On 2/18/08, System Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to secure a few distinct directories on this server, and to
simplify config file maintenance decided to put the common directives
into a file to be 'Include'd - reproduced further below. Here is an
example of such an 'Include' in
On 18 Feb 2008 at 10:16, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
On Feb 18, 2008 7:57 AM, Leonardo Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Actually what Ted has done was utterly disastrous, he knows his
own
code well enough to have completed it.
BTW, you are as big an oaf as Richard Stallman, you keep
Hello!
lookup.php at least gives a yellow page and also allows me to see it's
source, unlike the others:
?
/* This file was automatically created by the NfSen install.pl script */
This and especially the empty pages sound like you've short_open_tag
= Off in your /var/www/conf/php.ini. From
What shit are you talking about?
On Feb 18, 2008 2:01 PM, System Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18 Feb 2008 at 10:16, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
On Feb 18, 2008 7:57 AM, Leonardo Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Actually what Ted has done was utterly disastrous, he knows his
Come on guys, calm down, just stay what you are currently.
Just do your job.
Make OpenBSD the best router/firewall/server OS ever, you have the right
features for that now,
and I hope you will extend it in the nearest future.
And do not listen to those trolls.
Thank you all for what you do
Greetings,
I'm considering replacing my iBook G4 with possibly a MacBook
and I was hoping I'd find a couple of MacBook users that run
OpenBSD regularly on their MacBooks who could answer the
following for me.
First question I have is regarding swapping the caps-lock and
control keys (in
Hey folks,
i have been writing software about 6 year since i finnished my
university course. OpenBSD has always been impressive to my eyes.
Since correctness/security is conditio sine qua non, i disagree as a
group of developer has it as goal. Goal should be performance,
portability usability.
Hello,
Is there an suid option enabled on the perl built-into openbsd? I'm
trying to setup qmail under openbsd 4.2 and would like to view that
suid option for perl
thanks,
b
Hi folks,
Why is Groff not updated? OpenBSD 4.2 has Groff 1.15 from 1999.
Some compatability issues?
Pieter (offlist)
Hey guys,
Is either HP ProLiant NC364T[0] or the NC360T (one quad gigabit ethernet, the
second dual gigabit ethernet) supported under openbsd?
I checked http://www.openbsd.org/i386.html#hardware which would indicate
not, but I just wanted to double check here.
If not, can anyone point me at a
Not lies; we have a 5000 emails thread to prove that.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 07:35:55AM +0059, Han Boetes wrote:
Lies
chefren wrote:
... Richard Stallman stopped [coding] doing so long time ago...
B) Richard Stallman puts users first, =like you!=, Richard Stallman
=believes= users
No need for any new features?
Regards,
Andreas
On 18/02/2008, Pieter Verberne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
Why is Groff not updated? OpenBSD 4.2 has Groff 1.15 from 1999.
Some compatability issues?
Pieter (offlist)
--
Andreas Kahari
Somewhere in the general Cambridge area, UK
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 10:11:32AM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
Also, we don't get to use his code for FREE, I suppose most of the
users *buy* CD sets.
If only they did. A miniscule percentage of the user community buys
CD's, and the sales are dropping. The vast majority of users
On 2008/02/18 13:40, Joe Warren-Meeks wrote:
Is either HP ProLiant NC364T[0] or the NC360T (one quad gigabit ethernet, the
second dual gigabit ethernet) supported under openbsd?
Looks like they are Intel 82571EB, should be ok.
On Feb 18, 2008 3:48 AM, Tasmanian Devil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
lookup.php at least gives a yellow page and also allows me to see it's
source, unlike the others:
?
/* This file was automatically created by the NfSen install.pl script */
This and especially the empty pages
Aaron escreveu:
I am trying to configure ifstated on an i386 4.2 Stable pair of openbsd
firewalls but having some issues on how to determine connectivity of a
backup/secondary wan interface.
The carp states seem solid and preempt seems to work great. The only
thing I'm really worried about
If there were no downloads, there would be less users who donate. I'd
dare to claim some people have just downloaded and donated instead of
buying the CD - in my case it makes sense since I can afford very little
and the production of CDs would eat some of that little. I miss the
stickers, though.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 10:11:32AM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
I for one buy CDs every year, year after year.
Best,
~Mayuresh
The CD sets you buy must be different than the ones I buy; mine don't
come with a ballot for voting on features.
Please proxy vote for me and check [ ]
Hi,
I am trying to use the greyscanner within my anti-spam firewall.
