Re: softdep issue in 5.3-current ?

2013-06-29 Thread Philip Guenther
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Andreas Bartelt o...@bartula.de wrote: I also noticed that tar performance got much worse on current, and time for building release doubled somewhere around the first half of June. Hmm, please excuse my frustration, but I'm going to have to rant a moment.

Re: softdep issue in 5.3-current ?

2013-06-29 Thread Andreas Bartelt
On 06/29/13 08:15, Philip Guenther wrote: On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Andreas Bartelt o...@bartula.de wrote: I also noticed that tar performance got much worse on current, and time for building release doubled somewhere around the first half of June. Hmm, please excuse my frustration,

Re: apropos

2013-06-29 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Patric, patric conant wrote on Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 01:32:20PM -0500: During the first Toronto hackathon, I focused on the SQLite database backend for mandocdb(8). Currently, mandocdb is still disabled in OpenBSD-current, but it is intended to become a drop-in replacement for the

Re: softdep issue in 5.3-current ?

2013-06-29 Thread Ville Valkonen
On 29 June 2013 09:51, Andreas Bartelt o...@bartula.de wrote: snip time ./buildsrc.sh took about 41 minutes at 5.3 release, then went down to 32 minutes at some point afterwards. At some point after June 7th, build time doubled to 64 minutes. /snip Hi Andreas, story doesn't tell whether you

Re: X or cwm got slower

2013-06-29 Thread Matthieu Herrb
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:45:08AM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote: On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Callum Davies calrog...@gmail.com wrote: I'm also not an X hacker but nv should use EXA since ~2007? should? No, not if you believe nv(4). Can? It would seem so. Does by default, or at

routes stuck in bgpd after ifconfig destroy

2013-06-29 Thread Tony Sarendal
Tested on 5.2 and current. routes get stuck in bgpd after ifconfig destroy. titan# cat /etc/bgpd.conf AS 65001 router-id 10.1.1.1 network inet connected network inet static titan# bgpctl show rib flags: * = Valid, = Selected, I = via IBGP, A = Announced, S = Stale origin: i = IGP, e = EGP, ?

Re: Internet access on openvpn with PF and NAT

2013-06-29 Thread Loïc BLOT
Hello mike You are blocking trafic after matching nat rule. Because you don't use quick keyword, your PF match the first rule, and next the second and next the third and to do third. In your firewall configuration you block nothing and you nat nothing. Better way is to write this: set skip on

Re: softdep issue in 5.3-current ?

2013-06-29 Thread Andreas Bartelt
On 06/29/13 11:18, Ville Valkonen wrote: On 29 June 2013 09:51, Andreas Bartelt o...@bartula.de wrote: snip time ./buildsrc.sh took about 41 minutes at 5.3 release, then went down to 32 minutes at some point afterwards. At some point after June 7th, build time doubled to 64 minutes. /snip Hi

Re: apropos

2013-06-29 Thread Craig R. Skinner
On 2013-06-29 Sat 10:09 AM |, Ingo Schwarze wrote: In OpenBSD, all elementary userland utilities are actively maintained, Appreciated, -- Craig Skinner | http://twitter.com/Craig_Skinner | http://linkd.in/yGqkv7

Re: X or cwm got slower

2013-06-29 Thread Jan Stary
On Jun 29 11:12:50, mhe...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:45:08AM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote: On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Callum Davies calrog...@gmail.com wrote: I'm also not an X hacker but nv should use EXA since ~2007? should? No, not if you believe nv(4).

Re: OpenSMTPD with RBLs and spamd

2013-06-29 Thread opendaddy
Cool. Best of luck. O.D. On 28. juni 2013 at 10:59 PM, Gilles Chehade gil...@poolp.org wrote: On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 03:35:52PM +, openda...@hushmail.com wrote: Hi, Hi, Anybody know when OpenSMTPD will work with RBLs and spamd? Filters is a work in progress, it may or may not be

Re: OpenSMTPD and Rails: What to do with -i and -t?

2013-06-29 Thread opendaddy
Marvellous. Thanks a lot Gilles. O.D. On 28. juni 2013 at 11:05 PM, Gilles Chehade gil...@poolp.org wrote: On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 03:51:34PM +, openda...@hushmail.com wrote: Hi, Hi, Rails' Action Mailer's default arguments for Sendmail are -i and -t

Re: iwn0 no link device timeout

2013-06-29 Thread Sha'ul
I ran fw_update -v to no avail, it still can not connect, says no link

Re: iwn0 no link device timeout

2013-06-29 Thread dmitry.sensei
Try from browser firmware.openbsd.org. 29.06.2013 22:35 пользователь Sha'ul sh...@lavabit.com написал: I ran fw_update -v to no avail, it still can not connect, says no link

panic: kernel diagnostic assertion on June 27th amd64 snap

2013-06-29 Thread Johan Huldtgren
hello, while updating my server today it panics on boot. I can work around the issue and get it up by doing bsd -c and then a 'disable viomb' Details follows and dmsg is attached. panic: kernel diagnostic assertion level = IPL_TTY || level = IPL_CLOCK || flags IPL_MPSAFE failed: file

Re: iwn0 no link device timeout

2013-06-29 Thread Sha'ul
I did pkg_add http://firmware.openbsd.org/firmware/snapshots/iwn-firmware-5.7.tgz and still no link, device timeout

Re: panic: kernel diagnostic assertion on June 27th amd64 snap

2013-06-29 Thread Alexey E. Suslikov
Johan Huldtgren johan+openbsd-ports at huldtgren.com writes: panic: kernel diagnostic assertion level = IPL_TTY || level = IPL_CLOCK || flags IPL_MPSAFE failed: file ../../../../arch/amd64/amd64/intr.c, line 359

Re: panic: kernel diagnostic assertion on June 27th amd64 snap

2013-06-29 Thread Alexey E. Suslikov
Alexey E. Suslikov alexey.suslikov at gmail.com writes: Johan Huldtgren johan+openbsd-ports at huldtgren.com writes: panic: kernel diagnostic assertion level = IPL_TTY || level = IPL_CLOCK || flags IPL_MPSAFE failed: file ../../../../arch/amd64/amd64/intr.c, line 359

Re: panic: kernel diagnostic assertion on June 27th amd64 snap

2013-06-29 Thread Michał Markowski
2013/6/29 Johan Huldtgren johan+openbsd-po...@huldtgren.com: hello, while updating my server today it panics on boot. I can work around the issue and get it up by doing bsd -c and then a 'disable viomb' I was just about to report similar symptoms. Likewise, system works ok with viomb

Re: iwn0 no link device timeout

2013-06-29 Thread Greg Thomas
I'm just returning to OpenBSD after a lng time solely on OS X. I picked up a ThinkPad X220 a couple of days ago and this is the first thing I'm trying to troubleshoot. I'll get a dmesg later but right now I need a nap. On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Sha'ul sh...@lavabit.com wrote:

Re: iwn0 no link device timeout

2013-06-29 Thread Sha'ul
After disabling wireless security I am still getting No link Doing a $ sudo ifconfig iwn0 scan it lists the networks around me, in /etc/hostname.iwn0 I have nwid xxx #wpakey 'xx' dhcp since security is disabled, I broadcast the SSID, and still no link, device timeout.

Re: iwn0 no link device timeout

2013-06-29 Thread Greg Thomas
Nevermind, I must have fat fingered something. iwn is working fine with 5.3 release on this X220, Centrino 6205. On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Sha'ul sh...@lavabit.com wrote: After disabling wireless security I am still getting No link Doing a $ sudo ifconfig iwn0 scan it lists the