/ and in the end was defeated. A little more
complexity than I really wanted.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Craig Skinner skin...@britvault.co.uk wrote:
Hi Darren,
On 2015-07-14 Tue 17:47 PM |, Darren Spruell wrote:
Shamefully realized I missed the documentation from
/usr/local/share/doc/pkg-readmes
,[|tcp]
(DF)
Is there any way to successfully configure this or similar sort of
design with interception in Squid so that the proxy can reside on a
different host than the firewall?
[1] http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/Intercept/OpenBsdPf
--
Darren Spruell
phatbuck...@gmail.com
Shamefully realized I missed the documentation from
/usr/local/share/doc/pkg-readmes/ that covers this.
Bad luser. Will RTFM.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Darren Spruell phatbuck...@gmail.com wrote:
[Internet]
|
|
re1|
+=+re2
passwords that I actually remember.
i too find it annoying when the set of valid password characters is
not listed somewhere easy for the user to find.
-wes
--
Darren Spruell
phatbuck...@gmail.com
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Kenneth R Westerback
kwesterb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 12:03:13AM -0700, Darren Spruell wrote:
Wanted to verify my understanding that the included dhcpd(8) in base
does not currently support the domain-search option:
option domain-search
-options(5) don't mention the option.
I can currently override the search domains on clients, and it seems
like it might be supported in isc-dhcp-server package. Anything likely
to make it into base? Simply a matter of patch not having been
submitted, or anything deeper than that?
--
Darren Spruell
targets
root on wd0a (f79e8f05439765a0.a) swap on wd0b dump on wd0b
--
Darren Spruell
phatbuck...@gmail.com
I don't have a great deal of experience with SSD disks but was spec'ing
some systems to use them. We'd be doing RAID on the hosts and I'd prefer
to have something supported by bio(4) for volume management. Do SSDs
have any impact on ability to do this? Or can one use the same HW RAID
controllers
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:55 AM, openda...@hushmail.com wrote:
On 10. oktober 2013 at 7:15 AM, InterNetX - Robert Garrett
robert.garr...@internetx.com wrote:
I just want to know what a cloud is.
Not really satisfied with the definition at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_computing,
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 6:16 PM, openda...@hushmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone recommend a decent OpenBSD cloud hosting provider?
No experience with their cloud services, but M5 Hosting proudly offers
OpenBSD options. Maybe worth checking out:
http://www.m5cloud.com/
--
Darren Spruell
due to no socket
0 multicast messages dropped due to no socket
0 messages dropped due to full socket buffers
0 delivered
0 datagrams output
--
Darren Spruell
phatbuck...@gmail.com
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
On 2013-09-24, Darren Spruell phatbuck...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Alexey E. Suslikov
alexey.susli...@gmail.com wrote:
Any idea what the issue could be?
could you provide netstat -s output
on wd0b
--
Darren Spruell
phatbuck...@gmail.com
On Dec 30, 2007 11:00 AM, badeguruji [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
root:84# pkg_add amavisd-new-2.3.2p0.tgz
arc-5.21op0: complete
Error from ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/4.2/packages/i386/:
550 Failed to open file.
Error from ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/4.2/packages/i386/:
550 Failed
On Dec 29, 2007 2:59 PM, Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
I think your problem will be solved if you assign an alias in the
192.168.3.0 net to fxp0 and an alias in the 192.168.247.0 net to fxp3.
Just like Henning already suggested.
Henning wrote:
that depends wether
On Dec 29, 2007 4:41 PM, Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also added in my aliases on the external interface (two less aliases
now), with the
prescribed 255.255.255.255 netmask. All of my aliases now have only
their address as the
broadcast address. I realize this is right using a /32
On Dec 29, 2007 11:41 PM, Girish Venkatachalam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What on earth is this?
http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/rhel-centos-debian-ubuntu-jumbo-frames-configuration/
I was under the impression that Ethernet frames can never be more than
1500 bytes.
