Chris wrote:
However, typing newaliases still gives the mailwrapper.core
segmentation fault core dumped error. I have had postfix installed
which I removed (pkg_delete) after the upgrade. Could this be the
cause of this problem? I manually deleted the _postfix user/group
after I restored the
Juan Miscaro wrote:
You recommend a production server to be running -current?
Poll: who here is doing that?
I do. Actually started about a year and half ago or so. Not every
servers, but most and I see no reason not to if you fell OK with OpenBSD
at large. The real reason is I find it
Karel Kulhavy wrote:
You cannot, of course. But janitor being a rookie doesn't imply he doesn't know
what he's doing. He could be doing a job that doesn't require any special
knowledge - like rewriting documentation into a different format, fixing HTML
correctness, fixing typos and unclear
Karel Kulhavy wrote:
Maybe the outsiders just cannot find the PR database. I put
openbsd pr database into google and looked into all links on the first
page. The pr database is always mentioned, but never linked. Where is it?
This only again proof the point of waisting time try to help. How
Hannah Schroeter wrote:
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 05:16:06PM -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
So, start by sending diff's then. Almost every diff's I saw sent in, got
reply one way or an other.
My recent experiences differ, for my last 2 submissions (an issue with
swig, sent to ports@ after
This include example and full diff's below as well.
May be this is a waist of time, but will see.
Some say they needs some details, then here is an example, and this took
me only about 30 minutes or so from start to finish, including getting
the source tree.
Doesn't mean it will be pick up,
bofh wrote:
I just read man top. So, just to confirm, for those without ability
to read the source, or understand it, the nice cpu processor state is
the percentage of time spent on niced processes. Someone mentioned he
was not sure if it was 1-20, or includes -1 to -20. From the way the
man
n0g0013 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Development is not the same process as writing a whiny mail.
that is a shame. i can probably better understand the relectance to
re-visit this if it has failed before. perhaps, others are right,
perhaps linux can tolerate it because it's not as good as
Men,
This is a long list of emails. I read them all for fun. You want to know
where to start, then you can simply do very simple things if you want as
simple as taking the code and check for very simple style(9) stuff as
simple as.
spacespacespacetab
for example. style(9) is very specific
L. V. Lammert wrote:
Certainly! That is not the point, however. The point is that users of
OTHER 'application domains' have better security with a VM (or one of
the other approaches discussed) because THEIR environment has no ability
to interact with the OTHER environments. The digression into
Theo de Raadt wrote:
The security benefits are at the ability to buy a steak for dinner
level.
I vote to add it to theo.c.
Thanks
Daniel
Index: src/usr.bin/mg/theo.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/mg/theo.c,v
retrieving
Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
how do I install xbase without reformatting and reinstalling the whole OS?
http://openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#AddFileSet
ropers wrote:
On 08/10/2007, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexey Suslikov wrote:
CL5 is CAS latency I think, but what does PC25100 mean here? :)
PC2-5100
Hm, Wikipedia currently only knows PC2-5300.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DDR2_SDRAM
Of course Wikipedia is infallible... ;-P
OK guys,
Instead of fighting about using, or not using it, or i386 being
obsolete, PAE not being good, or slow, etc.
I for one would be very happy if we can support more then 4GB of memory
on it and I would be more then happy to test it as I now have machine
that actually have more then 4GB
Alexey Suslikov wrote:
CL5 is CAS latency I think, but what does PC25100 mean here? :)
PC2-5100
Claudio Jeker wrote:
Could you add the dmesg of the test box to the website?
Do you have any other network cards you could test? (I'm mostly interested
in bnx but sk, msk, bge and nfe could be interesting as well).
This box if the M2 version also come with nfe cards as well, but there
is
Tony Sarendal wrote:
On 10/3/07, *Daniel Ouellet* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Claudio Jeker wrote:
Could you add the dmesg of the test box to the website?
Do you have any other network cards you could test? (I'm mostly
interested
in bnx but sk
patrick keshishian wrote:
They seemed pretty random to me, but I did a quick
check after reading your response and I see 468 unique
fake email address @my-domain, only one was
duplicated twice.
