On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 10:51:32PM -0700, akonsu wrote:
hello,
i have a windows (ntfs) partition and an openbsd partition on my hard drive.
i am trying to mount the windows partition. but no success so far:
mount -t ntfs /dev/wd0i /mnt
it fails with an error message saying that
On Thu, 25 May 2006, Gaby vanhegan wrote:
Is there a working pf.conf that anyone can share with me? I can
connect to the server but PASV mode fails with the normal error that
it can't make the data connection.
You have to run two instances of the proxy. One as normal that listens on
the
Hi,
On 3.9 dmesg says
...
pccom3 on puc0 .. PCI USR modem..
...
and there is another 2 com ports in my box, they are detected as
expected: pccom0, pccom1
The question is how can i find which entry in /dev/[tty|cua|cuaU|..]
is for my modem device??
I tryed with
# cu -l /dev/tty02
# cu -l
On Fri, 26 May 2006, Yakov wrote:
Hi,
On 3.9 dmesg says
...
pccom3 on puc0 .. PCI USR modem..
...
and there is another 2 com ports in my box, they are detected as
expected: pccom0, pccom1
The question is how can i find which entry in /dev/[tty|cua|cuaU|..]
is for my modem device??
Hello List,
I have opbsd box (3.9). I need to make this box as a router. I have
two network cards. One internal, and other external. External card has
it's own ip address, let's say 1.2.3.4 (static). Internal card also
has it's own static IP - 192.168.1.1 with dhcp server running on it.
So I
On 5/11/06, Chris Cappuccio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I always run across cheap/free/lying around dell laptops that work great.
The sound works, the wireless might work, and suspend usually works. Right
now I have a dell latitude c400, they're on ebay for $300, the thing weighs
2.5 pounds, it's
Craig Hammond wrote:
I am wanting up upgrade a 3.8 system to 3.9
I normally do this by backing up any data I need and doing a clean
install.
It's mainly the whitelisted entries I want to keep over the rebuild.
I figured out to extract them by going:
spamdb | grep WHITE | cut -d | -f 2
To refocus the current discussion somewhat, I'm going with HTML::Mason
myself, for various reasons.
The first one is that I trust the perl people to do something sensible.
They've got a lot of advanced frameworks that do work, and they understand
something about security.
The downside is the
Hello,
On Thu, 25.05.2006 at 18:27:30 +0200, Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to compile a small C++ program (part of building the HylaFAX
port). This is the program:
thanks for all the answers. I'm no C++ guru either, as many of you have
already pointed out, but I didn't really
T I have opbsd box (3.9). I need to make this box as a router. I have
T two network cards. One internal, and other external. External card has
T it's own ip address, let's say 1.2.3.4 (static). Internal card also
T has it's own static IP - 192.168.1.1 with dhcp server running on it.
T So I need
On 25 May 2006, at 21:35, Peter Fraser wrote:
The nice thing about pftpx -- it is symmetrical
Yes, hence my question, and happiness that it replaced ftp-proxy.
Where are I going wrong here? (pf rules and config to be found below).
On 25 May 2006, at 21:42, Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote:
I
I don't know is it possible, but I added PASS statement to the rule
and the rule now looks like:
nat pass on vr0 inet from 192.168.1.0/24 to any - 1.2.3.4
Please, comment that (is it necessary or what?). Thanks.
And thank you all for reading.
On 5/26/06, Alexander Belikov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 26 May 2006, Gaby vanhegan wrote:
When I type the ls command. my.ip is the same in each case, the
firewall, proxy and ftp server are running on the same machine. My
aim here is to not open a load of ports for ftpd, but to have the
pftpx part of ftp-proxy only open the ports on
Hi,
caused by the lack of an available test-computer for trying this my own
right now -
has somone already made any experiences in getting ntop 3.x running on
System with OpenBSD 3.8 or 3.9 installed ?
Kind reagrds,
Stefan
On 26 May 2006, at 11:31, Camiel Dobbelaar wrote:
Ah right, running the proxy and server on the same machine is not
supported.