Or is it some kind of stupid
On Dec 28, 2007 7:13 AM, Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
main firewall Carp0:
inet 192.168.3.65 255.255.255.224 192.168.3.95 vhid 1 carpdev fxp0 pass
tester1
inet alias 192.168.3.66 255.255.255.224
inet alias 192.168.3.67 255.255.255.224
Not to solution your problem, but the correct netmask
On Dec 24, 2007 2:18 PM, Martin Schrvder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
this is probably a stupid error, but I'm stuck. :-(
I'm trying to set up my sendmail to use a smarthost. If I now do
-
sudo sendmail -bv [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] deliverable: mailer relay, host
On Dec 17, 2007 5:49 AM, J.D. Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having trouble with BIND logging in my OpenBSD 4.2-current DNS server.
I run it normally with this line in /etc/rc.conf.local:
named_flags= # for normal use:
My /var/named/etc/named.conf has these
to help the rest of us
out.
--
Darren Spruell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Dec 15, 2007 10:36 AM, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard is the face that launched a thousand Gnus. You as well as anyone
here know what he did for the concept of giving away source code. He
inspired a whole generation of free software writers.
I was not inspired by him,
On Dec 15, 2007 8:22 PM, vladas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Should not both - fxp0 and re0 - autoselect 1000baseT by
default by the dhclient? Both are connected to the same 1000M switch,
no other tweaks in GENERIC's setup:
re0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
On Dec 13, 2007 7:39 PM, Jeremy Huiskamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Users who can no invest the effort learn enough to use a simple
interface do not deserve a reliable operating system. They deserve
windows,
and they deserve pop up buttong in their browsers that they click
ok blindly
On Dec 12, 2007 11:41 AM, knitti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/12/07, Raimo Niskanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 08:35:50AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Joe wrote:
So if there are security bugs in a package or port shipped with OpenBSD
4.2,
On Dec 12, 2007 1:11 PM, knitti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/12/07, Darren Spruell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why -current? I thought what had fallen behind from lack of resources
was binary packages. Surely OPENBSD_4_2 (stable branch of ports tree)
still has updated ports.
Just build
On Dec 10, 2007 9:58 PM, Dongsheng Song [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OpenBSD assume bios time is utc, but it's PRC, can I tell OpenBSD the
bios time zone?
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=111956694726618w=2
DS
On Dec 10, 2007 10:58 PM, Dongsheng Song [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 10, 2007 9:58 PM, Dongsheng Song [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OpenBSD assume bios time is utc, but it's PRC, can I tell OpenBSD the
bios time zone?
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=111956694726618w=2
Thanks, but I
On Dec 2, 2007 2:21 PM, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 12:56:11PM -0700, Anthony Roberts wrote:
I have seen several installations of Postfix go catatonic due to spam
overload, large messages, mailing list expansions, and other undiagnosed
problems.
On Dec 1, 2007 11:12 AM, Iqigo Tejedor Arrondo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
El sC!b, 01-12-2007 a las 17:55 +0100, Henning Brauer escribiC3:
* Carl Roberso [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-01
17:32]:
I don't have any CPU problem, but an impressive (vmstat -i) amount of
interrupts (something like
On 14/11/2007, Mikel Lindsaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I want to automate handling them as much as possible and would like
some list suggestions on reading materials, software, or web howtos.
http://tentakel.biskalar.de/
http://www.garbled.net/clusterit.html
On Nov 19, 2007 10:53 PM, Clint Pachl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my DMZ research, some sources state that all services need to be
replicated in each DMZ. Following that advice, I would have to setup
Kerberos, ntp, backup, and DNS in each DMZ and the LAN; that sounds like
a lot of work. What
On Nov 12, 2007 7:21 PM, Linus Swdlas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:25:57 +0100, William Boshuck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 02:02:32AM +0100, Linus Swdlas wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:25:29 +0100, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
feel free to
On Nov 9, 2007 10:53 AM, new_guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If this is off-topic, I apologize. Just tell me and I'll go away ;)
I'm having discussions with a coworkers about moving to OpenBSD for
Apache/PHP web hosting. Right now, we use various Linux distros. I have no
problem with that. Linux
On Nov 3, 2007 4:29 AM, Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They write code, then they submit it, it does not suck too much and they
take the suggestions of the current project leads. Then they resubmit
better code.
