On 10/04/06, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-08 00:51]:
It looks like bgpd has a problem with validating nexthop on new
interfaces
when they are created.
A flap of the interface or restarting bgpd makes nexthop validate.
I have only
On 10/04/06, tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/04/06, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-08 00:51]:
It looks like bgpd has a problem with validating nexthop on new
interfaces
when they are created.
A flap
On 10/04/06, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-10 19:04]:
On 10/04/06, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-08 00:51]:
It looks like bgpd has a problem with validating nexthop on new
172.16.1.13100 400 i
ar206-CPH#
I have so far been unable to find a fixed pattern of where/why this happens.
Any ideas ?
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help it, it's my nature =-
On 10/04/06, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 06:56:33PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
On 10/04/06, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-10 19:04]:
On 10/04/06, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Dave Feustel wrote:
I got my 3.9 Cdrom set yesterday and today started installing
it on an external usb disk so as not to wipe out my existing
3.8 setup. When I got to the disk partition, I erased the existing
'a' partition (dos) and created a new bsd 'a' partition. The partition
had a
Dave Feustel wrote:
On Sunday 09 April 2006 16:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something is very confused.
I do not believe an existing 'a' partition (dos).
I bought the disk at Best Buy and copied a few files from
/home/daf to test the disk. The files were copied to the
usb-connected
Josh Tolley wrote:
On 4/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As to losing data, I suspect you'd lose a lot more
from PostgreSQL than MySQL on a failing hard drive.
Any particular reason for that suspicion? I ask out of genuine
interest, and I promise I don't want to start a
On 08/04/06, tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05/04/06, Jonathan Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 02:07:54AM +0100, pedro la peu wrote:
The 0x705c has a ZyDAS ZD1211 chipset in it, the 0x7050 is Ralink.
A Ralink based F5D7050 can be unambiguously
Chris Kuethe wrote:
On 06 Apr 2006 18:12:59 -0700, Randal L. Schwartz
merlyn@stonehenge.com wrote:
Given the cost of programmer time (and the cost of lost data) vs the
cost of a slightly faster processor, is it ever really worth it even
if MySQL is *twice* as fast?
Yes.
Example 1:
, unknown Looking
good
10.1.1.14valid vlan16 UP, Ethernet, unknown
172.16.1.5 valid vlan12 UP, Ethernet, unknown
10.1.1.1 valid vlan13 UP, Ethernet, unknown
cr203-STO#
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied
I installed a route-collector in my test network to get a better view on
things.
Originator is backwards.
/Tony
quagga-bgpd# sh ip bgp 192.168.10.0
BGP routing table entry for 192.168.10.0/24
Paths: (11 available, best #2, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Not advertised to any peer
Local
On 05/04/06, tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I installed a route-collector in my test network to get a better view on
things.
Originator is backwards.
Correction, I installed a route-collector in my openbgp network
which peers with all boxes. According the route-collector all
On 05/04/06, tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05/04/06, tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I installed a route-collector in my test network to get a better view on
things.
Originator is backwards.
Correction, I installed a route-collector in my openbgp network
: session_dispatch_imsg:
pipe closed: Connection refused
Apr 5 13:13:39 cr212-FRA bgpd[3196]: kernel routing table decoupled
Apr 5 13:13:39 cr212-FRA bgpd[3196]: Terminating
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help it, it's my nature =-
On 05/04/06, tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After a jug of coffee I tried being a bit more methodical.
I took the entire network down and brought up one router at a time.
I monitored the prefix 192.168.30.0/24 from a route-collector sitting on
192.168.30.10,
the first router
On 05/04/06, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:30:56PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
On 05/04/06, tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
On a side note, at this stage I did:
cr211-FRA# bgpctl reload
reload request sent.
cr211-FRA
On 05/04/06, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 08:45:22AM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
I installed a route-collector in my test network to get a better view on
things.
Originator is backwards.
/Tony
quagga-bgpd# sh ip bgp 192.168.10.0
BGP routing table
On 05/04/06, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 01:19:44PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
On 05/04/06, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:30:56PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
On 05/04/06, tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On 05/04/06, tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05/04/06, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 01:19:44PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
On 05/04/06, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:30:56PM +0100, tony sarendal
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
I'm not saying that having a blobbed driver in-tree would be an
improvement - however, a machine that runs is likely to be an
improvement over one that doesn't, at least for a while (because, as
pointed out, bugs like blobs).
