On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 05:44:05PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Chris Cappuccio wrote:
>
> > Mihai Popescu [mih...@gmail.com] wrote:
> > > I was in the same situation, impatient to have a 2021 snapshot.
> > >
> > > Warning: I am not sure you will not finish with a Frankenstein system. I
> > >
Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Mihai Popescu [mih...@gmail.com] wrote:
> > I was in the same situation, impatient to have a 2021 snapshot.
> >
> > Warning: I am not sure you will not finish with a Frankenstein system. I am
> > not so good with compiler-linker stuff.
>
> For those trying to use the
Mihai Popescu [mih...@gmail.com] wrote:
> I was in the same situation, impatient to have a 2021 snapshot.
>
> Warning: I am not sure you will not finish with a Frankenstein system. I am
> not so good with compiler-linker stuff.
For those trying to use the latest snap and the latest ports, try
I was in the same situation, impatient to have a 2021 snapshot.
Dirty hint: the .hk mirror still has the base part from 2020! But try it as
a last option, the folks there are not so bandwidth fortunate. After
installing the base, please switch /etc/installurl to something more
suitable as
Yeah, or that... I realized that after but didn't want to double post.
I emailed Kevin off-list to mention that the "/" character isn't special so
it doesn't need to be escaped so Edgar's example can be modified to:
location match "^/sendy/l/([%w/]+)$" {
request rewrite
On 2021-01-07, John McGuigan wrote:
> httpd's regex is based on Lua's, the following site will help you figure it
> out:
Or, you know, the patterns(7) man page.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
On 07/01/2021 1:30 p.m., Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Steve Williams:
I hesitate to send this because perhaps I'm just too impatient, but then
again, perhaps not. This is not critical/time sensitive.
I just thought I'd check if there a problem with the current packages folder
from the
Steve Williams:
> I hesitate to send this because perhaps I'm just too impatient, but then
> again, perhaps not. This is not critical/time sensitive.
>
> I just thought I'd check if there a problem with the current packages folder
> from the mirrors?
No, the amd64 package builds have been
Thanks for the correction!
amit
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 11:59 AM Patrick Wildt wrote:
>
> No, that's not correct. The libc++ 11 (*not* LLVM 11) has not yet been
> committed. This issue is because of libunwind 11. With libc++ 11 we
> have made a separate ports build first, to check the
Impatient it is :D
Thanks for the update!
Cheers,
Steve W.
On 07/01/2021 10:56 a.m., Patrick Wildt wrote:
I committed an update to libunwind which made a major bump necessary.
Maybe I should have asked ports to run with the build first, so that
base and packages would be aligned. Too late
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 01:01:53PM +, tech-lists wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 09:01:19PM +, a...@sdf.org wrote:
>
> [...method...]
>
> thanks for that, I'll let you know how I get on. I think your
> problem with spontaneous crashes might be down to swapfile,
> sdcard is unsuitable
Oh, and another correction: it's libc++ 10.0.1, we're not going 11 yet.
Am Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 06:59:52PM +0100 schrieb Patrick Wildt:
> No, that's not correct. The libc++ 11 (*not* LLVM 11) has not yet been
> committed. This issue is because of libunwind 11. With libc++ 11 we
> have made a
No, that's not correct. The libc++ 11 (*not* LLVM 11) has not yet been
committed. This issue is because of libunwind 11. With libc++ 11 we
have made a separate ports build first, to check the fallout. Once the
fallout is mostly fixed, we'll do the switch to libc++ 11. Until then
snapshots are
tech-lists wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 09:55:28AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >tech-lists wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 09:25:01AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >> >The miniroot is 33MB because it contains many install firmwares, and
> >> >it is 97% full.
> >> >
> >> >I suggest
Like naddy@ mentioned on ports@ they are trying to figure out the
fallout from the switch to LLVM 11 as system compiler. This is why the
packages are being delayed. Please wait a while till it is sorted out.
thanks
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 10:56 AM Steve Williams
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I hesitate to
I committed an update to libunwind which made a major bump necessary.
Maybe I should have asked ports to run with the build first, so that
base and packages would be aligned. Too late for that now. Time will
fix it though.
Am Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 09:54:39AM -0700 schrieb Steve Williams:
> Hi,
>
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 09:55:28AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
tech-lists wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 09:25:01AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>The miniroot is 33MB because it contains many install firmwares, and
>it is 97% full.
>
>I suggest you find another way of installing.
>
Is there a
tech-lists wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 09:25:01AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >The miniroot is 33MB because it contains many install firmwares, and
> >it is 97% full.
> >
> >I suggest you find another way of installing.
> >
>
> Is there a technical (or some other reason I'm not seeing)
Hi,
I hesitate to send this because perhaps I'm just too impatient, but then
again, perhaps not. This is not critical/time sensitive.
I just thought I'd check if there a problem with the current packages
folder from the mirrors?
I am trying to update my development system (to resume work
Christer Solskogen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 5:39 PM Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> The miniroot is 33MB because it contains many install firmwares, and
> it is 97% full.
>
> True, but the miniroot has space available to expand the msdos partition.
The miniroot has two filesystems.
a is
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 02:20:54PM +, a...@sdf.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 01:01:53PM +, tech-lists wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 09:01:19PM +, a...@sdf.org wrote:
[...method...]
thanks for that, I'll let you know how I get on. I think your
problem with spontaneous crashes
On Wed, Jan 6, 2021, at 17:16, Jeremy O'Brien wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm looking through the pkgtools code to determine how the version
> comparison logic works, and I came across this block of code at
> /usr/libdata/perl5/OpenBSD/PackageName.pm:385:
>
> sub from_string
> {
> my
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 09:01:19PM +, a...@sdf.org wrote:
[...method...]
thanks for that, I'll let you know how I get on. I think your
problem with spontaneous crashes might be down to swapfile,
sdcard is unsuitable for this. I've had good results with
arm64/freebsd-current/swapfile on
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 09:25:01AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
The miniroot is 33MB because it contains many install firmwares, and
it is 97% full.
I suggest you find another way of installing.
Is there a technical (or some other reason I'm not seeing) why miniroot68.fs
has been made as
Hi,
> It seems that only last person can use the tunnel. This reminds me
> problems through NAT.
True. Can it be caused by wrong PF rules?
> Both sessions seem to be connected from A.B.C.D. Are the clients
> behind a NAT?
Yes, both client are behind the same router/NAT.
I have a 66/i386 box
25 matches
Mail list logo
