On 2016-12-13, Mik J wrote:
> Peter, you use greylists but I read somewhere that gmail servers change their
> IPs when they retry to send the mails.
It used to be common to attempt a few deliveries from a "main" smarthost and
then push to a "slow retry" host, it seemed that
Op Wed, 14 Dec 2016 18:07:15 +0100 schreef Craig Skinner
:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 18:29:00 + (UTC) Mik J wrote:
I use spamlogd so that every outgoing mail adds the remote mx IP in
my whitelist.
As with many domains, large mail services deploy/out source separate
On 2016-12-14, OpenBSD lists wrote:
>
> Beside, this is only enabled on my primary server, the secondary server
> will still accept email where the sender doesn't listen for SMTP. A
> legitimate email server would detect the failure and try again with the
> next
Hi Mik,
On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 18:29:00 + (UTC) Mik J wrote:
> I use spamlogd so that every outgoing mail adds the remote mx IP in
> my whitelist.
As with many domains, large mail services deploy/out source separate
inbound & outbound clusters, so spamlogd'ing outbound mail wont help.
These
Just wanted to second this. While individuals would rarely send through
email servers set up this way, mid sized to enterprise businesses can.
On 12/13/2016 1:53 PM, Mikkel C. Simonsen wrote:
OpenBSD lists wrote:
Most of the spam I've received from marketing companies tends to come
from
Mikkel C. Simonsen wrote:
OpenBSD lists wrote:
Most of the spam I've received from marketing companies tends to come
from send-only servers (looking at the user-agent of the sending
server its some kind of Python library intended for just sending
pre-formatted messages to a list of recipients).
OpenBSD lists wrote:
Most of the spam I've received from marketing companies tends to come
from send-only servers (looking at the user-agent of the sending server
its some kind of Python library intended for just sending pre-formatted
messages to a list of recipients).
What I've done is
Mik J wrote:
Hello,
I've been annoyed for months/years by a few marketing companies from which I
regularly unsubriscribed (according to the law in my country they should have
done it).A few days ago I decided to make spamd work on my pf machine.
And I trapped that spam companyDec 12 19:25:55
This thread made me take a fresh look at some of my earlier scribblings,
mostly http://bsdly.blogspot.com/2014/02/effective-spam-and-malware.html
which has grown an addendum with a fresh graph of connection lengths
based on what was available on the spamd boxes where I have the liberty
to do what
Hello Peter, Craig,
Thank you for your answers. There are two machines trapped in my spamd at the
moment. For one of them it's been 18 hours already and stay connected for 800
seconds each time, the other one stays connected 11s only but has been trying
for 16 hours. So things are working.
Craig,
On 12/13/16 19:29, Mik J wrote:
> Peter, you use greylists but I read somewhere that gmail servers change
> their IPs when they retry to send the mails. With a high outgoing volume
> of mails, many IPs can be whitelisted thanks to spamlogd. But my server
> is very low volume. How would you deal
Hi Mik,
On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 23:21:51 +0100 Peter Hessler wrote:
> On 2016 Dec 12 (Mon) at 21:31:25 + (+), Mik J wrote:
> > I notice that this spammer lost 387 seconds so 6 minutes.
> > Is there a way to make them loose more time ?
> > # grep spamd /etc/rc.conf
> > spamd_flags="-5 -v -l
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:12:33PM +, Mik J wrote:
> Thank you Peter,
> I've added the -s 5 Option and removed the -5Do you know what is the default
> -w window size ?About the -S I didn't understand what it means (I read the
> man)
the -S option: by default spamd will 'stutter' (send one
Thank you Peter,
I've added the -s 5 Option and removed the -5Do you know what is the default
-w window size ?About the -S I didn't understand what it means (I read the
man)
Regards
Le Lundi 12 décembre 2016 23h22, Peter Hessler a
écrit :
On 2016 Dec 12 (Mon) at
On 2016 Dec 12 (Mon) at 21:31:25 + (+), Mik J wrote:
:Hello,
:I've been annoyed for months/years by a few marketing companies from which I
regularly unsubriscribed (according to the law in my country they should have
done it).A few days ago I decided to make spamd work on my pf machine.
Hello,
I've been annoyed for months/years by a few marketing companies from which I
regularly unsubriscribed (according to the law in my country they should have
done it).A few days ago I decided to make spamd work on my pf machine.
And I trapped that spam companyDec 12 19:25:55 openbsd
16 matches
Mail list logo