Re: Just curiosity about ntpd.c 1.61

Vous m'avez dit ricemment : Hi all, As subject says, simply curiosity. ?Why 1.61 of ntpd.c [1]? I mean ?what is the improvement? [1] http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.sbin/ntpd/ntpd.c.diff?r1=1.60r2=1.61sortby=datef=h I'd guess use of a dedicated API (errx) ? -- Mathieu

Re: OpenBSD 4.3 running in VirtualBox? Anyone have it working properly?

Vous m'avez dit ricemment : Thanks, I had just found this out and was writing about it. Apparently, KVM or the distributions have changed the default from ne2k. Either way, rtl8139 works in real machines so it is unclear whether the problem is a bug in OpenBSD or QEMU. 4.3 is affected as

Re: Vulnerability Note VU#800113 - Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning

Vous m'avez dit ricemment : Good morning, Today, I'm received alert from one of my friends regarding to Vulnerability Note VU#800113 - Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning. http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/800113 I checked the above site, and found that most of the

Re: Vulnerability Note VU#800113 - Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning

Vous m'avez dit ricemment : On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 04:52:39PM +0200, Mathieu SEGAUD wrote: Vous m'avez dit ricemment : Good morning, Today, I'm received alert from one of my friends regarding to Vulnerability Note VU#800113 - Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache