On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 07:41:46AM +0300, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
| AMS-IX (one of the biggest EU IPX) last year switched to OpenBGPD and
| they have some description of network on their pages and their stats
| are quite fine I think http://www.ams-ix.net/statistics/
Yes, AMSIX have OpenBGPD
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 05:38:54PM +, Jay K wrote:
My ideal setup would be:
1) no passwords (* in /etc/passwd or via vipw)
2) only ssh for remote access
i.e. no password-based security, only something better
3) except console, where anyone should be able to login
without
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 05:27:02PM +, Jay K wrote:
You know, installing ports/packages often gives you random manual
configuration advise, like:
=== Installing jdk-1.6.0.03p9 from /usr/ports/packages/amd64/all/
jdk-1.6.0.03p9:
ok
sysctl net.inet.gre.allow=1 ?
pass proto gre in your pf rules?
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:50:14 -0700
Peter Merritt pwmerr...@weirdwater.org wrote:
Hate replying to my own post but anyone have any ideas on this. This
for pptp pass thru not for a openbsd pptp server. Has anyone got this
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 02:34:03PM -0500, Carson Chittom wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 01:20:40PM -0500, Jay K wrote:
1) There should be a way to repeat all these messages for all installed
packages.
Maybe there already is.
$ less /var/db/pkg/*/+DISPLAY
3) You may wish to add
I want the messages to tell me how to get the repeat.
If there any messages, I want the instructions repeated at the end as well
(on
how to get the messages, not the actual messages).
pkg_add | tee pkg.out ??
I shouldn't have to.
What if I'm developing in a split python 2.4/2.6 environment?
Queres remeras de maxima calidad?
Vendemos la mejor remera publicitaria !!!
Ideal para tu?NEGOCIO/EMPRESA o para regalar
- NO SON DESCARTABLES
- NO SE ENCOGEN
- NO SE BORRA EL ESTAMPADO
Desde 100 remeras en adelante: 17.90 $ mas iva
Desde 1000 remeras en adelante :16,90 $ mas iva
Pedido
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Jay K jay.kr...@cornell.edu wrote:
I want the messages to tell me how to get the repeat.
If there any messages, I want the instructions repeated at the end as well
(on
how to get the messages, not the actual messages).
For this purpose there is FAQ and man
forward to pool port http check http / code 200
Mistake in my copy/paste, this is the real line in my relayd.conf
You can get almost the same thing by setting PasswordAuthentication to
no
in your sshd_config file, and hand out empty or ridiculously simple
passwords
for the console (honestly, who would forget yermomsawhore as a
password?).
How do I limit their use to the console?
If say I ssh in as
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Jay K jay.kr...@cornell.edu wrote:
You can get almost the same thing by setting PasswordAuthentication to
no
in your sshd_config file, and hand out empty or ridiculously simple
passwords
for the console (honestly, who would forget yermomsawhore as a
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 05:58:29PM -0500, Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 02:34:03PM -0500, Carson Chittom wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 01:20:40PM -0500, Jay K wrote:
1) There should be a way to repeat all these messages for all installed
packages.
Maybe there
I've been using Gmail and thought you might like to try it out. Here's an
invitation to create an account.
You're Invited to Gmail!
Mark Beihoffer has invited you to open a Gmail account.
Gmail is Google's free email service, built on the idea that email can be
intuitive, efficient, and fun.
Resolved with : relayd -d -f /etc/relayd.conf
...
Sorry for the noise.
2010/10/22 Alex Rastaklov alex.rastak...@gmail.com:
forward to pool port http check http / code 200
Mistake in my copy/paste, this is the real line in my relayd.conf
Estimados Clientes y Amigos , les informamos que ya se encuentran en actividad
nuevamente las cuentas de mail :
amenit...@fibertel.com.ar
amenitiesoluti...@fibertel.com.ar
fragancias@fibertel.com.ar
Desde ya les pedimos disculpas por alguna molestia ocasionada.
Como siempre nuestras
Hi all,
The Argentinian Mirror is going down for 2 hours (aprox) we need to
change the DC, this take place tomorrow (Saturday 15:00 / 17:00 UTC/GMT
-3 hours).
I'll send a mail, as soon as we're back up again.
Regards.
--
Sending from my Computer.
Hi misc,
I'm looking for some feedback from people who might have tried using an
Adaptec Serial ATA RAID 21610SA on OpenBSD. I completely understand why
Theo and the rest of the developers don't include the driver in the GENERIC
kernel since they were never given the documentation from Adaptec
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:01:17AM +, Jay K wrote:
You can get almost the same thing by setting PasswordAuthentication to
no
in your sshd_config file, and hand out empty or ridiculously simple
passwords
for the console (honestly, who would forget yermomsawhore as a
password?).
It's not only problem with license, but with quality of Adaptec as a
whole http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=125783114503531w=2 . But
maybe it changed as there is not Adaptec anymore.
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 6:44 PM, S H shbulkm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi misc,
I'm looking for some feedback from
run forest run!
really, don't use adaptec raid if you like your data.
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:44:08AM -0400, S H wrote:
Hi misc,
I'm looking for some feedback from people who might have tried using an
Adaptec Serial ATA RAID 21610SA on OpenBSD. I completely understand why
Theo and the
Hi,
I found this key sequence to crash cwm on Linux in CVS HEAD:
Minimal .cwmrc:
bind C-i grouponly2
bind CS-i movetogroup2
Run cwm, open a window (say xterm), press C-i, press CS-i, press C-i.
cwm crashes on Linux with this backtrace:
#0 0x76027595 in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1
Hi,
Pardon my ignorance, but is it possible to add more drives to a RAID-5 array ?
I basically can't afford to buy them all at once :(.
Thanks
Yes it is possible. The actual commands are dependent on the firmware and
device manufacturer. For instance if you have an LSI card you'll want to
look into the MegaCLI.
On 22 October 2010 17:08, Adam M. Dutko dutko.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes it is possible. The actual commands are dependent on the firmware and
device manufacturer. For instance if you have an LSI card you'll want to
look into the MegaCLI.
Maybe I wasn't clear, I'm considering softraid(4)
Hello,
I have 02 dual port Broadcom BCM5709CC0KPBG device running on
routing/pf machine (Dell T110) - OpenBSD 4.7 amd64:
b...@pci0:3:0:0:class=0x02 card=0x191714e4 chip=0x163914e4
rev=0x20 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation'
device = 'NetXtreme II Gigabit
I have 02 dual port Broadcom BCM5709CC0KPBG device running on
routing/pf machine (Dell T110) - OpenBSD 4.7 amd64:
b...@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x191714e4 chip=0x163914e4
rev=0x20 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation'
device = 'NetXtreme II Gigabit Ethernet
You will find a lot of answers here
http://2010.asiabsdcon.org/papers/abc2010-P8B-paper.pdf
But quick overview :
RAID5 is still experimental and softraid can be created from 200 chunks max.
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Christiano F. Haesbaert
haesba...@haesbaert.org wrote:
On 22 October
Tomas, I don't understand.
If I chroot then I can't do much at all right?
Unless I replicate/link like the entire system, minus login.
su/wheel group/sudo doesn't prevent simple running of login and typing the
root password, right?
Am I missing something?
Maybe that ssh-only access to myself
Tomas, I don't understand.
If I chroot then I can't do much at all right?
Unless I replicate/link like the entire system, minus login.
su/wheel group/sudo doesn't prevent simple running of login and typing the
root password, right?
Am I missing something?
Maybe that ssh-only access to myself
Turn off sudo and don't put users you don't want to have root in the
wheel group.
I find what you want to be questionable though.
But can't they still run login?
Why questionable?
I want security and convenience.
I don't consider passwords to be either.
physical security + ssh is what I
ok, 1.5 built, 1.6 built, 1.7 in progress. Thanks.
1.7 ultimately fails:
/usr/ports/pobj/jdk-1.7.0.00/openjdk/hotspot/agent/src/os/bsd/StubDebuggerLoc
al.c:153: error: redefinition of `throw_new_debugger_exception'
/usr/ports/pobj/jdk-1.7.0.00/openjdk/hotspot/agent/src/os/bsd/StubDebuggerLoc
Ops, sorry. I paste pciconf output instead pcidump, I tried these
setup on FreeBSD too and had the same problem, both running on amd64
port.
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
wrote:
I have 02 dual port Broadcom BCM5709CC0KPBG device running on
routing/pf
I believe you can do something like this. but I see it not really
making you more secure, still questionable
sed s/secure/insecure/g /etc/ttys /tmp/temp; mv /tmp/temp /etc/ttys
Mark
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Jay K jay.kr...@cornell.edu wrote:
Turn off sudo and don't put
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Jay K jay.kr...@cornell.edu wrote:
Tomas, I don't understand.
If I chroot then I can't do much at all right?
B Unless I replicate/link like the entire system, minus login.
You sai'd that you want to limit them, not I.
su/wheel group/sudo doesn't prevent
On 22 October 2010 17:31, Tomas Bodzar tomas.bod...@gmail.com wrote:
You will find a lot of answers here
http://2010.asiabsdcon.org/papers/abc2010-P8B-paper.pdf
But quick overview :
RAID5 is still experimental and softraid can be created from 200 chunks max.
Thanks Tomas, that would do :P.
Do you have release, stable, snapshot or current?
Which commands you tried and what's your /etc/mk.conf ?
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Jay K jay.kr...@cornell.edu wrote:
ok, 1.5 built, 1.6 built, 1.7 in progress. Thanks.
