On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 10:40 AM Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Wow, look -- more useless chatter on the topic.
>
> The bt stack we had was designed as "network code", and all sorts of
> complex layer violations and device hand-offs were very complicated and
> troublesome.
>
> The code was not deleted
Ha. I was about to start out with how I can guess how complicated managing
an operating system is. Then I see the last line of your email saying, "How
about if you don't know, stop making guesses".
My comments only apply to my experience coding for bluetooth on mobile
devices and it was just
Bryan Wright wrote:
> > On Aug 7, 2019, at 10:06, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >
> > Bryan Wright wrote:
> >
> >> Are there technical/philosophical problems that make all versions of
> >> Bluetooth incompatible with the project, or is it a just matter of
> >> removing what is not being maintained?
Wow, look -- more useless chatter on the topic.
The bt stack we had was designed as "network code", and all sorts of
complex layer violations and device hand-offs were very complicated and
troublesome.
The code was not deleted because bluetooth is shit. The code was
deleted *because it was
> On Aug 7, 2019, at 10:06, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> Bryan Wright wrote:
>
>> Are there technical/philosophical problems that make all versions of
>> Bluetooth incompatible with the project, or is it a just matter of
>> removing what is not being maintained?
>
> I'm sure a bunch of you can
Right, without reading the code and only reading this commit message
it's all conjecture.
I was just hoping to hear something more if someone was inclined to share.
inclined. The commit message seems like some sort of inside joke.
Log message:
"It's not the years, honey; it's the mileage."
Bryan Wright wrote:
> Are there technical/philosophical problems that make all versions of
> Bluetooth incompatible with the project, or is it a just matter of
> removing what is not being maintained?
I'm sure a bunch of you can come up with theories about what actually
transpired, without
Are there technical/philosophical problems that make all versions of Bluetooth
incompatible with the project, or is it a just matter of removing what is not
being maintained?
ok, thanks. Bluetooth is overcomplicated and if it's not managed properly
it just opens up the attack surface for no reason.
It definitely makes some things easy but there are always workarounds.
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 11:52 PM Consus wrote:
> On 17:12 Tue 06 Aug, John Brahy wrote:
> > Hello,
On 17:12 Tue 06 Aug, John Brahy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just curious if there was any change in OpenBSD supporting bluetooth.
Sadly, there is none.
Hello,
Just curious if there was any change in OpenBSD supporting bluetooth.
In this commit from tedu@ it's saying that support was ripped out of the
kernel because it never really worked.
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs=140511572108715=2
man -k blue brings up nothing appros.
Thanks,
JB
11 matches
Mail list logo
