Looks decent, but I'm looking for something fanless to replace
the 3 fanless geodes currently in use.
To put it all in better context, here is the current setup:
[ denotes default inbound redirection of trafic, dmz server ]
internet+OpenBSD---+
(30/1M pppoe)--| geode 300Mhz
Thanks, that does work. I was then able to create a SCSI mirror with
two drives using softraid, refer to that new volume by DUID in
/etc/fstab, and see the machine automatically mount the volume on
boot.
Is there a way to pass a root device to bsd during the boot process?
I don't find one in the
OBSERVATORIO ASTRONOMICO
AMPIMPA
TUCUMAN - ARGENTINA
Declarado de Interis Educativo por el Ministerio de Educacisn de la
Nacisn
_
misc@openbsd.org
At.
Campamentos Cientmficos 2012/2013
- Aqos del Maximo Solar -
Docetes
Campamentos Cientmficos exclusivos para Docentes
La ciencia en el
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 03:48:02AM -0500, Justin Haynes wrote:
Thanks, that does work. I was then able to create a SCSI mirror with
two drives using softraid, refer to that new volume by DUID in
/etc/fstab, and see the machine automatically mount the volume on
boot.
Is there a way to pass
Anyway I have decided on this:
Atom 1.8GHz, 3 x Intel 82583V Gigabit NICs.
http://www.commell.com.tw/product/SBC/LE-376.HTM
3 of them, to replace the geodes. I have an 8 core Xeon to replace
the Pentium 4 with also.
Then I certainly should get the 100Mbps throughput and not
need to upgrade
Hi there!
What do you guys think about the reliability of the news (unfortunatelly
in German only) on www.golem.de
(http://www.golem.de/news/bundesregierung-deutsche-geheimdienste-koennen-pgp-
entschluesseln-1205-92031.html) that the German government claims to be
able to break PGP and SSH. The
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 02:26:43PM +0200, Stefan Wollny wrote:
Hi there!
What do you guys think about the reliability of the news (unfortunatelly
in German only) on www.golem.de
(http://www.golem.de/news/bundesregierung-deutsche-geheimdienste-koennen-pgp-
entschluesseln-1205-92031.html)
Hi Stefan,
On May 24, 2012, at 2:26 PM, Stefan Wollny wrote:
Question:
3. Is the technique used also able to at least in part decode and/or
analyze encrypted communication (e.g. by SSH of PGP)?
Answer:
Yes, the technique used is in principle able to do this, depending on
the way and
Stefan Wollny ste...@wollny.de wrote:
that the German government claims to be able to break PGP and SSH.
I think you have to be cluelessly paranoid to read such a claim
into a meaningless statement.
Question:
3. Is the technique used also able to at least in part decode and/or
analyze
Nh(i''ce$)eg 1f57e7f ghh(g#d8f,!cg=g:?g4+e7 ce$'fce:
i;g'f/e
go f g5h?hh2;jqDyfDjn
hfd8 g,e
h(;ege i(e=)e!fi;ch?g gd:g!h5f1 f3=f0ee
$hd;
f2!f3e0f77e h,e;o?#
B
I am trying to configure a new server with OpenBSD 5.1 using CARP and
I am having trouble configuring the internal interface. When
configured the traffic flows out the physical interface (bge2) and not
the carp interface (carp5). I am currently running another set of
servers on OpenBSD 4.9 with
You wrote:
Hi there!
What do you guys think about the reliability of the news (unfortunatelly
in German only) on www.golem.de
(http://www.golem.de/news/bundesregierung-deutsche-geheimdienste-koennen-pgp-
entschluesseln-1205-92031.html) that the German government claims to be
able to break
On 2012-05-24 14:00:01 naddy () mips ! inka ! de (Christian Weisgerber) wrote:
Stefan Wollny ste...@wollny.de wrote:
that the German government
claims to be able to break PGP and SSH.
I think you have to be cluelessly
paranoid to read such a claim
into a meaningless statement.
* Jason Wagstaff wagsta...@gmail.com [2012-05-24 17:43]:
I am trying to configure a new server with OpenBSD 5.1 using CARP and
I am having trouble configuring the internal interface. When
configured the traffic flows out the physical interface (bge2) and not
the carp interface (carp5). I am
What do you guys think about the reliability of the news (unfortunatelly
in German only) on www.golem.de
My German's rusty but the follow-up article quoting Symantec mentions
spyware/keylogging, which has been the traditional technique used in in the
past.
-- p
Hi.
Running a standard OpenBSD 5.1 installation with 2 hosts (virtual for
this test).
The only things changed from default is that I added three interfaces
(em0, carp1 and carp2).
The problem is that I can't get Host 1 back as master automatically if
Host 2 becomes master. On the first test I
Fishy...
All documentation is pointing at the direction to default advskew on
the primary host and 100 on the secondary.
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/carp.html
fw1: default
fw2: advskew 128
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=carpsektion=4#end
host A: default
host B: advskew 100
Book
Peter Laufenberg wrote:
What do you guys think about the reliability of the news (unfortunatelly
in German only) on www.golem.de
My German's rusty but the follow-up article quoting Symantec mentions spyware/keylogging,
which has been the traditional technique used in in the past.
Yes,
I hope some developer may bring some light to this.
Regards Johan
2012/5/24 Tyler Morgan tyl...@tradetech.net:
Weird, I didn't expect it to help, since the docs are pretty much always
right.
Looking through the changelog of files that seem relevant to me (ip_carp.h,
man 4 carp,
What do you guys think about the reliability of the news
(unfortunatelly in German only) on www.golem.de
My German's rusty but the follow-up article quoting Symantec mentions
spyware/keylogging, which has been the traditional technique used in
in the past.
-- p
Quick, someone, how do you say
Since upgrading from 4.9 to 5.1, I am getting a lot of false positives
with spamd running in greylisting mode, from email addresses I
previously did not.
A number of false negatives are still getting through, too.
Eg: I needed to add lists.openbsd.org to /etc/mail/nospamd to receive
messages
21 matches
Mail list logo