I installed some of the mentioned packages:
# pkg_info
gettext-0.14.6p0GNU gettext
libiconv-1.9.2p3character set conversion library
logsentry-1.1.1p2 logfile auditing tool
lsof-4.77p0 list information about
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 02:35:01PM +0100, Pieter Verberne wrote:
Why is Groff not updated? OpenBSD 4.2 has Groff 1.15 from 1999.
Some compatability issues?
I've been thinking this too, and went ahead and tried doing it...
It's a bit of a pain actually, some problems: the directory layout
has
Hi,
How are you doing today? My name is James Adamati I live in London and work in
a financial institution here in United Kingdom. There is a potential
transaction relating to a dormant account of one of our deceased customers,
which I would like us to handle the fund actualization together.
Hi,
I did forget to mention I am running 4.2 STABLE on a
i386 machine.
Regards,
Jeff.
OpenBSD 4.2-stable (GENERIC) #0: Wed Dec 12 16:32:58 BRT 2007
OpenBSD.i386
--
Want an e-mail address like mine?
Get a free e-mail account today at www.mail.com!
Hello Misc,
Anybody successed with configuration of Nortel ERS 55xx, MLT/LACP and
OpenBSD trunk iface?
I am geting duplicate icmp messages from OpenBSD machine.
64 bytes from x.x.x.x: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=0.070 ms
64 bytes from x.x.x.x: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=0.175 ms (DUP!)
--
Fen
Jeff Santos wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to use the greyscanner within my anti-spam firewall.
# ./greyscanner.41
syntax error at ./greyscanner.41 line 199, near local_r
ules
syntax error at ./greyscanner.41 line 376, near }
Execution of ./greyscanner.41 aborted due to compilation errors.
Am I
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 08:50:34PM +1300, Richard Toohey wrote:
After spending the weekend testing this every which way and searching
the net and archives to no avail, [..]
[..]
From the manual ...
^^
[..]
So it would suggest that you CANNOT use Include within Directory?
Great, submit a diff and we'll get on it.
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 18:58 +0800, James Adamati wrote:
Hi,
How are you doing today? My name is James Adamati I live in London and work
in a financial institution here in United Kingdom. There is a potential
transaction relating to a dormant
I'm wondering if an OpenBSD box with apache can solve this problem...
A website requires authentication to access and the are a limited number
of accounts setup (within web application, not .htaccess) on that
website; so accounts are shared. Of course, this situation causes
problems when two
Usually they are intel; however, HP's distro blesses them with
a PXE boot option typically enabled by default. In the past,
this option seems to sometimes interfere with BSD's boot.
Recommend hard disabling the network/pxe option it first.
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Henderson
Just wanted to see if this is possible? I realize I'll have to
install twice in order to get to bioctl, but was curious to see if
anyone tried it.
--
Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com
http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk
This officer's
This is my last posting on this, take heart.
The threads advocates have never specified any
advantages of a program written using that model
(multiple execution points in a single image)
over a multiple process model, assuming that
parallelism is useful.
If the purported advantage is access to
Riviera Maya 5 dias por 339 dolares mas detalles en
http://tinyurl.com/28mnqz o marque al 01 800 123 3153
Hi Frank,
That has nothing to do with the Apache or OpenBSD at all.
All the authentications are done at your web app.
So, the question should be: Can my web app do that?
Regards,
Rosen
Frank Bax wrote:
I'm wondering if an OpenBSD box with apache can solve this problem...
A website requires
On Feb 18, 2008 1:26 PM, Geoff Steckel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is my last posting on this, take heart.
The threads advocates have never specified any
advantages of a program written using that model
(multiple execution points in a single image)
over a multiple process model, assuming
-Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-
Von: David Higgs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 17. Februar 2008 16:54
An: openbsd misc
Cc: OpenBSD-Misc
Betreff: Re: What is our ultimate goal??
On Feb 17, 2008 7:36 AM, openbsd misc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Urspr|ngliche
Hello,
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 08:50:34PM +1300, Richard Toohey wrote:
After spending the weekend testing this every which way and searching
the net and archives to no avail, [..]
[..]
From the manual ...
^^
[..]
So it would
Hello,
I have setup OpenBGP doing full routing with 3 other peers, so I get
around 240k routes from each peer. But if by some reason I have to
restar bgpd, it takes up to 5 minutes so I can all routes updated
again.
Is there a way to save and later restore the RIB/FIB tables?