I prefer looking at what's supported first
On 04/04/06, Craig Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 01:05:50PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
I'm afraid it is.
Look at the third option in 4.4.2.10. (PPPoE LLC/SNAP)
That is optional at the discretion of the ISP
Correct
default UK ADSL is VC-MUX
and therefore
On 04/04/06, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 10:37:38PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
I'm playing a bit with bgpd while trying to get the kids to sleep, 50%
to
go.
With Hennings next-hop self patch I made a minimal config and slapped
together
a network
the core, and thus not installing that /24 into
the
routing table.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help it, it's my nature =-
On 04/04/06, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 11:46:24AM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
On 04/04/06, Falk Brockerhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 29.03.2006 um 14:32 schrieb Falk Brockerhoff:
that, again, is sth nobody ever asked for or missed
lladdr 00:13:d4:de:cf:88
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT half-duplex)
status: no carrier
Do you have full duplex hardcoded on the switch and sk0 set to auto
negotiate ?
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied
peer,
nexthop, clusterlist should be different though, metric might be the same as
previous prefix.
If I get the little guy to sleep before me I'll try to have a closer look.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help
On 01/04/06, Craig Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Set the MTU and MRU to 1453, not 1500.
1453 ? Explain please.
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help it, it's my nature =-
On 01/04/06, Craig Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 09:16:33AM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
On 01/04/06, Craig Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Set the MTU and MRU to 1453, not 1500.
1453 ? Explain please.
Typo, should have been 1458:
http
On 01/04/06, Craig Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 10:39:26AM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
In my case (aslo on crappy UK broadband)
You should try it in NZ, 128k upstream!
1454 is actually optimal.
On the dsl part of the link my connection runs the Ethernet
that makes your other routes have a
route to that... like OpenOSPFD :)
or rewrite nexthop so you can run without an IGP.
When I tested openbgp I did that with the filter and set, although
next-hop-self
would have been nice.
/Tony
networks we don't use any aggregation of prefixes.
In general I try to avoid it anyway if I build something new.
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help it, it's my nature =-
On 29/03/06, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 01:33:15PM +0100, tony sarendal wrote:
The second problem is, that I want to announce an external
full-feed,
received with openbgpd, to my core-router. This works fine, but the
next-hop is the ip-adress
in the
network
offers some featurettes which you can't get without MPLS TE, and maybe not
even then
in reality.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help it, it's my nature =-
It's a lot like mountain climbing.
People do it, although personally I can't really imagine why.
Because it's there. Because they can. That's why. It is not rational.
Nice words maybe don't hurt, but at that level are certainly irrelevant.
Me, I lurk on this list because of the attitude and the
support
for dynamic keying is for securing the bgp session itself, nothing more.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help it, it's my nature =-
: phase authenticate
pppoe0: phase network
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help it, it's my nature =-
girlfriend put the 3.8 t-shirt...
3.9 order placed also, and she says I'm not organized.
/Tony
install
Never tried that combo.
modpython 3.2.x and apache2.0 works for me on openbsd3.7 and .8's
without any hassle except bumping some semaphores number with sysctl.
/Tony
Somebody should gave him the boot.
Respectfully,
Tony Sterrett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Consultant in Open Source Software, featuring OpenBSD and Linux.
www.sterrett.net
(858) 433-1467 San Diego
(408) 705-2135 San Jose
On Feb 24, 2006, at 5:06 PM, julio perez wrote:
hey, umm..i need help. Umm..can
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 03:21:38AM -0800, Tony Sterrett wrote:
I just compiled python2.4 which recommended for Zope 2.9.0. There a
small glitch in configure. You'll get an error like below. Its late
so just all reference to define_xopen_source starting around 1488.
this has to do with select
Include/pyport.h:116,
from Include/Python.h:55,
from Modules/python.c:3:
/usr/include/sys/event.h:53: error: syntax error before u_int
/usr/include/sys/event.h:55: error: syntax error before u_short
gmake: *** [Modules/python.o] Error 1
Respectfully,
Tony
closed the connection
(aka, tcp session went down). Why, we cannot know.
I'd bet my half-full beer that you hit the max-prefix limit of your peer.
