Athlon XP-M processor and KM400 chipset. APM does not work,
nor does ACPI, EHCI, or CPU throttling. Continued...
OpenBSD 3.8-current (GENERIC) #274: Sun Nov 27 12:59:22 MST 2005
[EMAIL
intel powerstep or any other garbage -- try turning it off in the BIOS?
cheers, scorch
--
out of the frying pan and into the fire
Hi,
I might be mistaken, but
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/dev/pci/
lists only a single file, whereas my local source tree has lot's of them.
Does look strange
Best regards,
Hans
Replying to my own message from 20051126:
In case anyone is interested, the problem seems to be related to the APM
settings in the BIOS. Disabling APM altogether seems to have fixed the
problem.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 02:29:21PM -0500, Bob Ababurko wrote:
The alternative is to use a dual P3 that we have but I am still
interested in optimum availibility. Do I implement RAID 1 with two
drives.OR does this create more problems that it is worth by
introducing more parts to
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 22:26:46 +0100
Hans Kremers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I might be mistaken, but
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/dev/pci/
lists only a single file, whereas my local source tree has lot's of them.
Does look strange
Best regards,
Hans
Theo already
Yes,
Stop this flame fest, please.
I think all the misc@ readers are tired.
-David
On 11/28/05, Paul Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the OpenBSD team is extremely focused on what they do best,
writing good code, and these irrelevant sideshows on things that don't
matter is incredibly
On 11/28/05, Sime Ramov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 13:28 Mon 28 Nov, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They welcome contributers.
You are not a contributor.
And it won't become one because of all the people on this mailing lists
with such attitude.
--
http://coastaldisturbance.com/
Neither
Tobias Ulmer wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 07:03:08PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 05:32:54PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek said that
It's even a FAQ: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq8.html#wwwnotstd
at least remove
We welcome new contributors,
because that
Hi guys,
Subject says it all. Error:
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access / on this server.
Apache/1.3.27 Server at www.openbsd.org Port 80
Issues?
P
Hi,
at the moment I am reading the text of
http://www.openbsd.org/translation-explained.html#Joining
From here I wanted to go to
http://www.openbsd.org/translation.html
but this link gives me
Not Found The requested URL /translation.html was not found on this server.
Does anyone knows what
Just for the record, there are many, many silent users that have used
OpenBSD and followed misc@ and other OpenBSD lists for years and years
that are getting really tired of the handful of common users that keep
clogging up these lists with total shit.
While I feel people like me should read
now fixed.
-Bob
* Paulo Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-28 15:39]:
Hi guys,
Subject says it all. Error:
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access / on this server.
Apache/1.3.27 Server at www.openbsd.org Port 80
Issues?
P
--
| | | The ASCII
Paulo Rodriguez wrote:
Hi guys,
Subject says it all. Error:
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access / on this server.
Apache/1.3.27 Server at www.openbsd.org Port 80
Issues?
P
Seems up to me
--
Best regards,
Chris
If several things that could have gone wrong have not
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 00.00, Chris wrote:
Thank you for your response.
I have tried this, incrementing C,S,R, and E (you didn't really say
which), and wound up increasing all of the to 15m. I also changed my
clamd.conf to 900 seconds as you suggested.
Same thing happens. It quits
On 28/11/05, Jeremy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/28/05, Eric Faurot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/28/05, Jeremy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The idea has been mentioned in this thread that it's too difficult to
make websites work in multiple browsers and still be valid. That
That did it!
You are the greatest!
*Thank you!*
I remembered /etc/clamd.conf, but I forgot about
/etc/smtp-vilter/clamd.conf -- I had it to 900, but the timeout was
still commented! A slip of the finger... I checked the other
clamd.conf and my sendmail about a million times, but I forgot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:53:45AM -0800, the unit
calling itself J.C. Roberts wrote:
I would assume that J.C. Roberts is a human, not a unit,
whatever that is supposed to imply.
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 11:27:56 -0600, J Moore
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did think - I
I've installed 3.8 on an sgi o2.
All seems to run but not the xserver.