Since the only
Eduardo Meyer P=P0P?P8QP0:
Hello,
I have setup OpenBGP doing full routing with 3 other peers, so I get
around 240k routes from each peer. But if by some reason I have to
restar bgpd, it takes up to 5 minutes so I can all routes updated
again.
Is there a way to save and later restore the
Geoff Steckel wrote:
This is my last posting on this, take heart.
The threads advocates have never specified any
advantages of a program written using that model
(multiple execution points in a single image)
over a multiple process model, assuming that
parallelism is useful.
If the purported
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 09:08:36PM +0100, Stefan Kell wrote:
Bullshit,
Bullshit? Check out, please, who wrote the quoted words... ;] not much to
search: today's mails only (tip: What is our ultimate goal?? thread)
--
pozdrawiam / regards
I'm currently using route-to in pf.conf to control the routing of
different internal subnets through different external gateways. It does
work, but I remember a comment in the past where route-to was called
evil. Is route-to evil (and why)? And if so is there another, better to
do routing
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 01:26:41PM -0500, Geoff Steckel wrote:
This is my last posting on this, take heart.
The threads advocates have never specified any
advantages of a program written using that model
(multiple execution points in a single image)
over a multiple process model, assuming
Hello,
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, System Administrator wrote:
After spending the weekend testing this every which way and searching
the net and archives to no avail, I need a few more eyes to help
determine whether this is a bug, a feature, or some minor stupidity on
my part...
First the
On 2/18/08, Geoff Steckel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is my last posting on this, take heart.
Please enlighten me if there are any -other-
http://acmqueue.com/modules.php?name=Contentpa=list_pages_issuesissue_id=26
See especially Software and the Concurrency Revolution. An
articulate and
Geoff Steckel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The threads advocates have never specified any
advantages of a program written using that model
(multiple execution points in a single image)
over a multiple process model, assuming that
parallelism is useful.
Remind us how asynchronous signaling
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
I suppose if I had a 16-core quad-socket Opteron board and needed to make
the box into one giant firewall with 10 Gbit NICs, I'd be disappointed
that the kernel only ran on one of the cores.
OpenBSD is only used for firewalls?
--
Matthew Weigel
hacker
[EMAIL
Hi, since I'm the one that started all of this I thought I would take a
moment to say a couple of words.
As Ben said - we aren't wedded to the idea of threads. They were a
useful path to take in order to prove the usefulness of some sort of
parallelization in OpenSSH. I think we've proved its
David Higgs wrote:
I'm not an advocate of threads, simply playing devil's advocate
because you patently refuse to believe this is anything but a mutually
exclusive proposition. Is it not possible to decompose a complex
program into a well-secured multi-process program, where one process
On Feb 18, 2008 5:39 PM, NetOne - Doichin Dokov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eduardo Meyer NAPISA:
Hello,
I have setup OpenBGP doing full routing with 3 other peers, so I get
around 240k routes from each peer. But if by some reason I have to
restar bgpd, it takes up to 5 minutes so I can
On Feb 17, 2008 11:23 PM, Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are talking about nebulous features that are over hyped and
under proven. One needs a problem first before fixing it. You are
putting it the wrong way around by saying hey I'd like a super duper
faster tcp/ip stack
Gregg Reynolds wrote:
On 2/18/08, Geoff Steckel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is my last posting on this, take heart.
Please enlighten me if there are any -other-
http://acmqueue.com/modules.php?name=Contentpa=list_pages_issuesissue_id=26
See especially Software and the Concurrency
I have another doubt.
My peers have different bw connected to me, one peer is 20Mb/s and the
other is 30Mb/s.
I know I may be failing on some BGP concepts here, but this is my very
first time implementing full routing with 2 peers. So, please be
patient ;)
How should I balance, proportionally,
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 02:31:13PM +0100, Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 01:07:06PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
By this, I mean, developers *are* working on improving the features
currently offered by OpenBSD. In general people work on things which
they will find the
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 12:42:38AM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
You're an idiot.
[..]
Think about it.
Idiots don't think.
If you didn't knew it - you're even bigger idiot, than I am.
Thanks for conversation.
--
pozdrawiam / regards
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 10:12:09AM -0500, David Higgs wrote:
Does the -B option to pkg_add do exactly this? Or YOU could do the
equivalent and tell ./configure to install to a different base
directory. This doesn't need any funding either.
