Ldapd features list

Dear List members, ‎Can someone please point me to where I can get the list of features supported by ldapd? Also if possible, features not supported by ldapd. Given the excellent documentation standards of OpenBSD - Am I right in assuming, whatever is in the manpages for ldapd.conf and

Re: can't upgrade using the last snapshot

Mon, 11 Apr 2016 18:31:35 + Robert Peichaer > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 07:22:31PM +0200, arrowscr...@mail.com wrote: > > The snapshot can't find the mirror. It prints: "no address associated with > > this name". > > I have tried many mirrors (inclusing the mother,

Re: about relayd.conf and certs

On Mon, April 11, 2016 7:55 pm, igor.kos wrote: > I am confused using relayd & certificates & pf > > First of all, I want to do ssl-accel, so do I need to do "divert" in > pf.conf, > as: > > pass in quick inet proto tcp from lan:network to any port https divert-to > localhost port 8443 > You

Re: Smokeping performance

Steve Shockley wrote: > I have several machines running Smokeping on OpenBSD 5.8 amd64 to > monitor latency through several web proxy servers. I have a lot of > frequent monitors (mostly curl) so performance is degrading. Opening > one of the Smokeping web pages can take 30-45 seconds at times,

about relayd.conf and certs

I am confused using relayd & certificates & pf First of all, I want to do ssl-accel, so do I need to do "divert" in pf.conf, as: pass in quick inet proto tcp from lan:network to any port https divert-to localhost port 8443 or is it OK just to use IP of relayd device, as: # $OpenBSD:

Smokeping performance

I have several machines running Smokeping on OpenBSD 5.8 amd64 to monitor latency through several web proxy servers. I have a lot of frequent monitors (mostly curl) so performance is degrading. Opening one of the Smokeping web pages can take 30-45 seconds at times, but from what I can see

Re: can't upgrade using the last snapshot

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 08:53:44PM +0200, arrowscr...@mail.com wrote: > I have network connectivity and DNS seems Ok. The build is 1459828632, from > Apr 5. > And now the system is broken (panic): > > Stopped at debugger+0x9: leave > debugger() at debugger+0x9 > panic() at panic+0xfe > setroot()

Re: can't upgrade using the last snapshot

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 06:31:35PM +, Robert Peichaer wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 07:22:31PM +0200, arrowscr...@mail.com wrote: > > The snapshot can't find the mirror. It prints: "no address associated with > > this name". > > I have tried many mirrors (inclusing the mother,

Re: can't upgrade using the last snapshot

I have network connectivity and DNS seems Ok. The build is 1459828632, from Apr 5. And now the system is broken (panic): Stopped at debugger+0x9: leave debugger() at debugger+0x9 panic() at panic+0xfe setroot() at setroot+0xa59 diskconf() at diskconf+0xe3 main() at main+0x538 Sorry, but I

Re: can't upgrade using the last snapshot

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 07:22:31PM +0200, arrowscr...@mail.com wrote: > The snapshot can't find the mirror. It prints: "no address associated with > this name". > I have tried many mirrors (inclusing the mother, ftp.openbsd.org), none work > for me. > > I has been a hard time to work with

can't upgrade using the last snapshot

The snapshot can't find the mirror. It prints: "no address associated with this name". I have tried many mirrors (inclusing the mother, ftp.openbsd.org), none work for me. I has been a hard time to work with snapshots since last month... many bugs. I'm using snapshots to help reporting bugs, of

Re: Recording computer sound.

On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 12:16:42PM +0300, li...@wrant.com wrote: > > Just an idea, before providing a diff, does it look like a good > candidate to go into FAQ13.4? Thank you for your consideration. > Yes, this would be good candidate (for the FAQ 13.5), as this is not the first time this is

Re: If FreeBSD isn't free, who is free?

Please don't post such things here. On 2016 Apr 09 (Sat) at 09:36:47 -0300 (-0300), Jorge Luis wrote: :I am posting just for fun. -- One good reason why computers can do more work than people is that they never have to stop and answer the phone.

Re: If FreeBSD isn't free, who is free?

On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Jorge Luis wrote: > I am posting just for fun. > > FreeBSD isn't Free. You are free to try posting this on the FreeBSD forums? -- Raul

Re: pf from self user _rebound to port 53 and rebound in front of unbound

Kevin Chadwick writes: >> Something like >> >> pass out ... proto udp from any to any port 53 user = _rebound >> >> same for tcp. > > Yeah but have you tried it and been successful without getting a syntax > error? This doesn't give a syntax error and seems to do what

If FreeBSD isn't free, who is free?

I am posting just for fun. FreeBSD isn't Free. * 4.3. Licensee shall not export, either directly or indirectly, any of this * software or system incorporating such software without first obtaining any * required license or other approval from the U. S. Department of Commerce or * any other

Re: avrdude

I remembered I have a sub to serial cable I always have to reboot with it plugged in to work. Did that with the programmer and all is well. Thanks, Edgar Sent from my iPhone On Apr 11, 2016, at 4:58 AM, Mihai Popescu wrote: >> Is anyone using avrdude with usbasp programmer?

Re: avrdude

> Is anyone using avrdude with usbasp programmer? I can't seem to get things > going. I was using it long time ago, but I remember I set up the programmer in a configuration file. Post your dmesg with usbasp device plugged in, just to verify it it properly recognized.

Re: Bad X performance, possible bug with radeon card

> *Dmesg extract* > *Xorg.0.log extract* Do post the full dmesg and Xorg logs inline, not on some internet links. This way someone may help you.

Re: pf from self user _rebound to port 53 and rebound in front of unbound

> Something like > > pass out ... proto udp from any to any port 53 user = _rebound > > same for tcp. Yeah but have you tried it and been successful without getting a syntax error? -- KISSIS - Keep It Simple So It's Securable

Re: Upgrade from snapshot to release.

On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Paco Esteban wrote: > On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Raf Czlonka wrote: > > Obviously, this is *not* a supported upgrade path so, if anything goes > > wrong, you're on your own. > > If it goes wrong, I'll reinstall ;-) > > Thanks Raf. By the way, upgrade was completed without any