On 2018/10/15 19:27, Nathan Clement wrote:
> > Try a snapshot (or 6.4). Not sure if it will help but there were some
> > fixes to sdmmc since 6.3.
>
> No dice.
> I tried using install64.fs, but still it tells me of some mythical 1024MB
> drive "sd0",
> of which fdisk "can't read sector 0". Using
> Try a snapshot (or 6.4). Not sure if it will help but there were some
> fixes to sdmmc since 6.3.
No dice.
I tried using install64.fs, but still it tells me of some mythical 1024MB
drive "sd0",
of which fdisk "can't read sector 0". Using 6.4 did get me a few more lines
about
sdhc:
sdhc0 at
On 2018-10-15, Sonic wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 5:09 PM Johan Hattne wrote:
>> Not sure I’m understanding your question, but is this not
>> application-dependent? So for an internal interface mec0 and ssh, you could,
>>
>> $ ssh -B mec0 f...@example.com
>>
>> and for ping,
>>
>> $
> On Oct 15, 2018, at 15:03, Sonic wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 5:09 PM Johan Hattne wrote:
>> Not sure I’m understanding your question, but is this not
>> application-dependent? So for an internal interface mec0 and ssh, you could,
>>
>> $ ssh -B mec0 f...@example.com
>>
>> and
> On Oct 15, 2018, at 11:20, Erling Westenvik
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 01:05:28PM -0400, Sonic wrote:
>> Have setup a site-to-site VPN using alias addresses which works fine
>> for systems inside the network, however, when attempting to connect
>> from the routers themselves to
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 5:09 PM Johan Hattne wrote:
> Not sure I’m understanding your question, but is this not
> application-dependent? So for an internal interface mec0 and ssh, you could,
>
> $ ssh -B mec0 f...@example.com
>
> and for ping,
>
> $ ping -I mec0 example.com
The addresses
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 01:05:28PM -0400, Sonic wrote:
> Have setup a site-to-site VPN using alias addresses which works fine
> for systems inside the network, however, when attempting to connect
> from the routers themselves to the remote network the fact that they
> use the default address on
Have setup a site-to-site VPN using alias addresses which works fine
for systems inside the network, however, when attempting to connect
from the routers themselves to the remote network the fact that they
use the default address on the external interface and not the chosen
alias address appears
On 2018-10-15, open...@kene.nu wrote:
> in theory. But when WAN links are composed of IPSEC and GRE (which
> does not have link state) OSPF falls to pieces as the core idea of is
> link-state.
OSPF primarily uses hellos. Link-state is also used to speed up failover
up but is not required.
There
hello, google brought me here. i too had the same error response. it is not
due to incorrect user/ p/w. in our application i had to change the SSL mode
from 0 to 2.
link explaining.
https://www.nsoftware.com/kb/xml/04070801.rst
just wanted to share
--
Sent from:
Hello,
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 2:49 PM Claudio Jeker wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 02:48:31PM +0300, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> > On 15.10.18 12:58, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> > > open...@kene.nu(open...@kene.nu) on 2018.10.15 11:05:41 +0200:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I am trying to get
On 2018-10-15, Nathan Clement wrote:
> Thank you, Maurice!
> Now at least I have dmesg, and also the output of disklabel:
>
>> dmesg:
>
> OpenBSD 6.3 (RAMDISK_CD) #98: Sat Mar 24 14:26:39 MDT 2018
Try a snapshot (or 6.4). Not sure if it will help but there were some
fixes to sdmmc since 6.3.
I agree, it would, be very nice.
For my case the "network inet priority 32"-hack could work, even
though it only exists in 6.4 so upgrading everything that needs it is
necessary. But as far as the future goes, rtlabels tagging of routes
in ospfd would be ideal. Having only the above hack to rely
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 02:48:31PM +0300, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> On 15.10.18 12:58, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> > open...@kene.nu(open...@kene.nu) on 2018.10.15 11:05:41 +0200:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I am trying to get bgpd and ospfd play nicely with route redistribution.
> > >
> > > So far
On 15.10.18 12:58, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
open...@kene.nu(open...@kene.nu) on 2018.10.15 11:05:41 +0200:
Hello,
I am trying to get bgpd and ospfd play nicely with route redistribution.
So far the only way I have found that suits my need is to use
bgpd.conf network statements and rtlabels.
Thank you, Maurice!
Now at least I have dmesg, and also the output of disklabel:
> dmesg:
OpenBSD 6.3 (RAMDISK_CD) #98: Sat Mar 24 14:26:39 MDT 2018
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/RAMDISK_CD
real mem = 2007171072 (1914MB)
avail mem = 1942614016 (1852MB)
mainbus0 at
I didnt update the boot loader with 1.10.6. I upgraded to ubnt 1.10.7
and then upgraded the bootloader to experiment what will happen with the
bootloader and further installing OpenBSD. OpenBSD works fine, as I
mentioned reboot isnt possible due to uboot.
Currently I would not recommend
On 2018-10-14 20:56:05, Jan Stary wrote:
> Are there any phoneticians running on OpenBSD?
> How do you type the phonetic alphabet in vim?
> Is there a standard keyboard layout for the English part of IPA?
>
> I wrote me an ipa.vim ftplugin with shortcuts (such as imap ,ae)
> for the unicode
On 14/10/2018, Nathan Clement wrote:
> Hello,
> I am new to OpenBSD, installing for the first time to an Acer Aspire
> ES1-111M. The only internal drive it has is a 32GB eMMC card.
> I have used dd to get install63.fs on a usb drive, and it boots fine.
> However, the installer reports sd0 as
open...@kene.nu(open...@kene.nu) on 2018.10.15 11:05:41 +0200:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to get bgpd and ospfd play nicely with route redistribution.
>
> So far the only way I have found that suits my need is to use
> bgpd.conf network statements and rtlabels.
>
> So, to make ospfd learn route
Hello,
I am trying to get bgpd and ospfd play nicely with route redistribution.
So far the only way I have found that suits my need is to use
bgpd.conf network statements and rtlabels.
So, to make ospfd learn route from bgpd I use rtlabels. So in bgpd.conf:
match from set rtlabel from_bgpd
On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 17:31:41 +0200
Marko Cupać wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 11:56:28 +0200
> Marko Cupać wrote:
>
> > After introducing carppeer option I see incoming traffic on physical
> > interfaces of both MASTER and BACKUP firewalls, as opposed to the
> > situation without carppeer
Jan Stary wrote:
Are there any phoneticians running on OpenBSD?
How do you type the phonetic alphabet in vim?
Is there a standard keyboard layout for the English part of IPA?
It wouldn't be too difficult to create one. I found this on DuckDuckGo
via the search query "ipa xkb layout":
23 matches
Mail list logo