The rest of us should simply buy CD's, ask and answer the occasional
On Nov 2, 2007 4:48 PM, Sean Darby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Stuart,
Thank you very much for the info! I appreciate it a lot.
I've now updated my /etc/mail/trusted-users file with my [EMAIL PROTECTED]
address (which is what I currently have in my from: field in my muttrc).
er, no.
On 10/27/07, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand from http://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html#35
that carp uses IP protocol 112. Does that mean CARP's port is 112?
Does CARP use a TCP or UDP port, or both?
See also protocols(5) for information.
DS
On 10/26/07, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 09:55:13AM -0700, Ted Unangst wrote:
On 10/25/07, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 10:19:19AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Well, there is no solution. 16 was chosen a lot of
On 10/24/07, L. V. Lammert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12:03 PM 10/24/2007 -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Anything we can do to increase security, *including* setting up VMs (of
any
flavor) is an improvement [that also increased hardware utilization].
This last sentence is such a lie.
On 10/24/07, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Darren Spruell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-24 21:48]:
Remember back 10-ish years ago when VLANs were being touted as the
ultimate network segmentation technology by marketers of managed
switches? And now everyone hopefully realizes
On 10/22/07, Regie H. Saberon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for quick response, I want to set-up a Primary Domain Name
Server, so that I hosts my own domain. Is there any good wiki that I can
follow?
You have a few options.
- http://www.isc.org/index.pl?/sw/bind/index.php - look at the
On 10/19/07, Luca Corti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AFAIK noone is working on it.
...
Sure I am not following source changes regularly, I don't believe this
is a requirement to just use the system.
It *is* a requirement to comment intelligently on what is or is not
being worked on.
DS
On 10/5/07, Chad M Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 5, 2007, at 2:53 PM, Karsten McMinn wrote:
On 10/5/07, Chad M Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My 4.2 CDs and t-shirt arrived in the mail today (near Buffalo, NY)
drat, I was hoping for first the first post. you forgot the pic.
I've noticed a few of these PF log entries that were logging traffic
passed and containing IP options:
Sep 30 22:52:12.586548 rule 32/(ip-option) [uid 0, pid 9872] pass in on sis1:
10.0.1.23.1031 x.x.13.31.1: [udp sum ok] udp 68 (ttl 255, id 5,
len 100, optlen=4 IPOPT-148{4})
Sure it does, just pull from CVS over SSH and compile your own. Only
Where do I get the ssh fingerprints of the CVS servers?
http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html#CVSROOT, of course.
Not all are listed, but one can either use one that needs verified or
contact the maintainer for a correct
On 9/23/07, Todd Alan Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/23/07, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 05:23:37PM -0600, Chris Kuethe wrote:
On 9/23/07, Todd Alan Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does lock -nv not work? I just read about this in BSD Hacks last
On 9/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24.09-11:49, Can E. Acar wrote:
[ ... ]
The guy can be some stupid binary software with an if(uid!=root) bail();
People running arbitrary binary software requiring root on their systems
deserve what they get. You can not work
On 9/20/07, Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Read this:
http://advosys.ca/viewpoints/2007/04/fuzzing-virtual-machines/
Read the paper linked there as well. Always good to go back to original
source material.
Anyone who told you VM technology and security had anything to do with
each
On 9/20/07, Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone please inform me if this is a really bad idea or not,
ideally with some nice reasoning?
Cheers,
Josh
Read this:
http://advosys.ca/viewpoints/2007/04/fuzzing-virtual-machines/
Read the paper linked there as well.
On 9/21/07, Scott Wells [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, I don't fully agree with the sentiment that running a firewall
in a virtual machine (let's be specific, VMWare ESX) guest environment.
I'm running my firewall on a ESX 3.0.2 guest, and it works perfectly
fine. That being said, you have
On 9/20/07, The One [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't bother following up, I won't be listening. Or maybe I will, and
I might even venture out from under my rock again before 4.4 ships.
