Or re-write next-hop to the carp address, so carp actually decides the
master firewall.
/T
Den tors 13 sep. 2018 kl 00:20 skrev Tim Jones <
b631093f-779b-4d67-9ffe-5f6d5b1d3...@protonmail.ch>:
>
> On Wednesday, 12 September 2018 20:49, Stuart Henderson <
> s...@spacehopper.org> wrote:
>
> > On
On Wednesday, 12 September 2018 20:49, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2018-09-11, Tim Jones b631093f-779b-4d67-9ffe-5f6d5b1d3...@protonmail.ch
> wrote:
>
> > I've had a quick look through the man pages and am still a bit unclear,
> > perhaps I'm just overthinking this ?
> > Let's say I've got
On 2018-09-11, Tim Jones
wrote:
> I've had a quick look through the man pages and am still a bit unclear,
> perhaps I'm just overthinking this ?
>
> Let's say I've got two perimeter "firewalls" running OpenBSD, talking BGP to
> upstream routers.
>
> On the "LAN" side I'm thinking about CARP,
I've had a quick look through the man pages and am still a bit unclear, perhaps
I'm just overthinking this ?
Let's say I've got two perimeter "firewalls" running OpenBSD, talking BGP to
upstream routers.
On the "LAN" side I'm thinking about CARP, which is active/passive, and the
devices on
4 matches
Mail list logo