On 9/12/06, Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While reading VPN(8) manual page, i could no figure it out in what
interface context the following line applies:
# Pass encrypted traffic to/from security gateways
pass in proto esp from $GATEWAY_B to $GATEWAY_A
pass out proto esp from
On 9/13/06, Kian Mohageri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/12/06, Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While reading VPN(8) manual page, i could no figure it out in what
interface context the following line applies:
# Pass encrypted traffic to/from security gateways
pass in proto esp from
What about ipencap protocol? Where does it play?
On 9/13/06, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gustavo Rios wrote:
Dear friends,
I am starting to learn VPN, and i am very confused with some points.
For instance, concerning firewall rules.
It is not clear right now, on which interface i
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 01:00:42AM -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote:
Dear friends,
I am starting to learn VPN, and i am very confused with some points.
For instance, concerning firewall rules.
It is not clear right now, on which interface i should see the
protocol esp, ipencap, ah, etc. I could
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Bryan Irvine wrote:
if(pclose(mail))
err(2, NULL);
that did it. I don't understand why though. Got a cluestick handy?
Not really. That's just a common idiom for making a system call and
aborting if there is an error.
hello,
i have a problem with me wrap board and a gigabyte ral card in hostap
mode. when my ibook or my thinkpad(with windows) is on battery then i
have packet lost. when the notebooks are connected to power the
connection is fine.
it seem i have this problem:
sorry,
forgot the dmesg.
OpenBSD 4.0 (GENERIC) #1103: Thu Aug 31 19:36:08 MDT 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Geode(TM) Integrated Processor by National Semi (Geode by NSC
586-class) 267 MHz
cpu0: FPU,TSC,MSR,CX8,CMOV,MMX
cpu0: TSC disabled
real mem =
Hi,
I have a Router/Gateway with:
dc1: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
address: 00:80:c8:c9:88:95
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
status: active
inet6 fe80::280:c8ff:fec9:8895%dc1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
inet
Hi, I noticed file corruption with a ide drive mounted via an
external usb casing, so I fsck'ed the FFS filesystem with
fsck -fy /dev/sd0a
And after putting out a lot of data it gets stuck at:
-1808525061 BAD I=1937144
961017051 BAD I=1937144
427404402 BAD I=1937144
429040826 BAD I=1937144
Take a look at www.mybboard.com
- Original Message -
From: Michael Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 8:13 AM
Subject: Forum-Software, good and secure, on OpenBSD systems?
Hello,
which experiences or what knowledge are/is available
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 02:19:36PM +0200, Han Boetes wrote:
umass0: BBB bulk-in stall clear failed, IOERROR
umass0: BBB bulk-in stall clear failed, IOERROR
umass0: BBB bulk-in stall clear failed, IOERROR
These look highly suspicious, but just for the sake of it, can you
please provide the
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 10:06:43AM -0300, Pedro Martelletto wrote:
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 02:19:36PM +0200, Han Boetes wrote:
umass0: BBB bulk-in stall clear failed, IOERROR
umass0: BBB bulk-in stall clear failed, IOERROR
umass0: BBB bulk-in stall clear failed, IOERROR
These look highly
Hi all,
I use transparent proxy, but I have some machines that should access
some subnets without proxy, in order to gain access to some
applications. When I allow the straight connection to these subnets
only the first subnet in the list has effect. The connection to other
subnets continue to
Pedro Martelletto wrote:
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 02:19:36PM +0200, Han Boetes wrote:
umass0: BBB bulk-in stall clear failed, IOERROR
umass0: BBB bulk-in stall clear failed, IOERROR
umass0: BBB bulk-in stall clear failed, IOERROR
These look highly suspicious, but just for the sake of it,
mickey wrote:
Pedro Martelletto wrote:
Han Boetes wrote:
umass0: BBB bulk-in stall clear failed, IOERROR
umass0: BBB bulk-in stall clear failed, IOERROR
umass0: BBB bulk-in stall clear failed, IOERROR
These look highly suspicious, but just for the sake of it, can you
please
Hi all,
Yesterday I just received 8 public IP addresses from my ISP. I'm running
ppp on my OpenBSD 3.9 server (DSL).
My xl0 has the public IP address (67.100.x.x) provided to me by my ISP, my
xl1 interface is my 192.168.3.1
Once I run /usr/sbin/ppp -ddial pppoe, my tun0 gets created
If I issue a
Joco Salvatti wrote:
Hi all,
I use transparent proxy, but I have some machines that should access
some subnets without proxy, in order to gain access to some
applications. When I allow the straight connection to these subnets
only the first subnet in the list has effect. The connection to
Chris Zakelj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He said good and secure. Phpbb is neither.
