-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Clint Pachl
Sent: Wednesday, 22 November 2006 2:41 PM
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: sshd idle session
atstake atstake wrote:
I am using ssh (OpenSSH_4.4, OpenSSL 0.9.7j) on OpenBSD4.0. I want
Olivier Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Most of what you see is the libc setting up default signal stuff.
After the ELF is loaded mprotect is used to make the area executable,
so when EIP is set to the starting point, the program does not SEGV.
Erm. No. Sorry, not correct at all. Wouldn't it
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 08:19:33AM +0100, Dr. Harry Knitter wrote:
sometimes I get the right resolution (1280x1024) sometimes only standard
vga (600x480).
How can I tweak my system to get a reliable KDM with a resolution of
1280x1024?
I'm not sure exactly when, but at some point something
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 19:34:04 +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote:
Now I plug a complete install as hard disc - which boots nicely when it is
the only drive - as hd1. This is what happens:
OpenBSD/i386 BOOT 2.10
boot boot hd1a:/bsd
booting hd1a:/bsd: hd1a:/bsd: Inappropriate file type or format
On Tuesday 21 November 2006 21:04, Martin Schrvder wrote:
symon/symux is 2.72 on 3.9
I can't get the pfq resources working. :-(
I've had this problem since somewhere post 3.8-ish; I've had a brief look and
poke but no solution.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2006/11/22, Mark Prins [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've had this problem since somewhere post 3.8-ish; I've had a brief look and
poke but no solution.
So my configuration is correct and pfq is simply broken?
Best
Martin
Hi,
I have the problem here on my i386:
with running startx or startkde I
receive always the resolution 1400x1050 with 75Hz on my ATI Radeon 9600. But I
can change the resolution in kde to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - so that is not the
problem. I do not know why my modelines are not accepted:
See my
[follow-up on my earlier post on 'mixed' bootloaders]
Now, what I propose to myself: install via serial console by leaving the
cd40 in the drive and boot with serial console to it. (It is difficult for
me to access my boxes out there, but someone can always insert a CDROM for
me).
So far, I (read
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 02:10:00PM -0600, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 10:10:28AM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
A small patch to make sure the reader understands the faq4.html is also the
place to read when upgrading.
Do you really think after comparing the OpenBSD
Laurence Tratt
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 08:19:33AM +0100, Dr. Harry Knitter wrote:
sometimes I get the right resolution (1280x1024) sometimes only standard
vga (600x480).
How can I tweak my system to get a reliable KDM with a resolution of
1280x1024?
I'm not sure exactly when, but at
On 22 Nov 2006 09:52:09 +0100, Artur Grabowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
There are two problems with this. One is that memory is protected from
writing, that's why there are those calls to mprotect all over the
place. The other problem is that dynamic binding isn't reentrant, we
don't want
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 02:10:00PM -0600, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 10:10:28AM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
A small patch to make sure the reader understands the faq4.html is also
the
place to read when upgrading.
On 22/11/2006, at 10:27 PM, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
I have ordered, because perceived OpenBSD as cool at that time. Now
I don't see
OpenBSD as cool anymore. The motivation for buying more is away.
I am considering switching back to Gentoo on next major problem
because the
illusion of
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 06:58:33PM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote:
| [follow-up on my earlier post on 'mixed' bootloaders]
|
| Now, what I propose to myself: install via serial console by leaving the
| cd40 in the drive and boot with serial console to it. (It is difficult for
| me to access my boxes out
Those who live in Turkey and purchased OpenBSD CDs in the past using the
ordering web page, did you have any problems with Turkish customs
processing? Were you able to receive your CDs safe and sound?
Because I'm planning to order a 4.0 CD set to an address in Turkey.
(I know first-hand stories
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 10:11:36AM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote:
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 21:07:57 +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
No clue, but upgrading is a good idea and this is what it looks like on
my box:
[...]