Put greyscanner from Bob in there and sit back and enjoy the look! (;
Make sure you pick the
Boris Goldberg wrote:
Hello Daniel,
Just want to make sure that we are on the same page: I'm talking about
i386. It seems from below that your concern is more about amd64, but I
didn't really try it, because my CPU isn't even a Xeon.
You are 100% right. An oversight on my part here.
n0g0013 wrote:
having a nightmare getting two openbsd (one 3.8, one 4.0) boxes to
setup a tunnel. finally got the phase 1 negotiation going (or so i
believe from reviewing the logs) but it appears that the phase two
starts and is just abandoned.
This may not be the best advise, but there have
pichi wrote:
Sorry if I ran into the Big Boys forum crying. I will be more cautious about
what I ask next time. Is there a forum for people who are starting out with
OpenBSD? The thing is I am new to it and I am in a situation where reading
pages and pages of Google is taking a lot of time away
Henning Brauer wrote:
* The One [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-09-19 11:17]:
What I meant to say was that Leopard's release will solve every
current problem prevailant in OS X Tiger and people's opinions about
the Macintosh platform, although their current, so-called opinions
have no evidence behind
Boris Goldberg wrote:
I have pretty much the same picture with HP ProLiant 320 G5 (Dual Core
Pentium-D 925). The server is new and passes all tests from the HP
maintenance CD.
I couldn't make what BIOS version you were actually running there, but
you did check to make sure you
Juan Miscaro wrote:
I tried it but whenever I include the larger 'uatraps' I get:
Look at set limit table-entries.
man pf
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/09/19 19:00, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Le me know how it goes with current, I am curious as so far all feedback I
got is no one yet can get an AMD64.mp stable at this time
this must be hardware-dependent, my main desktop is amd64 MP
(opteron 175 i.e. dual-core
Hi,
Looking on the man page, the ifconfig is suppose to show the stage of
the network cards, and it can't show the proper configuration on the nfe
cards, even if I force the configuration to fix value, I always get the
same results:
nfe0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu
Here is more. May be I do not understand the reading, I understand it to
mean for example:
media: Ethernet 10baseT (1000baseSX half-duplex)
Would be hard configuration to be 10mb half-duplex and then the (xx)
would show what is actually in use.
Isn't this correct?
I may be confuse, but
SX looks plain wrong anyway. Can you provide a dmesg? This is perhaps
related to the phy that attaches to nfe rather than nfe itself.
Sure, here is one of them.
OpenBSD 4.2 (GENERIC.MP) #1378: Tue Aug 28 10:48:58 MDT 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real
OK,
To follow on this and to try to isolate more problem, I did the
following tests.
- Setup two boxes, both Sun X4100 M2.
- The source box is using i386.mp version 4.2
- The destination box is using amd64.mp version 4.2 (same with current)
- Configure public IP's on the em0 interface of
Jonathan Gray wrote:
SX looks plain wrong anyway. Can you provide a dmesg? This is perhaps
related to the phy that attaches to nfe rather than nfe itself.
A bit more. Looking in logs, etc. I found this:
nfe0: tx v2 error 0x6004
Searching on google didn't bring much other then a problem
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Jonathan Gray wrote:
SX looks plain wrong anyway. Can you provide a dmesg? This is perhaps
related to the phy that attaches to nfe rather than nfe itself.
A bit more. Looking in logs, etc. I found this:
nfe0: tx v2 error 0x6004
Searching on google didn't bring much
Paul Taulborg wrote:
Booya! Updated my BIOS to the latest version (44), and applied the patch
that was kindly provided to me here:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-techm=118975639013313w=2
I also enabled acpi0 in the kernel by default (required to see the other
processors), and tada!
I had to
Also Paul,
Now that is working do me a favor and try to compile the userland and
kernel with that bsd.mp acpi enable kernel.
Also, try if possible to make transfer of huge files between two boxes
well connected to try to at a minimum get close to 100Mb/sec of
transfer, or more if you have
Paul Taulborg wrote:
I appologize for not including this, here is the dmesg of a successful
boot of the amd 4.2 DEFAULT kernel:
Paul,
Not sure all the tests you did, but first do not run AMD64 on Intel
processor. I would do this first thing if you haven't done already.
