Re: ChatGPT writes a pf.conf by spec, earns an "F" grade

2023-06-13 Thread mike tancsa
On 6/7/2023 5:36 PM, Stuart Longland VK4MSL wrote: On 8/6/23 06:32, Sean Kamath wrote: On Jun 7, 2023, at 01:28, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: Recorded at https://nxdomain.no/~peter/chatgpt_writes_pf.conf.html for those who would be interested. So in the thread that made you try it

Re: ChatGPT writes a pf.conf by spec, earns an "F" grade

2023-06-07 Thread Stuart Longland VK4MSL
On 8/6/23 06:32, Sean Kamath wrote: On Jun 7, 2023, at 01:28, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: Recorded at https://nxdomain.no/~peter/chatgpt_writes_pf.conf.html for those who would be interested. So in the thread that made you try it (https://bsd.network/@dch/110501874752402311) they said:

Re: ChatGPT writes a pf.conf by spec, earns an "F" grade

2023-06-07 Thread Sean Kamath
> On Jun 7, 2023, at 01:28, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: > > Recorded at https://nxdomain.no/~peter/chatgpt_writes_pf.conf.html for those > who would be interested. So in the thread that made you try it (https://bsd.network/@dch/110501874752402311) they said: "@pitrh I’m still waiting for it

ChatGPT writes a pf.conf by spec, earns an "F" grade

2023-06-07 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
Prompted by a followup on Mastodon, I was enticed to see what feeding a prose spec for a pf.conf to ChatGPT would produce. TL;DR: it failed miserably, but in a way that would have lead the gullible to try it out raw, leading them down a route that would lead to loads of misery and frustration.