Hi,
first of all, thanks @sthen for your answer (OP has no net access atm).
We are to the point where the clients get ip (windows/linux/OpenBSD) and
traffic is passing through the server as expected.
There is a very strange problem with ssh service though. While internet
traffic
is being routed
What does /etc/ssh/ssh_config look like on the OpenBSD client?
--
Jeff Goettsch
Agricultural and Resource Economics
University of California, Davis
http://agecon.ucdavis.edu/
On Fri, November 22, 2013 6:52 am, haris wrote:
Hi,
first of all, thanks @sthen for your answer (OP has no net access
Em 21-11-2013 18:44, J. Lewis Muir escreveu:
Hi, Shawn. I understand that, and I'm not trying to tell people how
they should talk on a mailing list. But to me documentation for a
project like OpenBSD is different. It's not individual people talking
however they like to talk. It's well-written
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 06:41:37PM +0200, Jeff Goettsch wrote:
What does /etc/ssh/ssh_config look like on the OpenBSD client?
The file is the default that comes with OpenBSD. No change there...
--
A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right.
Q: Why should I start my reply below the
On 11/22/13 11:17 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
If it's offensive for you, compile your own spamd man page with
the diff you so happily provided, and live the rest of your life
happy. Remember to always take this pill again on 1st of May, and 1st
of November, every year.
Hi, Giancarlo.
Il 22/nov/2013 19:07 J. Lewis Muir jlm...@imca-cat.org ha scritto:
On 11/22/13 11:17 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
If it's offensive for you, compile your own spamd man page with
the diff you so happily provided, and live the rest of your life
happy. Remember to always take this pill
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:06 AM, J. Lewis Muir jlm...@imca-cat.org wrote:
Well, no one wants to maintain a patch forever.
You lead a charmed life, my friend. Be well.
Lewis,
If censorship is your thing, why don’t you start by censoring yourself.
What you are asking for here is offensive.
-Rick
On Nov 22, 2013, at 12:26 PM, Paolo Aglialoro paol...@gmail.com wrote:
Il 22/nov/2013 19:07 J. Lewis Muir jlm...@imca-cat.org ha scritto:
On 11/22/13 11:17 AM,
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 1:06 PM, J. Lewis Muir jlm...@imca-cat.org wrote:
On 11/22/13 11:17 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
If it's offensive for you, compile your own spamd man page with
the diff you so happily provided, and live the rest of your life
happy. Remember to always take this pill
On 11/22/13 12:34 PM, System Administrator wrote:
Hi J. Lewis,
I am not a developer, but I've been lurking on this list for a very
long time and on that basis can tell you that you've committed two
cardinal sins as far as this mailing list is concerned:
1) you failed to do your homework --
Hi J. Lewis,
I am not a developer, but I've been lurking on this list for a very
long time and on that basis can tell you that you've committed two
cardinal sins as far as this mailing list is concerned:
1) you failed to do your homework -- had you done some research, in
particular about the
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 01:09:36PM -0600, J. Lewis Muir wrote:
I don't see it that way. Huckleberry Finn is a book, and I don't need
to read it unless I want to. The spamd(8) man page is a man page I need
to read in order to understand how to use spamd.
Let me fix that for you:
The
2) OpenBSD is the ultimate volunteer effort -- the developers do it in
their free time FOR PERSONAL FUN. Many of them have made it very
clear that they would cease development if it stops being fun. Your
original message (title and intro) goes to the heart of this issue. Its
tone and
I don't see it that way. Huckleberry Finn is a book, and I don't need
to read it unless I want to. The spamd(8) man page is a man page I need
to read in order to understand how to use spamd.
Let me fix that for you:
The spamd(8) man page is a man page I don't need to read it unless I
On Nov 21 20:04:32, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 08:02:06PM +0100, za...@gmx.com wrote:
Different people have different concepts of morality. I believe it
would be better to remove anything that is controversial, for
whatever reason
You emails are controversial,
J. Lewis Muir wrote:
If it's somehow offensive to them
and can be changed in a small way not to be, then I would accept the
patch to change it. Everybody wins--no big deal.
If everybody adapts what they say, to what they think others want to
hear, then we no longer have freedom of speach.
On 11/22/13 20:09, J. Lewis Muir wrote:
On 11/22/13 12:34 PM, System Administrator wrote:
Hi J. Lewis,
I am not a developer, but I've been lurking on this list for a very
long time and on that basis can tell you that you've committed two
cardinal sins as far as this mailing list is concerned:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 09:48:02PM +0100, Alexander Hall wrote:
I'm pretty sure Bob has noticed (and likely quite some time ago
ignored) this conversation.
You made your point and argumented for it. It does not apply here
though, so stop. Now. Please.
Actually, the longer it runs, the
On 22 November 2013 10:06, J. Lewis Muir jlm...@imca-cat.org wrote:
On 11/22/13 11:17 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
If it's offensive for you, compile your own spamd man page with
the diff you so happily provided, and live the rest of your life
happy. Remember to always take this pill again
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013, J. Lewis Muir wrote:
On 11/22/13 11:17 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
If it's offensive for you, compile your own spamd man page with
the diff you so happily provided, and live the rest of your life
happy. Remember to always take this pill again on 1st of May, and 1st
On 2013-11-22, haris ha...@2f30.org wrote:
Hi,
first of all, thanks @sthen for your answer (OP has no net access atm).
We are to the point where the clients get ip (windows/linux/OpenBSD) and
traffic is passing through the server as expected.
There is a very strange problem with ssh
Mentioned previously:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
Note that the mongodb port is currently broken (and has been since 5.3-ish
iirc).
Wondering if mongodb is operational with -current?
Thank you,
Chris
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Chris Smith obsd_m...@chrissmith.orgwrote:
Mentioned previously:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
wrote:
Note that the mongodb port is currently broken (and has been since
5.3-ish iirc).
Wondering if mongodb is
On Nov 22, 2013, at 10:06 AM, J. Lewis Muir jlm...@imca-cat.org wrote:
On 11/22/13 11:17 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
If it's offensive for you, compile your own spamd man page with
the diff you so happily provided, and live the rest of your life
happy. Remember to always take this pill
It looks like a pretty one-sided deal you're proposing:
passive-aggressive moves to control the speech of those who have
respected your freedom to express your opinion and be heard. Pretty
damned selfish behavior on your part as far as I can tell.
Michael -- well said.
On 11/22/2013 10:50 AM, Rick Pettit wrote:
Lewis,
If censorship is your thing, why don’t you start by censoring yourself.
What you are asking for here is offensive.
-Rick
+1
On Nov 22, 2013, at 12:26 PM, Paolo Aglialoro paol...@gmail.com wrote:
Il 22/nov/2013 19:07 J. Lewis Muir
Summary: with src/sys/dev/pci/if_athn_pci.c at revision 1.12, suspend/resume
will produce a uvm_fault on resume. I cannot reproduce the panic if I revert
to revision 1.11.
Of note: ddb(4) produces a brief traceback and a prompt but is inoperative.
I am unable to get a dump if ddb.panic=0.
hey josh,
this should be fixed in src/sys/dev/pci/if_athn_pci.c r1.13.
sorry for the inconvenience, but thank you for the report, especially the
backtrace.
cheers,
dlg
On 23 November 2013 16:37, Josh Grosse j...@jggimi.homeip.net wrote:
Summary: with src/sys/dev/pci/if_athn_pci.c at
28 matches
Mail list logo