- Go into BIOS and
Paul Taulborg wrote:
Kind of bummer, as I will be losing 64 bit support by use i386. This is
an Intel Xeon, which should be compatible with the amd64 branch.
I am not expert to say yes or no here. May be someone else will confirm
or deny. For now I would assume wrongly may be, but I wouldn't
Paul Taulborg wrote:
Update:
I ran boot -c with verbose on, and here are the last entries:
various probing failed messages (doesn't look like any problems), then:
ioapic0: conflicting map entries for pin 0
pctr: 686-class user-level performance counters enabled
mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR Support
Paul Taulborg wrote:
Kind of bummer, as I will be losing 64 bit support by use i386. This is
an Intel Xeon, which should be compatible with the amd64 branch.
To answer your question, I guess it depend on the version of your processor.
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=117112049507303w=2
I
Paul,
If you want to try the AMD64 mp kernel with the patch I point out to you
on tech of a few days ago and see if that help you or not, I can make
the kernel I built that night for you to download and try if you trust
it. I would say to built your own, but if you want to do a quick test
Paul Taulborg wrote:
I went through every option in the BIOS, and there is nothing at all
related to ACPI. :(
Your BIOS is version 35, and there is a very long list of BIOS upgrades
from Intel. The latest one for this board, if I am not mistaken is 44
and you have 35.
bios0: vendor Intel
Rolf Sommerhalder wrote:
The latest snapshot (13. Sept). of amd64 bsd.mp with ACPI enabled runs
stable on two X4100 M2 which are identically configured (single SAS
disk only, no RAID-1 yet, with current BIOS/SP/SAS Firmware from Sun).
Be caution and with reserved! Not stable if you do not add
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
I'd love to see how an user who gets a modified binary version has the
freedom to modify it. Go ahead. Prove me that it doesn't allow some users
to loose freedom...
You make the point of using BLOB so well, Thank you!
Looking forward to see you fight for
I have been very quiet on this for weeks now, but this really start to
piss me off at the highest level!
The bottom line is original work was stolen and copyrights are not
respected period!
Dance as much as you want around it, hide behind lawyers, word
definition twisted, false pretend,
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 20:35:35 -0400, Stephan Andre' wrote:
I hope one day soon OpenBSD will adopt a nice ncurses setup similar
to something like FreeBSD with ease to it.
Honestly, I don't see why. How does making the installer more
complicated is going to help anything.
I recently sat a
As we are on the subject and I do not want to deviate from the original
question, I would however appreciate suggestions as to how I can have a
one server witch can actually have up to 32 serial console to control
LOM on Sun server. I may need up to 48 in one case, but instead of using
a bunch
Rolf Sommerhalder wrote:
I did observe similar behaviour on four X4100 M2 as well (two with one
socket dual-core, two with two sockets dual-core Opterons) using amd64
bsd.mp snapshots from 23 and 28 Aug..
Currently, amd64 bsd.mp snapshot 28. Aug is running stable on those
four servers, although
Here is the new dmesg for current.
So far the boot process is much faster and do not hang anymore.
I am doing install on three more boxes now and will do a bunch of reboot
cycles to see the end results.
Still some acpi not configure in the dmesg, but so far does look better.
Also, note this
Tobias Weingartner wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Daniel Ouellet wrote:
So, I am not sure what testing you did, unless you built your own. new
Snapshots was just release now, witch I will be happy to test tonight
and see the results and report back.
If you guys could test out my
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Siju George wrote:
Can't find a DVD in
[snip]
As stated in the beginning of this thread,
DVD discs are not available, just CDs in DVD case.
Yes guys. It was my mistake in my Divine Vast Drewling extase of the
event instead of the Complete Domination release of 4.2. I
Hi,
Quick updates on this one.
My problem is now solved and I got very nice help from some gentlemen
working at Sun that step in off list to help me out and all is now
finally work.
Nice to see some good guys following misc@ and be interested to make
sure Sun hardware (some of them anyway)
K K wrote:
happens on the same approximate schedule. I suspect a power glitch.
It this is power glitch to the point of affecting your server, wouldn't
the LOM also show that to you? Then you would know the answer.
lomloghistory
Eventlog:
+0h35m1s host power on
+0h37m51s host power
Henning Brauer wrote:
bio is not implemented for mpi (yet).
bioctl in 4.2 onwards shows some inquiry data (vendor model fw serial)
for non-bio-capable disks. i. e. it falls back from bioctl -i to bioctl
-q if teh disk doesn't support bio.
Thanks Henning!
Jonathan Gray wrote:
mpi(4) currently has no bioctl support.
The 2 port LSI SAS RAID (mfi(4)) supports bioctl, however
sun don't sell any machines with this interestingly enough.
Thanks! That's what I figure, but wanted to check in case I wasn't
looking at the right place. Oh well. May be
Rolf Sommerhalder wrote:
Please find below the dmesg of amd64.mp-current (snapshot 23-Aug-2007)
on a Sun Fire X4600 M2 which is equipped with four dual-core Opteron
8220 CPU, 32 GB of RAM and four built-in NICs.
Sadly, the only problem is that you will not be able to use that much
memory
sonjaya wrote:
http://www.openbsdsupport.org/vpn-ipsec.html
This is almost 3 years old and there is so many changes, please don't
follow this on 4.1!
I most likely will remove it if we can get an updated version.
Consider this:
http://www.serverwatch.com/tutorials/article.php/3659686
or
sonjaya wrote:
http://www.openbsdsupport.org/vpn-ipsec.html
May be you could also have a look at this nice presentation that show
many changes done on OpenBSD.
You can start here to see some OpenBSD suggestions, but you can look it
all as well as it's nice. (;
Patrick Hemmen wrote:
Squid runs under the user _squid and this user is in the login class
daemon in which the data size is set to infinity. Or do I have to set
a another capability?
How do you start your squid is the key.
man 5 login.conf
man 8 rc
explain it. Just putting the class there
Marcos Laufer wrote:
When i post a message on the OpenBSD misc list it is because one
of two reasons:
Mostly one looks like.
1) I want to report an error i found while testing OpenBSD, and by
reporting it i might be helping the project, somebody might be able
to fix it and the OS grows.
2)
Toni Mueller wrote:
Hi Mark,
On Tue, 29.05.2007 at 14:13:06 +0100, mark reardon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just got a x2100 M2 from Sun yesterday on a 60 day trial and am having
trouble setting the MTU on one of the bge NICs. Just some initial findings.
Not a big problem for me really.
did
Dag Richards wrote:
I would recommend you take a look at the HP DL360,
one U
hardware raid
and have nice little management interface you can ssh to
which allows pretty complete console access, go into bios, watch boot
messages, power set the system.
The Sun 4100 is a pretty good one as well.
Marcos Laufer wrote:
Ok , i had followed the instructions at http://openbsdsupport.org/mysql.htm
Go back and read again many times over until you get it.
You didn't read it and you didn't pay attention to statement in bold
either. I could tell you what to do to fix it, but then you wouldn't
Marcos Laufer wrote:
Ok , i had followed the instructions at http://openbsdsupport.org/mysql.htm
I also forgot to add this as well in my previous reply, also in the text
of the document you have been pointed to.
So, be wise and change what you need to change for your setup! But only
what
Marcos Laufer wrote:
Now what?
http://openbsdsupport.org/mysql.htm
3) Mail setups
I can find lots of setups with virtual mailusers. I have been
succesfully using a Courier-imap/Postfix/MySQL setup for several years
now, connected to a webbased mailmanagement tool.
If I was to drop all that in favor of a more 'core' OpenBSD setup - what
would be a nice
Almir Karic wrote:
if you have trully big setups you might wanna look at ldap, from what
i've heard/read it should perform well under heavy read intensive
operations.
I always see a lots of LDAP talks and some documents on it for many
things including managing multiples users on multiples
J.D. Bronson wrote:
At 08:56 AM 06/28/2007, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/06/28 08:46, J.D. Bronson wrote:
Will NEW offenders be added to /etc/tables/scanners
as they are discovered and therefore not just remain in kernel?
No, pf does not write to files.
