Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
Another scenario. When all VPNs are up and stable (traffic is low) and
one of the clients is rebooted at boot time when ipsecctl -f
/etc/ipsec.conf is executed it's tunell is setup and _all_ other
tunnels are immediately dropped.
Am I right to assume that only those
On 2009-06-03, Mikolaj Kucharski miko...@kucharski.name wrote:
Can anyone give me example of embedded system (Soekris-like) which is
known to handle PF traffic + VPN traffic at MBit/s throughput, and
packets per second level, generated by home users browsing web,
skyping, playing games on-line
--
From: Mikolaj Kucharski miko...@kucharski.name
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 5:56 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Cc: miko...@kucharski.name
Subject: Re: Flapping VPN under load on Soekris
Can anyone give me example of embedded system (Soekris-like
On 2009-06-03, Lordsporkton lordspork...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a p2 at 400mhz with 128ram that can push 5+ megs of aes256 traffic
and I don't notice any problems, and I have no offload card
I know this isnt embedded but its overall system specs are similar to a
soakris
400MHz P2 is a
Hi,
Soekris is a VPN gateway for 11 clients. All those 12 machines are running
OpenBSD. 10 of client machines are connected to the VPN via wireless and
all of those 10 machines are behind NAT (they share the same external
ip). 1 host is at remote location connected via wire.
Afer all machine are
you're probably overloading the CPU. try -current, sis(4) has
MCLGETI now which should mitigate things a bit. still, that's a
lot of load you're putting on a little 486 which will almost
certainly be restricting your throughput.
On 2009-06-02, Mikolaj Kucharski miko...@kucharski.name wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone give me example of embedded system (Soekris-like) which is
known to handle PF traffic + VPN traffic at MBit/s throughput, and
packets per second level, generated by home users browsing web,
skyping, playing games on-line (low latency), at the same time.
*Fanless* and which can run
7 matches
Mail list logo
