Thanks for the answer.
On Friday, February 9, 2018 1:29 AM, "ed...@pettijohn-web.com"
wrote:
On Feb 8, 2018 4:26 PM, Tom Smyth wrote:
>
> Hi Zolt
>
> you can open the message on a command terminal ... copy and paste
> the
Yes, thanks for the hint. I thought about this. Actually in theory is more
simple to use directly the sendbug command, but for that you need to configure
a server (smtp I think). And I do not want to spend days now to learning how to
do it. So I will do at the simple way, as you told me.
Thanks
On 02/08/18 19:28, mazocomp wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 01:41:20PM -0800, Charlie Eddy wrote:
hello misc,
Hi!
I am considering a move to OpenBSD, since I subscribed to this mailing list
some time ago (~few months). I want to take advantage of security.
Good, go ahead, all doors are
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 01:41:20PM -0800, Charlie Eddy wrote:
> hello misc,
>
Hi!
> I am considering a move to OpenBSD, since I subscribed to this mailing list
> some time ago (~few months). I want to take advantage of security.
>
Good, go ahead, all doors are open.
> However, a programmer
On 8 Feb 2018 23:23, "Steve Litt" wrote:
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 13:41:20 -0800
Charlie Eddy wrote:
> hello misc,
>
> I am considering a move to OpenBSD, since I subscribed to this
> mailing list some time ago (~few months). I want to take
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 09:41:20PM +, Charlie Eddy wrote:
> hello misc,
>
> I am considering a move to OpenBSD, since I subscribed to this mailing list
> some time ago (~few months). I want to take advantage of security.
>
> However, a programmer who I know personally and respect considers
Thanks Daniel. Definitely the correct answer.
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 4:07 PM, Daniel Bolgheroni
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 09:41:20PM +, Charlie Eddy wrote:
> > hello misc,
> >
> > I am considering a move to OpenBSD, since I subscribed to this mailing
> list
> >
On Feb 8, 2018 4:26 PM, Tom Smyth wrote:
>
> Hi Zolt
>
> you can open the message on a command terminal ... copy and paste
> the message manually into a working email client,
> make sure the subject and email addresses are consistent
>
> I hope this helps ...
> Tom
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 13:41:20 -0800
Charlie Eddy wrote:
> hello misc,
>
> I am considering a move to OpenBSD, since I subscribed to this
> mailing list some time ago (~few months). I want to take advantage of
> security.
>
> However, a programmer who I know personally
multiplex'd wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've been reading into the signify(1) program a little recently, and the
> manual page mentons the '-t' option, which is used to ensure the public
> key deduced from the signature comment "matches /etc/signify/*-keytype.pub",
> where 'keytype' is the argument
Thanks kevin i missed the dump part... agree with disable dump on prod
..enable on dev
On 8 Feb 2018 22:51, "Kevin Chadwick" wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 19:39:39 +
>
>
> > Afaik swap is encrypted anyway on OpenBSD
>
> It is with a random key which is actually more
Hello all,
I've been reading into the signify(1) program a little recently, and the
manual page mentons the '-t' option, which is used to ensure the public
key deduced from the signature comment "matches /etc/signify/*-keytype.pub",
where 'keytype' is the argument given to '-t'. I'm not sure what
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 19:39:39 +
> Afaik swap is encrypted anyway on OpenBSD
It is with a random key which is actually more secure than the softraid
key.
However to the OPS question relating to dumps.
I believe the answer is that dumps are helpful and OpenBSD is a
developer system primarily
Hi Charlie,
https://sivers.org/openbsd is another good site to view :)
@Joren that is commitment the Tat :)
Thanks
Tom Smyth
On 8 February 2018 at 22:12, Jeroen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> OpenBSD has a clear and proactive stance when it comes to security,
> while Arch does not. If
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 13:41:20 -0800
> Does the difference boil down to one's
> definition of free software, and then compliance with that definition?
There is a huge difference. Arch is at the whim of Linux which is far
behind even the Windows kernel in mitigations (which is far
behind OpenBSD)
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 13:41:20 -0800
Charlie Eddy wrote:
> hello misc,
>
> I am considering a move to OpenBSD
Where from?
