Hello,
after boot on my DL360 G3 2Gb ram, hp array i5 (2x36gb mirroring)
with new 4.8 the boot blocked on:
npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: reported by CPUID; using exception 16
rd0: fixed, 3800 block
softraid0 at root
end .
NO error, no other info...
4.6 boot regulary...
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:33:41PM +0100, fabioFVZ wrote:
Hello,
after boot on my DL360 G3 2Gb ram, hp array i5 (2x36gb mirroring)
with new 4.8 the boot blocked on:
npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: reported by CPUID; using exception 16
rd0: fixed, 3800 block
softraid0 at root
end .
Plug serial cable and get some info.
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:33:41 +0100
From: fa...@openbeer.it
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: 4.8 fail boot
Hello,
after boot on my DL360 G3 2Gb ram, hp array i5 (2x36gb mirroring)
with new 4.8 the boot blocked
I'm running an application with a web-interface behind an Apache
reverse proxy (from base). As this application is on the same host as
Apache it is running on another port (8080 instead of 80).
Unfortunately Apache sends back the wrong Host-Header. After carefully
checking the CVS-log for a bit of
Hi all,
First of all, I don't want to start a flame. I will to know your opinion about
using virtual firewalls in virtual infraestructures like vmware, kvm ,xen, etc ...
like OpenBSD.
Advantages are very clear for me: provisioning, administration tasks, etc ... But
I will to know
2010/11/23 BjC6rn Ketelaars bjorn.ketela...@hydroxide.nl:
- B B B B B if (destportstr != NULL destport != DEFAULT_HTTP_PORT)
+ B B B B B if (destportstr != NULL || destport != DEFAULT_HTTP_PORT)
Your expression is always true, no sense in checking.
--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
Sorry, I was too fast to answer. I believe it can make sense.
2010/11/23 PPP8QQP8P9 PP0QQ P:PP2 czark...@gmail.com:
2010/11/23 BjC6rn Ketelaars bjorn.ketela...@hydroxide.nl:
- B B B B B if (destportstr != NULL destport != DEFAULT_HTTP_PORT)
+ B B B B B if (destportstr != NULL ||
Hi,
On Sun, 24.10.2010 at 08:20:35 +0530, Siju George sgeorge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote:
Also, Linux is better supported by hardware vendors, and/or much less
picky about hardware than OpenBSD is.
Not always is it ?
of
Hi,
On Sat, 23.10.2010 at 10:36:54 -0500, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us
wrote:
On Oct 23, 2010, at 8:48, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote:
Also, Linux is better supported by hardware vendors, and/or much less
picky about hardware than OpenBSD is.
If you consider the garbage
On 11/23/2010 01:42 PM, Bret Lambert wrote:
Because you're still relying on your host's network stack, you aren't
actually firewalling it.
Uhmm .. I am not sure about this. For example: you can configure several virtual
bridges under a ESXi host and then attach them to a virtual firewall
2010/11/23 Bjvrn Ketelaars bjorn.ketela...@hydroxide.nl:
I'm running an application with a web-interface behind an Apache
reverse proxy (from base). As this application is on the same host as
Apache it is running on another port (8080 instead of 80).
Unfortunately Apache sends back the wrong
On 11/23/2010 01:48 PM, carlopmart wrote:
On 11/23/2010 01:42 PM, Bret Lambert wrote:
Because you're still relying on your host's network stack, you aren't
actually firewalling it.
Uhmm .. I am not sure about this. For example: you can configure several virtual
bridges under a ESXi host and
* carlopmart carlopm...@gmail.com [101123 08:22]:
On 11/23/2010 01:48 PM, carlopmart wrote:
On 11/23/2010 01:42 PM, Bret Lambert wrote:
Because you're still relying on your host's network stack, you aren't
actually firewalling it.
Uhmm .. I am not sure about this. For example: you can
On 11/23/2010 02:30 PM, Timo Schoeler wrote:
thus carlopmart spake:
On 11/23/2010 01:48 PM, carlopmart wrote:
On 11/23/2010 01:42 PM, Bret Lambert wrote:
Because you're still relying on your host's network stack, you aren't
actually firewalling it.
