Hi,
perhaps i am totally missing something, but in the last snapshots
speedstep isn't detected by the kernel anymore. (ergo no hw.setperf)
I noticed this on my Thinkpad X200. [1]
Tested the Feb 22 snapshots on another Core2Duo system [2] and there it
doesn't work, too.
It's the same with a
Using the information out of acpi for this on amd64 has
been disabled for now due to reliability issues:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvsm=123492694729019w=2
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 09:32:24AM +0100, Robert wrote:
Hi,
perhaps i am totally missing something, but in the last snapshots
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 09:32:24AM +0100, Robert wrote:
Hi,
perhaps i am totally missing something, but in the last snapshots
speedstep isn't detected by the kernel anymore. (ergo no hw.setperf)
I noticed this on my Thinkpad X200. [1]
Tested the Feb 22 snapshots on another Core2Duo system
Richard Toohey schrieb:
$ md5 /usr/sbin/ntpd
MD5 (/usr/sbin/ntpd) = a0c8961d5818b438ecbfd6c40be47a5f
$ cat /etc/passwd
root:*:0:0:Charlie :/root:/bin/ksh
daemon:*:1:1:The devil himself:/root:/sbin/nologin
operator:*:2:5:System :/operator:/sbin/nologin
Your system must have been hacked.. The
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:59:22 +1100
Jonathan Gray j...@goblin.cx wrote:
Using the information out of acpi for this on amd64 has
been disabled for now due to reliability issues:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvsm=123492694729019w=2
Aw crap, i liked having particle projectile cannons...
Classic
Jesus Sanchez schrieb:
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/drm0
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (Operation not permitted)
drmOpenDevice: Open failed
drmAvailable: no
[drm] failed to load kernel module radeon
(EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIGetVersion failed to open the DRM
[dri] Disabling DRI.
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:20:07 -0500
David Heinrich dh0...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm installing OpenBSD AMD64 current (4.5) as of 12/19/2009 12:11:00
PM. I am at the step where it says Getting base45.tgz..it started
out saying it would require 40 or more minutes and seems to be
transferring data
My build of -current is a few days old. I'm having problems recording
with aucat on a particular device.
The system has an integrated Intel 82891DB AC97 audio chipset and has
three physical jacks: one output (headphone/hp) and two inputs
(mic/line-in). All the OpenBSD audio toys work perfectly
--- C. Bensend [Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 08:00:59PM -0600]: ---
I've been at m5hosting for the last few months and so far they're way
better than what I've seen elsewhere. Maybe just a bit too expensive,
if you compare the hardware with what you can get elsewhere, but they
do seem to know
On 2009/02/22 22:00, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
I also discover oppose to what I thought that the native vlan would be
the standard #1 as native, but when configure as 1, I couldn't get it
to work.
So, I guess the native vlan is no vlan at all (; Is that true?
ah, you're used to cisco
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:50:42AM +0100, Julian Leyh wrote:
Jesus Sanchez schrieb:
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/drm0
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (Operation not permitted)
drmOpenDevice: Open failed
drmAvailable: no
[drm] failed to load kernel module radeon
(EE) RADEON(0): [dri]
Hello,
As far as I know there were some driver changes (correct me if I'm wrong),
that's why you now have to use xrandr to configure dual display, which is
actually really simple!
I use this line in my .xinitrc:
xrandr --output DVI-0 --left-of DVI-1
Added, for my needs, this specific line
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 03:10:07AM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
My build of -current is a few days old. I'm having problems recording
with aucat on a particular device.
The system has an integrated Intel 82891DB AC97 audio chipset and has
three physical jacks: one output (headphone/hp) and two
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 03:10:07AM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
My build of -current is a few days old. I'm having problems recording
with aucat on a particular device.
The system has an integrated Intel 82891DB AC97 audio chipset and has
three physical jacks: one output (headphone/hp) and two
I found a different way to replicate the bug, this time it crashes ALL
the IPv6 sessions connected to multiple Foundry switches (cisco seems
fine). I have setup a v6 session with a tcp md5sig like so:
group peers-rs-v6 {
announce IPv6 unicast
announce IPv4 none
On 2009-02-23, Saifi Khan saifik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 4:35 PM, FRLinux frli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Saifi Khan saifik...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you think that it will help, if i took a video recording of the
boot process and posted it on
I'm running 4.4-RELEASE and recently bought an Intel WiFi Link 5300
Mini-PCIe card after reading it's supported in OpenBSD.
I read the iwn(4) man page and downloaded the iwn-firmware-5.1.tgz package
from Damien Bergamini's site.
However, it won't install.
When I run
# pkg_add
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:35:58 +0100 Matthieu Herrb mhe...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 10:56 AM, J.C. Roberts
list-...@designtools.org wrote:
Is there anything else I could do to help fix this instability bug?