Perhaps you would like to offer an alternative
Nope.
instead of just dissing the phpBB users?
I didn't say anything about any users.
Your definition of good is probably different, and phpBB might not
meet
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 04:38:40PM +0159, Han Boetes wrote:
I assume you request the relevant lines:
UID PID PPID CPU PRI NI VSZ RSS WCHAN STAT TT TIME COMMAND
0 32054 1087 0 10 0 348 4 wait IW+ p50:00.01 fsck -fy
/dev/sd0a
0 2545 32054 4
I'll look at these PSP problems after 4.0.
Thanks for your report.
Damien
| hello,
| i have a problem with me wrap board and a gigabyte ral card in hostap
| mode. when my ibook or my thinkpad(with windows) is on battery then i
| have packet lost. when the notebooks are connected to power the
|
Hello folks,
I've installed OpenBSD 3.9 this morning on a new server (my new gateway @ home)
it's a dual-processor so one of the first thing I did (after setting up
networking [pf nat/routing, dhcpd and named]) was to
# cp /bsd /bsd.bak
# cp /bsd.mp /bsd
# reboot
For some reason, after the
Thanks folks.
On 9/13/06, Martin Toft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joco Salvatti wrote:
Hi all,
I use transparent proxy, but I have some machines that should access
some subnets without proxy, in order to gain access to some
applications. When I allow the straight connection to these subnets
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 04:38:40PM +0159, Han Boetes wrote:
| Pedro Martelletto wrote:
| On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 02:19:36PM +0200, Han Boetes wrote:
| umass0: BBB bulk-in stall clear failed, IOERROR
| umass0: BBB bulk-in stall clear failed, IOERROR
| umass0: BBB bulk-in stall clear failed,
I have seen references to Hairy Eyeball, a systrace site.. I can't
find it. Does it still exist?
--
James C. Blasius
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 19:32, James Blasius wrote:
I have seen references to Hairy Eyeball, a systrace site.. I can't
find it. Does it still exist?
I think it is dead. There was another site (http://hades.uint8t.org/) run by
Luiz Gustavo that had some systrace policies based upon the
Pedro Martelletto wrote:
Thanks. It would be nice to have this information for the USB
threads as well. A ktrace of fsck_ffs (just the last few lines)
and the output of 'disklabel sd0' would also be welcome. :-)
OK, here we go again:
I weeded out all the stuff that's really irrelevant
UID
Does pfsync support redundancy for IPSec and NAT too?
Thanks in advance.
Hi misc,
I've been trying for the last 3 days to chroot (from OpenBSD) to a Linux
image, such as /emul/linux.
The problem is that all I get is my date being set back to 1970.
Basicly what I try/do is:
# export SHELL=/bin/sh
# mount -t procfs proc /emul/linux/proc
# chroot /emul/linux
What
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 08:57:25PM +0200, Han Boetes wrote:
Pedro Martelletto wrote:
Thanks. It would be nice to have this information for the USB
threads as well. A ktrace of fsck_ffs (just the last few lines)
and the output of 'disklabel sd0' would also be welcome. :-)
Thanks, but this
* Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-09-13 13:20]:
Does pfsync support redundancy for IPSec and NAT too?
Thanks in advance.
pfsync synch's NAT states along with the rest of pf state.
IPsec is not done by pfsync. RTFM at sasyncd(8) for info
on how to do that.
fyi NicM is a genius! thumbs up for this guy!!! :)
a symlink to /emul/linux in /emul/linux/emul fixed this!!
quote
NicM it just occurred to me now that once you have chrooted, the
kernel will sitll be automatically prefixing /emul/linux to linux
binaries
NicM and libraries
NicM so, the first
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 22:45, Paul Irofti wrote:
fyi NicM is a genius! thumbs up for this guy!!! :)
a symlink to /emul/linux in /emul/linux/emul fixed this!!
erm, what I meant is symlink to / in /emul/linux/emul
i.e. # mkdir /emul/linux/emul ln -s / /emul/linux/emul/linux
* Bob Beck [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-09-13 21:30]:
* Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-09-13 13:20]:
Does pfsync support redundancy for IPSec and NAT too?
Thanks in advance.
pfsync synch's NAT states along with the rest of pf state.
NAT is nt special - it's beasically just a
What would it be the working group for the IPSec protocol? The one
that relates all the necessary RFC for defining it.
thanks in advance.
