Re: Forum engine

2009-10-15 Thread Jason Dixon
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 03:08:11PM +1000, Aaron Mason wrote: Something that really bugs me about web software is how they limit themselves to MySQL. I chose PunBB because it supported SQLite and had a solid module base, along with a builtin update manager. I presume you're talking primarily

Re: Forum engine

2009-10-15 Thread Bob Beck
... how inexperienced web developers default to using MySQL because it has a lower barrier to entry, without considering if it's the right tool for the job or how to configure and secure it appropriately for production use. s/MySQL/php/g s/MySQL/asp/g s/MySQL/JavaScript/g

Re: Forum engine

2009-10-15 Thread Aaron Mason
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Jason Dixon ja...@dixongroup.net wrote: On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 03:08:11PM +1000, Aaron Mason wrote: Something that really bugs me about web software is how they limit themselves to MySQL. I chose PunBB because it supported SQLite and had a solid module

Re: Forum engine

2009-10-15 Thread Paul M
On 16/10/2009, at 11:39 AM, Aaron Mason wrote: On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Jason Dixon ja...@dixongroup.net wrote: On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 03:08:11PM +1000, Aaron Mason wrote: Something that really bugs me about web software is how they limit themselves to MySQL. I chose PunBB because

Re: Forum engine

2009-10-14 Thread Aaron Mason
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Maxime DERCHE max...@mouet-mouet.net wrote: Hello, On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 13:13:00 -0400 Samuel Baldwin recursive.for...@gmail.com wrote: I've heard good things about FluxBB and PunBB, but really you should consider using a mailing list instead of a server.

Re: Forum engine

2009-10-13 Thread Mark Thomas
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 10:01 AM, jean-francois jfsimon1...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Sorry to bother you with something more or less external to OpenBSD, however since I am settling a forum on my server and want to keep security high enough, please could you advise me about which forum shall

Re: Forum engine

2009-10-13 Thread Lars Nooden
Mark Thomas wrote: On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 10:01 AM, jean-francois jfsimon1...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Sorry to bother you with something more or less external to OpenBSD, however since I am settling a forum on my server and want to keep security high enough, please could you advise me about

Re: Forum engine

2009-10-13 Thread Maxime DERCHE
Hello, On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 13:13:00 -0400 Samuel Baldwin recursive.for...@gmail.com wrote: I've heard good things about FluxBB and PunBB, but really you should consider using a mailing list instead of a server. I second on that one : FluxBB (which is based on PunBB) may be a good choice. It

Re: Forum engine

2009-10-12 Thread jean-francois
where I prefer not to implement anything rather than taking the ones I found either forum or comments scripts. Le dimanche 11 octobre 2009 C 22:13 -0400, Eric Furman a C)crit : The question was: Does anyone know of a good secure Forum engine that runs well on OBSD. A debate of its merits vs

Re: [OT] Forum engine

2009-10-12 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:53:11PM +0200, jean-francois wrote: I will implement a forum because it is mean to be included as small lines in the end of some web pages for posting comments. Otherwise, if someone knows a secure comments system available either from package or from the web i'm

Re: Forum engine

2009-10-12 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi, On Sun, 11.10.2009 at 22:02:45 -0400, Sean Howard sil...@callysto.com wrote: A good usenet implementation is *closer* to a forum, which is what you want. But forums are a different (more dynamic) use case. With smaller entry barriers to large amounts of content. all other things aside: If

Re: Forum engine

2009-10-12 Thread Matthew Szudzik
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 04:42:44PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: archive, whereas, when the forum operator changes his forum software, or shuts down the forum, all past content is simply gone (or as good as). Not true. Whenever I read an interesting forum post, I save the html file to my hard

Re: Forum engine

2009-10-12 Thread Toni Mueller
On Mon, 12.10.2009 at 15:23:12 +, Matthew Szudzik mszud...@andrew.cmu.edu wrote: On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 04:42:44PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: archive, whereas, when the forum operator changes his forum software, or shuts down the forum, all past content is simply gone (or as good as).

Re: Forum engine

2009-10-11 Thread Sean Howard
Not seen a good test, nor run one. But YaBB has been good to me in the past. --Sean Howard Somebody claiming to be jean-francois wrote: Hello, Sorry to bother you with something more or less external to OpenBSD, however since I am settling a forum on my server and want to keep security

Re: Forum engine

2009-10-11 Thread Samuel Baldwin
I've heard good things about FluxBB and PunBB, but really you should consider using a mailing list instead of a server. -- Samuel Baldwin - logik.li

Re: Forum engine

2009-10-11 Thread Jesus Sanchez
Samuel Baldwin escribiC3: I've heard good things about FluxBB and PunBB, but really you should consider using a mailing list instead of a server. +1, mail list with archive it's always better than a forum.

Re: Forum engine

2009-10-11 Thread Mic J
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Jesus Sanchez zexe...@gmail.com wrote: Samuel Baldwin escribiC3: I've heard good things about FluxBB and PunBB, but really you should consider using a mailing list instead of a server. +1, mail list with archive it's always better than a forum. Why is that

Re: Forum engine

2009-10-11 Thread Nick Guenther
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Mic J michael.cogn...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Jesus Sanchez zexe...@gmail.com wrote: Samuel Baldwin escribiC3: I've heard good things about FluxBB and PunBB, but really you should consider using a mailing list instead of a server.

Re: Forum engine

2009-10-11 Thread Samuel Baldwin
2009/10/11 Mic J michael.cogn...@gmail.com: Why is that better? Because you get to pick your UI, because all your mail as amalgamated into one mailbox where you can sort it yourself where there's no easy place for garbage off-topic discussion, because your mailbox is where messages can be

Re: Forum engine

2009-10-11 Thread Sean Howard
I think you're being pretentious a little bit. A good usenet implementation is *closer* to a forum, which is what you want. But forums are a different (more dynamic) use case. With smaller entry barriers to large amounts of content. --Sean Somebody claiming to be Samuel Baldwin wrote:

Re: Forum engine

2009-10-11 Thread Nick Guenther
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Samuel Baldwin recursive.for...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/10/11 Mic J michael.cogn...@gmail.com: Why is that better? Because you get to pick your UI, because all your mail as amalgamated into one mailbox where you can sort it yourself where there's no easy place

Re: Forum engine

2009-10-11 Thread Eric Furman
The question was: Does anyone know of a good secure Forum engine that runs well on OBSD. A debate of its merits vs a mailing list is a tad off topic and has nothing to do with OBSD. Thanks. On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 22:02 -0400, Sean Howard sil...@callysto.com wrote: I think you're being pretentious

Re: Forum engine

2009-10-11 Thread Samuel Baldwin
2009/10/11 Nick Guenther kou...@gmail.com: I think you misunderstand forums; have you ever even participated in one? Not needing to choose your UI is a feature, not a bug. Yes, quite a few, and it drove me crazy and made my cynical. My favourite feature is having it all in one place, rather

Forum engine

2009-10-10 Thread jean-francois
Hello, Sorry to bother you with something more or less external to OpenBSD, however since I am settling a forum on my server and want to keep security high enough, please could you advise me about which forum shall be good enough according to you. For exemple, phpBB seems not good in terms of