I looked at the x386 dist and saw that
there is no xserv38.tgz for sgi.
I've tried mirrors in de and sg without
success.
Is there something special I should looking
for?
There is no X server for the sgi yet. Nor
X server support is listed in the projects section of the sgi port page:
http://openbsd.org/sgi.html
I suspect there isn't an open source xserver implementation for the O2
graphics. You might have luck building X from sources and using a PCI
card.
Dustin
I've installed 3.8 on an sgi o2.
All
Chris Kuethe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...However, OpenSSH deviates from the standards in its SCP (Secure
Copy Protocol) implementation.
SSH Tectia Client and Server now incorporate a compatibility mode
for OpenSSH SCP, which still uses
the old Secure Shell version 1 (SSH1)
On Monday 28 November 2005 04:04 pm, Theo de Raadt wrote:
This is why OpenBSD/OpenSSH does not need to hire a spin doctor.
Other people do it for us ;)
http://www.ssh.com/company/newsroom/article/684/
And... thanks to those of you who supported us when they were
threatening to sue us years
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using a mozilla 1.7 browser, with CSS on,
JavaScript off.
And it doesn't run javascript.
Outside my area of expertise, but that seems normal somehow.
The menus on the referenced cerealport.com web-site
don't expand at
http://cerealport.com does not answer
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 11:29:36AM -0700, the unit calling itself Spruell,
Darren-Perot wrote:
From: frantisek holop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hmm, on Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 05:32:54PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek said that
It's even a FAQ: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq8.html#wwwnotstd
at least
On 11/27/05, frantisek holop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it shouldn't. you might get files landing in the wrong directory (i'm
not really sure this is possible either, but it's probably the worst
that could happen), but there shouldn't be any real disk corruption.
i had files not showing up
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
That caused me to raise an eyebrow as well, but I think they refer
to the protocol of scp(1) itself, not the SSH1/2 protocol of the
underlying SSH session. The phrasing certainly is confusing.
I think you mean misleading. :-)
--
Matthew Weigel
On 11/28/05, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/27/05, frantisek holop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it shouldn't. you might get files landing in the wrong directory (i'm
not really sure this is possible either, but it's probably the worst
that could happen), but there shouldn't be
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 18:47:22 -0500
Kevin Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've read that Supermicro products are all standard hardware components
that do not lock you in to using Supermicro hardware for upgrades. Is
that generally agreed upon in here?
I'm very happy with our Supermicro's so far
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 09:47:25PM -0600, Tan Dang wrote:
I dual boot OpenBSD 3.8
and Windows XP on my laptop. Both os's share a fat partition. For my
particular case, I put Windows XP into hibernation mode and booted to
OpenBSD. I copied some ogg files from the ffs partition to the fat
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:29:43 -0500
Jeremy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/28/05, Jason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.openbsd.orgcharset=%28det
ect+automatically%29
There are 5 errors on the main page alone.
And this is a *real*
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Tan Dang wrote:
I have had this problem of files not showing up on the fat partition
after moving the files over from ffs also. I dual boot OpenBSD 3.8
and Windows XP on my laptop. Both os's share a fat partition. For my
particular case, I put Windows XP into hibernation
On 11/28/05, Tan Dang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have had this problem of files not showing up on the fat partition
after moving the files over from ffs also. I dual boot OpenBSD 3.8
and Windows XP on my laptop. Both os's share a fat partition. For my
particular case, I put Windows XP into
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 08:30:05PM -0600, J Moore wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 11:29:36AM -0700, the unit calling itself Spruell,
Darren-Perot wrote:
From: frantisek holop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hmm, on Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 05:32:54PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek said that
It's even a
Jacob Meuser wrote:
this is how the world works: ignore the whiners, they offer nothing
useful.
Some irresistable straight lines?
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 21:43:34 -0600
Matthew Weigel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
That caused me to raise an eyebrow as well, but I think they refer
to the protocol of scp(1) itself, not the SSH1/2 protocol of the
underlying SSH session. The phrasing certainly is
98 matches
Mail list logo