If anyone can solve security, whether it is with Leopard or in the
future, Apple definitely can.
In my
On 9/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to:
http://www.openbsd.org/amd64.html
W^X will not work on Intel's 64 bit chips. I for one chose to go with i386 on
my Core 2 because of this fact alone.
Intel produces 2 families of 64-bit processors; the EM64T and an AMD64
On 9/18/07, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are given a brand new machine; you bring your install CD; and after
four minutes of using the standard tools (disklabel, fdisk, ifconfig,
...) you are already very familiar with, you have a fully working box,
modulo afterboot.
The
On 9/16/07, Catalin Stoian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did a fresh install of OpenBSD-CURRENT on my new laptop, an Acer
Aspire 5610 that comes with an Intel 3945 wireless adapter. But it
seems I can't use the adapter with OpenBSD.Following the wpi manpage,
I installed the
On 9/14/07, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
Ok, here is a sample. I tried a connection from my workstation 10.0.0.103
to ftp.openbsd.org.
Firewall's pf.conf
---BEGIN
if_loopback=lo0 # loopback
if_public=em1 # connected to public network
if_int=bnx1 #
On 9/14/07, Jason Calhoun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have an OpenBSD 4.1 system running as a NAT firewall for our office and
unfortunately I have to support a couple of active
FTP clients on the inside of the firewall, so I've set up ftp-proxy. I've
never used ftp-proxy before and I've
On 9/13/07, Julian Leyh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20:52 Wed 12 Sep , Pau Amaro-Seoane wrote:
You'll notice that Mark Kohut (Lenovo's worldwide analyst) cannot tell
the difference between linux and BSD (both freebsd and openbsd fall in
the category of linux) but, in any case, maybe you
On 9/13/07, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The FSF should take a deep breath and apologize to Reyk, apologize to
Theo, apologize to OpenBSD and apologize to the open source community at
large.
While reading this I got a mail that OpenSolaris released the adapted
version of our
On 9/13/07, Shawn K. Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 07:09 -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
GNUspeak:
These are definitely not the views of the GNU project. They *might* be
views of the self-styled Linux nerds that think they are k00l and
eleet because they read Slashdot, but
On 9/13/07, Steve Shockley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Beck wrote:
As OpenBSD grows there simply is no reason, or logic to keeping
around such an archaic method of installation it now uses.
I await your diffs! Please feel free to write one that works, and
fits on the install media for
On 9/13/07, Cyrus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im currently running openbsd 4.1 on my server, Proliant 8500. This server
is SMP with 4x 700MHz PIII proc. Im just wondering, is it using all four
cpu's? or do I have to configure the system to utilize SMP?
SMP is the kernel that supports multiple
On 9/13/07, Darren Spruell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/13/07, Cyrus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im currently running openbsd 4.1 on my server, Proliant 8500. This server
is SMP with 4x 700MHz PIII proc. Im just wondering, is it using all four
cpu's? or do I have to configure the system
For the scenario where you have two openbsd hosts, one connected to
the second with a serial null modem cable, what is the right device to
use when connecting using tip(1) from the first to a console on the
second?
These suggest that cua is the right device to use:
On 9/12/07, Sunnz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://lenovoblogs.com/insidethebox/?p=98
Interestingly both FreeBSD and OpenBSD are listed as a choice of
Linux distro; as well as anyone that refuses to carry binary-only
drivers, so that all others will also benefit, as it will require
documented
On 9/6/07, Jona Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 6 Sep 2007 07:11:47 -0700
J.C. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 04 September 2007, Jona Joachim wrote:
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:17:44 +0200
Martin SchrC6der [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/9/3, The One [EMAIL
On 9/6/07, Sam Fourman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello misc@
from the page http://www.openbsd.org/42.html , one of the changes made
to OpenBSD 4.2 is
A change in the way the kernel random pool is stirred greatly
increases performance with network interface cards that support
interrupt
On 9/1/07, Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If code is released under copyright. be it BSD, or GPL, and someone
other than the author(s) changes the license, can the person(s)
who(m) made the changes seriously expect that somebody else cannot
take that code under the terms of the original
On 9/1/07, Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/1/07, Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try to run strings on windows command line utilities. You'll see that
they preserved the copyrights as required.
