Re: Secure end points for Internet tunnel, the most secure hardware

2020-05-12 Thread info
>That is a kernel level issue, not an SOC level one. Well, I have ordered a couple of Orange PI ONE. According to: http://philip.xinqu.net/orangepi.html it shall work on OpenBSD at least without a video port. Good features for my use case: 1) No video port means anyone non qualified enough

USB 3.0 flash drive not functional

2020-05-12 Thread Andrew Klaus
I recently tried using a USB Flash Drive (64GB Capacity) under OpenBSD 6.7 on both amd64 and arm64. It's detected as a umass0 device, but won't display the disksize/sector line in dmesg and is not available for me to use as a drive. This drive does work on other operating systems, so I know the

Re: Secure end points for Internet tunnel, the most secure hardware

2020-05-12 Thread Aaron Mason
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 1:27 PM wrote: > > Aaron, thank you for your suggestion. > > For now I prefer to try to use the oldest suitable hardware I can find, not > sure if it is a good idea. > YMMV. Don't fall into the sunk cost fallacy. > Please someone let me know if AllWinner SoC backdoor

Re: OpenBSD insecurity rumors from isopenbsdsecu.re

2020-05-12 Thread slackwaree
And who the fuck gave you permission to talk cockbreath? ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Monday, May 11, 2020 8:03 PM, Daniel Jakots wrote: > On Mon, 11 May 2020 17:27:24 +, slackwaree > slackwa...@protonmail.com wrote: > > > I wish if the someone who took the time to make this page at

Re: Intel I210 Fiber Optic Ethernet Card Transceiver Info.

2020-05-12 Thread Tom Smyth
Hi Vertigo, can you send on a dmesg, what version and architecture OpenBSD are you running. ? I believe dlg@ had added in SFP+ functionality between OpenBSD 6.5 6.6 ? ( it may have been SFP+ functionality on the ix(4) (and not em(4) driver) On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 20:58, Vertigo Altair

Intel I210 Fiber Optic Ethernet Card Transceiver Info.

2020-05-12 Thread Vertigo Altair
Hi Misc, I have 2 questions about my dual port fiber optic ethernet card with Intel I210 chipset: 1. The ifconfig em0 media command output only shows that it supports multi-mode fiber (1G SX). Actually it worked when I tried single mode fiber. But I still wanted to report this to OpenBSD

Fwd: Are there architectural limitation for packages in ports?

2020-05-12 Thread info
Though according to: https://www.andrewhoefling.com/Blog/Post/net-5-and-the-future-of-net-framework-and-net-core >.NET 5 and .NET Standard >What is the life of .NET Standard and will it be going away? >.NET Standard is not going anywhere as far as I understand and will be very >important to

Re: Are there architectural limitation for packages in ports?

2020-05-12 Thread info
Another question, are we going to see DotNet Core in OpenBSD? Something like: https://data.gpo.zugaina.org/lanodanOverlay/dev-dotnet/dotnetcore-sdk/dotnetcore-sdk-3.0.100.ebuild

Re: pf table for all publicly routable ipv4 addresses

2020-05-12 Thread Marko Cupać
Hi, thanks to everyone who sent me tips and ideas about the topic. At the moment I am testing "negated table" approach, which seems to work fine: block log all pass in on $vlan_guests from $vlan:guests:network to ! ...where table is list of subnets I don't want to be reachable from guest

Are there architectural limitation for packages in ports?

2020-05-12 Thread info
For example if we look at mono package on Gentoo: https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/dev-lang/mono We will see there are missing ports for alpha, hppa, ia64 and sparc, actually I might be interested only in sparc among them. On the other hand are there any similar limitations for the:

Re: OpenBSD insecurity rumors from isopenbsdsecu.re

2020-05-12 Thread Florian Obser
Please leave, optionally seek professional help and never come back. -- I'm not entirely sure you are real.

Re: OpenBSD insecurity rumors from isopenbsdsecu.re

2020-05-12 Thread info
> What exactly does your budget mean? These are all free, open source > operating system. You may sell both OpenBSD and any installations and > consulting. That could improve your income for your budget. I am in the process of trying to find a devops remote work, may be it will improve my

Fwd: Secure end points for Internet tunnel, the most secure hardware

2020-05-12 Thread info
Dear OpenBSD gurus, Please suggest which one of the following types of CPU and preferably the whole system too is the most secure and backdoor free: ARM, PowerPC, SPARC64, SH-4, MIPS Can you please suggest a specific model of the board compatible with OpenBSD? Пересылаемое сообщение

Re: OpenBSD insecurity rumors from isopenbsdsecu.re

2020-05-12 Thread Chris Bennett
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 07:17:44AM +0200, i...@aulix.com wrote: > I would prefer to begin from grsecurity, but it is not available up to date > for my budget. > What exactly does your budget mean? These are all free, open source operating system. You may sell both OpenBSD and any installations

Re: Any plans to support newer Loongson-based systems?

2020-05-12 Thread Fabio Martins
I believe loongson people are primaly after running some Linux distros for their processor (new ones), but maybe if you ask them directly about their plans to donate people's effort / hardware to OpenBSD, might be a good start: I asked some months ago about buying Loongson out of China to play

Re: OpenBSD insecurity rumors from isopenbsdsecu.re

2020-05-12 Thread info
>Also NSA controls your brain with 5G radio waves. Go burn some towers in the name of the Freedom! Would not just a foil hat help? Do you have some OpenBSD edition?

Re: OpenBSD insecurity rumors from isopenbsdsecu.re

2020-05-12 Thread Ottavio Caruso
On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 09:47, wrote: > > Is not systemd one of such backdoors? Does it include any interesting > "features" except so called "init system"? 1) You're asking in the wrong place 2) It's off topic 3) If you need to ask, it means you don't have a clue. It's ok to ask, but don't

Re: OpenBSD insecurity rumors from isopenbsdsecu.re

2020-05-12 Thread Ottavio Caruso
On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 02:13, wrote: > > Linux GNU software has hardly visible NSA backdoors If you have the technical skills to back this argument up, please look in the "Linux GNU software" source, find the backdoors and report back. -- Ottavio Caruso

Re: OpenBSD insecurity rumors from isopenbsdsecu.re

2020-05-12 Thread Consus
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 10:47:48AM +0200, i...@aulix.com wrote: > Sure I do not have such skills, I am a very noob trying to build a > secure console and router, but most likely IMHO the backdoors are > targeted to be used from invisible virtualization trojans on X86? I > was even suggested to

Re: OpenBSD insecurity rumors from isopenbsdsecu.re

2020-05-12 Thread info
Sure I do not have such skills, I am a very noob trying to build a secure console and router, but most likely IMHO the backdoors are targeted to be used from invisible virtualization trojans on X86? I was even suggested to avoid Libreboot on X86 because it is GNU, though for me it is sometimes

Re: OpenBSD insecurity rumors from isopenbsdsecu.re

2020-05-12 Thread doug
Original Message Subject: Re: OpenBSD insecurity rumors from isopenbsdsecu.re From: i...@aulix.com Date: Mon, May 11, 2020 9:18 pm To: Philip Guenther Cc: OpenBSD misc It is IMHO rather not a matter of trusting your questions, but not my willingness to answer them right now,

Re: OpenBSD insecurity rumors from isopenbsdsecu.re

2020-05-12 Thread info
There is a single place to take buzzwords from (not random as you said): http://www.freezepage.com/1589263204VJFCCPNUBQ https://hardenedbsd.org/content/easy-feature-comparison