On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 06:29:26PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
How often is firmware updated without a maching driver update?
fw_update is really just to provide an automated fuction during
install or upgrade, the same time when you are getting a new
kernel/drier, it would be rare that a
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 10:07:15PM -0600, L. V. Lammert wrote:
| On Sat, 14 Jan 2012, Philip Guenther wrote:
|
| Any progress? I see plenty of replies to the people that you *don't*
| think are helping you but no reply to my question about what user you
| think locate.updatedb runs as,
On 2012-01-14, Jason McIntyre j...@cava.myzen.co.uk wrote:
i ask because we need to watch how we word this. we could reasonably
assume that people would also run it from time to time just to see if
there's an update available, right?
Newer firmware versions often require changes to the driver,
Hi Jason,
Jason McIntyre wrote on Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 08:28:29AM +:
ok, so perhaps the diff below will avoid future confusion.
I agree with adding that information and don't strongly object
to your wording, but given that fw_update(1) is just a wrapper
around pkg_add(1), some might
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:57:34AM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
Hi Jason,
Jason McIntyre wrote on Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 08:28:29AM +:
ok, so perhaps the diff below will avoid future confusion.
I agree with adding that information and don't strongly object
to your wording, but given
Perhaps he did. Wouldn't it be useful to help the guy trying to help
you (you know, the wheat) by giving a really simple and
straightforward answer, even if it is repeating yourself ? Probably
would've been less typing than what you just did (e.g. Sorry, I think
it runs as user ).
Hi Jason,
Jason McIntyre wrote on Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 01:01:50PM +0001:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:57:34AM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
Jason McIntyre wrote on Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 08:28:29AM +:
ok, so perhaps the diff below will avoid future confusion.
I agree with adding that
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 01:01:50PM +0001, Jason McIntyre wrote:
hmm. i would argue that it's more rightly fw_update(8)'s place to go
into that level of detail, not pkg_add(1).
I agree. I'm not too fond of fw_update(1), though synching to the kernel
makes it a necessity.
And pkg_add(1)
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 02:26:19PM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
hmm. i would argue that it's more rightly fw_update(8)'s place
to go into that level of detail, not pkg_add(1).
The pkg_add(1) manual does talk about PKG_PATH later on,
so mentioning that a specific class of packages has
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 02:32:56PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 01:01:50PM +0001, Jason McIntyre wrote:
hmm. i would argue that it's more rightly fw_update(8)'s place to go
into that level of detail, not pkg_add(1).
I agree. I'm not too fond of fw_update(1), though
Hi all
After upgrading to 5.0 (and also on -current) I keep getting those
errors for 2 out of 4 carp'd interfaces in a fw cluster pair:
/bsd: carp2: ip_output failed: 65
/bsd: carp3: ip_output failed: 65
And effectively, no CARP traffic is seen on those two interfaces,
neither in nor out. Both
Hello:
I was wondering if anyone has tried using scannedonly with samba on openbsd
(4.9).
Scannedonly is a daemon/VFS module for samba that scans files on request
using clamav (description at http://olivier.sessink.nl/scannedonly/ )
The samba version (3.5.6) available with openbsd 4.9 already
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:27:56PM +0100, Simon Kuhnle wrote:
openbsd.cs.fau.de will be down on January 14th,
from 08:00 to approximately 12:00 o'clock
due to yearly power system maintenance works.
Same problem I had last year:
the RAID controller forgot his setup again and now I can't
Hello,
I was wondering is it possible to run OpenBSD (5.0-stable) on
RouterBoard RB750GL.
I've searched for the supported hardware on OpenBSD and are aware that
only RouterBoard 600A is supported (and was discontinued by the
manufacturer about a week after it's been included into the supported
RB750GL use the sames CPU and ethernet switch as RB450G and Ubiquiti
Routerstation Pro. The big difference is that RB750GL have 2 ethernet
switch instead of 1.
I know that RSPro is support by FreeBSD and if I remeber well, I read on
this list that it could easily be port to OpenBSD.
