Re: OpenBSD httpd and HTTP/2

Isn't it a result of wrong assumptions based on developer's experience with employer-provided high-end laptops and workstations? Like "oh, i'm gonna to add this feature and that tweak here and it will be good enough because any PC (around me, in the office) has 16 (ok, at least 8) Gb of RAM AND

Re: Is there something to replace zaurus?

Until I really wanted to mess with vmm(4) late last year (thus requiring me to move to a more portly i5 laptop), my daily driver was a Toshiba NB305, on which I've run OpenBSD since 2011. It still comes out to play whenever I need excellent battery life and/or a light carry load-out. Everything

Re: malloc.conf recommended settings

> I have a question about the recommended settings for /etc/malloc.conf. Well, by default we ship without the file. > I'm currently using JUC on my i386 laptop, just to see how the old beast > handles it. I hadn't noticed any significant performance issues though it > did crash Chromium

NFS uid/gid remapping for root

The man page for exports(5) claims that remote accesses by root will be mapped to uid/gid -2:-2 unless overridden via the -maproot or -mapall options. But if root creates a file the result is clearly different: # touch test # ls -alF total 32 drwxrwxrwx 2 ken 999 512

AMD Ryzen

Has anybody achieved an installation of OpenBSD on this yet please? Just curious whether it is worth the effort to try. Regards - Damian Pacific Engineering Systems International, 277-279 Broadway, Glebe NSW 2037 Ph:+61-2-8571-0847 .. Fx:+61-2-9692-9623 | unsolicited email not wanted here

Re: Is there something to replace zaurus?

On 03/29/17 05:51, Luke Small wrote: > I thought I read that there is an arm7 based mobile device, but I can't > find anything about it. > Not quite as tiny, but in more capable in almost every way are the netbooks of a few years ago. In addition to being small and portable, they can have real

Re: Question about bsd.rd

* Raf Czlonka [170401 00:15]: Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:13:57 +0100 From: Raf Czlonka To: OpenBSD Misc Subject: Re: Question about bsd.rd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) Sender:

malloc.conf recommended settings

Hi, I have a question about the recommended settings for /etc/malloc.conf. I'm currently using JUC on my i386 laptop, just to see how the old beast handles it. I hadn't noticed any significant performance issues though it did crash Chromium because it was using memory it had just freed. On

Re: Sony Vaio VPCSA

Thanks all for your help on this, much appreciated. Not an auspicious choice of machine to start out on! The sony's bios seems incapable of switching raid off, spent some time toggling settings and retrying the install. Looks as if Paul's patch is the next step. Work took over during the week so

Re: Missing message-ID header in OpenSMTPD emails

I don't use the submission port on either server, just port 25, but 5.9 sends a message-id and 6.0 does not. What does "/if necessary/" mean for the 5.9 server? What is the deciding factor to make the header necessary? I would like the v6.0 server to send a message-id too, how do I make

Re: Missing message-ID header in OpenSMTPD emails

LD wrote: > I don't use the submission port on either server, just port 25, but 5.9 > sends a message-id and 6.0 does not. What does "/if necessary/" mean for the > 5.9 server? What is the deciding factor to make the header necessary? I > would like the v6.0 server to send a message-id too, how do

Typo in man page for xsetroot

Hello, There is a typo in man page for xsetroot. In section OPTIONS, there is '-verson' and I think it should be '-version'.

Missing message-ID header in OpenSMTPD emails

I have an OpenBSD 5.9 and an OpenBSD 6.0 server each set up as email servers. The v5.9 server adds a message-id header to outgoing emails, the v6.0 does not. Looking at the change log for each release it states that for v5.9 "/Add Message-Id header if necessary/" and v6.0 "/Add missing date or

Re: HEADS up: how to cope with pre-release testing with pkg_add(1)

On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:28:42PM +0300, Mihai Popescu wrote: > > So pkg_add will look for the release directory, and not find it yet because > > it's not out > yet. > > Is PKG_PATH ignored then? RTFM, I'm just making people aware of recent stuff that's fully documented. > > until the release

Re: HEADS up: how to cope with pre-release testing with pkg_add(1)

> So pkg_add will look for the release directory, and not find it yet because > it's not out > yet. Is PKG_PATH ignored then? > until the release is done. So this is for people wanting to install release only?

Kernel panic during boot on Dell Inspiron 15-5558

Hello, I am new to OpenBSD and am trying to install OpenBSD on my Dell laptop, specifically Dell Inspiron 15-5558. When I boot the installation, the kernel panics with pci_make_tag: bad request. I am able to install if I disable acpi during boot though. I am new to this, so if I forgot

Re: Question about Skylake GPU support

narvu...@tutanota.com wrote: > Hello, > > Currently, there is no support for Skylake GPU, I just want to know if > someone is working on it. > If not, are there some technical difficulties to support this generation ? Or > nobody is working on it ? The technical difficulty is that upstream,

HEADS up: how to cope with pre-release testing with pkg_add(1)

Just so that the subject makes it clear. This info already made it in various messages ont the mailing list. Right now, if you install OpenBSD, it says 6.1 without beta. So pkg_add will look for the release directory, and not find it yet because it's not out yet. pkg_add -Dsnap will make

Re: OpenBSD httpd and HTTP/2

On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 12:14:34 +0200 Reyk Floeter wrote: > Isn't QUIC the hot new thing now? It is UDP, so Google can reinvent > TCP and turn even more of their browser into an OS-replacement ;) Oh come on now, how else will Google be able to claim they are inventing or

Question about Skylake GPU support

Hello, Currently, there is no support for Skylake GPU, I just want to know if someone is working on it. If not, are there some technical difficulties to support this generation ? Or nobody is working on it ? Thanks Regards

Re: OpenBSD httpd and HTTP/2

Yes, that's the point of QUIC. On 2017 Mar 31 (Fri) at 13:30:59 +0200 (+0200), Marina Ala wrote: :UDP servers listening? would that open possibility for massive DOSes?  :  : :Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 at 12:14 PM :From: "Reyk Floeter" :To: "Marina Ala"

Re: OpenBSD httpd and HTTP/2

UDP servers listening? would that open possibility for massive DOSes?    Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 at 12:14 PM From: "Reyk Floeter" To: "Marina Ala" Cc: "OpenBSD Misc" Subject: Re: OpenBSD httpd and HTTP/2 On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at

Re: OpenBSD httpd and HTTP/2

On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 09:14:10AM +0200, Marina Ala wrote: > Hello! > > When will the httpd have HTTP/2 support in OpenBSD? > > Endpoints, webservers and the devices/networs between the two points would > greatly benefit from HTTP/2. > > Faster and less traffic. > > Thanks. > Isn't

Re: Question about bsd.rd

On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 02:51:47AM BST, Steven Schneider wrote: > Hi @misc, > > I've noticed that bsd.rd wants to download the install base packages from > /pub/OpenBSD/6.1/i386. Is this an error or some sort of alias for the path > to the snapshots of the install base? bsd.rd seems to find the

OpenBSD httpd and HTTP/2

Hello! When will the httpd have HTTP/2 support in OpenBSD? Endpoints, webservers and the devices/networs between the two points would greatly benefit from HTTP/2. Faster and less traffic. Thanks.