On 9/13/06, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Bob Beck [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-09-13 21:30]:
* Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-09-13 13:20]:
Pedro Martelletto wrote:
Thanks, but this ktrace is not really of interest. :-( I was
more interested in fsck_ffs (not fsck) to see which location of
the disk it's hanging when trying to perform I/O on.
doh! Sorry.
~% l ktrace.out
-rw--- 1 root users 481M Sep 13 21:59 ktrace.out
Ouch!
I don't think I want to use the words good and secure, however PunBB
with SQLite works well for a friend's site. It's probably not quite
as woeful as PhpBB from a security standpoint, but it still uses PHP.
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:13:23PM +0200, Michael Schmidt wrote:
Hello,
which
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 14:35, Marcos Laufer wrote:
Take a look at www.mybboard.com
The license contains the following gem:
The MyBB Group may alter or modify this license agreement without
notification and any changes made to the EULA will affect all past and
current copies of MyBB.
Adam wrote:
Chris Zakelj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He said good and secure. Phpbb is neither.
Perhaps you would like to offer an alternative
Nope.
Then you are a useless troll. This will be my last reply to your filth.
instead of just dissing the phpBB users?
I
I tried chrooting into an emulated Linux recently, but failed because
the version of linux I needed was using a linux syscall not yet
included in the kernel emulation. But if you stick to the supported
version of linux, you should be okay.
--
Christopher
On 9/13/06, Chris Zakelj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam wrote:
Chris Zakelj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He said good and secure. Phpbb is neither.
Perhaps you would like to offer an alternative
Nope.
Then you are a useless troll. This will be my last reply to your filth.
Why is
[This is an auto reply. Please do not reply to this message.]
Dear Valued Customer
Thank you for your support to Pacific Internet.
We appreciate the time you have taken to write to us, and we would like to give
you a personal reply. We are currently looking into your enquiry and will be
Original message
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:43:19 -0500
From: bofh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [spam] Re: Forum-Software, good and secure, on OpenBSD systems?
To: Open BSD misc@openbsd.org
On 9/13/06, Chris Zakelj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam wrote:
Chris Zakelj [EMAIL
bofh wrote:
Why is that a troll? He offered an opinion on Phpbb. It is neither good
nor secure. [see below] Just because he cannot offer an alternative (there
may not be a secure alternative even!)
Because that sentiment had already been echoed by others. No sense
beating dead horses
Chris Zakelj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam wrote:
Chris Zakelj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He said good and secure. Phpbb is neither.
Perhaps you would like to offer an alternative
Nope.
Then you are a useless troll.
Or maybe I just don't happen to have an
Hi,
We've got OpenBSD running as firewall and router for a 100Mbps connection.
Our internal network is working OK.
However, when someone from outside tries to reach one of our servers,
there is a delay and the initial packets get lost. For example:
$ sleep 20 ping -c 10 2.4.1.2 ; sleep 1 ;
On Sep 13, 2006, at 8:37 PM, Fernando Braga wrote:
Hi,
We've got OpenBSD running as firewall and router for a 100Mbps
connection.
Our internal network is working OK.
However, when someone from outside tries to reach one of our servers,
there is a delay and the initial packets get lost. For
if you want to be taken seriously, maybe you should change your
e-mail address to something that isn't offensive to everyone who
receives your e-mails, in this case, several thousand people.
You're just asking to be misunderstood. People misunderstand, and you
wonder why.
why don't you grow up?
On Sep 13, 2006, at 8:54 PM, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
I did some searching in the archives and it looked like somebody
started working on a port to the Cobalt MIPS-based machines back in
2001. Is there a developer who is interested in making this port
happen? I know very little about
Robert Urban [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if you want to be taken seriously, maybe you should change your
e-mail address to something that isn't offensive to everyone who
receives your e-mails, in this case, several thousand people.
I am glad to offend the people who find it offensive.
You're
On Sep 12, 2006, at 3:49 AM, Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 06:08:22PM -0500, Doug Carter wrote:
I really doubt that this is a system problem; I just can't figure out
what stupid thing I have done.
Using: OpenBSD 3.9 (GENERIC) #617: Thu Mar 2 02:26:48 MST 2006 on a
Dell
Este mensaje forma parte de nuestro programa de difusion y apoyo educativo.
Si desea darse de baja de nuestra lista, haga clic aqui:
http://www.vanguardiaeducativa.com/baja/[EMAIL PROTECTED] o responda este mail
con asunto DAR DE BAJA y disculpe las molestias ocasionadas.