Uhmm .. I am not sure about this. For
On 11/23/2010 02:33 PM, Jim Razmus wrote:
* carlopmartcarlopm...@gmail.com [101123 08:22]:
On 11/23/2010 01:48 PM, carlopmart wrote:
On 11/23/2010 01:42 PM, Bret Lambert wrote:
Because you're still relying on your host's network stack, you aren't
actually firewalling it.
Uhmm .. I am not
On 11/14/2010 1:04 PM, Steven Surdock wrote:
Greetings, I'm attempting to use an OBSD 4.8-stable machine as an NFS
server for storing snapshots from an ESXi 3.5 server. Unfortunately my
NFS performance seems relatively poor at about 55 Mbps (6 MBps).
I've found ESX performance over NFS is
On 11/23/10 07:38, carlopmart wrote:
Hi all,
First of all, I don't want to start a flame. I will to know your
opinion about using virtual firewalls in virtual infraestructures like
vmware, kvm ,xen, etc ... like OpenBSD.
Advantages are very clear for me: provisioning, administration
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 1:38 PM, carlopmart carlopm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
First of all, I don't want to start a flame. I will to know your opinion
about using virtual firewalls in virtual infraestructures like vmware, kvm
,xen, etc ... like OpenBSD.
Advantages are very clear for me:
Hi,
This looks like a nice, small and cheap server:
HP ProLiant AMD Athlon II NEO N36L
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16859105905
However, there seem to be some HP stuff in there which Im not sure is supported.
Ethernet Controller
Embedded NC107i PCI Express Gigabit
Having problems viewing this email? Please click here.For enquiry, please send
email to sa...@epromotion.com.hk
eg!f3i1h.d;%d8 ge'e.9o h+ f f-$.ef
d;;d=f %h)h+ i;i5h3 sa...@epromotion.com.hk
ef f(d8
f3e
f6e0fegd?!d;6o h+ f ih#ie.
OK
You are right.
But you know in this case your security level is not higher than virtual
machine.
Because your security level in complex chained system is not higher than
weakest point.In fact you are accepting the risk of using virtual machine.
I think in this case if your virtual machine
Storage Controller
Embedded SATA Controller with Embedded RAID (0, 1)
This concerns me. Generally with RAID, it's either a known, branded raid
controller that can easily be replaced, or software raid. Anything in
the middle like raid on desktop motherboards I avoid for servers
carlopmart wrote:
Advantages are very clear for me: provisioning, administration tasks,
etc ... But I will to know disadvantages. What is your opinion from the
point of view of security?
I use virtualization for many things (mainly for the productivity
advantages that you list), but it has
On 23/11/10 13:56, Bahador NazariFard wrote:
OK
You are right.
But you know in this case your security level is not higher than virtual
machine.
Because your security level in complex chained system is not higher than
weakest point.In fact you are accepting the risk of using virtual machine.
I
Hi,
On Thu, 18.11.2010 at 16:38:55 +0100, Manuel Guesdon
ml+openbsd.m...@oxymium.net wrote:
Is there a way to get detailed em(4) device errors without having to
recompile kernel with EM_DEBUG ?
I try to find in-errors reason(s) but netstat only gives errors as a sum of
dropped_pkts +
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 03:16:57PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 18.11.2010 at 16:38:55 +0100, Manuel Guesdon
ml+openbsd.m...@oxymium.net wrote:
Is there a way to get detailed em(4) device errors without having to
recompile kernel with EM_DEBUG ?
I try to find in-errors
On 2010-11-23, Joakim Aronius joa...@aronius.com wrote:
Hi,
This looks like a nice, small and cheap server:
HP ProLiant AMD Athlon II NEO N36L
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16859105905
However, there seem to be some HP stuff in there which Im not sure is
supported.
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 03:16:57PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 18.11.2010 at 16:38:55 +0100, Manuel Guesdon
ml+openbsd.m...@oxymium.net wrote:
Is there a way to get detailed em(4) device errors without having to
recompile kernel with EM_DEBUG ?
I try to find in-errors
On 2010-11-23, carlopmart carlopm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
First of all, I don't want to start a flame. I will to know your opinion
about
using virtual firewalls in virtual infraestructures like vmware, kvm ,xen,
etc ...
like OpenBSD.