Could somebody please explain about Running Strings?
strings(1) -
On 9/1/07, David H. Lynch Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
That is entirely false.
Why ? The ISC seems to me to say you can do anything you wish -
except remove the copyright.
... but I do not see anything in the license that
requires preserving the license.
On 8/29/07, Jussi Peltola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 09:17:11PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
P.S. One more issue: you *do* realize that getting OpenBSD to
authenticate against LDAP is not entirely trivial, right? This might be
a serious problem if the LDAP system is
On 8/27/07, Paolo Supino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I came across the following situation: there's network where several
employees have access to a client of theirs using Cisco VPN clients.
To centralize and ease administration I want to put in place an OpenBSD
box that will create a
On 8/27/07, Kevin Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Artur,
Thanks,
Upgrade code based on release of obsd is easy, but it would a big job to
maintain early released of products based on previous version of obsd. For
example, we would maintain 8 version of products from 3.3 to 4.0 if codes
are
On 8/27/07, Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Travers Buda wrote:
*snip*
Just tell him that OpenBSD in the stead of HP-UX will be cheaper, faster to
setup, and easier to maintain (because of your experience with Open.) Both
OpenBSD and HP-UX can do LDAP, yes, but it's
On 8/25/07, Clint Pachl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The reason for this is that I can use a single build machine running the
current release, and two source trees, current and previous.
[1] Well, it usually does, but it can break in interesting ways that are
difficult to fix.
Joachim, your
On 8/24/07, Lars Noodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a recommended best practice for securing a remote log server?
Is it worth it to try to tunnel between the machines?
Would be good to know what is meant by securing, as in what exact
sense of security are you trying to address?
DS
On 7/25/07, Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard Storm wrote:
Is openbsd bind vulnerable to attacks on binds PRNG described here:
http://www.securiteam.com/securitynews/5VP0L0UM0A.html
A glance at the README.OpenBSD file for 4.1 in /usr/src/usr.sbin/bind
shows (among other things):
-
On 8/18/07, steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It must have been too long ago since I built routers under BSD. I got three
subnets in a series below the internet connection and cannot add a proper
route between subnet 1 and 3.
I've tried numerous route commands but it never results in routing it
On 8/18/07, steve szmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 18 August 2007 22:19, steve wrote:
Hmm, I had added the route commands to rc.local and with each edit executed
sh netstart which of course does not read rc.local.
See hostname.if(5), and particularly the description for
On 8/8/07, Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/9/07, Clint Pachl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or you could programatically change each user's .profile.
Uhm, why? Markus is correct that both /etc/profile and $HOME/.profile
are sourced when you log in so to set up global variables you set
Has named(8) on OpenBSD ever used randomized source ports for DNS
queries? I thought for some reason it had and noticed today that this
probably was not right:
10.0.1.2.34140 192.35.51.30.53: 64395% [1au] ? sec1.apnic.net. (43)
10.0.1.2.34140 192.0.34.126.53: 50119% [1au] ?
On 8/3/07, Tom Bombadil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Short of recompiling spamd, is there any undocumented way of changing
the 250 responses from spamd?
- 250 Hello, spam sender. Pleased to be wasting your time.
- 250 You are about to try to deliver spam. Your time will be spent, for
On 7/6/07, Jose H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kernel messages since a certain time and hide the hardware specs from users
will be achieved the same way, suppose you have a parameter for dmesg that
prints the current buffer and then clears it.
I don't think it is a silly knob, in fact it may be
On 7/1/07, Alden Pierre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All,
I'm having a hard time trying to install packages on my machine.