I see. What about running them on separate IP addresses (both still
on the same machine)? Or do they need to be on different physical
interfaces? Should I use a
On Fri, 26 May 2006, Gaby vanhegan wrote:
I see. What about running them on separate IP addresses (both still
on the same machine)? Or do they need to be on different physical
interfaces? Should I use a separate package, such as ftpsesame? Is
there any way round this problem?
Using
How about this?
Btw. default options can be left out, makes the rules even simpler to
write...
Since you are scrubbing everything the same way, try too keep it
simple, not sure if just scrub would work too, but try it.
If not, scrub in and scrub out will work.
fragment reassemble is default
I'll try that later in the evening.
For now, I've just needed working NAT. And now it's working.
Later there will be more rules, and every simpler rule will be important :)
Thanks in advice.
That NAT rule works for me. If thats not the complete pf.conf it would
help to see the whole.
For
Tautvydas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It looks like internal network is working, but there is no routing
between vr0 (external) and vr1 (internal) network cards.
To me this sounds a bit like you have forgotten to enable gatewaying, ie
# sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding=1
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen,
Sorry for offtopic, not right place where to ask, but i use an openbsd
as host server ;)
So, is here any way how to whitelist blacklisted hosts from
sbl's(spamcom, spamhaus, etc.) for ONLY ONE DOMAIN.
For example, spammer.host.bar, spammer.host2.bar passes to
my.spamlover.domain, but is still
On 26/05/06, Christopher Snell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/11/06, Chris Cappuccio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I always run across cheap/free/lying around dell laptops that work great.
The sound works, the wireless might work, and suspend usually works. Right
now I have a dell latitude c400,
On Fri, 26 May 2006 10:40:02 +0200
Marc Espie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The main issue with perl modules is that there are so many of them.
Most of CPAN is trivial to port over to OpenBSD, but is it worth it ?
Most of it probably isn't...
Porting all of CPAN is probably not necessary, and the
On 5/25/06, Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because it'll clash. Clashing is good.
I'm pretty sure you would be more successfull on a humor TV show as a
clown than wasting people time and bandwith with stupid statements
like that. And I don't mind if you are a OpenBSD developer,
On 5/25/06, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how many parse_config functions do you think spamd needs?
It was an example. The point is: is there a reason for not using
static on functions with internal linkage? There's at least one reason
to use static: name clashes.
--
DG
On 5/26/06, Craig Hammond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am wanting up upgrade a 3.8 system to 3.9
I normally do this by backing up any data I need and doing a clean
install.
It's mainly the whitelisted entries I want to keep over the rebuild.
I figured out to extract them by going:
spamdb | grep
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 10:14:04AM -0300, Diego Giagio wrote:
On 5/25/06, Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because it'll clash. Clashing is good.
I'm pretty sure you would be more successfull on a humor TV show as a
clown than wasting people time and bandwith with stupid statements
My answer is correct. It is not my fault that you don't have a clue
about programming. Static has it's uses however for some reason the
(open source) world at large seem not to understand what they are. Same
is true with typedef, it has its uses too but mostly it is abused.
I bet you have
On 5/26/06, Diego Giagio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/25/06, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how many parse_config functions do you think spamd needs?
It was an example. The point is: is there a reason for not using
static on functions with internal linkage? There's at least one reason
hello.
what can i do with unknown at iic0 addr 0x18 not configured?
how can i recognize device behind? is it possible to find out
i2c-chip model without using screwdriver against my notebook?
thanks.
OpenBSD 3.9-stable (GENERIC) #1: Sat May 6 14:01:00 EEST 2006
[EMAIL
On May 25, 2006, at 4:53 PM, akonsu wrote:
hello,
i read somewhere that openbsd is not as scalable as other OS. this
atricle,
for example. http://www.serverwatch.com/sreviews/article.php/3415651
but the reviews and benchmarks that i could find are about two
years old or
so. does anyone
Original message
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 10:14:04 -0300
From: Diego Giagio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Static functions in C code
To: Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
On 5/25/06, Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because it'll clash. Clashing is
On 5/26/06, edgarz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, is here any way how to whitelist blacklisted hosts from
sbl's(spamcom, spamhaus, etc.) for ONLY ONE DOMAIN.
snip
i'm using postfix.
This is probably more of a postfix question than an OpenBSD one. A
quick glance of the documentation at
On 5/26/06, Diego Giagio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/25/06, Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because it'll clash. Clashing is good.
I'm pretty sure you would be more successfull on a humor TV show as a
clown than wasting people time and bandwith with stupid statements
like that. And
On 5/25/06, Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because it'll clash. Clashing is good.
I thought you were being sarcastic, and I was wrong. I strongly apologize.
--
DG
On 5/26/06, Jason Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And Marco was explaining why he (and probably other OpenBSD devs)
don't use static: name clashes. static makes things more difficult to
debug, and having 50 different static functions named the same thing
could get pretty confusing in large
On 5/26/06, Jacob Yocom-Piatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wow. this is just about the most offensive thing i've ever seen on list. that's
not to say it should be censored ;).
I wrongly interpreted Marco's statement, and shot him badly.
all this from someone who spends time pointing finding
Tim Donahue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my experience since stuff in CPAN generally Just Works(TM) on
OpenBSD and is as simple as `perl -MCPAN - e install module` I
really can't see any compelling reasons for everything to be put into
the ports tree.
As you say, CPAN itself works fine
Hi,
I had this USB stick called CHEER,
see message ID
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
here is a clip from messages showing the ID,
May 11 16:05:41 neptune /bsd: umass0: CHEER USB_DISK, rev 2.00/2.00, addr 2
May 11 16:05:41 neptune /bsd: sd1 at scsibus2 targ 1 lun 0: CHEER, USB_DISK,
1.00
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:59:51AM -0300, Diego Giagio wrote:
Because it'll clash. Clashing is good.
I thought you were being sarcastic, and I was wrong. I strongly apologize.
No sarcasm. If you've clashes, the linker will tell you. But if you
make everything static, you may using the same
On Thu, 25 May 2006, Toni Mueller wrote:
I'd like to compile a small C++ program (part of building the HylaFAX
port). This is the program:
-
#include iostream.h
int main(){ cout Hello World! endl; return 0;}
-
Compiling it goes like this:
$
Marco,
Thanks very much for your response. The tape drive does not show up on
the BIOS messages, but before initially writing to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I was
told by Dell that the absence of the tape drive on the messages was OK.
I just called Dell again, and was told that it is normal for the PERC
thank you.
does anyone know if there is software to access a FFS partition from windows
(on a dual boot machine)? trying to avoid creating a FAT patition...
mount -t ntfs /dev/wd0i /mnt
it fails with an error message saying that operation is not supported.
ntfs is not enabled in
Original message from Diego Giagio [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
1. there are debugging requirements. Static functions do not expose entry
points.
Even for user-level code?
If you are thinking there is a difference between kernel code userland code,
no. Compilers compile code based upon the
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When I started trying to resolve this, I knew that the add-in
card was a
possible solution, and I am leaning towards it more now, especially
since the Adaptec 39160 that the tech suggested is on the OpenBSD
supported hardware list.
I am not committed to that
On 5/26/06, Matthias Kilian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No sarcasm. If you've clashes, the linker will tell you. But if you
make everything static, you may using the same name for different
things without noticing, and this *may* be confusing when reading
the code.
That's a very reasonable
Martin Vahi wrote:
Actually, I tried to compile Qt 4.something new about a month
ago on OpenBSD 3.8 and it also failed. The very same tarball
compiled perfectly on RedHat's Fedora Core. No, it's not a
but report, I've given up compiling the Qt on OpenBSD.
The purpose of my current message is
3.8 had clamav-088.2 and 3.9 only has clamav-088
Is there going to be (soon) and update to the 3.9
packages for clamav ?
