On Thursday 02 March 2006 15:14, Tobias Weingartner wrote:
If the client can't find any DNS information on the destination, it
tends to bounce. At least in all non-broken MTAs. Try it. Send
email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and see what happens.
This was 1/2 his argument. No DNS info means no DNS
Hello.
Just for curiosity, yesterday I was thinking about Linux emulation and
redhat OpenBSD packages. I would like to know if it is planned to
switch to some more free Linux distribution like Debian instead of Red
Hat to be used as the base system for Linux emulation.
Thanks in advance.
Ramiro.
Hi,
i had an other ethernet interface configured and the default route via
the other interface. I removed this hostname.if and restarted.
then i did the following:
# ifconfig upl0 inet 10.200.200.1 10.200.200.2 netmask 255.255.255.252 up
# route add default 10.200.200.2
# ping 10.200.200.1
Hello!
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:54:35AM +0100, Ramiro Aceves wrote:
Just for curiosity, yesterday I was thinking about Linux emulation and
redhat OpenBSD packages. I would like to know if it is planned to
switch to some more free Linux distribution like Debian instead of Red
Hat to be used as
I have a small problem with squirrelmail. The problem is that users
cannot read their mail messages if they are too large (though not very
large). I use SquirrelMail 1.4.5, OpenBSD 3.8, PHP 4.4.1, and IMAP
(from PINE package, from ports). The problem is that users cannot read
their mail (even
Hello
In what exact way is Debian more free than Redhat with respect to the
portions OpenBSD takes for the emulation stuff?
I am not an expert in this kind of issues, I just have some curiosity.
You understand what I mean, RedHat 9 was the latest freely available
RH version. RH 9 is becoming
Marc Espie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
make search key=
is more or less deprecated...
Interesting, So is /usr/ports/INDEX being dumped too at some point.
Or will it still have listings showing dependancies and stuff?
Hi,
I'm facing a problem where a vpn-tunnel fails for 1 to approx. 3 Secs.
every few minuntes.
we have - well quite successful established a ipsec-vpn-mesh with
Carp-failover across our four locations.
While the connection between three members of the mesh runs fine - we
have a problem with our
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 03:33:21PM -0500, marrandy wrote:
Has anyone tried VIA Eden fanless at 1GHz yet or the new Eden-N or NL (Luke
series) yet ? If so, how did they perform.
I used to have one of them with a HD plugged.
They perform quite well, as long as you keep them cool enough
under
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 04:36:12PM -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote:
Hey folks,
i am trying to set my desktop serial console in order to be able to
have serial access to my soekris box.
The probably easiest way is a
tip -BAUDRATE TERM
# tip -19200 tty00
/Markus
...on Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 05:01:52PM -0600, Joel Gudknecht wrote:
I'm concerned that sendmail is even accepting these messages as they
have nothing to do with my domain and I don't know how to prevent this
behavior, any info on this subject would be appreciated, thank you.
From the
...on Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 01:07:09PM +0200, Gabriel George POPA wrote:
I have a small problem with squirrelmail. The problem is that users
cannot read their mail messages if they are too large (though not very
[..]
going on? Settings from /etc/inetd.conf:
# IMAP server from PINE
On 2. mar. 2006, at 14.00, Alexander Bochmann wrote:
...on Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 01:07:09PM +0200, Gabriel George POPA
wrote:
I have a small problem with squirrelmail. The problem is that
users
cannot read their mail messages if they are too large (though not
very
[..]
going on?
The problem is that users cannot read
their mail (even if they contain only text) if they reach a certain
limit (SquirrelMail stalls while reading).
Perhaps it is still reading data from imapd (or waiting for it).
Is imapd process (of the user being logged in) running while squirrelmail
Janusz Gumkowski wrote:
The problem is that users cannot read
their mail (even if they contain only text) if they reach a certain
limit (SquirrelMail stalls while reading).
Perhaps it is still reading data from imapd (or waiting for it).
Is imapd process (of the user being logged in)
Rod == Rod Whitworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rod As a result spammers target secondaries strongly in preference to
Rod primaries. As a project I listed a secondary for a server I support
Rod using an alias on the same machine. All of the mail sent to the
Rod secondary address (unless I missed
NO - it does not! Well, not unless the sending MTA is broken. To quote
from Postfix documentation referring to not getting an MX record from
DNS:
By default, the Postfix SMTP client defers delivery and tries again
after some delay. This behavior is required by the SMTP standard.
Yes it
$ host -t mx stonehenge.com
stonehenge.com mail is handled by 666 spamtrap.stonehenge.com.
stonehenge.com mail is handled by 5 blue.stonehenge.com.
