Output for
'pfctl -si', 'pfctl -sm' and 'sysctl -a|grep net.inet.ip.ifq would be hie to
see.
//mxb
On 18 nov 2013, at 04:20, Leonardo Santagostini lsantagost...@gmail.com
wrote:
Sorry, looking more detailed at the logs i found this:
/var/log/daemon
Nov 17 18:36:12 v-arcbabalancer01
If you're using Google+, this community brings together all BSD systems and
BSD projects such as pf, OpenSSH and ZFS. I started it so I could keep in
touch with what's going on in other BSDs while I happily use OpenBSD, and
that's pretty much how it works out.
It's spam-free and 100% on topic,
On 11/17/13 14:02, Nick Holland wrote:
On 11/17/13 12:53, Wesley MOUEDINE ASSABY wrote:
Le 2013-11-17 20:27, dmitry.sensei a écrit :
What about 1Tb disk? Is CHS mode correct for this disks?
I done the test using Virtualization.
Not tried with a physical hard drive 1 TB.
The smallest
Is patching source followed by building and installing new binaries
and/or kernel the only way to update to errata version?
Is there something like errata snapshot which can be used to update the
system?
--
Marko Cupać
On 2013-11-18 07:53, Marko Cupać wrote:
Is patching source followed by building and installing new binaries
and/or kernel the only way to update to errata version?
Is there something like errata snapshot which can be used to update the
system?
Marko,
OpenBSD is source code maintained. There
On Fri, November 15, 2013 13:50, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
Kirill Bychkov said:
I can't agree with that. You can test something not in FAQ if you are sure
it
will make no harm to your system. Dance with bootloaders and partition
managers could lead to catastrophe if you make an error.
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 08:00:48 -0500
josh Grosse j...@jggimi.homeip.net wrote:
OpenBSD is source code maintained. There is the -stable branch, which
includes errata and any patches against -release that are not published
as errata. See FAQ 5.1 for a detailed description of this branch.
Ok, thanks for all the replies. Im waiting to this situation appears to
send to you the output of those commands.
Thanks and regards
Saludos.-
Leonardo Santagostini
http://ar.linkedin.com/in/santagostini
2013/11/18 mxb m...@alumni.chalmers.se
Output for
'pfctl -si', 'pfctl -sm' and
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Marko CupaÄ marko.cu...@mimar.rs wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 08:00:48 -0500
josh Grosse j...@jggimi.homeip.net wrote:
OpenBSD is source code maintained. There is the -stable branch, which
includes errata and any patches against -release that are not
Hello list, i found something strange.
By one side, cpu idle is at 0%
[root@v-arcbabalancer01 ~]# vmstat 2 20
procsmemory pagediskstraps cpu
r b wavm fre flt re pi po fr sr wd0 cd0 int sys cs us
sy id
5 0 0 86576 1450072 845 0
Hello everyone, I have a question regarding relayd(8) in OpenBSD 5.3
I was playing a little with relayd as a transparent proxy with URL
filtering using this relayd.conf:
http protocol httpfilter {
# Return HTML error pages
return error
qemu-kvm ...-smp sockets=2 ... solved it for me. What qemu version an build
are you using ?
Am 14.11.2013 18:47 schrieb Leonardo Santagostini lsantagost...@gmail.com
:
Thanks a lot to all, i will give it a try and gives tou you feedback as
soon as it get implemented.
Saludos.-
Leonardo
Hello Jan, thanks for answering.
The point was with booting without bsd.mp, now box rebooted and showing 4
procs =)
By now, all is working fine. Thank for all your support. I will keep you
all informed how things are going.
Best regards
Saludos.-
Leonardo Santagostini
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 01:58:54PM +, claudiozu...@gmail.com wrote:
I've tried a few different mirrors and they all seem to have the
same issue, could you suggest me one?
Packages build may not be complete yet so the packages with the
libsndio.so.6.0 may not be available yet. Base system
I've tried a few different mirrors and they all seem to have the same issue,
could you suggest me one?
--Messaggio originale--
Da: Alexandre Ratchov
A: Me
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Oggetto: Re: speex can't find /usr/lib/libsndio.so.5.0
Inviato: 18 nov 2013 08:26
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at
double (or even better long double) would be a better underlying type for
time_t than long long.
Programs that are using time_t properly would not notice the difference.
Programs that very
incorrect would get complete garbage for a result, and thus be easier to notice
and correct.
Using
Hi All,
I've been a user of OpenBSD for almost 10 years now and always
advocated it, as the most free and secure OS in the world (which it is).
But some things have been bugging me even more on the last few months.
In light of the recent events that changed the way the entire world
see
double (or even better long double) would be a better underlying
type for time_t than long long.
If you believe strongly in this idea, you should take an entire
operating system base and prove the case. By converting the entire
base. By showing that it will work. By getting X and firefox
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 17:47, Peter Fraser wrote:
double (or even better long double) would be a better underlying type for
time_t than long long.
Programs that are using time_t properly would not notice the difference.
Programs that very
Also, the strictly OpenBSD community on G+:
https://plus.google.com/communities/113634135604793474364
| -Original Message-
| From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On
| Behalf Of Tony Sidaway
| Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 6:18 AM
| To: OpenBSD misc
| Subject: For
Theo de Raadt wrote:
double (or even better long double) would be a better underlying
type for time_t than long long.
If you believe strongly in this idea, you should take an entire
operating system base and prove the case
15 years ago a gen-yoo-wine software engineer in our department
GM45 works fine playing html5 videos in firefox for me
OpenBSD 5.4-current (GENERIC.MP) #150: Thu Nov 14 00:30:57 MST 2013
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem = 4161064960 (3968MB)
avail mem = 4042162176 (3854MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0:
Hello all, unfortunally i have to setup a cron entry that bounce relayd.
Here the log that show how relayd stopped working
Nov 18 18:34:55 v-arcbabalancer01 relayd[20347]: relay relay5, session 1961
(54 active), 0, 200.16.99.232 - 172.19.224.71:80, done
Nov 18 18:34:55 v-arcbabalancer01
Join both! Breen Ouellette's community is best for a focus on OpenBSD.
And being one of the .. contributors of the OpenBSD G+ community (ie,
reposter from undeadly ;), I thought that the openbsd stuff in the general
BSD channel was mostly all the good stuff from the specific OpenBSD channel
anyhow, so I'd rather point people to the OpenBSD one.
2013/11/19 Tony
25 matches
Mail list logo