Nope, -B is mostly for chroot and flashdist-like
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 03:10:12PM +0100, Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
I noticed, that default path, where software from binary pkg and ports
gets unpacked, is /usr/local hierarchy - unfortunately, it's also the
traditional default of every individual source *.tar.gz package - such
way
Geoff Steckel wrote:
This is my last posting on this, take heart.
For someone who has indicated a distrust of threads (which I
am in agreement with), you have sure started a lot of them on
this same blooming topic (five, by my count).
If you were trying to prove a point by doing so, let's call
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 02:50:15PM -0600, Matthew Weigel wrote:
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
I suppose if I had a 16-core quad-socket Opteron board and needed to make
the box into one giant firewall with 10 Gbit NICs, I'd be disappointed
that the kernel only ran on one of the cores.
OpenBSD is
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 04:22:42PM -0500, Chris Rapier wrote:
As Ben said - we aren't wedded to the idea of threads. They were a
useful path to take in order to prove the usefulness of some sort of
parallelization in OpenSSH. I think we've proved its usefulness (and
believe it or not, a lot
On 2/19/08 2:04 AM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
I wonder where the perceived bottleneck is. I mean, you have two boxes
connected by ethernet (whatever speed), and you're running a sftp bulk
file transfer. What is the limiting factor? Are the boxes less than
20% idle? Is the nework saturated or
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 10:11:32AM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
... why don't you and rest of the team, led by Theo take a
concious decision to stop downloads?
OpenBSD is introduced (e.g., on the main web page) by three,
adjectives. It might be worthwhile to grasp the first of
those before
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 10:16:08AM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
... I've NEVER got any of the code for FREE,
Yes, you did. The code is free. The CDs are not.
Not just yet!
You can boot of something non-softraid and do the rest on softraid.
This will be a feature I will work on once I have the initial 3
disciplines ready and we can handle foreign metadata. Then I'll work on
booting/rooting a softraid. My todo list is still on my website if
you'd like
Will anybody already be in Riga later today (Tuesday)?
I will arrive myself this afternoon.
Would anybody like to meet up?
Cheers,
--ropers
On Feb 18, 2008 8:47 PM, Dustin Lundquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To balance your inbound you can prepend your AS number to your
advertisements to depreference them. Some larger ISPs do this on a per
prefix basis, but since a sizable portion of ISPs are running Cisco gear
with a 256K prefix
Mayuresh Kathe
On Feb 17, 2008 5:50 PM, Tony Abernethy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
OpenBSD is an OS with amazing security and stability, but
it has too
few modern features.
H related?
thats exactly my point, our mindset has become that security
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 11:29:25AM +0800, Wong Peter wrote:
Hello all respect network administrator, i have set up a openbsd gateway but
the wireless connection(gateway) is not detected by client but before this
is ok. Can see it widnows but now cannot. I don't know what wrong with it.
I
I understand English sentences.
What is this English-based sentences you speak of?
My logic may be flawed, but it seems it surpasses you abilty to elucidate
the exact nature of the presumed flaw.
I've got a life. What have you got.
In fact beating up on dead goats might make an entertaining
Dead billy goat or dead nanny goat?
which are you?
-Original Message-
From: Mayuresh Kathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 12:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What is our ultimate goal??
Are you as weird as your writing suggests.
Do you get
I think therefore I am.
I think you are a billy goat, therefore you are.
-Original Message-
From: Mayuresh Kathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 12:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What is our ultimate goal??
There you go again, disconnected
Are you a silly billy goat or an asininny goat.
Ayou a live or a dead dead goat?
You own thought processes seem to be at about that plateau.
You make wild statements with not even a plausible connection to prior
discourse.
Try tinking in English sentences, not whatever English-like sentences you
Eduardo Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For example, I have a certain traffic outgoing to AS 4230, it was
going via AS17379, and with localpref I could make it go via 18881.
However, I need to balance it in the adequated ratio, say, make 40% of
outgoing traffic to 4230 go via 1881 while 60%
You claim you don't have enough vision or intelligence to understand me.
and you offer (to the list included) no explanation.
I may lack the vision and intelli9gence, but why do you insist that the rest
of the list also lacks vision and intelligence?
This thread is already polluted far beyond my
I may be an oaf, but it is with FULL REALIZATION THAT I AM SENDING THIS TO
THE LIST
MY PURPOSE IN DOING SO IS TO PAINT YOU WITH SOMEHTING RESEMBLING YOUR TRUE
COLORS.
BTW, what is the color of a dead goat?
-Original Message-
From: Mayuresh Kathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
73 matches
Mail list logo