Any mail delivered to spamtrap gets the following response:
450 Violation of RFC2821 Section 5 Paragraph 8 correlates highly with
spamming
On 2006/03/02 08:16, Graham Toal wrote:
Any mail delivered to spamtrap gets the following response:
450 Violation of RFC2821 Section 5 Paragraph 8 correlates highly with
spamming and is therefore rejected.
Ouch! You're a brave one. That's fine until your first big network outage
Graham == Graham Toal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Graham Ouch! You're a brave one. That's fine until your first big network
outage :-)
Graham Oh wait - I bet they're both on the same net segment, right? You
wouldn't
Graham dare do that with a machine elsewhere on the net!
No, they're both on
On 02/03/06, Graham Toal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally I do believe in Backup MX, as long as it does proper
relay checking. It's nice if it also does spam checking, but
not critical because your primary MX will still do that. However
Do you know just how disturbing it is to receive
On 02/03/06, Graham Toal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ host -t mx stonehenge.com
stonehenge.com mail is handled by 666 spamtrap.stonehenge.com.
stonehenge.com mail is handled by 5 blue.stonehenge.com.
Any mail delivered to spamtrap gets the following response:
450 Violation of RFC2821
On 02 Mar 2006 06:54:45 -0800 merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L.
Schwartz) wrote:
I hate greylisting. It hurts legit mail to solve the spam problem.
And I don't need it, based on the amount of spam I can kill with this
(and a few other tricks described in the referenced paper).
If you used spamd
On 3/2/06, Ramiro Aceves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In what exact way is Debian more free than Redhat with respect to the
portions OpenBSD takes for the emulation stuff?
I am not an expert in this kind of issues, I just have some curiosity.
You understand what I mean, RedHat 9 was the latest
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 09:47:35PM +0700, Cahyo wrote:
I wish someone make this
http://www.docum.org/docum.org/faq/cache/65.html for obsd pf n altq,
because very useful for SOHO user for bandwidth efficiency, maybe have
another ideas for that goal
It's a dirty hack, really. You could try to
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 03:38:09PM +, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
Graham,
You seem to have some contradicting views on the matter. What is the
difference between greylisting and the aforementioned spamtrapping
approach? Isn't it essentially a variation of the very same thing,
namely
Hi,
I just searched the net for hours but didn't find a reasonable solution.
My intention is to get traffic graphs, like the ones in mrtg for
interfaces but for specific services (that is one for ftp, one for http
and so on).
First idea was to use mrtg/snmp that I already use for simple
On 02/03/06, David Terrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 03:38:09PM +, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
Graham,
You seem to have some contradicting views on the matter. What is the
difference between greylisting and the aforementioned spamtrapping
approach? Isn't it
Wouldn't a even simpler solution be to define a
high MX record to a dummy address that would never
answer. The spammers were going to retry, they would
anyway and a real server would retry for sure.
Constantine == Constantine A Murenin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Constantine Correction: this very neat trick is by Randal L. Schwartz; Graham
Constantine was the one opposing it in this thread. :-)
Constantine Here are some results of 'You Had Me at HELO':
Constantine
Peter == Peter Fraser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter Wouldn't a even simpler solution be to define a
Peter high MX record to a dummy address that would never
Peter answer. The spammers were going to retry, they would
Peter anyway and a real server would retry for sure.
My understanding is that
Hello all,
Although I cannot believe my eyes, but I SOLVED THE PROBLEM. The
problem was NOT UW IMAPD. The imapd waited a lng time,
while the SquirrelMail page was stalled. But I couldn't notice two other
facts:
1) httpd was eating the CPU;
2) the first message could be read without
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just searched the net for hours but didn't find a
reasonable solution.
My intention is to get traffic graphs, like the ones in mrtg for
interfaces but for specific services (that is one for ftp,
one for http
and so on).
First idea was to use mrtg/snmp that I
You could take a look at pfflowd, flow-tools, flowd, and tcpflow. These are
all in the ports tree.
Tim Donahue
On Thursday 02 March 2006 11:16, David Elze wrote:
Hi,
I just searched the net for hours but didn't find a reasonable solution.
My intention is to get traffic graphs, like the
Hi gurus,
I'm working on a project where carp loadbalancing firewalls could exactly fit
our needs. Before that, I wonder how it will work outside of the OpenBSD boxes.