It doesn't look different on mine ... and the upgrade will happen
hopefully
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:42:41 +0100, Oliver Fuchs wrote:
with running startx or startkde I
receive always the resolution 1400x1050 with 75Hz on my ATI Radeon 9600. But I
can change the resolution in kde to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - so that is not the
problem. I do not know why my modelines are not
Hi guys,
I have an OpenBSD router at home and the clients are connected
through a wired interface (fxp0) as well as wireless interface (ral0
running in HostAP mode). Previously, wired network has a different
network then the wireless network, wired network has the address of
Hello,
According to the manual I should be seeing only
one value:
On i386 machines, this driver also supports the Xeon embedded I2C temper-
ature probes. In this case, however, only one temperature value is pro-
vided.
$ /sbin/sysctl hw
hw.machine=i386
hw.model=Intel Pentium II Xeon
Actually I do. Clients are able to connect to the router, as well as
the Internet (I use NAT). However, clients cannot communicate to
other clients. For example, ip 192.168.1.2 (connected through wired
interface) and ip 192.168.1.3 (connected through wireless interface)
are the clients.
Am Mittwoch, 22. November 2006 10:59 schrieb Laurence Tratt:
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 08:19:33AM +0100, Dr. Harry Knitter wrote:
sometimes I get the right resolution (1280x1024) sometimes only standard
vga (600x480).
How can I tweak my system to get a reliable KDM with a resolution of
Hi,
I use OpenBSD (3.8) / OpenBDGP and it works fine whith 3 ISP.
I want to set outbound communutie to influence incoming traffic on 1 peer.
Here is the end of my bgpd.conf :
-
[...]
neighbor aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd {
remote-as efg
descr
Thanks ti o all who answered:
I had to correct the Modeline:
ModeLine [EMAIL PROTECTED] 94.50 1024 1076 1172 1376768 769
772 808 +hsync +vsync
The @84 was missing.
So thank you again
Oliver
- Forwarded message from Uwe Dippel [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
To:
Hello,
I'm trying to build a High Availability IPSEC Tunnel between two OpenBSD
Clusters. For a start, is this possible ?
For my test, I have the following setup:
Desktop1 - VPN Cluster - VPN --- Laptop
VPN Cluster has carp interfaces at both sides.
I can't find much
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 04:10:27PM +0100, Ludovic Collomb wrote:
Hi,
I use OpenBSD (3.8) / OpenBDGP and it works fine whith 3 ISP.
You should update to 4.0. ospfctl in 4.0 has options to show you incomming
and outgoing tables for each neighbor. This makes it easier to figure out
what is
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 08:22:20PM -0600, Vijay Sankar wrote:
Good day,
I took one of my desktops that has two EIDE hard drives and went through
the steps I had sent earlier to you and tried to verify that it does
work on OpenBSD 4.0. It does work -- almost. I am pretty sure I was
booting
I'm trying to test gre(4) tunnel.
Both machines in one LAN. OpenBSD has IP 192.50.51.52, another end -
192.50.51.28.
# ifconfig gre0
gre0: flags=9011UP,POINTOPOINT,LINK0,MULTICAST mtu 1476
groups: gre
physical address inet 192.50.51.52 -- 192.50.51.28
inet6
Karel Kulhavy a icrit :
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 02:10:00PM -0600, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 10:10:28AM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
A small patch to make sure the reader understands the faq4.html is also the
place to read when upgrading.
Do you really
Hello.
First I am new to using spamd.
I have a spare IP address that is sometimes used for
outbound stuff (keep state) - it is not listed
anywhere in DNS, so nobody should be touching any of
the 65535 ports unless they are scanning me, trying to
connect to windows ports, etc.
ignoring icmp, is
I have seen some benchmarking stat's on Bind [1] and NSD that
compare FreeBSD 6.1 to 4.11, and 4.11 kick 6.1's ass and then
wipes up the floor with it.
I'm going to be putting a DNS server in production soon and was
planning to use FreeBSD, but now I'm wondering if OpenBSD would
be a better
Salut,
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 08:52:11PM +0500, Igor Goldenberg wrote:
20:28:38.627914 0:4:23:ce:bb:b4 0:16:cb:a2:8e:c5 0800 122: gre
192.50.51.52 192.50.51.28: [] 192.168.254.254 192.168.254.253:
icmp: echo request (id:bd53 seq:44) (ttl 255, id 3713, len 84) (DF)
(ttl 64, id 26235, len
On 11/22/06, Mark Bucciarelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand performance is secondary to security for this
project, but I am curious what the numbers are in this specific
case.
For performance and security too, I suggest you to try djbdns instead bind:
http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 08:23:06PM -0400, STeve Andre' wrote:
I have a cardbus modem that I've used for years. The relevant line in
the dmesg data is
pccom3 at pcmcia1 function 0 U.S. Robotics, XJ/CC1560, Megahertz 56kbps \
Modem port 0xa3f8/8: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
I started to reply to
On 11/22/06, Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 08:22:20PM -0600, Vijay Sankar wrote:
Good day,
I took one of my desktops that has two EIDE hard drives and went through
the steps I had sent earlier to you and tried to verify that it does
work on OpenBSD 4.0.
2006/11/22, Tonnerre LOMBARD [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Did you set net.inet.gre.allow to 1?
Yes.
# sysctl net.inet.gre
net.inet.gre.allow=1
net.inet.gre.wccp=0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on :
2006/11/22, Mark Prins [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've had this problem since somewhere post 3.8-ish; I've had a brief
look and poke but no solution.
So my configuration is correct and pfq is simply broken?
I guess; symon will tell if the
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 10:29:30AM -0600, Emilio Perea wrote:
The relevant dmesg line:
Toshiba America, 3CXM056-BNW, 3COM/NoteWorthy 56K Modem \
port 0xa3f8/8: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
Sorry. That should have been:
pccom3 at pcmcia1 function 0 Toshiba America, 3CXM056-BNW,\
3COM/NoteWorthy
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 11:58:14AM +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 02:06:42PM -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
Then, from the VPN CLIENT, how would an ssh connection to 192.168.1.1,
server A on the internal network behind FW2, work? IPsec would encrypt
the packet between
I'm trying to get an FC5 laptop behind a firewall connected to an
OpenBSD 4.0 server running isakmpd (controlled by ipsecctl) with IPsec
using CA authentication. The CA authentication seems to be working and
I seem to have passed the Phase 1 exchange but am getting stuck in the
Phase 2 exchange.
Hello all
when i apply this patch system asks me
File to patch:
what should i enter here
Bye
On 11/22/06, martin g [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all
when i apply this patch system asks me
File to patch:
what should i enter here
Hi.
Nothing.
You are
a) not standing in /usr/src (read the first few lines from the patch file)
or
b) you don't have anythin under /usr/src
Andreas.
I've had very good results with MaraDNS, been using it for at least two
years now with no problems.
Some highlights:
Memory based, so
it loads all the configuration settings on startup and then jails itself so
it cannot write to the FS
Small, and FAST - It's been benchmarked as faster than Bind
On 11/22/06, martin g [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if it is allready patched
i have the latest sources. is this possible
Nope.
If it is already patched you will see something like this:
# cd /usr/src
# patch -p0 4.0/common/003_systrace.patch
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text
On 11/22/06, Andreas Maus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|And then rebuild your kernel.
*ahem*
Do you have the kernel sources (sys.tar.gz) installed
in /usr/src/sys ?
Andreas.
--
Hobbes : Shouldn't we read the instructions?
Calvin : Do I look like a sissy?
On 2006/11/22 18:01, fRANz wrote:
On 11/22/06, Mark Bucciarelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand performance is secondary to security for this
project, but I am curious what the numbers are in this specific
case.
For performance and security too, I suggest you to try djbdns instead
I'm trying to setup a few diskless Linux machines using an OpenBSD 4.0
machine to provide NFS, and two questions have arisen:
First, if I edit a line in /etc/exports, does it suffice to send
SIGHUP to mountd on the server and remount the filesystem on the
affected clients? If not, what are the
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 10:43:42AM -0500, Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
I have seen some benchmarking stat's on Bind [1] and NSD that
compare FreeBSD 6.1 to 4.11, and 4.11 kick 6.1's ass and then
wipes up the floor with it.
I'm going to be putting a DNS server in production soon and was
planning
Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 10:11:36AM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote:
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 21:07:57 +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
No clue, but upgrading is a good idea and this is what it looks like on
my box:
[...]
It doesn't look different on mine ... and the upgrade will
Igor Goldenberg wrote:
I'm trying to test gre(4) tunnel.