If one
Hi list,
I'm in the process of finding out why my Ubiquity SR7-e PCIe
module worked perfectly with the 29.12.2011-snapshot, while I
only see problems with the 13.01.2012-snapshot.
When testing the module for the first time with the December
snapshot, I thought I'd never saw a card working that
Hi everybody,
I wonder if anybody knows a solution for this:
I had an encrypted partition working wonderfully in my system.
my /etc/fstab is:
/dev/sdXX /dev/svnd0c vnd rw,noauto,-k 0 0
/dev/svnd0c /mnt/ZZ ffs rw,noauto,nodev 0 0
so I used to do:
mount /dev/sdXX
Encryption key:
enter my key
vnd's used to be seperated into two modes: raw vnd mode, and the cooked
svnd mode.
The raw vnd mode has been killed. Only the cooked svnd mode remains --
and at the same time we renamed it to vnd.
Hi everybody,
I wonder if anybody knows a solution for this:
I had an encrypted partition
It's in the fine manual:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade50.html#vnd
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 19:33:33 +0100, marc wrote:
Hi everybody,
I wonder if anybody knows a solution for this:
I had an encrypted partition working wonderfully in my system.
my /etc/fstab is:
/dev/sdXX /dev/svnd0c vnd rw,noauto,-k 0 0
/dev/svnd0c /mnt/ZZ ffs rw,noauto,nodev 0 0
so I
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 02:15:39 -0700
Duncan Patton a Campbell campb...@neotext.ca wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:47:48 -0600
L. V. Lammert l...@omnitec.net wrote:
At 01:30 PM 1/11/2012, Jeremy O'Brien wrote:
4.3 was released May 1, 2008. That's almost 4 years old software. What
are you
Anexo: Documento-Planilha.doc (149,1 KB) Segue em anexo conforme
solicitado o relatorio.
Tenha um bom dia!
Thx! I renamed svnd to vnd and it worked like a charm.
PS. I think I read vnd(4) removed, oh how bad for them.. svnd
will still rock... why should I care to read further?
leaving svnd(4) renamed to vnd(4) in a world of disregard and
darkness. Sorry...
PS2. 5.0 rocks for me, it's a
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Ted Wynnychenko ted@comcast.net wrote:
...
When I look at the pthread.h header file (which is included in the source),
I cannot find pthread_spinlock_t defined.
It is my understanding that on linux pthread_spinlock_t is defined in
On 2012-01-15, Markus li...@neuronenwerk.de wrote:
I'm in the process of finding out why my Ubiquity SR7-e PCIe
module worked perfectly with the 29.12.2011-snapshot, while I
only see problems with the 13.01.2012-snapshot.
...
I skimmed the CVS commit log from end of December to know and did
On 01/15/12 20:52, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2012-01-15, Markusli...@neuronenwerk.de wrote:
I'm in the process of finding out why my Ubiquity SR7-e PCIe
module worked perfectly with the 29.12.2011-snapshot, while I
only see problems with the 13.01.2012-snapshot.
...
I skimmed the CVS commit
Hi,
It will be famous if somebody can update mailserv project to work
on the last version OpenBSD 5.0
Therefore it works like a charm on OpenBSD
4.8/4.9
Here the source : https://github.com/mailserv/mailserv/
Best
regards,
Wesley.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Wesley M. open...@e-solutions.re wrote:
Hi,
It will be famous if somebody can update mailserv project to work
on the last version OpenBSD 5.0
Therefore it works like a charm on OpenBSD
4.8/4.9
Here the source : https://github.com/mailserv/mailserv/
There's
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 07:40:57 +0100, Tomas Bodzar tomas.bod...@gmail.com
wrote:
There's sendmail in base system and there's ongoing work on smtpd by
OpenBDS devs (other components are in ports). Anyway you're welcome to
start port see http://www.openbsd.org/faq/ports/index.html
It is not an
29 matches
Mail list logo