How about cron(8) and pfctl(8)
J.D. Bronson wrote:
Guys...I was not the one that started this thread..
I just chimed in and asked for a tweak on the setup.
Sorry for my mistake then. I should refrain from replying on lack of
sleep. (;
I have what I need for now :)
Glad it help you never the less.
I'm trying to install the newest clamav (0.90.3) on OpenBSD 3.9 . I updated
The clamav package for 3.9 is clamav-0.88.tgz
For 4.1 it is: clamav-0.90.tgz
Don't mix versions.
http://openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#Latest
Reyk Floeter wrote:
you have to enable ip multicast on the systems.
Shouldn't it be included in the man page then? May be I miss it, but I
read them many times over to try to figure it out. I sure will test
tonight when the servers are a bit less use.
by default, openbsd rejects any ip
openbsd neophyte wrote:
Fast Data Access MMU Miss
ok
--
i'm kinda at a loss here.
I do not have the Sun 5, but on some other Sun, when I get the Fast Data
Access MMU Miss and other error like that. I do the steps like you did,
but one more that correct it.
Not sure that apply
Claudio Jeker wrote:
The reject route only triggers for UDP traffic. So carp (which runs inside
the kernel) and ospfd (uses a raw socket) are not affected. On the other
hand ripd/routed and other tools using multicast over UDP hit that route
and when sending all packets are discrded.
Thanks
The FTP problem has been fixed (worked around)
in -current AFAIK. See the archives for ports@
Thank you!
Jason McIntyre wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 04:05:06PM -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Thanks for the clarification Claudio!
May be a suggestion, a quick addition to man 8 spamd in regards to
enable ip multicast on the systems might be welcome. I sure overlook
that for sure and looking
Steve B wrote:
The rule I've had in my pf.conf file to catch and block forceful SSH
attempts no longer appears to be working. I see the entries in my authlog,
but the IPs are no longer getting added to my table. I suspect I screwed
something up, but so far I am at a loss to see where. Could
Hi,
I setup the spamd sync feature between two servers running 4.1 and I
observe the following issues with the setup itself. Some setup based on
the man page do not work for me anyway and some are not always reliable
and some always work. See below.
Example
Interface facing the Internet:
Alex Kwan wrote:
Hello,
Can I read and write on NTFS system under OpenBSD?
Alex
man 8 mount_ntfs
Hi,
Anyone can recommend a good SIP termination provider, specially for
International calls. Domestic US is also needed, but not as badly.
I am using Level(3) already and the connection speed is definitely not
great all the time and Masergy works well, however to many failed
connection is
Florin Andrei wrote:
I'm building several firewalls that need to be able to sustain 1000 Mbit
throughput. We're using AMD64 processors a lot, so that's the kind of
architecture I'm looking at right now. I will use OpenBSD 4.1 64 bit
version.
The set of rules on the firewalls will be relatively
Hi,
Not sure if this is a new problem, or specific to 4.1 on powerpc, or all
architecture.
But I setup a few times an old iMac for my sun that really wanted to try
OpenBSD desktop setup and so far loved it! (;
In the process of installing packages on it, I always have the same
issue
Adam wrote:
Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Time have show my over and over that candidate that need to justify what
they know by papers are not the one that get the job done when you are
in crisis and as such, that become my quick filter before the interview
as to who not to invite
dreamwvr wrote:
Just my 2 cents. Personally there is nothing wrong with making money.
What I find sad is when that becomes the only way to enter the fray.
For example the CISSP certification cost quite a bit and is used as
a secret handshake by quite a few corps. It is the tip of the iceberg
Pieter Verberne wrote:
Hi there OpenBSD users,
I wonder how much time it took for the average person to 'master'
OpenBSD or a similar OS. With 'master' I mean you have all skills
to configure and use the system. You know reguar expressions,
thorough cli skills like pipes/vi/mg/scripts etc.
Marcos Laufer wrote:
I'm not sure that the reason mysql4 isn't in the packages is due to lack of
time
or resources..
There must be some other reason, i think this because everytime there are
more
and more packages, so removing one that so many people use is kind of weird.
Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
well here is a question, I was wondering if there would be anyway to make
OpenBSD based DNS
servers have a PostgreSQL backend. (I know there will be a performance hit)
and does anyone know of a gtk front end for DNS management? or maybe a web
based solution that is just
More for you.
Go here:
http://openbsdsupport.org/
4th one from the top called OpenBSD as a domain name server
Also you can read to get understanding of DNS usage here:
http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html ( that's not bind, but provide good detials
on how things work as well)
Same here:
Marcos Laufer wrote:
Hello there,
I don't know if this has been asked or discussed before,..
here's no mysql4 packages in OpenBSD 4.1 . Why?
mysql-server-5.0.33.tgz
Is available. They do not have the resources to have every possible
version as packages, nor do they have the equipment to
Rafael Almeida wrote:
what's happening with [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What, you didn't notice? It's been sold and now it's [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry, I really thought you knew that.
Rafael Almeida wrote:
PS: it's not very polite of you calling your intern stupid.
That is sure true, but see, if the radio show can get by with what they
call STUPID intern that are use to interface with listeners, may be that
also tell you about the show itself and/or it's listeners may be.
Hi,
Here is some weird dmesg on a new install on a Sun X4100 X2 brand new
out of the box.
Hopefully it is helpful to clear some errors and may be as well to know
if I should do anything special.
I am just starting to test these to put them in productions soon, but I
may hold back a bit
I guess as well that the 4GB limit is per system, not per processor
right? I assume wrong when I added memory in that box looks like.
I get this from top. Obviously, I am loosing 5GB out of this.
hmmm.
OpenBSD 4.1
load averages: 0.09, 0.09, 0.07
mickey wrote:
currently memory above 4G is not supported there either.
and yes same note about bios mapping it funky applies
for amd64 machines too.
Thanks!
Last question. so, removing 4 and leaving 4GB then, even if the system
may use less, it's not going to make it crash is it? Meaning, it
Here both dmesg with acpi enable if anyone is interested or if that any
use for anyone.
Any interest on current?
Thanks
Daniel
OpenBSD 4.1 (GENERIC) #874: Sat Mar 10 19:09:51 MST 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC
real mem = 3757625344
I am trying to find out how many peek active process a server run in a
given time period, like in one day, and may be a week. I try to see how
servers handle heavy peak at time.
I thought that systat vmstat, or others could provide me that.
Unless I don't read the right man page, looks like
Damien Miller wrote:
systat doesn't support display of maxima. It would probably be trivial to
add it though.
Oh well, will do without then.
Thanks for the reply, really appreciated.
Daniel
Stephen Schaff wrote:
That's a really good point. However we have about 200 users we'd have to
get to switch their mail settings - 99% of don't know what mail settings
are of course.
Changing ports could prove very painful. I will definitely consider it
though, given how painful email is
Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
One thing I was wondering about the X1. Does it support hard drives
larger than 137 GB or whatever that old limit was? I don't know if Sun
systems are affected by those same kind of issues as older PC stuff but
I don't want to get bitten by that one if they are.
No it
On 18/05/07, Bryan Vyhmeister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone give any information about the Sun Netra X1 being used as
a pf firewall. I am specifically looking for throughput information.
I am considering using a pair for a theoretical maximum throughput of
about 45 Mbps. Can the Netra X1
Ted Unangst wrote:
On 5/9/07, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I try to stay safe in my choices and comments are welcome, but I have to
point out as well that ALL the values below needs to be changes to that
new value to get working well. If even only one of them is not at the
level
Quick question. In FAQ 6.6.1 we have reference for:
net.inet.tcp.keepinittime
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#Tuning
But in man(3) sysclt we have:
tcp.keepinittime
Unused.
I assume the man page is right, is it so? Value sure cna be preset via
sysctl:
# sysctl
Claudio Jeker wrote:
keepinittime is used by the syncache to timeout SYN request.
So the manpage seems to be wrong.
Thanks for the clarification.
Daniel
As requested a few times in private to make the results available, here
you go with what works for me. Hope this help some anyway.
Use what make sense to you based on your setup, hardware and traffic.
Final value in use after testing are now set as follow for me assuming a
good amount of
601 - 700 of 1128 matches
Mail list logo