Fill a bug to bugs.freedesktop.org (product Xorg) with as many
You are not the one paying the fixers unfortunately. The only influence
you have is what Matthieu suggested.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 06:10:39AM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:35:58 +0100 Matthieu Herrb mhe...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 10:56 AM, J.C.
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:52:18 + Jacob Meuser
jake...@sdf.lonestar.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 03:10:07AM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
My build of -current is a few days old. I'm having problems
recording with aucat on a particular device.
The system has an integrated Intel
2009/2/23 damien.bergam...@free.fr
| I'm running 4.4-RELEASE and recently bought an Intel WiFi Link 5300
| Mini-PCIe card after reading it's supported in OpenBSD.
| I read the iwn(4) man page and downloaded the iwn-firmware-5.1.tgz
| package from Damien Bergamini's site.
4.4-RELEASE does
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:35:14 +0100 Alexandre Ratchov a...@caoua.org
wrote:
aucat records 1-channel, s16le at 16kHz (required by the device)
then it converts it to 2-channel, s16le at 44.1kHz (required by -o
defaults) and saves the result. So it appears to work.
You probably want to record
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:27:08 -0600 Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us
wrote:
You are not the one paying the fixers unfortunately. The only
influence you have is what Matthieu suggested.
Thanks Marco. If I'm reading Mathieu and you correctly, I have to take
this upstream to get it fixed, and
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 07:58:22AM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:35:14 +0100 Alexandre Ratchov a...@caoua.org
wrote:
aucat records 1-channel, s16le at 16kHz (required by the device)
then it converts it to 2-channel, s16le at 44.1kHz (required by -o
defaults) and saves
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 07:58:22AM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:35:14 +0100 Alexandre Ratchov a...@caoua.org
wrote:
aucat records 1-channel, s16le at 16kHz (required by the device)
then it converts it to 2-channel, s16le at 44.1kHz (required by -o
defaults) and saves
Hi All,
As far as I understand, the sftp service is always running since it is
the ssh daemon (maybe one can correct me if I'm wrong).
Hence I need to chroot some users to specific directories.
I prefer not to use vsftp at present time if this feature is available
with sftp of OpenBSD.
One can
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 4:59 AM, Jonathan Gray j...@goblin.cx wrote:
Using the information out of acpi for this on amd64 has
been disabled for now due to reliability issues:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvsm=123492694729019w=2
I don't know why est.c wasn't backed out to its old pre-acpi state
... bsd has fallen
---
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/current-users/2009/02/07/msg007841.html
For those new to NetBSD, the early user experience can be poor. This
is especially true when coming from a Windows, Mac or Linux
backgrounds. While basically
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 06:19:07PM +0100, Jean-Francois wrote:
Hi All,
As far as I understand, the sftp service is always running since it is
the ssh daemon (maybe one can correct me if I'm wrong).
Hence I need to chroot some users to specific directories.
I prefer not to use vsftp at
After watching the old i810(4) driver work fine for me, and seeing
all the bug reports on the new intel(4) driver, I've got this bad
feeling that nobody cared to test it on the older chipsets... i.e. they
are not getting paid to care about legacy support.
Would this be a correct assessment?
See sshd_config(5) and search for ChrootDirectory.
Floor
On Feb 23, 2009 6:24 PM, Jean-Francois jfsimon1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
As far as I understand, the sftp service is always running since it is
the ssh daemon (maybe one can correct me if I'm wrong).
Hence I need to chroot some users
Hello,
If I understand this will chroot any user. Am I correct ?
- Is root chrroted as well ?
- Is it possible to chrrot only some users ?
I am afraid that is I do this then all users will be chrooted and I
won't be able to turn this back since I will not have access to /etc.
Line to be changed
Ok that thread is funny. Very very funny.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 06:38:07PM +0100, Pau wrote:
... bsd has fallen
---
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/current-users/2009/02/07/msg007841.html
For those new to NetBSD, the early user experience can be
Snip possibly trolling stuff
Only one OS has been holding out against HappyNewWorld's rampaging
user-friendliness, GUIs co. armies: OpenBSD!
On the contrary, I find OpenBSD remarkably user-friendly. Almost
everything I want is already in base, most things are set up with
intelligent and safe
Snip possibly trolling stuff
???
sorry, sir; I think you got me wrong
I agree 100% with you.
I want OpenBSD to stay like it is now. I was giving net as an example
of what I wouldn't like to see happening to obsd
And I only have this OS on my computers.
A big thank you to all obsd developers
Dave Wilson wrote:
... I find OpenBSD remarkably user-friendly. Almost everything I want
is already in base, most things are set up with intelligent and safe
defaults...
