Re: help understanding cua/tty EBUSY behaviour?

2019-08-07 Thread Theo de Raadt
Adam Thompson wrote: > On 2019-08-03 18:14, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > Adam Thompson wrote: > > > >> Summary: I open cua0 with cu(1), quit cu(1), try to re-open with > >> cu(1) but now it immediately fails with EBUSY. *Usually* doesn't > >> happen with USB-to-serial (cuaU[0-9]) but have still

Re: help understanding cua/tty EBUSY behaviour?

2019-08-07 Thread Adam Thompson
On 2019-08-03 18:14, Theo de Raadt wrote: Adam Thompson wrote: Summary: I open cua0 with cu(1), quit cu(1), try to re-open with cu(1) but now it immediately fails with EBUSY. *Usually* doesn't happen with USB-to-serial (cuaU[0-9]) but have still seen it once or twice. [...] You are

Re: Bluetooth support status

2019-08-07 Thread John Brahy
Ha. I was about to start out with how I can guess how complicated managing an operating system is. Then I see the last line of your email saying, "How about if you don't know, stop making guesses". My comments only apply to my experience coding for bluetooth on mobile devices and it was just

Re: Bluetooth support status

2019-08-07 Thread Theo de Raadt
Bryan Wright wrote: > > On Aug 7, 2019, at 10:06, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > > > Bryan Wright wrote: > > > >> Are there technical/philosophical problems that make all versions of > >> Bluetooth incompatible with the project, or is it a just matter of > >> removing what is not being maintained?

Re: Bluetooth support status

2019-08-07 Thread Theo de Raadt
Wow, look -- more useless chatter on the topic. The bt stack we had was designed as "network code", and all sorts of complex layer violations and device hand-offs were very complicated and troublesome. The code was not deleted because bluetooth is shit. The code was deleted *because it was

Re: Bluetooth support status

2019-08-07 Thread Bryan Wright
> On Aug 7, 2019, at 10:06, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > Bryan Wright wrote: > >> Are there technical/philosophical problems that make all versions of >> Bluetooth incompatible with the project, or is it a just matter of >> removing what is not being maintained? > > I'm sure a bunch of you can

Re: Bluetooth support status

2019-08-07 Thread John Brahy
Right, without reading the code and only reading this commit message it's all conjecture. I was just hoping to hear something more if someone was inclined to share. inclined. The commit message seems like some sort of inside joke. Log message: "It's not the years, honey; it's the mileage."

Re: Bluetooth support status

2019-08-07 Thread Theo de Raadt
Bryan Wright wrote: > Are there technical/philosophical problems that make all versions of > Bluetooth incompatible with the project, or is it a just matter of > removing what is not being maintained? I'm sure a bunch of you can come up with theories about what actually transpired, without

Re: Bluetooth support status

2019-08-07 Thread Bryan Wright
Are there technical/philosophical problems that make all versions of Bluetooth incompatible with the project, or is it a just matter of removing what is not being maintained?

Re: Bluetooth support status

2019-08-07 Thread John Brahy
ok, thanks. Bluetooth is overcomplicated and if it's not managed properly it just opens up the attack surface for no reason. It definitely makes some things easy but there are always workarounds. On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 11:52 PM Consus wrote: > On 17:12 Tue 06 Aug, John Brahy wrote: > > Hello,

Re: Building Unbound with Python module support

2019-08-07 Thread Andy Lemin
Hi Claudio, I did actually try putting my python plugin and unboundmodule.py into the chroot, but I completely forgot that I would also need to install the rest of python into the chroot! Haha Serves me right for working on it until 1am when I should should have been asleep and trying with

Re: How do I publish default router preferences using rad?

2019-08-07 Thread Florian Obser
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 11:17:04PM +0200, Sebastian Benoit wrote: > Caleb(enlightened.des...@gmail.com) on 2019.08.06 08:05:48 -0700: > > How do I publish default router preferences as defined in RFC 4191 > > (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4191) using rad in OpenBSD 6.5? > > I've read the

Re: Building Unbound with Python module support

2019-08-07 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 08:44:07AM +0100, Andy Lemin wrote: > Morning Stuart, > > So I’ve tested with the base build options properly, the initial errors I saw > before have gone which is good. But I have a more fundamental issue with > Unbound now sadly. > > Swig successfully built

Re: Building Unbound with Python module support

2019-08-07 Thread Andy Lemin
Morning Stuart, So I’ve tested with the base build options properly, the initial errors I saw before have gone which is good. But I have a more fundamental issue with Unbound now sadly. Swig successfully built “/usr/src/unbound/pythonmod/unboundmodule.py” and installed it to

Re: Bluetooth support status

2019-08-07 Thread Consus
On 17:12 Tue 06 Aug, John Brahy wrote: > Hello, > > Just curious if there was any change in OpenBSD supporting bluetooth. Sadly, there is none.