/Tony
Matthias Kilian wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 02:00:24PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
I would expect the people writing books, specially on OpenBSD to know a
lots more then me, so that I can learn from them, but if what
you say is
true, it make me question my idea and intention of buying
jt 14 jf 15
(014) ret #96
(015) ret #0
mail#
Respectfully,
Tony Sterrett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Consultant in Open Source Software, featuring OpenBSD and Linux.
www.sterrett.net
(858) 433-1467 San Diego
(408) 705-2135 San Jose
On Feb 13, 2006, at 3:17 PM, Ray Lai wrote:
On Mon
On Feb 13, 2006, at 5:16 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
On 2/13/06, Tony Sterrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking at the tradeoff of porting bpf with states from linux to
OpenBSD from linux. Daniel Hartmeier in Design and Performance of
the OpenBSD Stateful Packet Filter (pf) says that pf
J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 17:35:58 -0500, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
J.C. Roberts wrote:
As others have pointed out, you simply misunderstood the article and
then posted to the list what many people would consider an inflammatory
question. This is not the
Dave Feustel wrote:
[snip]
Well, I'm lazy, so I let pf drop all unsolicited incoming
traffic. Works Great!
Lets me experiment with my system in peace and safety.
Not really.
Depends on what you can be conned into soliciting.
Just in case?
Like just in case a moth is drawn to a flame?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Dave Feustel
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 4:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Mats O Jansson; misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: X11 Demo programs
man sudo for starters.
(actually that's quite enough even for a noob like me)
(even a very out of date linux is enough)
sheesh
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Dave Feustel
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 9:50 AM
To: Otto Moerbeek
Cc:
You sudo something, it asks for your password
You do it again soon after, it doesn't ask.
So somehow it remembers you.
Definitely more trouble, and probably opens some holes
for nasties, if it also remembers which version of you.
That's without knowing enough to have an opinion.
-Original
Tobias Weingartner wrote:
On Saturday, February 11, Dave Feustel wrote:
I found out via a google search on 'tickets sudo' about
the behavior I had discovered and reported. Then after Otto
let me know how pathetic my post was, I went back to man sudo
but found nothing about tickets
Quoth Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu
On Wednesday 08 February 2006 04:20, Diana Eichert wrote:
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Miod Vallat wrote:
i think we should rewrite the kernel in java since it
has good support
for threads.
Remember we opted for C++ during c2k2 (or was it
the kernel is written
in
as long as they can find it in the ports tree.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cd /usr/ports/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] make search key=kernel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When it's in there I might start to use it also.
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied
On 07/02/06, frantisek holop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi there,
i see this on a 3.8 stable:
-pa-r- bad_ssh
Addresses: 0
Cleared: Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
Looks like a very early beta of 3.8 if you ask me.
/Tony
the future regarding this
matter, and what are their opinions about the other os'es paths as
well.
i think we should rewrite the kernel in java since it has good support
for threads.
Get real Ted.
You know that python is the way to go.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
want to make us loose focus in this important dicussion, or start a
flamewar,
but someone has to say it. Emacs sucks, vi rules.
/Tony
pf
to be the easiest to work with once I understood how states actually were
handled
and could make a design for it. My vlan firewalls are a breeze to manage,
especially
with excellent tools like CVS/RCS.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied
based
cards are pretty common as cheap white box adapters. Mind, Sil3112
based cards are known widely to be crap, so I doubt anyone would give
it the gold seal of approval.
Good Luck,
Tony Del Porto
SysAdmin
USENIX Association
2560 9th Street, Suite 215, Berkeley CA 94710
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 30/01/06, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-01-29 13:04]:
On 29/01/06, Marco Fretz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Probably not. Your box will be limited by the pps it can handle.
I don't know exactly what pps your hardware can handle, but I guess
afterwards on how things went and what kind of performance you got.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help it, it's my nature =-
is unidirectional, traffic from A-B doesn't have to go over the
same box
as traffic B-A. With three boxes you can get speed and a be pretty
resilient also.
/Tony
Lukasz Sztachanski wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 01:42:13AM +1100, Shane J Pearson wrote:
~~~
OpenBSD
by hahiss
How is it that OpenBSD is able to be so secure by design with so few
resources and yet all of Microsoft's resources cannot stem the tide of
security problems that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
All good points. That, however, still leaves my
point standing that by
evading PHP, you evade the worst crap.
True, but that is the same as that by evading ENGLISH as a
lnaguage in posts, you evade the worst crap.
If these discussions were carried out in
Bob Beck wrote:
* Matthias Kilian [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-01-23 15:58]:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 05:08:00PM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
Securia gives OpenBSD a pretty nice security rating at
http://secunia.com/product/100/
Those statistics say nothing at first glance. For example, I
On Saturday, January 21, 2006 2:16 PM the whatever calling itself
J Moore wrote:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 05:42:08PM +0800, the unit calling itself
Lars Hansson wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 03:30:34 -0600
Get a bigger H/D... 40 GB is about the smallest you can buy
today; 4 GB
drives
Do you have a ssh server with static ip address anywhere ?
If so, make the client with dynamic ip address log into your server at
startup and make a port forward back to the ssh port on the client.
Very handy trick when you need to manage boxes sitting behind
others nat'ing firewalls.
--
Tony
On 15/01/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2006/01/15 20:55, tony sarendal wrote:
Do you have a ssh server with static ip address anywhere ?
If so, make the client with dynamic ip address log into your server at
startup and make a port forward back to the ssh port
On Tuesday, January 10, 2006 1:12 AM, Peter Bako wrote:
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Remove all password restrictions?
I have an internal OpenBSD 3.8 system that I use as a data dump, internal
source for PXE installs and the like. It is not accessible to the outside
world, so security is
Andreas Bihlmaier wrote:
Hi,
I got a quick question because I fucked up and think quite a bunch of
other people I have read about here did as well.
I read in a couple of postings that people like to mount their root
partition as read-only, I followed that since it prevents accidents in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear
I installed the package autoconf but still day time client is not working
following error occur
plz help
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ gcc -o byteorder byteorder.c
byteorder.c:1:17: unp.h: No such file or directory
byteorder.c: In function `main':
byteorder.c:10:
on a trunk. OpenBSD is doing the right
thing.
/Tony
On 16/12/05, Chris Cappuccio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most nice switches can tag all vlans on a trunk. OpenBSD is doing the
right
thing.
Sure, once you set the native vlan to something other than vlan 1. Most
switches have a native vlan concept
Uwe Dippel wrote:
Theo de Raadt wrote:
So don't use it.
But please, I beg of you, stop your incessant complaining.
The more you whine, the less we feel the need to change anything.
Oh, my wrong. I simply thought you were with the intention to improve
the system.
They are.
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 22:51 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Considering the goals of OpenBSD, I would not expect USB rodents,
sound cards or even video to be necessarily well supported.
The reality is that USB gear is
on multiple ports without duplicate suppression?
duplicate suppression, makes the lack of per-vlan mac-address tables
sound like a feature.
Get switches with per-vlan mac-address tables, even old cisco 3500 has this.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion
On 01/12/05, Christopher Vance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 08:08:27AM +, tony sarendal wrote:
Which managed switch brands behave right with carp, allowing traffic from
carp source addresses on multiple ports without duplicate suppression?
duplicate suppression
Sophie Laurie wrote:
theo,
Coming from Canada, have you ever skated on thin ice? Well, you're doing
it now!
I've lived in Canada. Nine months of winter and three months of bad skating
is just a myth.
She's a wheelchair bound 65 year old woman who only wanted your help and
Same age, but
It is very important that we educate people about what the choice
of open source software means.
From a business perspective I don't see this being very important =)
If the competition is willing to give me an edge on them, be my guests.
/Tony
prefix
via multiple protocols is pretty common, especially when migrating from
protocol x to protocol y.
One thing I noticed when testing with openbsd was that I wasn't able to add
xxx/yy on an interface if the same prefix already was known via bgp.
/Tony
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robbert Haarman writes:
Greg,
Again, you raise some interesting issues. I
wonder how likely the
catastrophic failures you describe are, versus
how likely it is that
things fail in a way where ccd actually helps
you. I was hoping someone
else would comment on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
all or nothing.
make the pages match the quality of the code and
the cd's.
even if you don't care, other people do.
I PAID for my CDs. I am happy with artwork, particularly the
smirk on that puffer fish.
I did not pay for the website. If I can stumble into the FAQ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hmm, on Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 05:32:54PM +0100, Otto
Moerbeek said that
It's even a FAQ:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq8.html#wwwnotstd
doesn't mean it's right, does it?
Certainlly doesn't mean it's wrong.
Almost certainly means it's OpenBSD
What system were you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:53:45AM -0800, the unit
calling itself J.C. Roberts wrote:
I would assume that J.C. Roberts is a human, not a unit,
whatever that is supposed to imply.
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 11:27:56 -0600, J Moore
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did think - I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using a mozilla 1.7 browser, with CSS on,
JavaScript off.
And it doesn't run javascript.
Outside my area of expertise, but that seems normal somehow.
The menus on the referenced cerealport.com web-site
don't expand at
http://cerealport.com does not answer
Jacob Meuser wrote:
this is how the world works: ignore the whiners, they offer nothing
useful.
Some irresistable straight lines?
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
In all these:
I'm going to take this thread for what I think it is... the old guard
telling us youngin's that our efforts are appreciated, but we've got a
bit more to learn about how things work, and how to write good
documentation, before we're really ready to jump
J.C. Roberts wrote:
I went looking for HIER(7) but didn't know it's name, so I stuffed the
words file system into an Apropos keyword search and got nothing.
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=file+systemsektion=0
manpath=OpenBSD+Currentarch=i386apropos=1format=html
Damn, I
J.C. Roberts wrote:
To the rest of list users; Please pardon another long email from me on
this. Helping reasonable people like Robbert understand why many people
consider HOWTO's to be harmful is hopefully worth the added noise and
bandwidth.
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:57:12 +0100, Robbert
On 23/11/05, Kor Boerema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Tony,
Thanks for the reply.
In what ways do the GIF tunnels differ from a normal ipsec tunnel?
By using a tunneling protocol your traffic will from an ipsec point of
view always have the same source/destination. You also avoid
they were being tagged with.
Some of this may have changed since.
Hopefully I will be able to spend some real time on how I can use bsd/bgpd in a
service provider network, it depends on what I will be doing in the future.
If you do any testing on this, feel free to let me know how it goes.
/Tony
away pretty quickly and you will
have a solution you feel confident with. If you don't get that feeling
don't use it.
This works the same with or without IPsec.
The gif setup is one ifconfig command on each end, I doubt you'll need help
with that.man page, tcpdump, trial/error.
/Tony
--
Tony
-addresses while they still were in the table. In my case something
happened in the network and when things stabilized the openbsd bridge
had incorrect info in the mac-address table and did no re-learn until
I cleared the table.
I wasn't able to troubleshoot more due to the thing being live.
/Tony
Ted Unangst:
[i was trying to stay away, but can't.]
I've never really trusted prepositions ;)
By and by, stand by that clock and adjust it by 30 minutes,
by whatever means and by whatever rubric you deem appropriate.
By which direction, I wonder.
On 11/18/05, J Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Damien Miller wrote:
...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] djm]$ netstat -sp ip | grep -E
'(bad.*checksum|total packets)'
61092730 total packets received
0 bad header checksums
wouldn't netstat -sp tcp | grep -E
'(bad.*checksum|total packets)' give
the output
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 15 Nov 2005 08:20:07
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 10:23:00AM +0100, the unit
calling itself Henning Brauer wrote:
'adjusting local clock by XXs'
The word 'by' is a preposition with a specific
meaning in the context of
its use... it means in the amount of... but
probably not -- but we use ldap here at work, and the auth_ldap in the
ports tree works great.
Aiko Barz wrote:
I googled, but I couldn't figure out the current status.
My problem:
I tried to move my mailservers from Linux to OpenBSD. It's a qmail-ldap
system with its users stored in
Try:
boot -c
disable fdc
Lionel Vidal wrote:
I tried to boot the new 3.8 version on a (rather old) PC,
a HP pavilion 422.fr. I tried both to boot from cdrom38.fs
and floppy38.fs and the result is the same :
OpenBSD i386 BOOT 2.10
boot
booting fd0a:/bsd: 3263620
Entry point at 0x100120
correct at all, but it works.
Sebastian Dehne wrote
Hi Tony,
It turns I'm having the same problem and saw you've done some research.
# dmesg| grep DMA
pciide0 at pci0 dev 15 function 0 VIA VT82C571 IDE rev 0x06: DMA,
channel 0 configured to compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility
wd0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 12:40:12AM -0200, Gustavo
Rios wrote:
Hey folks,
sorry, but i found this on the web. May someone
tell if it is serious,
i myself could not believe it.
http://www.informit.com/articles/article.asp?p=4244
51seqNum=1
Looks like a rehash of
501 - 600 of 672 matches
Mail list logo