+1
Also, there is *really* good documentation. Concise at times, but not
deficient.
-Lars
That was the funniest thing I have ever seen.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Mike Erdely m...@erdelynet.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 06:19:07PM +0100, Jean-Francois wrote:
Hi All,
As far as I understand, the sftp service is always running since it is
the ssh daemon (maybe one
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Dave Wilson
richard.wil...@senokian.com wrote:
On the contrary, I find OpenBSD remarkably user-friendly. Almost
everything I want is already in base, most things are set up with
intelligent and safe defaults, I can't even remember the last time I had
to even
On Mon, February 23, 2009 17:02, Lars NoodC)n wrote:
Dave Wilson wrote:
... I find OpenBSD remarkably user-friendly. Almost everything I want
is already in base, most things are set up with intelligent and safe
defaults...
+1
Also, there is *really* good documentation. Concise at times,
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 06:38:07PM +0100, Pau wrote:
For those new to NetBSD, the early user experience can be poor. This
is especially true when coming from a Windows, Mac or Linux
backgrounds. While basically sound, the installer asks many detailed
questions and is unintuitive. If new users
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 09:56:18PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
Next time when I'm in a condition similar to that in vienna after
p2k8, I'll test *all* installers of *all* existing operation systems.
I'm sure I'd managed to do a perfect installation of OpenBSD; but
pirofti@ may disagree ;-)
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 07:33:23PM +0100, Jean-Francois wrote:
Hello,
If I understand this will chroot any user. Am I correct ?
- Is root chrroted as well ?
Don't scp or SSH in as root. Use a regular account and sudo, or at
least the root password.
- Is it possible to chrrot only some
I suspect you might want /32 on the carp interfaces (255.255.255.255
rather than your 255.255.255.224).
What are the exact symptoms of not being able to reach .197 when HostB
is in backup state? It may be stating the obvious but check there's no
PF rule that might be blocking it.
You don't
To clarify. IPv6 nfs support does exist in the wild, just not for OpenBSD,
yet.
--
Todd Fries .. t...@fries.net
_
| \ 1.636.410.0632 (voice)
| Free Daemon Consulting, LLC \ 1.405.227.9094
Found this one in the www: http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/Sample_Fn-F7_script
Is there something similar one can do in OpenBSD? No clue, how to grab
the fn-f8 event here... brightness adjustment works somehow out of the
box, but the screen toggle doesn't seem to do anything.
Would be nice for
Hello,
Having trouble listing ftp-proxy anchor rules.
For example:
pfctl -a 'ftp-proxy/*' -sr
never returns any data
nor does:
pfctl -a 'ftp-proxy' -sr
and:
pfctl -a '*' -sr
throws out:
pfctl: DIOCGETRULES: Invalid argument
when it gets to the ftp-proxy anchor.
What am I missing here?
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 04:21:01PM -0500, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 07:33:23PM +0100, Jean-Francois wrote:
- Is it possible to chrrot only some users ?
I don't believe so. You could look at scponly, it can chroot users.
It's an add-on shell, not in ports, has not been
Hi,
You might try a looking at Match in the sshd_config man pages, ChrootDirectory.
Something like this in sshd_config, home directories must be root owned if
chrooted. This is in Openssh v5.1, not sure when it was introduced.
ChrootDirectory %h
Subsystem sftpinternal-sftp
Match
I have a problem with xmodmap on an OpeBSD 4.4 installation
(Dell Latitude D830). My .xmodmap file looks like this:
remove Lock = Caps_Lock
keysym Caps_Lock = Control_L
add Control = Control_L
keycode 22 = backslash bar
keycode 51 = BackSpace BackSpace Delete underscore
keycode 49 = Escape
I did some searching around and found a cvs message talking about
removing support for the bcm4311. I was wondering if anything has
changed since then? I don't see any newer updates. My Dell 1721
amd64 comes with this wireless adapter. Mine is rev 0x01 so I am
not really sure if it applies.
On 21:31, Mon 23 Feb 09, Stuart Henderson wrote:
I suspect you might want /32 on the carp interfaces (255.255.255.255
rather than your 255.255.255.224).
I'll try that in the next week. Thanks for the pointer.
What are the exact symptoms of not being able to reach .197 when HostB
is in
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:17:57 -0600
patric conant mirage.comput...@gmail.com wrote:
That was the funniest thing I have ever seen.
Funny, at least. :)
--
Maxime DERCHE
GnuPG public key ID : 0x9A85C4C0
(fingerprint : 0FDC 16AF 5A5B 1908 786C 2B85 2D3C C83E 9A85 C4C0)
Hi,
yes it's possible to chroot only some useee,
see match user in sshd_config
Le Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:33:23 +0100,
Jean-Francois jfsimon1...@gmail.com a C)crit :
Hello,
If I understand this will chroot any user. Am I correct ?