Advantages are very clear for me:
On 11/23/2010 04:03 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2010-11-23, carlopmartcarlopm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
First of all, I don't want to start a flame. I will to know your opinion
about
using virtual firewalls in virtual infraestructures like vmware, kvm ,xen, etc
...
like OpenBSD.
?Problemas visualizando este e-mail? Ver Online
Smguenos en:
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Coordinacisn Ejecutiva Nacional de las Conmemoraciones del
2010â
[IMAGE]
Cuando veas esta
pregunta
[IMAGE]
?Quiin sabe qui pass aqum?
[IMAGE]
Podras
descubrir la historia de
On 2010-11-23, at 6:38 AM, carlopmart wrote:
Hi all,
First of all, I don't want to start a flame. I will to know your opinion
about using virtual firewalls in virtual infraestructures like vmware, kvm
,xen, etc ... like OpenBSD.
Advantages are very clear for me: provisioning, administration
At logical level who is responsible against layer two threats (vm or fw)?
You are using virtual machine and its network drivers aren't you?
I think it is so clear that in this solution health of VM is vital for
your network.
It seems you are concentrating and focus only about network layer
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 03:16:57PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
# ifconfig em3
em3:
flags=8b43UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,ALLMULTI,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu
1500
lladdr 00:30:48:94:0b:21
priority: 0
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 01:50:09PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
nope. I regularly see hardware which is supposed to be good, and which
gives no problems under Linux, which causes a lot of problems under
OpenBSD. I'm just about to throw away a bunch of recent machines that
worked fine with older
* carlopmart carlopm...@gmail.com [101123 08:44]:
On 11/23/2010 02:33 PM, Jim Razmus wrote:
* carlopmartcarlopm...@gmail.com [101123 08:22]:
On 11/23/2010 01:48 PM, carlopmart wrote:
On 11/23/2010 01:42 PM, Bret Lambert wrote:
Because you're still relying on your host's network stack, you
Somehow I have an bad entry in my /var/db/spamdb the entry in question is a
follows.
GREY|kadorken.thspamdb -t -a itroll.03092...@thinkage.chinkage.on.ca|spamdb -t
-a kgdykesb...@thinkage.on.ca|spamdb -t -a kgdykesb...@thinkage.on.ca|spamdb
-t -a kgdykescxspamdb|1160168514|0|0|1|-2
I have no
Quoting Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net:
Hi,
On Sat, 23.10.2010 at 10:36:54 -0500, Marco Peereboom
sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
On Oct 23, 2010, at 8:48, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote:
Also, Linux is better supported by hardware vendors, and/or much less
picky about hardware
Possibly, yes. Here's why. You're not attacking an OpenBSD host.
The hypervisor has a network stack that is engaged before any guest.
How else can you setup virtual switches, attach interfaces, etc.
Assuming that stack is vulnerable in some fashion, you have the
opportunity to attack the
-- Forwarded message --
From: R0me0 *** knight@gmail.com
Date: 2010/11/23
Subject: Re: OpenBSD 4.8 kernel: protect fault trap, code=0
To: Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
OpenBSD 4.8 (GENERIC.MP) #335: Mon Aug 16 09:09:20 MDT 2010
$B?7$7$$%a!%k%%I%l%9$r$*CN$i$;$7$^$9?7$7$$%a!%k%%I%l%9!'(B
edithab...@yahoo.co.jp
I am Mrs Edith Abed I am a cancer woman that have short time to live. I want to
make a donation to you. i am awaiting for your reply for more information Your
Direct Tel Fax Your ID Your Age
- Mrs edith abed
On Nov 23, 2010, at 7:50 AM, Toni Mueller wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 23.10.2010 at 10:36:54 -0500, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us
wrote:
On Oct 23, 2010, at 8:48, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote:
Also, Linux is better supported by hardware vendors, and/or much less
picky about hardware
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 05:05:14PM +, Peter Fraser wrote:
Somehow I have an bad entry in my /var/db/spamdb the entry in question is a
follows.