Both machines in one LAN. OpenBSD has IP 192.50.51.52, another end -
192.50.51.28.
[... cut ...]
First of all, use an empirical methodology.
Destroy your gre tunnel with
ifconfig gre0 down
ifconfig gre0 destroy
Clear
Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
And when does performance really start to matter for a DNS
server? Say I host 500 web sites and 500 email domains with
average traffic, for some value of average. Is a limit of
15,000 DNS queries/second ever going to be a problem? If not,
when could it become a
* Berk D. Demir [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-11-22 22:04]:
Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
And when does performance really start to matter for a DNS
server? Say I host 500 web sites and 500 email domains with
average traffic, for some value of average. Is a limit of
15,000 DNS queries/second ever
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 09:40:07PM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote:
| | 2. Does anyone have a cd40.iso for amd64 readily available ?
|
| Not yet, maybe next week .. try http://www.weirdnet.nl/openbsd/serial
|
| But I can't wait to get the boxes finally up on dual XEON with amd64 !
OK, i've unslacked and
Henning Brauer wrote:
err... 15k pps is easily reachable
well, not on a soekris perhaps
I can't reach that value with a Dell OptiPlex GX280 w/ onboard bge(4)
MP kernel, net.inet.ip.ifq.maxlen=250, 4.0 or -current, doesn't matter.
Collision count increases monotonically. Stops forwarding
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:00:17PM +0200, Berk D. Demir wrote:
Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
And when does performance really start to matter for a DNS
server?
15.000 queries/sec seems a bit unrealistic to me. I bet even
with 15.000 packets/sec your ethernet cards will create an
interrupt
2006/11/23, Berk D. Demir [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Destroy your gre tunnel with
ifconfig gre0 down
ifconfig gre0 destroy
Done.
Clear your ARP table.
arp -ad
Done.
Try to reach 192.50.51.28. For example with ping or telnet to port 22.
Then check arp table entry
Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
In any case, it's obvious DNS performance is not something I need
to worry about.
I think you are correct. You can also add more DNS servers at any point.
Simplistic (but sufficient) load balancing and redundancy are
trivially easy with DNS.
--
Darrin Chandler
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 12:49:50PM -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
I'm trying to get an FC5 laptop behind a firewall connected to an
OpenBSD 4.0 server running isakmpd (controlled by ipsecctl) with IPsec
using CA authentication. The CA authentication seems to be working and
I seem to have passed the
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 08:52:17AM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 09:23:15AM -0600, Merv Hammer wrote:
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
[...snip long, pompous rant]
Do you have anything technical and/or interesting to say? If you don't,
then with all
hi all , i can print japanese by konqueror.
i am poor in english .
i only write down my doing .
1) my printing environment is next .
openbsd:192.168.72.251---LAN---192.168.72.55:LP-9200PS2
here, LP-9200PS2 is a postscript printer .
2) /usr/local/sbin/cups-enable
3) /usr/local/sbin/cupsd
The entire message underside, originally sent to you by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
([EMAIL PROTECTED]), has been forwarded to you from the Antigen Quarantine area.
This message may have been re-scanned by Antigen and handled according to the
appropriate scan job's settings.
Entire Message.eml
[demime
The entire message BUSINESS REPRESENTATIVE WANTED!, originally sent to you by
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), has been forwarded to you from the
Antigen Quarantine area.
This message may have been re-scanned by Antigen and handled according to the
appropriate scan job's settings.
The entire message Re: Marvell Yukon 88E8053 on Apple Mac mini (hanging
system), originally sent to you by [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), has
been forwarded to you from the Antigen Quarantine area.
This message may have been re-scanned by Antigen and handled according to the
appropriate
On 11/10/06, Patrick Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi misc,
I'm trying to setup a new openbsd 3.9 install on i386. It worked before
on
that computer when I installed quickly to test for compatibility, but I
needed to finish up some hardware stuff on it and then I wanted to
install
for
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 18:42:40 +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote:
Another problem on the Proliant ML350: the time isn't calculated properly.
I noticed the problem with (open)ntpd; which continuously wanted to adjust
by thousands and tens of thousands of seconds; after only a few hours of
running. So I
64 matches
Mail list logo
