On 2020-08-13 02:39, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
Jordan Geoghegan(jor...@geoghegan.ca) on 2020.08.12 10:32:21 -0700:
On 2020-08-12 02:08, Stuart Henderson wrote:
The only proxy we have for "what is really used" is dmesg submissions.
Since 6.7 release:
amd64 62
i3865
arm64 3
macppc 2
Jordan Geoghegan(jor...@geoghegan.ca) on 2020.08.12 10:32:21 -0700:
>
>
> On 2020-08-12 02:08, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >The only proxy we have for "what is really used" is dmesg submissions.
> >Since 6.7 release:
> >
> >amd6462
> >i386 5
> >arm643
> >macppc 2
> >octeon
Den ons 12 aug. 2020 kl 00:50 skrev Predrag Punosevac :
> Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > No, it is a question of which additional platform, you avoided that
> > didn't you
>
> octeon is the only one I can think of.
>
I would volunteer doing the work and dedicating two octeons of mine for
building
On 2020-08-12 02:08, Stuart Henderson wrote:
The only proxy we have for "what is really used" is dmesg submissions.
Since 6.7 release:
amd64 62
i3865
arm64 3
macppc 2
octeon 1
Based on this there isn't a great case for adding any more.
I didn't realize you guys used dmesg@ as a
The only proxy we have for "what is really used" is dmesg submissions.
Since 6.7 release:
amd64 62
i3865
arm64 3
macppc 2
octeon 1
Based on this there isn't a great case for adding any more.
On 2020-08-11 20:35, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Jordan Geoghegan wrote:
On 2020-08-11 15:50, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Predrag Punosevac wrote:
Theo de Raadt wrote:
No, it is a question of which additional platform, you avoided that
didn't you
octeon is the only one I can think of.
read
Jordan Geoghegan wrote:
> On 2020-08-11 15:50, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> >
> >> Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >>
> >>> No, it is a question of which additional platform, you avoided that
> >>> didn't you
> >>>
> >> octeon is the only one I can think of.
> > read below:
> >
>
On 2020-08-11 15:50, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Predrag Punosevac wrote:
Theo de Raadt wrote:
No, it is a question of which additional platform, you avoided that
didn't you
octeon is the only one I can think of.
read below:
if you name one that less than 100 people use, then well come on
Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> >
> > No, it is a question of which additional platform, you avoided that
> > didn't you
> >
>
> octeon is the only one I can think of.
read below:
> > if you name one that less than 100 people use, then well come on
Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> No, it is a question of which additional platform, you avoided that
> didn't you
>
octeon is the only one I can think of. arm64 binary patches are
available for few releases already. The binary patches might be the
least of the troubles on that platform.
No, it is a question of which additional platform, you avoided that
didn't you
if you name one that less than 100 people use, then well come on
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> Just a general question as I got to really love syspatch and sysupgrade
> to the point that oppose to before, now my
Just a general question as I got to really love syspatch and sysupgrade
to the point that oppose to before, now my platforms are pretty much
always up to date and patch in just a few days after patches are release
or even in some cases the same day.
To add more platform, I guess that mean man
12 matches
Mail list logo