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 02:15:22PM -0400, Peter Fraser wrote:
3.8 had clamav-088.2 and 3.9 only has clamav-088
Is there going to be (soon) and update to the 3.9
packages for clamav ?
http://www.openbsd.org/pkg-stable.html
Ciao,
Kili
Ugh that means they are running the drive on a RAID channel. That is a bad
idea. Go for the 39160 option.
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 10:29:59AM -0700, Victor wrote:
Marco,
Thanks very much for your response. The tape drive does not show up on
the BIOS messages, but before initially writing to
On 5/26/06, Peter Fraser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3.8 had clamav-088.2 and 3.9 only has clamav-088
Is there going to be (soon) and update to the 3.9
packages for clamav ?
According to http://www.openbsd.org/pkg-stable.html 3.9 does have
clamav-0.88.2 in it's packages. And my spam/virus email
I did check, I still have the output of my screen
I did an ftp to ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/3.0/packages/i386
And clamav-0.88.2 is still not listed there.
Clicking the clamav-0.88.2.tgz. i386 in
www.openbsd.org/pkg-statble.html in firefox give 550 Failed to change
director
I suppose that
Just wanted to take a minute to wish all devs present to the 2006
Hackathon in Calgary a nice time and on behalf of the users a thank you
for your time and dedications to the improvement of our beloved OS!
I don't know what surprise this year Hackathon will bring, but as each
years, I can't
Marco,
Thanks a bunch for the help! I'll post again when it's resolved...
-Victor
At 11:33 AM 5/26/2006, you wrote:
Ugh that means they are running the drive on a RAID channel. That is a bad
idea. Go for the 39160 option.
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 10:29:59AM -0700, Victor wrote:
Marco,
Thanks
Hi everyone,
I setup an OpenBSD 3.9 machine to act as a router and traffic shape
hosts behind it.
The setup looks like this:
INTERNET
|
SWITCH_1
|
OpenBSD 3.9 fxp0 (x.x.x.126 255.255.255.128)
OpenBSD 3.9 fxp1 (x.x.x.129 255.255.255.128)
|
SWITCH_2
|
Looking at /bin/head source code.
The usage function uses:
fputs(usage: head [-n line_count] [file ...]\n, stderr);
While many other programs use:
fprintf(stderr, usage: arch [-ks]\n);
Is there a difference? Is one preferred?
Yes, I know. I should take a C programming course.
On 5/26/06, Peter Fraser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did check, I still have the output of my screen
I did an ftp to ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/3.0/packages/i386
You seem to be correct. It's listed on the site but not in the FTP dir.
I compiled 88.2 myself, but I'm running current, and
On 5/26/06, Jason Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/26/06, Peter Fraser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3.8 had clamav-088.2 and 3.9 only has clamav-088
Is there going to be (soon) and update to the 3.9
packages for clamav ?
According to http://www.openbsd.org/pkg-stable.html 3.9 does have
I just pulled down ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/3.9/ports.tar.gz
and it too contains only clamav-0.88 not clamav-0.88.2
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Peter Fraser
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 2:57 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just pulled down ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/3.9/ports.tar.gz
and it too contains only clamav-0.88 not clamav-0.88.2
The updated ports come from CVS.
http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html
DS
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 02:56:55PM -0400, Peter Fraser wrote:
I did an ftp to ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/3.0/packages/i386
^ that ought to be '9',
I guess.
And clamav-0.88.2 is still not listed
Hello all,
I'm new to OpenBSD, I installed it a few times but than did not know
what to do realy. Right now I'm little more experienced with Linux and I
thought give it a nother try.
Now I'm runnin an Openbsd 3.9 Box.
Default setup. I try to run a Webmailbox and later Openvpn.
It did not work
It's on cvs, I don't think they update the src and ports tar files on
the ftp site with stable cvs updates.
