NextCloud: failed integrity checks

After installation on OpenBSD 6.3 with pkg_add, NextCloud complains about files failing the integrity checks. More specifically: - occ * expected hash: 7e3fce0d7b5c20a7775ed1b548cb2e29bed078d3ca77b01a83d438f671b3d473147d4e8217d2084e17b6fe23a18ba258b11ba60106e23381f1e2889ce14971c4 * current

Re: Status of Owncloud?

tion you need to > copy your resolv.conf to /var/www/etc/ > > Mischa > > >> On 22 Jul 2018, at 19:26, Ax0n wrote: >> >> On Jul 22, 2018 10:11, "Nicolas Schmidt" wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I just installed and configured owncloud on OpenB

Status of Owncloud?

Hi, I just installed and configured owncloud on OpenBSD 6.3, and so far everything seems to work (except for owncloud complaining about not having an internet connection). However, when visiting http://localhost/owncloud/ after installation, I was greeted by an unfriendly message telling me

segfault when exiting a program

/src/lib/libc/stdlib/exit.c:54 #2 0x18bef421 in main () from /home/nico/test Anyone able to reproduce this? Best, Nicolas Schmidt

make_keys produces segfault when building 6.2-stable

I just tried building the base in 6.2-stable (building the kernel worked fine), following the instructions in https://man.openbsd.org/release. Unfortunately, the build process fails when trying to build libcurses. The error I get is ./make_keys keys.list > init_keytry.h Segmentation

Re: Upgrade 6.1->6.2 fails with "id 0 on/: file system full"

went through without a hitch. TL;DR: Use relative paths when you symlink „/bsd“. Nicolas > Am 20.02.2018 um 15:42 schrieb trondd <tro...@kagu-tsuchi.com>: > >> On Tue, February 20, 2018 8:34 am, Nicolas Schmidt wrote: >> Hey, >> >> it's me again, still tr

Upgrade 6.1->6.2 fails with "id 0 on/: file system full"

Hey, it's me again, still trying to upgrade to 6.2. After choosing to skip verification and continue the upgrade process, I now immediately get the following error: Installing bsd 0% | id 0 on /: file system full /: write failed, file system full ftp:

Re: SHA256.sig not contained in install62.iso

Sorry, I of course meant to say it‘s *not* on it. > Am 20.02.2018 um 12:56 schrieb Nicolas Schmidt <schmi...@math.hu-berlin.de>: > > Hi, > > I am finally getting around to upgrading 6.1->6.2. When I try to install from > CD using the install62.iso image, t

SHA256.sig not contained in install62.iso

Hi, I am finally getting around to upgrading 6.1->6.2. When I try to install from CD using the install62.iso image, the install script complains that it can't find SHA256.sig (indeed, it's on it). Is that supposed to happen? Best, Nicolas A. Schmidt

Re: Integrating "safe" languages into OpenBSD?

> Am 04.12.2017 um 14:45 schrieb Nick Holland : ... > > Oh yeah. > I recently discovered a very major business operations application where > rather than using the OS's FTP and SFTP functions, they wrote their own > in "safe" Java. I don't know why. ... > If the

Integrating "safe" languages into OpenBSD?

nt C implementations with an implementation written in another, "safer" language? Note that with Cgrep and haskell-ls, there do in fact exist implementations/analogues of two of the mentioned utilities in a memory safe language (Haskell). Best, Nicolas Schmidt

Re: About WPA2 compromised protocol

amendment), as it still accepts retransmissions of Message 3 even if it is already in the PTK-DONE state. — Nicolas Schmidt > Am 17.10.2017 um 19:15 schrieb Matthew Graybosch <li...@matthewgraybosch.com>: > > On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 19:09:29 +0200 > "Stephane HUC \"PengouinB

Re: permission denied local nfs mount

Did you try setting an explicit netmask? > Am 29.07.2017 um 01:36 schrieb Allan Streib : > > 6.1 amd64 release > > My goal is to serve files from a directory in my home dir via httpd. As > I understand it the way to do this is a local NFS mount in the httpd > chroot. > >

Re: Can I use OpenBSD as a desktop system?

>> On 06/09/17 15:39, SOUL_OF_ROOT 55 wrote: >> Can I use OpenBSD as a desktop system? > > You? No, I doubt it. ... > But, you are welcome, and invited ... > Nick. Nick, I don't think you were being either welcoming or inviting there. To answer OP's question: Yes of course you can, and I did

kernel panic: ehci_device_clear_toggle

Hi, I just installed OpenBSD 6.1 and set up a CUPS server with a usb printer, and I'm experiencing kernel panics that seem usb related. These kernel panics actually occured also on the old version of OpenBSD I upgraded from, but only very rarely (once every few months a most). Now I've had

Re: torrent downloads

Many distros sport torrents: NetBSD, Debian, and Ubuntu to name some. Rationale behind this is simple: torrents download with ridiculous speed if they are popular enough. Best, Nicolas > Am 27.04.2017 um 14:36 schrieb Markus Rosjat : > > Hi, > > I think it's kinda pointless

Re: IPPORT_RESERVED 'security' check in nfsd obsolete?

Am 19.01.2017 um 12:21 schrieb Theo de Raadt : >> Then may I suggest to add an option to disable this behaviour for specific mounts >> ounts? > > No. > > NFS always required reserved ports. Do you mean that the "reserved ports restriction" is required as part of the NFS

Re: IPPORT_RESERVED 'security' check in nfsd obsolete?

> Am 19.01.2017 um 01:20 schrieb Theo de Raadt : > > No, this change will not be done. Then may I suggest to add an option to disable this behaviour for specific mounts? NetBSD provides the "-noresvport" flag for this. The following quote is from the NetBSD man for exports:

IPPORT_RESERVED 'security' check in nfsd obsolete?

if (0 == 1) { //don't fail when sport >= IPPORT_RESERVED ### end of mountd.patch ### ### start of nfs_subs.patch ### 1455c1455 < (ntohs(saddr->sin_port) >= IPPORT_RESERVED || --- > (0 == 1 || // don't fail when sport >= IPPORT_RESERVED ### end of nfs_subs.patch ### Best, Nicolas Schmidt