GREY|kadorken.thspamdb -t -a itroll.03092...@thinkage.chinkage.on.ca|spamdb -t
-a kgdykesb...@thinkage.on.ca|spamdb -t -a
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 01:38:04PM +0100, carlopmart wrote:
Hi all,
First of all, I don't want to start a flame. I will to know your
opinion about using virtual firewalls in virtual infraestructures
like vmware, kvm ,xen, etc ... like OpenBSD.
Advantages are very clear for me: provisioning,
Ambi Fresh, sale igroscopico, mangiaumidita, antimuffa - domini in
venditaQuesta non e' una newsletter, e' una comunicazione utile indirizzata a
te per risolvere il problema dell'umidita'.
Pochi segreti, tanti fatti. Se non hai mai provato il nostro prodotto, tenta
almeno una volta! Quando
On 11/23/10 08:32, carlopmart wrote:
On 11/23/2010 02:30 PM, Timo Schoeler wrote:
...
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/openbsd-misc/2007/10/24/352059
Yes, but this question is three years old and hypervisors have changed
Thanks.
what's changed?
Layering? Nope.
Crappy programming?
Nick Holland wrote:
what's changed?
Layering? Nope.
Crappy programming? Nope.
Better hardware? not really.
Features-before-security? Nope.
Good points. The goals of virtualization are, easy management, power
savings, quick provisioning and deployment, redundancy, etc. When you
talk about
Hi,
On Tue, 23.11.2010 at 11:07:40 -0500, Ted Unangst ted.unan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 03:16:57PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
# ifconfig em3
em3:
Hi,
On Tue, 23.11.2010 at 17:45:16 +0100, Alexander Schrijver
alexander.schrij...@gmail.com wrote:
Why don't you run linux on them? You aren't being very environmentally aware
are you?
I don't understand what you mean with this remark.
The application that I use these machines for requires
Hi,
On Tue, 23.11.2010 at 10:55:30 -0500, and...@msu.edu and...@msu.edu wrote:
Toni, have you published a list of the hardware thats been causing you
problems?
sorry, no I didn't think of it, yet. But I have posted to this list
about some of them, most prominently the small PCs with C7 chips.
Hi,
On Tue, 23.11.2010 at 14:09:48 -0500, daniel holtzman
d...@redmountainfarm.net wrote:
Perhaps one or more developers would be curious about the crashes? Why not
donate the machines instead of throw them out?
ok. I'm not the owner, only the janitor, for these machines. Unless I
figure out
16087 6928 6928 1000 3 0x2000180 selectimspector
You dirty dirty voyeur, you.
-Bryan.
POSTGRADO
EN EL MODELO SISTIMICO
Asociada a la Escuela de Terapia Familiar del Htal. Sant Pau de
Barcelona, Espaqa
y al MRI (Mental Research Institute), Palo Alto USA
Director: Dr. Horacio Serebrinsky - Director Acadimico: Dr. Marcelo R.
Ceberio
La Escuela Sistimica Argentina es una
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:53:55 +0100
Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 23.11.2010 at 14:09:48 -0500, daniel holtzman
d...@redmountainfarm.net wrote:
Perhaps one or more developers would be curious about the crashes? Why
not
donate the machines instead of throw them out?
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 15:28 -0500, Brad Tilley wrote:
Nick Holland wrote:
what's changed?
Layering? Nope.
Crappy programming? Nope.
Better hardware? not really.
Features-before-security? Nope.
Good points. The goals of virtualization are, easy management, power
savings, quick
I'm upgraded installed packages with pkg_add -u and recompiling impector
Thank you
2010/11/23 Brynet bry...@gmail.com
16087 6928 6928 1000 3 0x2000180 selectimspector
You dirty dirty voyeur, you.
-Bryan.
I've had no problem with the HP DL360 G3s
I have both
OpenBSD 4.7-current (GENERIC.MP) #560: Wed Apr 28 11:55:01 MDT 2010
and
OpenBSD 4.8 (GENERIC.MP) #359: Mon Aug 16 09:16:26 MDT 2010
running on DL360 G3s. In a very similar setup as you are describing.
Have you installed any special
On 11/23/10 16:20, R0me0 *** wrote:
I'm upgraded installed packages with pkg_add -u and recompiling impector
Thank you
My comments were totally unrelated, this will not solve your problem.
-Bryan.