Jason
On 5/26/06, Peter Fraser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just pulled down ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/3.9/ports.tar.gz
and it too contains only clamav-0.88 not clamav-0.88.2
Well it appears that stable packages havn't been completely updated on
the ftp sites. I would then suggest you grab the stable ports tree and
install via that method. This may not always be easy, but in the case
of a virus scanner, you probably want it to be updated as quick as
possible. I always
Darren,
Thanks for the comment. Well, the reasons that I am heavily
prejudiced in favor of the Adaptec adapter are my time crunch
(I need this to work correctly yesterday), the clear Dell and
OpenBSD support for it, and my ignorance about SCSI
adapters combined with the slow pace at which I would
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:15:55AM -0400, Stephen Takacs wrote:
One point I forgot to mention ealier to the OP: another nice thing
about Perl is that it comes in the base system. All other languages
you mentioned have to be installed via packages/ports.
Absolutely one of my motivations
misiu wrote:
Hello all,
I'm new to OpenBSD, I installed it a few times but than did not know
what to do realy. Right now I'm little more experienced with Linux and I
thought give it a nother try.
Now I'm runnin an Openbsd 3.9 Box.
Default setup. I try to run a Webmailbox and later Openvpn.
On 5/26/06, Alexander Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christopher Nelson wrote:
[...]
I was wondering what window manager was recommended for use with OpenBSD
3.9? i.e, one that is reasonably current, and not broken.
Am I the only one that is quite satisfied with fvwm? While not as
On 5/26/06, Will H. Backman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking at /bin/head source code.
The usage function uses:
fputs(usage: head [-n line_count] [file ...]\n, stderr);
While many other programs use:
fprintf(stderr, usage: arch [-ks]\n);
Is there a difference? Is one preferred?
Yes, I
misiu wrote:
Hello all,
I'm new to OpenBSD, I installed it a few times but than did not know
what to do realy. Right now I'm little more experienced with Linux and I
thought give it a nother try.
Now I'm runnin an Openbsd 3.9 Box.
Default setup. I try to run a Webmailbox and later
Hello,
On Thu, 25.05.2006 at 22:38:53 +0200, Sylwester S. Biernacki [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
But it doesn't. Other peers can't see as 8545 nor prefix
195.182.219.0/24.
how about adding
network 195.182.219.0/24
to your bgpd.conf?
Best,
--Toni++
Hello all,
On Thu, 25.05.2006 at 19:23:20 +, Steffen Wendzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#include iostream.h
using namepsace std;
I'd like to resolve the question and report my findings:
* Deleting everything under /usr/include and then reextracting
comp39.tgz was the first step that made
akonsu a icrit :
thank you.
does anyone know if there is software to access a FFS partition from windows
(on a dual boot machine)? trying to avoid creating a FAT patition...
http://ffsdrv.sourceforge.net/
Aurilien.
this really is a question that should be posted to the misc@ list
instead of to tech@ per this http://www.openbsd.org/mail.html so
I'll give it nudge in the proper direction.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Wikipedia yielded the correct solution to also add
#include ostream // for std::cout and std::endl
which can then be used by writing either std::cout, or
instead having
a namespace declaration in front (that came after my time, thanks,
Steffen!).
Ken Ebling wrote:
Hi everyone,
I setup an OpenBSD 3.9 machine to act as a router and traffic shape
hosts behind it.
The setup looks like this:
INTERNET
|
SWITCH_1
|
OpenBSD 3.9 fxp0 (x.x.x.126 255.255.255.128)
OpenBSD 3.9 fxp1 (x.x.x.129 255.255.255.128)
|
Original message from Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
...
Now, what's the recommended books for C++ these days?
_The C++ Programming Language_ by Bjarne Stroustrup.
I think the original reply had the right idea.
Look at
http://kerneltrap.org/node/5186
to quote-
Currently the only program that Ted has gotten fully working with the
new library is xmms. Comparing the new library to the old, Ted
commented, 'when xmms was playing, you could scroll the playlist
Tony Abernethy schrieb:
The problem with a changed root is that everything you will ever
need to access needs to be inside this changed root.
All the libriaries, etc etc --- that's right, another copy.
One advantage of OpenBSD is that they actually understand security.