>
> However, a programmer who I know personally and respect considers
> OpenBSD to be old-school, in a negative sense. He recommends Arch
> Linux
Hi Zolt
you can open the message on a command terminal ... copy and paste
the message manually into a working email client,
make sure the subject and email addresses are consistent
I hope this helps ...
Tom Smyth
On 8 February 2018 at 21:37, Zsolt Kantor wrote:
>
https://www.openssl.org/docs/man1.0.2/crypto/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_host.html
They say they NEED this because they can delete a whole load of code
that could have security bugs.
Perhaps I am wrong but upon a quick glance, doesn't this just boil
down to some simple ORing?
How does this sit with
If your programmer friend has any source code patches he would like to
submit then I am sure the project would love to have them.
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 4:58 PM Charlie Eddy
wrote:
> hello misc,
>
> I am considering a move to OpenBSD, since I subscribed to this
Hi,
OpenBSD has a clear and proactive stance when it comes to security,
while Arch does not. If you want to stay atop of new developments, feel
free to try -current. If you need a very stable environment, go with
-stable. Don't expect to find that latter one in Arch, as it works with
a rolling
Hello, I'm very new to the OpenBSD OS, I found a bug in the inteldrm driver and
I want to send it with sendbug. Probably something needs to be configured to
actually send out the message, because I sent the bug report, but it only
landed in my local mailbox. The question is what should I
hello misc,
I am considering a move to OpenBSD, since I subscribed to this mailing list
some time ago (~few months). I want to take advantage of security.
However, a programmer who I know personally and respect considers OpenBSD
to be old-school, in a negative sense. He recommends Arch Linux as
>When it comes to Meltdown:
>Does OpenBSD is going to release patches for 6.2? I don't see anything related
>to Meltdown in errata, but maybe it is too early. I understand other OSes
>received disclosed information about bug a few months earlier.
amd64 snapshots contain a fix, which is undergoing
Also use noatime mount option so whe reading files you are not updating
access time
Ie there would be writes to disk everytime u access a file if noatime is
not set
On 8 Feb 2018 7:36 PM, "Tinker" wrote:
> Hi!
>
> If I understand mount(8)
Also use noatime mount option so whe reading files you are not updating
access time
On 8 Feb 2018 7:36 PM, "Tinker" wrote:
> Hi!
>
> If I understand mount(8) (http://man.openbsd.org/mount) right, FFS
> mounts have a metadata I/O mode and a data I/O mode. By default,
>
Afaik swap is encrypted anyway on OpenBSD
On 8 Feb 2018 6:52 PM, "Tinker" wrote:
Hi misc@,
I looked through previous discussions on whether a SWAP partition
should be inside or outside the RAID partition when making a crypto
softraid.
The only argument I stumbled into was
On Thu, February 8, 2018 1:49 pm, Tinker wrote:
> Hi misc@,
>
> I looked through previous discussions on whether a SWAP partition
> should be inside or outside the RAID partition when making a crypto
> softraid.
>
> The only argument I stumbled into was that it should be outside because
> swap is
Hi!
If I understand mount(8) (http://man.openbsd.org/mount) right, FFS
mounts have a metadata I/O mode and a data I/O mode. By default,
metadata is accessed synchronously and data is accessed
asynchronously.
"-o sync" will force both to synchronous mode, and "-o softdep" would
change the
Chris, install -current on USB key and boot from it.
Ve.
Hi misc@,
I looked through previous discussions on whether a SWAP partition
should be inside or outside the RAID partition when making a crypto
softraid.
The only argument I stumbled into was that it should be outside because
swap is encrypted anyhow and it would be unnecessary to double-encrypt
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 09:03:09PM -0800, Chris Bennett wrote:
> Does any of my hardware work in -current?
>
> OpenBSD 6.2 (GENERIC.MP) #2: Sun Dec 10 21:14:42 CET 2017
>
> r...@syspatch-62-amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
> pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5 irq 1 irq 12
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018, at 7:02 AM, Mihai Popescu wrote:
> > Then i setup only one port using configure command all ports work normally.