Hi,
if this has been answered before, my apologies. If not, it would
seem a good candidate for the faq.
I'm wondering if dependencies for a particular port can be satisfied
via installed packages. For example, I'd like to compile amavisd-new-2.3.2,
which lists the following dependencies:
Jason Dixon wrote:
On Sep 13, 2006, at 8:54 PM, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
I did some searching in the archives and it looked like somebody
started working on a port to the Cobalt MIPS-based machines back in
2001. Is there a developer who is interested in making this port
happen? I know very
Robert Urban [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If not, it would seem a good candidate for the faq.
Its already there.
I'm wondering if dependencies for a particular port can be satisfied
via installed packages.
That's the only way they can be satisfied. A port is just the rules on
how to make a
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 03:39:06 +0200
Robert Urban [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake:
Hi,
if this has been answered before, my apologies. If not, it would
seem a good candidate for the faq.
I'm wondering if dependencies for a particular port can be satisfied
via installed packages. For example, I'd
Over the years one gets used to some small things that makes life easier but
is only slowly catching up on OBSD. I'm curious as why this is. Is it that
real coders don't need some of them, or is it just something like a matter of
being a lower priority?
* Not needing -a on ifconfig - Now
On 9/13/06, Chris Zakelj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bofh wrote:
Bad comparison. MSFT's patches are across an entire product line. You
are
talking about one specific product here. In order to get a valid
comparison, you will have to count patches for a product of similar size
and
I was reading ftp-proxy code, more specially line 921 to 960 from ftp-proxy.c.
In my scenario, i read the add_nat,add_rdr, add_filter as the
following structure:
rdr from $client to $server port $proxy_port - $server port $port
nat from $client to $server port $port - $proxy
pass in from
... [various other misinformed half truths] ...
* Out of date vi, harder to navigate and use, poor visual feedback.
vi is completely current. I believe you are thinking of vim which
a bunch of linux distros install, and stupidly, alias to vi - it's not
the same thing. It is in ports,
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 10:53:04PM -0400, steve szmidt wrote:
Over the years one gets used to some small things that makes life easier but
is only slowly catching up on OBSD. I'm curious as why this is. Is it that
real coders don't need some of them, or is it just something like a matter of
steve szmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Not showing all I/F's by default in ifconfig, requiring -A.
This is a good thing. Do you really want every command to just list any
possible information in a huge mess? Personally, I like to just get the
info I ask for.
* Defaulting to bash, easier to
bofh wrote:
On 9/13/06, Chris Zakelj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I never said it was secure. In fact, I distinctly recall saying
hell no to whether or not I considered phpBB secure. What I
*did* say was that it fit my needs, as I laid them out.
Which is good to you, but probably isn't good to
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 23:23, Bob Beck wrote:
... [various other misinformed half truths] ...
Not so, maybe you did not read it...
* Out of date vi, harder to navigate and use, poor visual feedback.
vi is completely current. I believe you are thinking of vim which
a bunch of
Recipient of the infected attachment: McDonald, Ira\Inbox
Subject of the message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One or more attachments were quarantined.
Attachment [EMAIL PROTECTED] was Quarantined for the following
reasons:
Virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] was found.
Virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] was found in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 13, 2006, at 7:53 PM, steve szmidt wrote:
Over the years one gets used to some small things that makes life
easier but
is only slowly catching up on OBSD. I'm curious as why this is. Is
it that
real coders don't need some of them, or is
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 22:53:04 -0400, steve szmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
* Defaulting to bash, easier to use - Implemented.
OMG, not this again
If you like bash install it.
VI is proabably the worst as it gets a lot of use. It requires a lot more
keystrokes than it's newer versions. It
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 11:49:29PM -0400, steve szmidt wrote:
I don't get very emotional about either one and try to keep things simple.
I'm
curious to see how many not equally hard core users prefer vi over vim when
having a choice.
This is an easy choice. The base install should have
Hey folks,
i am playing with ftp-proxy and could not understand the benefits of
the new one compared to the previous up to 3.8. Could some one enlight
me?
One thing i realized is the number of rules the new version creates on
run time. Whether this feature is a plus i could not understand.
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 11:49:29PM -0400, steve szmidt wrote:
I don't get very emotional about either one and try to keep things simple.
I'm
curious to see how many not equally hard core users prefer vi over vim when
having a choice.
These days I mostly use vi, because it is already there.
69 matches
Mail list logo