(Most that tries to
misiu wrote:
Tony Abernethy schrieb:
The problem with a changed root is that everything you will ever
need to access needs to be inside this changed root.
All the libriaries, etc etc --- that's right, another copy.
One advantage of OpenBSD is that they actually understand security.
(Most
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:21:54PM +0200, misiu wrote:
Tony Abernethy schrieb:
The problem with a changed root is that everything you will ever
need to access needs to be inside this changed root.
All the libriaries, etc etc --- that's right, another copy.
One advantage of OpenBSD is
Hello,
I tried to boot OpenBSD on E7230 chipset, but no luck so faar. System
hangs during device recognition in random moments.
Strange thing is that cursor jumps to the center of the screen.
Has anyone managed to run OpenBSD on E7230 chipset ?
regards
M.K.
[demime 1.01d removed an
On Fri, 26 May 2006 03:01:36 +0200 Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* akonsu [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-25 23:02]:
i read somewhere that openbsd is not as scalable as other OS.
nonsense.
depends heavily on what exactly you are going to do.
in soem cases, we blow away everybody else
Or you could run mod_perl
Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:21:54PM +0200, misiu wrote:
Tony Abernethy schrieb:
The problem with a changed root is that everything you will ever
need to access needs to be inside this changed root.
All the libriaries,
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 05:48:46PM -0400, Adam wrote:
in soem cases, we blow away everybody else easily.
What cases are those?
PF and spamd, for example. bgpd may be a good candidate, too.
Ciao,
Kili
I've using ion since a time ago, and I absolutely recommend it to
everyone. At least, give it a try, it's pretty handy.
Greetings.
On 5/26/06, Roger Neth Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/26/06, Alexander Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christopher Nelson wrote:
[...]
I was wondering what
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 03:02:04PM -0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:21:54PM +0200, misiu wrote:
Tony Abernethy schrieb:
The problem with a changed root is that everything you will ever
need to access needs to be
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Jeff Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-25 22:53]:
Same spindle, but 8x as fast as the 10k SCSI disks.
guess in the dark: the scsi drives have the write cache disabled, the
ide drives enabled. at least that tends to be what the defaults are.
As a fellow SCSI user on
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 03:25:59PM -0400, Peter Fraser wrote:
I just pulled down ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/3.9/ports.tar.gz
and it too contains only clamav-0.88 not clamav-0.88.2
iirc that's -release, not -stable
checked a few of the others in that pkg-stable.html, and
the versions
Today I received my OpenBSD 3.9 CDs this are my first OpenBSD CDs set
(because I new in OpenBSD) and really I'm impressed, congratulation to
all OpenBSD team, is a beautiful work. :-D
Thanks and congratulations again.
Julian Bolivar
Caracas, Venezuela
* Fred Crowson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-26 02:31]:
...
man 8 spamd-setup not doing it?
with a line like:
table spamd-white persist file /yourspamdwhitelocation/spamd-white
That doesn't do the same thing. he wants to keep his 30 day whitelist.
you are turing it into a permanent
On Sat, 27 May 2006 00:18:03 +0200 Matthias Kilian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 05:48:46PM -0400, Adam wrote:
in soem cases, we blow away everybody else easily.
What cases are those?
PF and spamd, for example. bgpd may be a good candidate, too.
Those scale better
misiu wrote:
Hello all,
I'm new to OpenBSD, I installed it a few times but than did not know
what to do realy. Right now I'm little more experienced with Linux and I
thought give it a nother try.
Now I'm runnin an Openbsd 3.9 Box.
Default setup. I try to run a Webmailbox and later Openvpn.
Peter Philipp wrote:
Hi,
I had this USB stick called CHEER,
see message ID
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
here is a clip from messages showing the ID,
May 11 16:05:41 neptune /bsd: umass0: CHEER USB_DISK, rev 2.00/2.00, addr 2
May 11 16:05:41 neptune /bsd: sd1 at scsibus2 targ 1 lun 0:
93 matches
Mail list logo