First, regarding Carp and STP what happens usually in a manageable L2 switch
when the same MAC is announced on two different
On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:14:29 -0700, Tobias Weingartner wrote:
On Thursday, March 2, Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 23:16:59 -0600, Graham Toal wrote:
If your DNS is on the same net as the mailer, its down too. Senders
soon get no result at all when they look you up, with the
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Sylvain Coutant wrote:
First, regarding Carp and STP what happens usually in a manageable L2
switch when the same MAC is announced on two different ports ? I don't
remember that STP includes loadsharing, so isn't it possible the switch
will only choose one port to forward
Thanks Jason for the details. I'm quite good from L3 and up, but I still never
had to understand so much about L2 ;-))
The problem you will/may encounter will differ based on the vendor of
SWITCH1 and SWITCH2. Some vendors will handle it OK if the MAC is a
multicast MAC, some will log a
First, regarding Carp and STP what happens usually in a manageable L2
switch when the same MAC is announced on two different ports ?
Switches often remember which ports a MAC was seen on, not which
MACs were seen on each port. Not what you might first expect, but
I think the common failover
On Thursday 02 March 2006 17.16, David Elze wrote:
Hi,
I just searched the net for hours but didn't find a reasonable solution.
My intention is to get traffic graphs, like the ones in mrtg for
interfaces but for specific services (that is one for ftp, one for http
and so on).
First idea
Am Donnerstag, den 02.03.2006, 15:47 -0500 schrieb Tim Donahue:
Hi,
You could take a look at pfflowd, flow-tools, flowd, and tcpflow. These are
all in the ports tree.
Thanks for these hints, they seem to be exactly what I need. I'm
currently playing around with the tools, the next step is to
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 17:16:02 +0100, David Elze proclaimed...
I just searched the net for hours but didn't find a reasonable solution.
My intention is to get traffic graphs, like the ones in mrtg for
interfaces but for specific services (that is one for ftp, one for http
and so on).
Best
On 3/2/06, Markus Schatzl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 03:33:21PM -0500, marrandy wrote:
Has anyone tried VIA Eden fanless at 1GHz yet or the new Eden-N or NL (Luke
series) yet ? If so, how did they perform.
I used to have one of them with a HD plugged.
They perform
On 2006-03-02 19:01:13 -0600, eric wrote:
Best you'll find for reliable traffic accounting (and the most flexible) is
argus http://www.qosient.com/argus/. I'd recommend that route, then using
Seems to be quiet since 2004-05 and has its own license :-(
Best
Martin
--
On 3/2/06, David Elze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I just searched the net for hours but didn't find a reasonable solution.
My intention is to get traffic graphs, like the ones in mrtg for
interfaces but for specific services (that is one for ftp, one for http
and so on).
First idea was to
On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 03:33:53 +0100, Martin Schrvder proclaimed...
Seems to be quiet since 2004-05 and has its own license :-(
Good software works, it doesn't need to be updated every 3 hours.
As far as it's license, that is what the author chose. Does that mean you
can't use it? Seems pretty
Have/had a V100 working as an office firewall. It maintains a VPN
connection between itself and another OBSD firewall. All running OBSD
3.8. Both are quite new in their current positions. Previous to this an
Ultra2 with 3.5 was doing this job without issue.
The V100 twice now has hung without
Hello everybody,
Is there a way to use IPSec in such a scenario:
Server: fix IP
some clients: fixed IPs
some clients: dyn. IPs
All HowTos/Manuals I read just explained how to set up an IPSec with 2 Fix
IPs (as far as I understood it).
But how can I set up a VPN if a client has a dynamic IP
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everybody,
Is there a way to use IPSec in such a scenario:
Server: fix IP
some clients: fixed IPs
some clients: dyn. IPs
All HowTos/Manuals I read just explained how to set up an IPSec with 2 Fix
IPs (as far as I understood it).
But how can I set up a VPN if a
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 07:37:12PM +0100, Michael Schmidt wrote:
Hello,
version: 3.8
architecture: i386
I have seen that /etc cannot be located on a separated partition.
Why can it be not on an extra partition?
Just curious, but why would want /etc on a separate partition?
Have a great
The reader should note that while this configuration uses numeric IP
addresses, the configuration can also be done with fully qualified
domain names. To use domain names, simply copy the keys into the
/etc/isakmpd/pubkeys/fqdn directory, and use srcid and dstid keywords in
you /etc/ipsec.conf
:: Cartao -
Virtualcards.com.br ::
:: Flash Player 2005 -
Virtualcards.com.br ::
::Termos do servico - Arquivo
.pdf - Virtualcards.com.br ::
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just read the articles provided at www.unixguru.de and googled but
didn`t found this one.
Just was and still is on the front page of undeadly.org:
http://www.undeadly.org/
Plenty of OpenBSD only stuff there.
53 matches
Mail list logo