1. PKG_PATH=ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/4.1/packages/i386/
2. pkg_add -i screen gives me the following:
sh: cannot create
On 6/29/07, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In their homedir there is a `ln -s` to their /var/www/home/username
webspace. That webspace is chowned username:www and chmodded 770 so
httpd can access/write to their dir as well.
Is that advisable / workable? Other ideas?
You don't want the www user
On 6/17/07, Darrel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://openbsd.rt.fm/faq/faq10.html#httpdchroot
Per the heading 'What is a chroot?', I plan to change the owner of all
the files in the /var/www directory as read-only by User www. Should
the group of directories and files be changed to www as well?
On 6/16/07, Aaron Hsu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Is this the correct interpretation or not?
So far off base, it seems like you haven't even read it.
DS
On 6/14/07, Steve B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recently I acquired an old Belkin wireless nic that has an RTL8180D chipset
on it. It supports Host AP and is working nicely. Thanks to all those who
helped breath life into that card/chipset! Dmesg reports it as:
rtw0 at pci0 dev 10 function 0
On 6/13/07, Edd Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
I have been reading a thread on opensolaris.org regarding the
open-sourcing of 4front's OSS. After explaining why CDDL licensing is
unsuitable for OpenBSD, some of the developers have expressed an
interest to contact Theo regarding
On 6/12/07, Soner Tari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Probably a simple shell script could do the job, which would look at
SpamAssassin logs to find out the spam score and IP address, and insert
into spamd blacklists as necessary. The only caveat is that threshold
spam score for blacklisting should be
On 6/9/07, Bryan Vyhmeister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 9, 2007, at 9:28 PM, Darren Spruell wrote:
So, not sure about the connections failing. As for your aliases, check
hostname.if(5) and you'll see that IPv4 interface aliases typically
have full /32 subnet masks.
Sorry! I spoke too
On 6/10/07, Lawrence Horvath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a Data T1 card to put in an OBSD firewall/router
looking for suggestions on a quality card for under 1000 that
OBSD supports reasonably well.
digium offers the Wildcard TE120P for about 600 but i was unsure of support
where
On 6/9/07, Bray Mailloux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Everyone;
# ifconfig -A
rl0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
lladdr 00:50:bf:3a:2e:66
groups: egress
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
status: active
inet6
On 6/8/07, Rico Secada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
What do you think of The BSD Certification Group at bsdcertification.org?
Is this a good idea? From my perspective it looks like a smart marketing
way. A way to make money from people who think this would
help in some way.
Read up about the
On 6/6/07, Ronnie Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henning Brauer a icrit :
* nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-05 21:44]:
I built 3 OpenBSD 3.6(?) servers in mid 2005 with these cards, and
was able to get a peak throughput of about 520Mbps in bridged mode
(pf disabled) measured using iperf.
On 6/4/07, Douglas Allan Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 03:28:50PM +0200, Timo Schoeler wrote:
Thus [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter N. M. Hansteen) spake on Mon, 04 Jun 2007
15:17:26 +0200:
Douglas Allan Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, sendmail is a very steep
/ | http://metabug.org/
http://www.stilyagin.com/ | Daemons in the Desert | Global BUG Federation
--
-Lawrence
-Student ID 1028219
-CCNA
--
Darren Spruell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 6/2/07, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The c2k7 hackathon is over, with roughly 50 developers attending the
event for 10 days in Calgary.
So many projects were started or finished, it is basically impossible
for me to describe all the projects.
I elect merdely to fill in all the
On 5/31/07, Chris S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/29/07, Andrey Shuvikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I chainload OpenBSD with GRUB also and don't have any problems with cursor...
It might really be Ubuntu's modified version that is to blame... for
instance, the standard menu.lst features a quiet
On 5/31/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know the maximum packets per second that can traverse a 100MB
internet link. From what I've been able to gather its about 8300 or so? Is
this number accurate? Do connections just start to timeout once I hit this
limit? I'm a little
On 5/31/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
by the way. I know where google is. I've been there and have even read some
of the links that are posted in this very thread. However I am confused and
there even seems to be some confusion/discrepancies within this thread... so
I
1 - 100 of 225 matches
Mail list logo