I've upgraded packages and recompiling , problem persists, now I have
disabled imspector, so I will watch and see what will to happen
Regards,
2010/11/23 Brynet bry...@gmail.com
On 11/23/10 16:20, R0me0 *** wrote:
I'm upgraded installed packages with pkg_add -u and recompiling impector
Hi,
when booting my Asus EEE 901 netbook without battery, the power unit
type is reported as Watthour, whereas if booted with battery inserted
its Amphour. The same behavior appears on my Samsung netbook at work.
Although not really serious, I just noticed because it broke my shutdown
scripts
You might try the vr(4) errata:
http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/4.8/common/003_vr.patch
or a -current snapshot.
Ken
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 03:41:41PM -0200, R0me0 *** wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: R0me0 *** knight@gmail.com
Date: 2010/11/23
Hello,
In general, I run/track stable. I periodically rebuild the OS from source.
I've done this successfully probably about 50 times over the past N years.
I have a set of shell scripts I use to set up the various directories, pull
from CVS, build kernel, build userland, build release, etc, so
Hi,
I've recently tested login_ldap and ypldap on OpenBSD 4.8 as a test case
for an authpf gateway for ldap users.
Apart from these solution and having in mind that PAM is not (and
probably never will be) an option, what would you suggest as the right
place for someone to try to develop
looks like you are setting DESTDIR during build. unfortunately DESTDIR builds
got broken with the move to GCC 4 and aren't supported during the build phase
any more.
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-techm=128072148432121w=2
the patches in the previous message in the thread do work (you must build
and
Szczesc Boze
Nie to jest miloscia co czujesz, a to co postanawiasz
Film dokumentalny na DVD, prosze wpisz haslo w przegladarce:
JEDEN POKOJ
lub wpisz TAK, a ja w odpowiedzi przesle adres strony filmu.
Tresc filmu dotyczy rodziny, malzenstwa.
Z Bogiem
Hi all, maybe I'm failing to understand pftop, but I can't seem to reconcile
this. I run pftop -orate -vspeed (or just run it and switch to that view) and
I see one connection supposedly using a huge amount of bandwidth:
PRDIR SRCDEST
RATE PEAK
From: carlopmart carlopmart () gmail ! com
Date: 2010-11-23 12:38:04
Hi all,
First of all, I don't want to start a flame. I will to know your
opinion about using virtual firewalls in virtual infraestructures
like vmware, kvm ,xen, etc ... like OpenBSD.
Advantages are
Gentile Cliente,
Nell'ambito delle misure di sicurezza da noi adottate, controlliamo
costantemente
le attivita del sistema. Durante una recente verifica, abbiamo rilevato un
problema
riguardante il tuo conto.
Abbiamo deciso di limitare l'accesso al tuo conto fino a quando non verra
[IMAGE]
Mayores informes responda este correo electrsnico con los siguientes
datos.
Empresa:
Nombre:
Telifono:
Email:
Nzmero de Interesados:
Y en breve le haremos llegar la informacisn completa del evento.
O bien comunmquense a nuestros telifonos un ejecutivo con gusto le
atendera
Tels. (33)
[IMAGE]
Prezado (a) cliente,
Seu dispositivo iToken foi desatualizado perante o servidor,
e deve ser atualizado para a versco 1.2 por medidas de seguranga.
A atualizagco corrige uma grave falha de seguranga e do csdigo gerado em
seu Dispositivo iToken e pode evitar assim problemas futuros.
On Nov 23, 2010, at 3:06 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
looks like you are setting DESTDIR during build. unfortunately DESTDIR
builds
got broken with the move to GCC 4 and aren't supported during the build
phase
any more.
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-techm=128072148432121w=2
the patches in the
A presente e-newsletter destina-se znica e exclusivamente a informar e nco
pode ser considerada SPAM. De acordo com a legislagco internacional que
regulamenta o correio electrsnico, o e-mail nco podera ser considerado SPAM
quando incluir uma forma do receptor ser removido da lista. Caso o seu nome
OK, removing DESTDIR from my build-userland shell script fixed the problem.
To be specific, the FAQ says:
Make sure all the appropriate directories are created.
# cd /usr/src/etc env DESTDIR=/ make distrib-dirs
And here is what I had in my build script (ksh):
cd
73 matches
Mail list logo