1.7 ultimately fails:
If I chroot then I can't do much at all right?
Unless I replicate/link like the entire system, minus login.
You sai'd that you want to limit them, not I.
I just don't want them to be able to login as root.
And I don't want a password for root.
If they are on the console though, ok
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Jay K jay.kr...@cornell.edu wrote:
If I chroot then I can't do much at all right?
Unless I replicate/link like the entire system, minus login.
You sai'd that you want to limit them, not I.
I just don't want them to be able to login as root.
B And I don't
First off, see attachment for an updated version of the spec file for
the portable version tarball. Changes:
- version number (needs to be updated to the actual version of the
release every time a new release is sent out)
- replaced Copyright keyword with License
- made other changes to allow
On 10/22/10 11:56, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
It's not only problem with license, but with quality of Adaptec as a
whole http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=125783114503531w=2 . But
maybe it changed as there is not Adaptec anymore.
And don't forget this follow up:
On 10/22/2010 02:09 PM, Florin Andrei wrote:
First off, see attachment for an updated version of the spec file for
the portable version tarball.
Apparently attachments are removed. Okay, here's an online copy:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/29966/openbsd/openntpd.spec.txt
--
Florin Andrei
I've been using an IBM Thinkpad T22 (P3 900MHz) laptop for quite some
time and I want to upgrade. I am looking for some expert advice on what
to upgrade to in the Thinkpad T-Series.
Two main considerations:
1. Core Duo 32-bit (T60) or Core 2 Duo 64-bit (T61)? I've only used
i386, should I
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Clint Pachl pa...@ecentryx.com wrote:
I've been using an IBM Thinkpad T22 (P3 900MHz) laptop for quite some time
and I want to upgrade. I am looking for some expert advice on what to
upgrade to in the Thinkpad T-Series.
Two main considerations:
1. Core Duo
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Clint Pachl pa...@ecentryx.com wrote:
1. Core Duo 32-bit (T60) or Core 2 Duo 64-bit (T61)? I've only used i386,
should I think about amd64?
Are you sure about that? I didn't think they made any T60s with plain
Core chips, though I could be wrong. My T60 has a
On 10/21/2010 09:52 AM, hyjial wrote:
Hi list !
There is a u_int on line 50 of sys/tcp.h. u_int is defined only if
__BSD_VISIBLE is which it is not is _POSIX_SOURCE is defined.
Is this intended ?
Hit into this when trying to build a program which uses libsoup.
Thanks,
hyjial
I was hit with
Ted Unangst wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Clint Pachlpa...@ecentryx.com wrote:
1. Core Duo 32-bit (T60) or Core 2 Duo 64-bit (T61)? I've only used i386,
should I think about amd64?
Are you sure about that? I didn't think they made any T60s with plain
Core chips, though I
Neal Hogan wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Clint Pachlpa...@ecentryx.com wrote:
I've been using an IBM Thinkpad T22 (P3 900MHz) laptop for quite some time
and I want to upgrade. I am looking for some expert advice on what to
upgrade to in the Thinkpad T-Series.
Two main
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, hyjial wrote:
There is a u_int on line 50 of sys/tcp.h. u_int is defined only if
__BSD_VISIBLE is which it is not is _POSIX_SOURCE is defined.
Is this intended ?
No. Easy fix.
Index: tcp.h
===
RCS file:
[IMAGE]
!Promociones Especiales para Grupos!
Mayores informes responda este correo electrsnico con los siguientes
datos.
Empresa:
Nombre:
Telifono:
Email:
Nzmero de Interesados:
Y en breve le haremos llegar la informacisn completa del evento.
O bien comunmquense a nuestros telifonos un
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 19:25 -0700, Clint Pachl wrote:
I've seen T60 with Core or Core 2 selling here locally on craigslist. I
figured, if I go with a 64-bit Core 2, I would just opt for the T61 with
the slightly faster bus and supposedly lower acoustics. Plus they are
selling for the same
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, hyjial wrote:
There is a u_int on line 50 of sys/tcp.h. u_int is defined only if
__BSD_VISIBLE is which it is not is _POSIX_SOURCE is defined.
Is this intended ?
No. Easy fix.
(This is PR 6192)
Instead, how about making
Thanks for your updates to the story Nick. As I said at this time I can't
replace the card but I will certainly do so as soon as I'm able. I
appreciate your feedback.
Shawn
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Nick Holland
n...@holland-consulting.netwrote:
On 10/22/10 11:56, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010, Philip Guenther wrote:
Instead, how about making netinet/tcp.h comply with SUS/POSIX, which
says that in a conforming environment this header file shall define
TCP_NODELAY and may declare additional TCP_* macros, but shall not
otherwise intrude on the applicatiojn
53 matches
Mail list logo