- Is root chrroted as well ?
- Is it possible to chrrot only
You cannot get internet access on a backup carp interface, period.
I have seen what you see before, and it comes from not starting things
up in proper order manually, i.e. configuring a system, and not
rebooting it after it was configured so that boot time configs get
processed in proper order.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 05:05:52PM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 07:58:22AM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:35:14 +0100 Alexandre Ratchov a...@caoua.org
wrote:
aucat records 1-channel, s16le at 16kHz (required by the device)
then it converts it
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:52:33 -0600, Todd T. Fries wrote:
As a corrilary, for those ISP's who think there is only need for a
single /30 for a client's router, the concept of failover routers
means 1 physical IP per router, and 1 IP for the failover IP, aka
3 IP's for the client side, dictating a
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 05:20:17PM -0500, Mike Erdely wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 04:21:01PM -0500, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 07:33:23PM +0100, Jean-Francois wrote:
- Is it possible to chrrot only some users ?
I don't believe so. You could look at scponly, it
Hi all,
I've been trying to get a simple firewall system up-and-running in
OpenBSD. I have The Book of PF and Secure Architectures
with OpenBSD so I thought it would be very simple. Well, we're two
weeks later now and still no firewall. :-) The pf rules I found in
those books don't seem to work
I'm a lurker on this mailing list, and I'm no master of pf, but I think the
problem is that your block statement comes before all of your pass
statements. In most firewall configurations, rules are processed until one
matches and then no others are processed. So if the first rule that matches
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Hilco Wijbenga
hilco.wijbe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've been trying to get a simple firewall system up-and-running in
OpenBSD. I have The Book of PF and Secure Architectures
with OpenBSD so I thought it would be very simple. Well, we're two
weeks later
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:09:36PM -0600, kevin thompson wrote:
I'm a lurker on this mailing list, and I'm no master of pf, but I think the
problem is that your block statement comes before all of your pass
statements. In most firewall configurations, rules are processed until one
matches and
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 8:09 PM, kevin thompson
kevin.david.thomp...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm a lurker on this mailing list, and I'm no master of pf, but I think the
problem is that your block statement comes before all of your pass
statements. B In most firewall configurations, rules are processed
Comments inline.
On Feb 23, 2009, at 5:58 PM, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
Hi all,
I've been trying to get a simple firewall system up-and-running in
OpenBSD. I have The Book of PF and Secure Architectures
with OpenBSD so I thought it would be very simple. Well, we're two
weeks later now and still
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 05:58:20PM -0800, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
Hi all,
I've been trying to get a simple firewall system up-and-running in
OpenBSD. I have The Book of PF and Secure Architectures
with OpenBSD so I thought it would be very simple. Well, we're two
weeks later now and still no
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:05:52 + Jacob Meuser
jake...@sdf.lonestar.org wrote:
I still think the issue has something to do with the new resampling
(rate change) code that allows aucat in server mode (-l) to handle
anything you toss at it. If I'm reading the debug output correctly,
the
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:11 PM, patrick keshishian pkesh...@gmail.com wrote:
why all the quick stuff? This is supposed to be a very simple set
up. Granted we don't exactly understand what the OP wants to do, but
from what I gather, he most likely wants to allow all outbound traffic
with NAT
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 8:47 PM, johan beisser j...@caustic.org wrote:
On Feb 23, 2009, at 5:58 PM, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
/etc/pf.conf
01 ext_if = sk0
02 int_if = sk1
03 localnet = $int_if:network
04 internet = $ext_if:network
05 udp_services = { domain, ntp }
06 icmp_types = { echoreq,
On Feb 23, 2009, at 9:11 PM, patrick keshishian wrote:
why all the quick stuff? This is supposed to be a very simple set
up. Granted we don't exactly understand what the OP wants to do, but
from what I gather, he most likely wants to allow all outbound traffic
with NAT and everything else gets
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 09:01:45PM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:05:52 + Jacob Meuser
jake...@sdf.lonestar.org wrote:
I still think the issue has something to do with the new resampling
(rate change) code that allows aucat in server mode (-l) to handle
anything
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Dorian B|ttner dorian.buett...@gmx.de
wrote:
Found this one in the www:
http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/Sample_Fn-F7_script
Is there something similar one can do in OpenBSD? No clue, how to grab the
fn-f8 event here... brightness adjustment works somehow out of
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 05:36:27 + Jacob Meuser
jake...@sdf.lonestar.org wrote:
My shellfu with audio devices leaves a lot to be desired, and my
mind reading skills are even worse. :-)
Could you give me the exact commands you want to see run?
# configure mic on uvideo
$ audioctl -f
71 matches
Mail list logo