>
> I worked a lot with multiple RS-232 ports boards. They all had some
> hardware jumpers to configure the IRQ and Address for each port ( a
> lot of jumpers!).
Intel provided stable microcode for Skylake mitigating Spectre variant 2.
Current status
https://newsroom.intel.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2018/02/microcode-update-guidance.pdf
When it comes to Meltdown:
Does OpenBSD is going to release patches for 6.2? I don't see anything related
to
On 02/08/18 04:31, Захаров Анатолий wrote:
> I install OpenBSD on my Fastwell CPB905 Singleboard compter. IT have
> 4-RS-232 port on same IRQ, but on different address on isa bus. Then i
> setup only one port using configure command all ports work normally. But
> when i setup 2 of them in one boot
Hi,
I was speculating about another instance of syslogd, just as a log
host services while having base syslogd running on same box.
1. -p /dev/null deletes /dev/null and replaces it with socket file
with same name
crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel2, 2 Feb 8 13:25 /dev/null
# syslogd -d -F -f
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Mihai Popescu wrote:
>
> How did you manage to find and even install 3.8 ?
>
>
To his defense, he didn't say he installed 3.8. Only what he found
something in the 3.8 documentation.
> Then i setup only one port using configure command all ports work normally.
I worked a lot with multiple RS-232 ports boards. They all had some
hardware jumpers to configure the IRQ and Address for each port ( a
lot of jumpers!). Maybe this option is integrated in your board BIOS,
check it.
On 2018-02-07, Grzegorz Kowalczyk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can relayd(8) be used as a plain HTTP proxy (no interception, no
> filtering, SSL/TLS via the CONNECT method)?
No. tinyproxy is probably the simplest existing thing that can do this.
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 11:33:01AM +, listo factor wrote:
> On 02/08/2018 08:58 AM, Stephane HUC "CIOTBSD" wrote:
> > install package gvfs if X, to use with xfce or gnome...
>
> Unfortunately, this is an "X-less", non-graphic "portal",
> the only computer open to the world, and only via ssh,
On 02/08/2018 08:58 AM, Stephane HUC "CIOTBSD" wrote:
install package gvfs if X, to use with xfce or gnome...
Unfortunately, this is an "X-less", non-graphic "portal",
the only computer open to the world, and only via ssh,
on a LAN full of Linux and Windows computers that are
samba servers.
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 02:31:31PM +0500, ?? wrote:
> I install OpenBSD on my Fastwell CPB905 Singleboard compter. IT have
> 4-RS-232 port on same IRQ, but on different address on isa bus. Then i
> setup only one port using configure command all ports work normally.
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 09:03:09PM -0800, Chris Bennett wrote:
> OpenBSD 6.2 (GENERIC.MP) #2: Sun Dec 10 21:14:42 CET 2017
>
> r...@syspatch-62-amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
> real mem = 3774021632 (3599MB)
> avail mem = 3652612096 (3483MB)
the ram will
> I install OpenBSD on my Fastwell CPB905 Singleboard compter. IT have
> 4-RS-232 port on same IRQ, but on different address on isa bus. Then i
> setup only one port using configure command all ports work normally. But
> when i setup 2 of them in one boot configuration i get in dmesg: irq
>
Chris Bennett(chris...@bennettconstruction.us) on 2018.02.07 21:03:09 -0800:
> Does any of my hardware work in -current?
cd0 at scsibus1 targ 1 lun 0: ATAPI 5/cdrom
removable
your cd-rw drive probably works.
> Lots of stuff fails in 6.2 stable.
> WiFi and touchpad
I install OpenBSD on my Fastwell CPB905 Singleboard compter. IT have
4-RS-232 port on same IRQ, but on different address on isa bus. Then i
setup only one port using configure command all ports work normally. But
when i setup 2 of them in one boot configuration i get in dmesg: irq
already in use.
install package gvfs if X, to use with xfce or gnome...
Le 08/02/2018 à 01:18, listo factor a écrit :
> I have a need to mount existing samba shares on a linux box,
> on the openbsd 6.2 computer. There is no use for a samba server
> on it, and I would prefer not to install one. What is the
>
46 matches
Mail list logo